Categories
Environment

[1017] Of global warming on the front page of Utusan

Today is the first time in my life I see a mainstream Malaysian newspaper highlights global warming on its front page:

Screenshots of Utusan Malaysia. Fair use. Scanned by Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams.

“Kesan pemanasan global” means “the effect of global warming”. I’d prefer the headline to be retitled “Kesan pemanasan sedunia” but that’s another issue altogether. For the article, it’s accessible through Utusan.com.my:

KUALA LUMPUR 22 Dis. — Saintis tempatan percaya perubahan cuaca sekarang disebabkan oleh fenomena pemanasan global, sekali gus memberi kesan ketara termasuk kejadian banjir di negara ini.

Pengarah Pusat Perubahan Cuaca Universiti Malaya (UMCCA), Profesor Khairul Maini Osman Salleh berkata, fenomena itu telah mempergiatkan proses-proses cuaca sehingga menyebabkan berlaku pelbagai perubahan yang mendadak dalam tempoh masa yang tidak menentu.

Very rough translation:

KUALA LUMPUR Dec. 22 – A local scientist believes that global warming is the cause behind the changing of the climate which is producing profound effects such as the current flooding in this country.

Professor Khairul Maini Osman Salleh, the direction of University of Malaya Climate Change Agency (?) (UMCCA) said the phenomena is catalyzing climatology processes to cause unpredictable drastic changes.

Of note, the article also cites on article on global warming at Wikipedia. And a few days, I wondered the connection between climate change and the magnitude of disaster hitting Malaysia nowadays. For your information too, the IPCC is expected to make a formal connection between climate change and stronger storms.

What unfortunate however is the tendency of the article to make the United States of a scapegoat:

Menurut Khairul Maini lagi, berbanding negara-negara maju yang lain terutamanya Amerika Syarikat (AS), negara ini mengambil berat mengenai fenomena pemanasan global dengan menyokong Konvensyen Kyoto mengenai Kesan Rumah Hijau.

Translation:

According to Khairul Maini, compared to other developed countries especially the United States, this country (Malaysia) places great concern for the global warming by supporting the Kyoto Procotol.

This is a disgusting statement. Not that I’m defending the United States but the statement on how Malaysia cares more about global warming, or climate change in general, than developed countries is untrue on general. Europe, the EU in particular, is the leading supporter of the Kyoto Protocol. Among the developed countries, only the US and Australia that have refused to rectify the Protocol.

If it’s true Malaysia cares more about global warming than other developed countries, then Malaysia should commit itself to the responsibilities of parties to Annex 1 of the Kyoto Protocol, even if Malaysia is not required to be a party, just like a few other developing nations. Furthermore, what has Malaysia done to reduce its emission? What is the emissions standard of Malaysian vehicles? Fuel efficiency? Suffice to say, it does not come close to the efficiency level developed countries are accustomed to. So, it’s outrageous to claim Malaysia cares more about global warming than other developed countries.

According to Wikipedia, in 2003, Malaysia produced 6.4 metric tons of carbon per capita; more than 150,000 metric tons in total. Observe how Malaysia fares in carbon emissions per capita in 2003 among countries of the world, keeping in mind the ridiculous “Malaysia cares more about global warming than developed countries” statement:

Public domain. Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:CO2_per_capita_per_country.png

Nevertheless, this article is important because Utusan Malaysia is a major Malay mainstream paper. The policymakers of this country read it and it does affect the politics of this country, whatever the magnitude might be.

People, make way for green politics. It’s one of those politics that will cut through narrow and outdated communal politics, be its by ethnicity or religion.

Categories
Books, essays and others Personal

[1016] Of drunk and sobering again

I suffered temporary madness just a few hours ago. Or maybe, I was just a little drunk.

It was Friday and merely a few days before Christmas. With having nothing to do, I decided to give Kinokuniya a visit. With me running out of books to read, I felt it was the perfect time for me to go on book shopping.

Initially, I had a specific title in mind and probably one or two other titles I would decide once I actually saw them. For that one specific book, I was looking for Francis Fukuyama’s The End of History and the Last of Man. I thought, I have never read Fukuyama despite being familiar with his ideas. At the book store, I went straight to the counter, asked for Fukuyama’s and got it. One thing though, Kinokuniya placed The End of History at the history section…

The girl at the counter was cute though.

Then, the random walk amid the racks began.

First was The Undercover Economist. It was right beside Freakonomics. And yes, I admit, I haven’t read Freakonomics. I know it’s pop-econ but I feel I know enough economics that I wouldn’t feel too astounded to the facts in the wildly popular book. What’s more, I actually had read some of its content and while entertaining, I could say I’m familiar with it. Besides, I prefer not to read what most others read. As with The Da Vinci’s Code, I only read it after a friend incessantly told me I should read it day in day out. I read Da Vinci’s just to shut her up. Digression aside, I picked that book.

The third book was Amartya Sen’s The Argumentative Indian. I don’t know why I picked it up but I suspect it was because Nik Nazmi mentioned it earlier in his blog. For all I know, Nik Nazmi probably run a subliminal message that would sound like “read Sen. read Sen.” And The Argumentative Indian became the third book I picked up.

I thought I would stop at three books but soon, I spotted Richard Dawkins’ The God Delusion. I remember Dawkins from an article on New York Times. Furthermore, the title was on Kunikoniya’s top ten non-fiction list. I picked that one up too. So much for “don’t really like reading what most people like to read“, eh?

The fifth book was The Affluent Society by John Kenneth Galbraith, one of the more prominent economists in our times. I have great respect for him, despite the fact that some of his ideas aren’t too friendly to libertarianism.

The sixth was The Origin of Wealth by Eric D. Beinhocker. The reason I picked up this book is pure curiousity. At the back of its jacket, it writes “There is a revolution underway in economics and you need to know about it.” Call me a sucker but I really wanted to know about the revolution. And judging from the selection of the books, you could probably guess which section I was lingering at.

Bill Clinton’s My Life was next. People — well, my democrats-friendly friends actually — told me how great the book is. They might be biased but I do think Bill Clinton is a great President. So, one more.

The last one was History the Malay Kingdom of Patani by Ibrahim Syukri. Why I picked this one up? I thought, hey, maybe I could read this and then contribute to Wikipedia!

After all the madness, I started to sober up. The cause of the awakening was the increasingly heavy burden I was carrying. Yes, the burden was the books. And all those books probably would have burned a hole through my wallet if I hadn’t sober up.

I inspected price tags and I said to myself, “whoa!”. The whole thing cost more than RM 500. In fact, it was more like RM 800!

I didn’t plan to spend RM 800 as recklessly as I had picked up the book and so, with heavy hearts, I had to filter them out.

The first victim was The Undercover Economist. Second was The Argumentative Indian.

Then, it was History of Patani. This book in particular is priced in the most irrational way. It’s a relatively thin book but priced nearly RM 50. Clinton’s My Life is about five times as thick and cost just RM 65. Maybe, I could blame it on economies of scale!

The fourth unfortunate victim of the unwanted culling was The Affluent Society.

Ironically, the scourge cost the book that I came in the first place. Yes, I threw away The End of History.

So, in the end, I was left with My Life, The Origin of Wealth and The God Delusion.

While I’m currently happy with two titles, I’m not so sure with The Origin of Wealth though. When I got home, I immediately opened by New Years’ present and took a sneak peak of what to come. Naughty me.

The Origin of Wealth unfortunately looks like an economics thesis instead of something one could read for leisure. The appendices itself could be made into a book by itself. That’s how thick it is. Maybe I should just return and trade it for Fukuyama’s instead.

And great. I forgot that I wanted to get Sophie’s World.

Regardless, these three titles ought to keep my busy for weeks.

Categories
Environment Politics & government

[1015] Of where’s Prime Minister Waldo?

Despite all the bad decisions Bush had made, at least during the aftermath of Katrina, when New Orleans fell into anarchy, he as the President of the United States committed himself to the rescue effort mobilized throughout the affected areas. While Johor and several other states are suffering major flooding, one has to wonder, where’s our Prime Minister?

He’s not in Malaysia but instead, he’s still on holiday, vacationing, somewhere abroad. When I read a blogger expressing his disgust of that fact, I share the blogger’s sentiment. Moreover, with people, real Malaysians, are cut off from power, clean water and food as long as four days, the Prime Minister is more interested in defending himself against an allegation that he purchased a MYR 30 million yatch.

As far as the flood is concerned, I honestly believe that our Prime Minister has failed us, Malaysians. In absence of the top executive person in the country, the Deputy Prime Minister taken over the job of sorting this out. The Johor Chief Minister seems to be active in the rescue effort too. Kudos to them but the jury is out there. They will have to excel if both of them prefer history to be kind to them.

I’m so glad that a state-wide emergency has been declared:

Malaysia had declared a state of emergency yesterday and civil defense personnel, volunteers, and members of the armed forces took part in evacuation and rescue operations.

I can’t find any local media reporting an the declaration of the emergency. I’m not sure whether that’s due to my ignorance, the fact that the media has yet to report it or the foreign source is wrong. Assuming good faith, nevertheless, if this is an emergency as I understand it, the emergency allows state and federal machineries to direct full energy into the ongoing rescue effort. The declaration of emergency however makes the Prime Minister looks even worse — Prime Minister is nowhere in sight amid state-sanctioned emergency!

Today, the Prime Minister expresses sadness over the disaster:

Najib said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi expressed his sadness over the flood situation and asked the Federal and state agencies to help the people. Abdullah had conveyed the message to Najib over the phone.

Mr. Prime Minister, merely expressing sadness is not enough. You must act on it. Come back home and supervise the rescue effort in Johor and other states. According to a news report, residents in the affected areas have been without food and water as many as four days. How long since you last had your dinner, Mr. Prime Minister?

Categories
Economics

[1014] Of property prices set to go up

The government has eased up restriction on trade. In particular, within the property industry. In the NST today:

KUALA LUMPUR: Foreigners can now own or invest in as many houses costing more than RM250,000 per unit as they want in Malaysia.

In a statement yesterday, the Prime Minister’s Office said effective today, foreigners can buy residential units costing RM250,000 or more without seeking approval from the Foreign Investment Committee (FIC) under the Economic Planning Unit of the Prime Minister’s Department.

What will this liberalization do?

Foreign demand for local property will increase total demand for property in Malaysia. That will increase property prices, while holding supply constant, with all else being equal. It might also add more liquidity in the property market.

Today might be a good day to invest in properties, if supply is unable to cope with the future demand surge.

Categories
Politics & government

[1013] Of dear minister, what if the communists…

I’m attracted to a post by The Sensintrovert that highlights an episode on the current communist memorial controversy between Malaysian information minister Zainuddin Maidin and certain fraction within the Chinese Malaysian community. In the article by Bernama:

Zainuddin, who is also the Member of Parliament for Merbok, had alleged during a speech at a Merbok Puteri Umno function last week that such memorials had been found at private Chinese cemeteries in Sarawak and in Nilai, Negeri Sembilan.

According to him, memorials should only be erected for those who had fought for the country’s independence or against the communists, irrespective of which group or movement they belonged to.

Dear minister, what if the communists had fought for Malayan independence? When the communists were fighting for Malayan independence, where was UMNO?

The communists did fight for Malayan independence and by your own qualification, memorials for the communists could be erected.

Regardless, not that I support typical communist ideals, sir, it’s none of your business. Those memorials are on private properties.

“We should not pay tribute to one movement or group that involved only a particular race but individuals or larger organisations that had played instrumental roles for the benefit of all the races in the country,” he said.

Oh, really? What about UMNO which its membership involved only a particular race?