Categories
Environment

[1241] Of when justice was swift and sure

Somehow, I am proud of my uncle:

SULAIMAN Nordin was a new district forest officer in Pahang in the mid-Sixties. He had recently graduated in forestry from the University of Tasmania, where he had been a popular student, and hailed from rural Malacca, where breeding and good manners were particularly highly prized.

In all the years that I knew him, I had never seen him without a smile. Many who mistook his natural good nature as a sign of weakness had reason to regret their mistake. Underneath that gentle exterior of warmth and politeness was a man determined to protect and defend his personal values of self worth, honesty and integrity, at all costs.

Stories of corruption in forestry were legion. Sulaiman did not have long to wait for his scruples to be put to the severest test.

When he discovered that a company was engaged in illegal logging, he confiscated their Caterpillar and Komatsu equipment, the best in the business, worth several million ringgit. All this was done according to the law.

He was not surprised when two unsavoury characters came a-calling.

They had obviously been used to buying their way out of trouble, and previous DFOs had been more than accommodating in a situation such as this. They genuinely believed in the conventional wisdom that “every man has his price”. They were adept at name-dropping. Their conversation was laced liberally with stories intended to show the young forest officer how close they were to the state forest officer, the director of lands and mines, the state secretary and the district officer.

When Sulaiman showed he was not overawed, they changed tack. How about a night out, perhaps? They claimed they were going to Taiwan and Japan, and he would be most welcome to tag along.

Thank you, said Sulaiman, but he was too busy to go anywhere.

He was a difficult customer, the likes of whom they had never met before. They concluded that if a night out on the town, a jolly party to the geisha houses of Japan and close connections they enjoyed with the cream of Pahang society could not produce the results, they had another trick up their sleeve which, based on previous experience, was guaranteed to work.

Then, with the confidence that came with regular practice, the briefcase they had brought was pushed with all due ceremony across the table towards Sulaiman. He rose to his full height of five foot five, picked it up and hurled it out through the swing doors into the general office, to the astonishment of his staff.

In measured language, he read the riot act, warning his visitors he was reporting their attempt to bribe him, a government officer. He left them in no doubt that they were not to come to his office ever again.

He took the briefcase, full of high denomination notes, to the police and lodged his report. He thought, knowing how slow the wheels of bureaucracy moved, he would wait a few days to see the outcome of his fight against corruption.

To his utter disgust, he learnt that the police had orders not to proceed. He found himself bombarded with telephone calls from his head in Kuantan and other influential individuals to withdraw his report and release the logging equipment.

It was then that Sulaiman realised he was taking on forces that could destroy his career, but he was strengthened by his conviction that the system could not destroy his deep aversion for corruption. He was not going to be part of corruption, no matter what the material cost to him personally. He resigned, as he had obviously become the odd man out, and knew that the department of forestry was not an option for an honest professional.

My own direct experience of forestry corruption in high places started when I applied, in my capacity as the Guthrie executive responsible for land matters, among other things, for an additional 5,000 acres of state land adjoining Chenor Estate in Pahang. The 4,500-acre rubber plantation was being converted rapidly to oil palm and it was thought that a plantation of less than 5,000 acres would not be able to support its own mill.

I was so delighted the approval came so quickly that I overlooked the unusually big premium we were being asked to pay. On further enquiry, I was told that the area alienated to Guthrie contained very valuable timber, referred to as “merchantable timber”.

As I had to visit Kuantan to finalise the transaction with the land office, I thought I should drop into Chenor Estate and say hello to our Belgian manager, who came with the property when Guthrie acquired it.

Business completed, I proceeded to Kuantan, arriving in the early evening. In the late 1960s, the only decent accommodation to be had for love or money was the rather nice government rest house at Teluk Chempedak.

As I was enjoying a cup of tea and some cucumber sandwiches, in walked a former Pahang state forest officer, Eric Foenander, who, while in service, doubled as the game warden.

He was the famous big game hunter who wrote the much admired classic, Big Game Hunting in Malaya, published in England. I invited him to join me.

He wanted to know what I was doing in Kuantan. I mentioned the additional area that had been alienated to Guthrie, and he wanted to know where it was exactly and how much the premium was.

I produced the land office map of the surveyed area. When I said the premium was a little on the high side because the land contained “merchantable timber”, he literally exploded: “Tunku, what merchantable timber? There is absolutely nothing there. It was completely logged out almost as soon as I retired!”

Foenander, who knew Pahang like the back of his hand, said he would show me the area.

Early the following morning, he drove me in his Rover up a hillock near Chenor Estate. He spread a Malayan survey department map on the bonnet of his car and proceeded to point out the area in question. There was not a single tree that even the greediest logger would want to waste his time on.

Armed with this information, I asked the district forest officer of Temerloh for an explanation, then the state forest officer, followed by the director of lands and mines. I had no joy from any of them and reported the matter to (the late Tan Sri) Harun Hashim, the no-nonsense head of the Anti-Corruption Agency.

I remember seeing him on Wednesday morning and he said he would arrange for the menteri besar, then Datuk Yahaya Mohd Seh, to see me the following Monday. His letter would be on the MB’s desk.

The kindly Yahaya looked decidedly under the weather, and his opening remarks were: “Tunku, you should have come to see me first before going to Harun Hashim.”

I replied, “Datuk, I am from an old Kedah civil service family, and have been taught never to short-circuit established channels. It was only when I received no satisfactory explanation that I went to Harun.”

The upshot of my report was the mass transfer of senior federal officers out of Pahang.

Those were the days of swift action against the corrupt by a government determined to confront corruption decisively.

Harun was independent, a man of great courage who had the complete support of Tunku Abdul Rahman, the prime minister and Tun Ismail Abdul Rahman, the minister for home affairs.

The writer is a former president of Transparency International and former special adviser to the UN secretary-general on ethics. He can be contacted at tunkua@gmail.com. [Tunku Abdul Aziz. When justice was swift and sure. NST. May 27 2007]

When I first read the article over the weekend, I did not quite remember that I have an uncle by the name of Sulaiman and a grandfather named Nordin.

Silly me.

Fearing time turning the article into corrupted matters, I am reproducing this article here in totality.

Categories
Economics Environment Humor Politics & government

[1228] Of too witty to be serious

Panda Kong:

Copyrights by The Economist. Fair use.

Roar!

IF THE guest list determined a meeting’s value, the Strategic Economic Dialogue between China and America on May 22nd would be a roaring success. Almost half the Chinese cabinet is trooping to Washington, DC, for the second of the twice-yearly discussions, conceived by Hank Paulson, America’s treasury secretary, between the world’s largest economy and its fastest-growing one. The process was designed, in large part, as an antidote to the latest case of Asiaphobia among America’s politicians. [America’s fear of China. The Economist. May 17 2007]

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p/s — also at The Economist:

Conservationists—and polar bears—should heed the lessons of economics.

[]

One reason for this taxonomic inflation is that the idea of a species becoming extinct is easy to grasp, and thus easy to make laws about. Subspecies just do not carry as much political clout. The other is that upgrading subspecies into species simultaneously increases the number of rare species (by fragmenting populations) and augments the biodiversity of a piece of habitat and thus its claim for protection.

In the short term, this strategy helps conservationists by intensifying the perceived threat of extinction. In the long term, as every economist knows, inflation brings devaluation. Rarity is not merely determined by the number of individuals in a species, it is also about how unusual that species is. If there are only two species of elephant, African and Indian, losing one matters a lot. Subdivide the African population, as some taxonomists propose, and perceptions of scarcity may shift. [Hail Linnaeus. The Economist. May 17 2007]

Categories
Economics Environment Politics & government Science & technology

[1202] Of the final Summary for Policymakers is out

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change meeting in Bangkok has finally released the final part of the Fourth Assessment Report. Download it here.

I have not had the chance to look at it but essentially, this report is about the mitigation of climate change.

Frankly, I am a little bit disappointed after reading initial reports about the Bangkok meetup and am becoming slightly bitter against the People’s Republic of China. In my worldview, China is fast becoming a villain within the context of climate change politics, joining the Bush and the Howard administrations.

Just as what the European Union expressed earlier, developing countries, be it China, India, Brazil or even Malaysia, can no longer justify their inaction through the inaction of others, namely the United States and Australia. Their inaction makes them free riders.

Further, this is essentially a repeated prisoners’ dilemma model and it is important to punish all uncooperative free riders. In such model, tit-and-tat is the most efficient strategy to encourage cooperation to achieve mutual maximum benefit while respecting private rights.

Categories
Environment

[1184] Of podcasting on Earth Day

The second podcast, ever.

[audio:podcastEarthDay2007.mp3]

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

I have celebrated every Earth Day for the past several years by highlighting environmental issues that have — in my humble opinion — captivated the nation. I wish to stay true to that tradition by doing the same thing this year.

There is no doubt that the natural environmental faces challenges each day and there are countless issues that need to be addressed. Sometimes, it is overwhelming to simply list down those issues. It is even harder to prioritize it. So, the issues I am going to highlight here are in no way the only issues we face. Rather, the issues are the ones that have taken the center stage of public attention. Further, in no way this list is exhaustive and it will be updated as we ride on 2007.

Earlier this year, major flooding took the whole nation by surprise. A town deep in the heartland of Johor, Kota Tinggi, despite its name which could be rendered as a city on high ground was flooded for several weeks, cutting simple folks from food and fresh water. It was no less than a national emergency since four states suffered billion of ringgit of losses due to the flood.

The flood attracted public attention to anthropogenic climate change. For the first time in Malaysian history, as far as I could recall, the Malaysia started to take climate change seriously. Or least, the perception of it is there. More importantly, the issue of climate change enters into public consciousness and no longer becomes an issue among small number of environmentalists and scientists in the country.

The government announced that it would produce a report on climate change amid the chaos that followed the disaster. Though I am not sure if the document has been completed, I have not heard the government making the report public. If the government is serious about being transparent, perhaps, it could take the first step by making the report public.

El Niño would have been an issue to be discussed but the phenomenon itself has been mild.

Related to climate change is the intention of the government to increase fuel standard in Malaysia. I welcome such move. The move however might increase gas prices. I would support the price hike but that is just me. I support taxation on fuel consumption and disagree with fuel subsidy. The government plans to adopt EURO II while the current standard is EURO I. For your information, in the EU, the more stringent EURO IV is common.

I am unsure if the adoption of EURO II covers carbon emission. Nevertheless, we are losing significant amount of carbon sink through deforestation. While deforestation is common in Malaysia, so far this year, nothing is more controversial than the one in Lojing, Kelantan. Finger-pointing game is currently being played out but no substantial step towards the conservation of Lojing has been undertaken by any side.

And then, there is poaching. If last year, we had a proud tiger butchered and stored a like a common chicken inside a refrigerator, not too long ago this year, to those that care, to our horror, hundreds of turtles were discovered on the boat. Only a few were alive and saved from the barbarians. The authority successfully arrested several Chinese citizens of whom were responsible for the act.

What gone is gone however. We must take effort to protect what is left, and try to replenish it from what we have. Though controversies have struck the Selangor state government for the past few years, probably in effort to clean up its image, declared a large portion of its eastern frontier as state park. From Hulu Selangor in the north to Hulu Langat in the south, the approximately 90,000 hectare park is a good news. Nonetheless, just as what is happening with Kota Damansara Community Forest Park and many others, this announcement should be received with guarded posture for so many words have been proven to be worthless for so many times.

I wonder though, how would the water pipe link between Pahang and Selangor is going to affect that promise. The pipe will have to go through the park. That is not the main issue however. It is the dam in Pahang that will displace many Orang Aslis off their ancestral home. Dams always devastates local environment. The planned dam in Pahang is no different.

These issues no doubt are large issues and individually, we are almost always powerless to act against it. But when individuals of common interest band together to form a common front, much can be done. But one does not have to confront these issues to make the world we live in a better place for all us. Even gram of carbon we reduce, every consumption we reduce, every time we recycle, we are doing our part for ourselves, for our children and for our home.

Happy Earth Day.

Categories
Environment Politics & government

[1182] Of the rape of Lojing and the clowns in PAS

Exposé on the rape of Lojing started a finger pointing fest between UMNO and PAS in Kelantan. It was not long before the the state and the federal government started to join the blame game. To a certain extent, given how poor the state is and hence, the lack of resource to protect the natural environment, I am sympathetic of the state. Nevertheless, I am refraining from taking side for I am fully aware that both sides are more interested in looking for brownie points instead of the environment. Yet, I cannot help but ridicule PAS on the way it handles the issue. Instead of engaging in damage control, it makes matter worse for itself, much to the UMNO’s gain.

About a week ago, it was revealed by the minister of the environment Azmi Khalid that the state government — more precisely, the office of the state chief minister (menteri besar; MB) — issued a gag order to the state forestry department on the situation at Lojing. The deputy MB denied the allegation:

KANGAR: The Kelantan government is said to have stopped the state Forestry Department from divulging information on the environmental damage in the Lojing Highlands.

Natural Resources and Environment Minister Datuk Seri Azmi Khalid, who made the claim yesterday, said the gag order had resulted in the ministry not being able to get any information.

“I want the people of Kelantan to know that the Kelantan menteri besar’s office had issued a written directive to the state Forestry Department preventing them from giving any information on the damage in Lojing Highlands.”

Kelantan Deputy Menteri Besar Datuk Ahmad Yakob had earlier denied allegations that the Kelantan government had withheld information about Lojing. [‘Forestry Dept told to keep mum about Lojing’. NST. April 15 2007]

In The Star:

“The statement by the Deputy Menteri Besar that the Kelantan government did not issue such a directive is not true and implies that I have lied. I have written proof as the letter came from the Menteri Besar’s office.

“I urge Datuk Ahmad to retract his statement and check the matter with the Menteri Besar’s office,” he told reporters after closing a handicraft seminar and workshop in Mata Air near here yesterday. [Azmi hits back at Kelantan government over Lojing logging. The Star. April 15 2007]

Later, the deputy MB admitted to the existence of the order after consulting with the MB’s office:

KOTA BARU: Deputy Menteri Besar Datuk Ahmad Yakob made another about-turn yesterday, saying that there had indeed been an order restricting the disclosure of information on forest clearing in the state.

He said the menteri besar’s office had issued a letter dated March 26 to the state forestry director not to divulge details on logging in the state to federal authorities.

[…]

Ahmad, who had denied issuing the gag order, said he was only told about the letter by the menteri besar’s office on Monday. [Deputy MB blames boss. NST. April 18 2007]

In the article, the word another refers to this:

In a sudden about turn, the state government is now claiming that 13,000ha of Lojing Highlands had long been gazetted as a forest reserve.

Deputy Menteri Besar Datuk Ahmad Yakob, contradicting his own statement on Sunday that the government-owned 25,000ha of land in Lojing which had yet to be gazetted under the National Forestry Act 1984, said the 13,000ha had been earmarked as a water catchment area. [Deputy MB’s gaffe over Lojing Highlands claim. NST. April 17 2007]

That means he shot himself in the foot, twice. He should be in a wheelchair now. It is unsure if the shot foot was in his mouth.

Back to the letter, apparently, the letter ordered the forestry department not to divulge information to the public with permission from the chief minister’s office, as clarified by PAS member Husam Musa:

State Public Administration, Economic Planning, Finance and Community Development Committee chairman Datuk Husam Musa said Menteri Besar Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat, as a state leader, was “well within his rights” to insist on being kept informed.

He said a letter dated March 27 to the department was in fact not a gag order although it ordered the department director to obtain permission from the menteri besar before releasing any information on land clearing in the state. [State says MB ‘well within his rights’. NST. April 19 2007]

Not a gag order? Really? Further in the same article:

“We have no intention of restricting information or vetting them as we are transparent. But the menteri besar must be informed, otherwise there will be chaos.” [State says MB ‘well within his rights’. NST. April 19 2007]

No intention of restricting information? Transparent? Au contraire!

There is no restriction of information if and only if the state does not restrict information!

And yes, that is a tautology.

Moreover, how does the rationale “menteri besar must be informed” rationalize the restriction of information? Would the MB be uninformed if there was no gag order? Stupid is it not?

Also, despite what had happened:

Its secretary, Takiyuddin Hassan, said the party would hire a consultant who would be accompanied by knowledgeable government officials to inspect the development of hilly terrain in other states.

“We are pushing for total conservation of the environment. We are aiming for it in Kelantan, but can other states follow suit?” he said in an interview. [Look at damage in other states first, says Kelantan. The Star. April 1 2007]

The people from PAS will be better off if they take my advice: slow down and think way, way harder before blurting an opinion.