Categories
Economics Environment Politics & government

[1112] Of all hail to Environmental Defense

When KKR, a coal power plants operator and the Environmental Defense are mentioned in one article in the same paragraph, one would expect a report on vicious political skirmish. Quite to the contrary and to my surprise, the three groups are working together!

The buzz first came up a couple hours ago but it is only just now that I accepted it. I was like running into a think see-through glass door — it takes a moment to realize what is going on after a pang in the face. This might signal the greatest cooperation between the greens and the grays yet:

Early Monday, after several weeks of marathon negotiations that brought together both environmentalists and Wall Street bankers, TXU announced that its board of directors had approved the bid from Kohlberg Kravis and Texas Pacific for about $45 billion, which would be the largest buyout in history.

[…]

The deal was noteworthy not just for its size, but for the confluence of business decisions and environmental concerns that drove the ultimate transaction. Because private equity firms are unregulated and historically have valued their privacy, neither Kohlberg Kravis nor Texas Pacific were eager to become an “enemy combatant” of the environmental groups, people involved in the talks said. Reducing the coal plant initiative will also free up billions of dollars in planned spending that the firms will be able to use for other projects or to help finance the transaction. [NYT, Feb 26 2007]

I have a newly found respect for the Environmental Defense! That whole lot spams I received through email, tons of snail mail I received in my mailbox and that couple of bucks I donated to them while I was at Michigan worth every single bit!

This is the crux of the deal, as far as the environment is concerned, as stated in an email I received from Environmental Defense:

As part of the sale agreement, Environmental Defense helped negotiate an aggressive environmental platform that will, among other things:

  • Terminate plans for the construction of 8 of 11 coal-fired power plants TXU had hoped to build;
  • Stop TXU’s plans to expand coal operations in other states;
  • Endorse the U.S. Climate Action Partnership (USCAP) platform, including the call for a mandatory federal cap on carbon emissions; and
  • Reduce the company’s carbon dioxide emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.

Way to go!

w00t! w00t!

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p/s — and Al Gore won the Oscar for An Inconvenient Truth!

Categories
Politics & government

[1103] Of Krugman says Hillary needs to admit mistake

Paul Krugman of the New York Times is reminding Presidential candidates, especially Hillary Clinton of the need to admit mistake (via):

But back to Mrs. Clinton’s problem. For some reason she and her advisers failed to grasp just how fed up the country is with arrogant politicians who can do no wrong. I don’t think she falls in that category; but her campaign somehow thought it was still a good idea to follow Karl Rove’s playbook, which says that you should never, ever admit to a mistake. And that playbook has led them into a political trap.

For those that have not been following the current race for the 2008 Presidential election, the New York senator is under attack for refusing to admit mistake for authorizing the invasion of Iraq. As in right now, John Edwards and Barack Obama are in one way or another on the offensive as far as Iraq is concerned. That is very unlike what Hillary Clinton is experiencing right now.

Categories
Politics & government

[1098] Mengenai melatah tentang pembubaran Parlimen

Jika semalam Utusan Malaysia, meminjam frasa The Sensintrovert, cuba menyemarakkan nafsu politikus-politikus di seluruh negara, Timbalan Perdana Menteri Najib Razak melalui Utusan dan juga saluran-saluran Media Prima memadamkan keghairahan tersebut. Bak kata Mat Salleh, TPM “poured cold water” ke atas perkara yang secara langsung menyentuh kemungkinan pilihanraya di dalam tahun 2007.

Di muka hadapan Mingguan Malaysia hari ini:

Scanned by Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Copyrights by Utusan Malaysia. Fair use.

Lebih lanjut lagi:

KUALA LUMPUR 17 Feb. — Banyak pihak menganggap masih terlalu awal untuk kerajaan membubarkan Parlimen bagi memberi laluan kepada pilihan raya umum walaupun petunjuk ekonomi pada masa ini berada pada kedudukan memberangsangkan.

Mereka berpendapat kerajaan tidak perlu tergesa-gesa kerana negara baru sahaja selesai mengadakan pilihan raya umum pada tahun 2004 dan mandat itu hanya berakhir pada April 2009.

Adalah rugi bagi kerajaan membubarkan Parlimen dalam tempoh singkat selepas hanya separuh penggal memegang amanah rakyat selain menurut mereka, Barisan Nasional (BN) tidak berada dalam keadaan terdesak untuk mengadakan pilihan raya.

Saya berpendapat bahawa Utusan lebih merupakan suara orang-orang Melayu daripada orang-orang UMNO. Mungkin ramai akan menyangkal pendapat itu tetapi kegagalan pengambungan di antara Utusan dan New Straits Times akibat penentangan hebat orang-orang Utusan dan ahli-ahli politik Melayu (yang juga ahli-ahli UMNO) terhadap kehendak Perdana Menteri menyakinkan saya tentang kedudukan Utusan.

Oleh itu, mengambil kira kedua-dua laporan mengenai pilihanraya yang cuba membawa maksud yang berbeza, mungkin sedang berlaku satu perdebatan hebat di dalam UMNO tentang pilihanraya. Atau, mungkin sekali, orang-orang Melayu sudah mula bosan dengan UMNO.

Atau mungkin Utusan hanya mengulangi apa yang Reuters telah sampaikan.

Walau bagaimanapun, saya teringat slogan pasukan yang berkempen untuk William Jefferson Clinton untuk pilihanraya Amerika Syarikat 1992. Slogan itu berbunyi, “It’s the economy, stupid.

Clinton kemudiannya dipilih oleh rakyat Amerika untuk menjadi Presiden yang ke-42 negara tersebut.

Tiada siapa patut lupa akan kata-kata itu.

Categories
Politics & government

[1096] Mengenai kemungkinan pembubaran Parlimen dalam masa terdekat

Di muka hadapan Utusan Malaysia hari ini:

Scanned by Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Fair use. Copyrights by Utusan.

Ingat lagi laporan Reuters beberapa hari lepas?

Categories
Economics Politics & government

[1093] Of RM46 billion vote of confidence? I have questions instead…

In the NST today:

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia is back on the global investment map. A record RM46 billion was invested in 1,077 approved manufacturing projects last year by local and foreign investors, a 48 per cent jump from the RM31 billion invested in 2005.

The keyword is “approved“. A more important question is, how much was actually committed?

The article is comparing approved investment in 2006 against actual investment in 2005. Why the article does not compare approved investment in 2006 with approved in 2005? Or, why the article does not compare actual investment in 2006 with actual investment in 2005?

Further, it is more likely that the figures are nominal figures. An honest analysis would use real figures for comparison purpose.

Let us compare oranges to oranges, apples to apples.

More from the article:

Domestic investments amounted to RM25.8 billion, making up 56.1 per cent of the total approved investments, compared with RM13.1 billion or 42.2 per cent in 2005.

I wonder, how much of the RM25.8 approved domestic investment are actually approved investment related to the government?

The answer should be compared against the outcome of Mundell-Fleming model.

Another question is, how does Malaysia perform against our neighbors? Regionally?

Finally, from Reuters (via):

KUALA LUMPUR (Reuters) – Malaysia’s media has been trumpeting good news about the economy, and that is stoking speculation of an early election this year.

Hmm….