Categories
Economics Environment Liberty

[1696] Of why I oppose the logging move by Kedah government

With budget constraints clearly visible, the Kedah state government announces move to harvest timber from several water catchment areas in the state to increase its revenue.[0] I find the action disagreeable and my opposition is two folds.

First revolves around the question of sustainability. While the state government will utilize helicopters to allow selective harvesting,[1] having the activity done within water catchment areas is really hard to support. I am not convinced on logging done within water catchment areas has sustainability in its equation. On top of that, when referring to sustainable forestry, I always have dedicated tree farms in mind. Furthermore, such tree farms are available in Europe and more importantly, as well as in Malaysia. This proves that the availability of a more sustainable harvesting method. So, I am through and through with the Malaysian Nature Society in disagreeing with the state government.

Secondly, it concerns the function of a government. I, as with many libertarians of minarcist tendency, prefer to have a small government focusing on governance, maybe on some developmental projects with positive externality which the private sectors have absolutely no interest in and little else. So, when the state government says it requires greater revenue to finance its operating expenditure, I could only raise a red flag. In my humble opinion, it is the expenditure which requires reduction.

If the state government plans to do some investment, then borrowing may be a better idea instead. If the investment is really good, I am sure the returns from the investment to cover at least the cost of borrowing some years later. If it is not, well, one has to wonder why should the investment be made in the first place.

Also, the current Menteri Besar himself, when he was in the opposition, opposed the helicopter harvesting when it was first proposed by the previous state administration back in 2003.[2] Now, he holds a different position. Thus, forgive me if I am beginning to think he was objecting then for the sake of objecting instead of seeing the issue on its merit. As it turns out, it does not matter if it is PAS or UMNO; all of them are the same!

The two reasons notwithstanding, I also take exception with the federal government for reneging in its promise to pay Kedah RM100 million yearly for encouraging a logging moratorium 5 years ago.[3] Though I personally think such transfer is inferior to a solution which I shall share next week at The Malaysian Insider, a promise is a promise nonetheless. Inability to fulfill a commitment reflects badly on the federal government and it has its repercussion, not just to the Barisan Nasional, but more importantly, to the country. If the Abdullah administration is incapable of staying true to its words, they should simply stop making more promises.

As in right now, the Barisan Nasional has little credibility. The Menteri Besar’s inconsistent position on the matter does little to differentiate him from the Abdullah administration.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[0] ALOR STAR: The Kedah Government has approved logging activities at the Pedu, Muda and Ahning dam catchment areas, a move that is expected to generate about RM16bil in revenue for the state.

Mentri Besar Azizan Abdul Razak said the move was necessary to cover the high expenditure incurred by the state following the petrol price increase. [Kedah approves logging activities. Embun Majid. The Star. June 19 2008]

[1] ALOR STAR: The Kedah Government is going ahead with its plan to allow selective logging in the Ulu Muda catchment areas using the heli-harvesting technique. [Kedah to use heli-harvesting. Sira Habibu. The Star. June 22 2008]

[2] … Azizan, when reminded that he had strongly opposed a logging plan for the forest reserve when the former Barisan Nasional state government had proposed using helicopters to fell timber trees in 1992, said the circumstances were different then.

He said when he was the state opposition leader, he was not well informed on the matter. [Kedah MB stands firm on logging in the Ulu Muda forest reserve. New Straits Time. June 25 2008]

[3] ALOR STAR, June 18 (Bernama) — Kedah plans to open up the Hulu Muda Forest Reserve to logging activities to increase its revenue as the federal government has not paid the compensation for banning logging in the area five years ago.

Menteri Besar Azizan Abdul Razak said the federal government had not paid the RM100 million compensation to Kedah for banning logging in the area under the National Forestry Policy. [Kedah To Log Forest Reserve To Increase Revenue. Bernama. June 18 2008]

Categories
Earthly Strip Environment

[1695] Of none of them along the line know what any of it is worth

Some background on the logging controversy in Kedah. This is one of those rare instances where I reproduce the whole article.

GREEN groups have always eyed so-called Reduced Impact Logging or RIL techniques with suspicion. Although they do incur less damage to forests then conventional logging methods, RIL methods such as skyline yarder, long haulage ground cable system and helicopter logging — which essentially lift felled trees from the forest floor instead of dragging them — have remained controversial.

There is a nagging fear that they may be misused to log areas inaccessible to bulldozers and tractors, thereby opening the most remote forests to loggers. Or they may be used to log ecologically-sensitive sites on the pretext that they cause little destruction.

In helicopter logging, felled trees are lifted from the forest floor, unlike conventional logging where bulldozers drag logs along skid trails to the main road, exposing huge tracts of soil and damaging surrounding trees.

And now, those fears have come true. Sarawak timber giant WTK Holdings Bhd plans to extend the use of helicopter logging (or heli-logging) to forests in Kedah — forests which are not only untouched, but designated as water catchments. WTK says heli-logging is the best option for the site as it is less destructive than conventional logging.

The Kedah Government has bought into that idea. Last March, it approved in principle heli-logging of 122,798ha of forests. Timber harvesting will stretch over 10 years in two phases in the project by WTK which holds a 80% stake and the Kedah Yayasan Islam, 20%.

Phase I covers 72,934ha of the Ulu Muda forest reserve. Phase II covers 49,864ha in six forest reserves: the Ulu Muda, Chebar Besar, Padang Terap, Pedu, Bukit Saiong and Bukit Keramat. A detailed Environmental Impact Assessment, but only on Phase I, is being reviewed by the Department of Environment (DOE).

If the project proceeds, much is at stake. These forests are gazetted as ”protection forests” because they function as the water catchment for three important dams: the Ahning, Pedu and Muda. Kedah, Perlis and Penang depend on these dams and their catchment for water, as do the 96,000ha Muda Irrigation Scheme, otherwise known as Kedah’s Rice Bowl.

”If trees are harvested, the catchment forest will no longer function as a source of water,” warns a forest botanist familiar with the project. ”The terrain is hilly and logging will lead to erosion and eventually, the dam may be silted up.”

Local folks are protesting too. ”Logging will threaten farming in the Muda area,” says padi farmer Ahmad Fadzil Mohammad, 52, of Kampung Padang Tui Air Hitam, near Alor Star. ”The dams may dry up. Once you cut the trees, there will be less water.” As it is, the Muda area has suffered water woes. Just last year, a water shortage prevented the double cropping which had made padi cultivation there a success.

”Even before logging, we already have water problems. After logging, it will be worse. Only the state will profit from the project. We, the farmers, will suffer,” says Ahmad.

He says many farmers are unaware of the project and its ecological consequences. ”We have formed a group to explain to people so that they will not be confused. They can then judge for themselves whether the project is good or bad.” About 10,000 farmers have supported a signature campaign protesting against the project.

What with Kedah being known as a ”water deficit” area, the Consumers Association of Penang (CAP) says the important consideration here is to protect its water catchment. ”The loss of water due to logging will offset any economic benefits from logging,” says CAP president S.M. Idris. Furthermore, the Ulu Muda forest is one of the last tracts of remaining virgin forests in the country and is known to harbour rich wildlife.

Regrettably, these facts and the basic principle that the area is a gazetted catchment have been blatantly ignored. [Much to lose despite heli-logging. Tan Cheng Li. The Star. March 26 2003]

Oh:

“There must be some way out of here,” said the joker to the thief,
“There’s too much confusion, I can’t get no relief.
Businessmen, they drink my wine, plowmen dig my earth,
None of them along the line know what any of it is worth.”

— Bob Dylan, All Along the Watchtower.

And I like this version:

[youtube]Ka_sHy9cVH0[/youtube]

Holy frak, we are all cylons!

Some rights reserved.

Categories
Economics

[1694] Of Singapore PM is a Pigovian

Lee Hsien Loong proves his worth:

SINGAPORE, June 24 (Bernama) — Energy, whether in the form of electricity or petrol, should be priced properly and not subsidised, Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said today.

He said ideally, energy should be priced not just at todays market levels but also taking into account the likelihood of a future carbon-constrained world, be it due to scarcer supplies of fossil fuels or a post-Kyoto regime to restrain carbon emissions. [Energy Should Be Priced Properly, Not Subsidised – Singapore PM. Zakaria Abu Wahab. Bernama. June 24 2008.

I am sure the founder of the Pigou Club approves the Prime Minister’s membership, at least, as far as fuel prices are concerned.

Categories
Liberty

[1693] Of from Tibet to East Turkestan, tyranny

Just as you think the issue of Tibet went into slumber as a sign of respect for the victims of the Sichuan earthquake, the China strives to dismantle any kind of sympathy it may have garnered. Just today, a mosque was demolished by the Chinese government, allegedly because the local Muslim community refuses to do what the government had ordered: show sign of support for the Olympics.

In a Reuters article (via):

BEIJING (Reuters) – Chinese authorities in the restive far western region of Xinjiang have demolished a mosque for refusing to put up signs in support of this August’s Beijing Olympics, an exiled group said on Monday. [Group says China demolishes mosque for not supporting Olympics. Reuters. June 23 2008]

The official reason, it seems is this:

Dilxat Raxit added that the mosque, which had been renovated in 1998, was accused of illegally renovating the structure, carrying out illegal religious activities and illegally storing copies of the Muslim holy book the Koran. [Group says China demolishes mosque for not supporting Olympics. Reuters. June 23 2008]

I may be able to reluctantly accept illegal renovation as a reason for demolition but “illegally storing copies” of the Koran?

Remember, this is the same government which thinks that it has “an exclusive rights to the selection of all future reincarnations of Tibetan lamas and have ordained that the Dalai Lama must be a citizen of China.”

Categories
Politics & government

[1692] Of Tim Russert is gone

I cannot believe that I did not realize this for more than a week.

[youtube]vwNcuikop8A[/youtube]