Categories
Economics

[2236] Of Kelantan gold dinar is bound to fail

The idea of the issuance of gold dinar and silver dirham as currency in Kelantan is not new but this week, the northern Malaysian state has decided to go ahead with it finally.[0] This will be a lesson demonstrating the superiority of  fiat currency to that which is backed by commodity: commodity-backed currency simply does not do well alongside fiat currency.

Never mind the legality of the whole thing.

First of all, the dinar and the dirham are pegged to the ringgit.[1] This option eliminates the need to use the new currency vis-a-vis the ringgit, notwithstanding the supposedly Islamic ideal. With wider circulation, why would a person not choose the ringgit over the new currency? Call it the status quo bias but that is the reality.

Furthermore,  the dinar is likely fail to fulfill the double coincidence of wants, which is necessary for any trade to happen between at least two parties. This is the reason why barter trading is not nearly as popular as trading done through a medium of exchange called money.

A far more threatening factor is the prices of metals. Sufficient increase in gold and silver prices vis-à-vis the exchange rate will make the money more valuable as metals than as a medium of exchange. That will create an incentive to sell the dinar and the dirham as metals, thus lowering the quantity of money in circulation. The next time metal prices go through the roof, one may expect the dinar and the dirham as a currency to collapse or at the very least becoming very, very unpopular. It will be hard to see the currency around and in use.

One possible solution to the circulation problem is that the Kelantan government may want to support the currency by printing more of them. That will prove to be a costly policy to carry out in the long run.

Alternatively, the Kelantan government may reevaluate exchange rate between the commodity-backed currency and the fiat ringgit to address rising gold prices. The higher value of the commodity-backed currency compared to the prices of the relevant metals, the more valuable it will be as currency and less as metals.

If reevaluation is the favored policy, it will be a race between the issuer and arbitrageurs: who can act first. There is an handsome profits to be made. Remember, for instance, the painful experience of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism.

Between a state government (along with the issuer) with no experience in monetary policy and countless arbitrageurs, I have a feeling the state government will not fare too well. I doubt Kelantan has sufficient reserve to support a currency, in case of a run. Somebody once said something to this effect in a different but entirely applicable scenario: the government has to win every time but the arbitrageurs need to win only once to induce a collapse of the currency.

Or, the Kelantan government can float the exchange rate. But if it does so, there is a feeling that that policy would make the dinar redundant as a currency to the ringgit, leading us back to the status quo bias.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[0] — KOTA BAHARU, Aug 12 (Bernama) — Kelantan paved the way to become the first state to introduce the gold dinar and silver dirham currency on Thursday.

Speaking when launching the Syariah currency, Menteri Besar Kelantan Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat said the state would strive to expand the use of gold dinar and silver dirham in all transactions, including paying civil servants’ remuneration. [Kelantan Launches Dinar Gold. Bernama. August 12 2010]

[1] — The exchange rate are RM589 to a dinar and RM13 to a dirham. See World Islamic Mint. Accessed August 13 2010.

By Hafiz Noor Shams

For more about me, please read this.

5 replies on “[2236] Of Kelantan gold dinar is bound to fail”

The page was updated on August 12 2010. So, I think it’s updated enough. Furthermore, Nik Aziz has been cited that 1 dirham is equivalent to RM13:

Nik Aziz said the state government introduced the gold dinar currency as history had shown that the gold dinar and silver dirham were inflation-proof as the metals could retain their value in any economic situation.

“For example, the price of chicken in the time of our prophet was about one dirham and now the value of our dirham is rated about RM13, which is about the market price of a chicken now. http://www.nst.com.my/nst/articles/22SALOG/Article/

On the return of gold/silver standard, I suggest some reading in the history of the Roman empire as well as the history of the US in the 1800s and world history in 1970s. Those part of history would be enough to explain why gold standard failed.

The fiat currency is an improvement of commodity-backed currency, despite all of its flaws.

Hi, I think there is some misunderstanding. Ever since the Emas Dinar Kelantan was launched in 2006, it has been a *floating* currency. I bought some a couple of years ago and then sold them for a profit earlier this year.

There is very little information provided on the web related to the new batch of coins. And given that the website has not been updated I think I see how you came to the conclusion that the dinar is pegged to the ringgit (it is not).

Some of the press releases have made it clear that the dinar will float – Kelantan has mentioned posting latest prices on a central signboard with the option for SMS updates. These uncertain and slipshod announcements leave a lot to be desired. However, I do feel that a return to commodity-backed currencies will be inevitable over the next 5-10 years.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.