I just have to share this.
[youtube]w9FhN0H2IPY[/youtube]
I just have to share this.
[youtube]w9FhN0H2IPY[/youtube]
Yup. We are off to the semifinal of the 16th Sultan Azlan Shah Cup.
The goal was one of the weird goals I have ever seen. The ball, flicked from the midfield and all the way to the Korean D with a lone Malaysian player in it needed only to touch his stick with the ball mid air. All Korean defenders and including the goalie were visibly dumb-founded.
Drugs is a marvelous substance when consumed with care. Among other things, it heals illnesses, relieves pain and gives us the extra boost we might need. The more adventurous use involves psychedelic pleasure. Taken with moderation, it is all that and more. Taken excessively, it is a poison that wrecks life. In parallel, the Malaysian New Economic Policy (NEP), an affirmative action policy, is very much like drugs to the Malays.
Though discriminatory and perhaps, flawed in its rationale, to a certain extent it eliminated race as an economic function. The NEP coupled with other policies reduced poverty and created a large middle class in the country. Above all, it guaranteed political stability and paved the way to later prosperity. That however was then. The NEP is a specific policy designed in the 1970s to rise up against the challenges of that time. Despite officially ended in 1990, the policy in actuality outlives its supposed end date, well into a new age that provides new challenges.
While the policy had its successes, its side-effects cannot be ignored. The discrimination it introduced excited the Malaysian diaspora. Those that did not benefit from the NEP and further marginalized by the same policy migrated away to other countries that offered better and fairer economic opportunities. Malaysia was bleeding the talents that it needed for modernization. The trend continues till today, as with the policy of the 1970s.
Months ago in one of the tallest buildings in the world, overlooking Kuala Lumpur, a consultant told me that at some point, the NEP has made the non-Malays stronger while weakening the Malays. I agreed with him even before he explained himself.
The privileges enjoyed by the Malays made them complacent while the rest had to endure obstacles placed for the sake of the Malays. The restriction taught the non-Malays the survival skills they needed in the face of discrimination. They learned how to become fiercely independent economically while the Malays continue to be fed by a policy designed to save them in the first place. Nietzsche wrote that which does not kill you make you stronger. He is right.
Years turned into decades and now here we are with the drugs strongly ingrained in our society. What was a privilege then has now been demanded as a right. The majority of the Malays have become so dependent on the policy that they are addicted to it. A drug addict would have to overcome a withdrawal symptom to be free. Most Malays would need to do the same in order to be truly free.
There are Malays that do not need the NEP to survive. There are those that manipulate the NEP for unfair gains. While these groups deserve the disgust some give them, we cannot overlook those that sincerely believe in how the policy is linked to their destiny. To many Malays, years of dependency have eroded their self-confidence.
Not too long ago, I had supper with two friends. One is a Chinese and another is a Malay, of whom I had been introduced to just hours earlier. At the coffee shop, one thing led to another and NEP became topic of the moment.
The Chinese friend questioned the NEP and the Malay defended it. I, half asleep, decided to stay out of it. The debate went on and at one point, the Malay friend said something to the effect that the Malays are incapable of competing against the Chinese in Malaysia.
I, whom was already bored, observing how the same argument was being repeated here, immediately awakened, felt grossly insulted by the comment. I had wanted to reply but already under assault by the other person, I felt pity for him and decided to let it pass. The day ended peacefully soon after.
That incident statement excited the cogs in my mind, asking is this really a question of self-confidence?
In the self-doubting Malay friend’s mind, the NEP is the only and the best option there is in this world. A majority of the Malays might share his sentiment. After all, how could the same side win over and over again if the majority did not believe in such defeatist mantra of insecurity?
The truth is, there are better options. But the question is not whether there are option. The question is how do we convince these Malays.
The first step in undoing the NEP is to offer hope to the majority of the Malays. We need to provide reason to have confidence in themselves. Show to them how one could be successful in life without the NEP. We must convince these groups of Malays that do not need the NEP to succeed in life. We need to show that that others have succeeded without the NEP, that the others have succeeded despite discrimination.
This particular group is the key to a better society. If this group is won over, the dream of a fairer society is one step closer.

The Eredivisie ended in a dramatic way but Ajax lost.
The KNVB Cup ended dramatically too but Ajax won only after 16 penalties:
On 22 May 1996 Edgar Davids missed a penalty for Ajax in Rome – and it wasn’t an unimportant one: Ajax’s first in the shoot-out of the Champions League final against Juventus in Rome. Ajax lost the shoot-out: 2-4. Davids’ miss marked the start of Ajax’s 2-4 collapse. The ‘pitbull’ of Louis van Gaal’s golden Ajax team knew that he would leave Ajax for AC Milan that summer and would have given his left arm for a more succesful last ball contact as an Ajacied…
Almost eleven years later, on 06 May 2007, Edgar Davids once again stepped forward for a penalty. This time it wasn’t Rome but Rotterdam. This time the goalkeeper wasn’t Juventus’ Angelo Peruzzi but AZ’s Khalid Sinouh. This time it wasn’t the first, but the 16th and possibly last of the shoot-out. This time Louis van Gaal wasn’t Davids’ coach, but his opponent. And… this time Edgar Davids didn’t fail: he made it 7-8, just after AZ defender Ryan Donk had missed the 15th in a long series of 16 near-perfect spotkicks, and gave Ajax their 17th Dutch cup in club history. “This feels like a new beginning,” the Ajax veteran said after official ceremony on the pitch of De Kuip. [Ajax claim KNVB Cup after 120 minutes and 16 penalties. AjaxUSA. May 7 2007]
Poor AZ. Poor Van Gaal. Sincerely. I would rather have AZ won the Eredivisie instead of PSV. But do enjoy the victory, humbly:
[youtube]jQstTQhi_1o[/youtube]
Enjoy the Cup.
I am not a fan of tagging but since I have been tagged twice, first by John Lee and later, Nik Nazmi, I will play along regardless.
To be honest, I do not read too many blogs and those that I read, they are popular economics and political blogs hosted in the United States. If I were to tag them, they would probably not be bothered to response at all. At the same time, I think it is good to promote local blogs and so, I would limit my choices to local blogs. Support your local blogosphere! Yeah!
But it is unfair to list only five blogs as my list of blogs that get me thinking goes beyond the number five. But for the sake of staying true the rule that comes along with the tagging process, I will list five, randomly, whatever that crosses my mind first.
Number one is Arrested Development by Elanor Tan. Delightfully full of economics, sometimes when she does not extensively quote articles from somewhere, from time to time, she forces me to reassess my worldview.
Number two, in no particular order, is, or rather, was Volume of Interactions by Aizuddin Danian. Though he seems to blog, or blogged, almost everything under the sun, his observation of our society is somewhat neutral. This is especially welcoming given how the local blogosphere now and then engages itself in a battle between liberal and conservative camps. Too bad that he seems to have stopped blogging.
Third is Cikgu Lee by, Cikgu Lee. This is a fun read but yet, deep. It is an unfortunate fact that this blog is sparsely updated.
Fourth is SaifulIslam.com, by Saiful Islam. One of the more rational and more importantly, I think, intellectually honest, unlike some self-proclaimed defender of Islam that is more interested in polemics, disinformation and cheap publicity. Though I rarely visit his blog, whenever I do, he provides me with insight on how a traditionalist’s mind might work, bringing in understanding, clearing out misunderstanding.
Finally, hell, what the heck. He responded to my query earlier and I am hoping that he would respond to this one too. One of my favorite economists, Professor Greg Mankiw. Do not forget to buy his favorite textbook!
Alright, I am done. For the tagged, you guys might want to play this silly game and list down five blogs that excite you to have mental masturbation.

p/s — another person tagged me and he is author of myAsylum. I will just reused this post.