Oh heck. What the hell.

With the talk about free speech and all, what are you going to do about it, realistically?
Paste a banner on your blog and then do nothing?
I propose a boycott on NST. Read ’em but don’t buy ’em. Hit them where it hurts the most.
p/s — There might be a misunderstanding caused by this entry. I have nothing against defamation law. NST has every right to seek right of redress from Jeff Ooi and Rocky’s Bru, if Jeff Ooi and Rocky’s Bru are indeed guilty of defamation. By that, I am not implying that Jeff Ooi and Rocky’s Bru have committed fraud or defamation. I am just saying that the post has little relevant to the case, originally.
This post is one of those entries that try to ride on a wave but not actually part of the wave. I am targeting NST not because of the current lawsuit. Rather, it is because of NST’s biased reporting. I do however sympathize with the two bloggers.
Notwithstanding the right, I do not feel the redress NST is seeking is not sufficiently justified. I doubt that the two bloggers have made malicious false statements against NST. If there are strong proofs of otherwise, I would be glad to rescind my sympathy towards the two bloggers and even support prosecution. But I still will not buy NST.
Please differentiate the such right from such justification. I disagree with the justification, not the right. For this reason, I do not plan to endorse “Blogger United” or paste their banner here on my blog. The “movement” seems to deny the right to redress while dismissing NST’s allegation.
John and SiPM might have described what my position on the case.
12 replies on “[1055] Of Tak Nak NST”
oh man! these girls, c’mon, find other channels to find your soulmate!
actually i’m also doing research on NST….i’m attracted to read your article…hmmmm…it really nice article….i like it….i’m also like u too…may i know you more??????????…;-}
ACTUALLY I LIKE U…I LOVE U…..
yup…i also agree with u…u r so sweet….hehe… with yellow flowerss.. hurmmm, so handsome. =)
[…] the__earthinc: [1055] Of Tak Nak NST […]
[Admin – Impersonator. Suspected sockpuppet, as Gary w bush, or gul, or 218.111.39.55]
John, I agree with you completely on defamation law.
The above is an impostor, by the way. I’ve written about why I won’t be supporting Bloggers United, even though I support Jeff and Rocky.
[Deleted by Admin – this is an imposter, IP 218.111.39.55]
Agreed, Hafiz. I personally will avoid reading the print version, but will continue reading nst.com.my. It will cost them money to pay for their servers, and they get absolutely nothing in return. :D
Total boycott which includes not reading it prevents us from information. I am not prepared to be deprived of information, be it from any source.
the only realistic way is to have an alternative source of news, be it legal or illegal. Revolutiona always started by those who the goverment deem as terrorist or threat to national security.
Maybe you can start a free underground daily with underground support.
That is something i would fork out my savings for.
read but don’t buy?
i think the readership doens’t depend merely on circulation.
AC Nielson will still know the statistics.
The only way is to boycott totally.