Categories
Photography

[2227] Of cool or warm?

I had an outing to Mrs. Macquaries Point with a friend earlier today. Mrs. Macquaries Point means photography.

Here is one of my favorite shots from the outing.

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams.

I typically like pictures that exude coolness to those which are warm. Bluish pictures provide the crispness that I like. It feels strong. It makes a statement. And I am always prepared to shout ‘Go Blue!’

Yeah, sue me.

I had that discussion with the friend about it and he thinks warmer pictures look better. Here is warmer version of the picture shot under different white balance.

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams.

I do like the hint of warmth in the clouds but the second picture is too redish to me.

Maybe it is purely a matter of opinion which one can never be wrong.

Or maybe, for some pictures, certain colors just fit in. This bothers me a lot. Achieving the ‘level of coolness’ through the camera is easy (trust me, no post-production manipulation here at all apart from resizing). Knowing which is better is more subjective and hence, harder.

Regardless, I have finally found a little clique to roam Sydney with. This is the beginning of an exciting and wider experiment in photography for me.

Categories
Economics Fiction

[2226] Of the road to hell…

It begins with a good intention. Everybody deserves to consume fantastical juice. After all, everything is made out of it. It would be a grave injustice to limit its consumption only to those who can afford it.

Invested with executive power, a group of individuals with only the interest of the public at heart intends to make the fantastical juice available to everyone. They — the do-gooders —decide to introduce a policy to subsidize the production of the fantastical juice.

What follows is a production boom that lowers the prices of the fantastical juice to affordable levels. In fact, the fantastical juice sold here is the cheapest in the region.

On the breakfast, lunch, brunch, tea, dinner and supper menus, the fantastical juice is a star. Consumers are happy. The policy becomes popular. The do-gooders are popular.

All is fine and dandy until one little problem pops up: scarcity. They realize the subsidy policy demands a whole lot of resources. The policy is depriving resources from other programs. They begin to realize that good intention is expensive.

It is all the more expensive when the producers are guaranteed payment through the subsidy scheme. Producers of the fantastical juice just keep on producing even when there is no need for more fantastical juice. After all, who does not want free money?

The do-gooders complain, ”Oh those pesky producers. How dare they take advantage of this noble effort to make the fantastical juice available everywhere to everybody at affordable prices? Never trust them. They are only in it for themselves. They leave us no option. We must regulate them.”

And so, the do-gooders decide to have producers of the fantastical juice licensed. Quota is imposed on production.

The producers protest but not too hard. After all, the policymakers still pay them money. ”At least, we are still making profits.” Without the government and the subsidy program, they would have been left at the mercy of the market. ”We might make a loss if there was no subsidy!” They figure, better work with the government than be at the mercy of the greedy consumers.

That stops the cost of the policy from ballooning further. It solves one problem but it creates another: the fantastical juice mysteriously begins to disappear from shelves of grocery stores.

Consumers are infuriated. Consumers demand action.

The do-gooders panic. They need a scapegoat fast. No, they do not need a scapegoat. One cannot make scapegoats out of smugglers. It must be those greedy smugglers abusing a system designed to benefit all. ”We will double officers at the borders and we will triple the penalty.”

They catch those smugglers but fantastical juice still disappears into thin air. At some point, they realize that they cannot continue to blame the smugglers. If they still do so even after greater enforcement, they would send out a message of failure that there is something wrong with the good policy, and that it is not the smugglers after all. That would undo all good work they have done. Support for their policy would plummet with the slightest hint of admittance of failure.

”We need to identify the problem,” demand the do-gooders.

They conduct a thorough study of the supply chain of the fantastical juice and they find it. It is the retailers. ”These retailers are hoarding the fantastical juice and profiteering from our noble effort. They leave us with no choice. We must regulate them.”

And so, the do-gooders decide that only retailers with the special license can sell the fantastical juice. The do-gooders also introduce price control and ensure that there is a fat margin for retailers. This will encourage the retailers to be more honest because if they are caught, they will lose their license and, because of high demand for the fantastical juice, they will lose a guaranteed profit. The elimination of price variation eliminates the opportunity for retailers to indulge in profiteering as well.

The retailers register a protest, claiming that it is not their fault. ”Supply, being inflexible, is unable to match demand. We do not hoard it. We cannot sell what does not exist.”

”Oh, if that is the case, then you are not managing your inventory efficiently enough for the good of the people. There is enough production for the whole country. We will manage the supply for you.”

Just to keep it airtight, only government-owned transporters are allowed to deliver the fantastical juice in the country.

The do-gooders marvel at their new master plan for the fantastical juice. Their proudest achievement is this: the cheapest fantastical juice in the region is still here.

Alas, shortage persists. ”Someone must still be profiteering from this noble effort,” cry the do-gooders.

Being at their wit’s ends, the do-gooders approach several consultants. These consultants point out that the consumers are consuming too much of fantastical juice. ”That is why there is shortage. They are over demanding it.”

The do-gooders are angry. ”Those no good consumers! They are abusing the system! We want to help everybody, but everybody is abusing our trust! We must regulate them!”

And so, consumption quota is imposed on every consumer. With control at every point, the do-gooders match demand and supply to solve the problem of shortage.

At least, theoretically because those with low demand get too much quota and those with high demand get too little quota. To solve the problem, consumers participate in the black market. Consequently, crime associated with the black market flourishes as cartels are formed to profit from the unlicensed and hence, illegal trade.

”Criminals! All of them are criminals!” shout the do-gooders, ”Send in the police.”

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

First published in The Malaysian Insider on July 18 2010.

Categories
Photography

[2225] Of a wallaby

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams.

A wallaby is cuter than a kangaroo. Take it from me.

Categories
Economics

[2224] Of merger or not, get the government out first

Malaysian national carmaker Proton celebrated its 25th anniversary yesterday. In conjunction of the celebration, Prime Minister Najib Razak said, as reported by The Star, “[i]f overcapacity is a limiting factor to the companies, should the process to merge automotive companies in Malaysia be done so that it will create a company that is stronger or bigger and more capable?[1]

This has been interpreted by the media as a call for merger instead of a hypothetical question. The managing director of Proton echoes the call for merger.[2]

With the government having business interest in Proton — the government is likely to have the same interest in that merged entity — it inevitably raises the question of protectionism. It becomes the government’s interest to protect that giant local car maker.

The government of course does have interest in Proton but the larger the carmaker becomes, the harder it is for the government to resist the tide of protectionism.

There was a time when Proton was the monopoly in Malaysia, and backed by the government wholeheartedly in form of tariff on imported cars. The tariff was obviously introduced to protect Proton. Or in the words of protectionists and nationalists, to encourage the local automotive industry. Unfortunately for protectionists nationwide, the policy stunted the growth of local automotive industry and helped Thailand emerged as the ‘Detroit of Asia’.

Not that Detroit is the hallmark of the automotive industry…

The policy limited  options for a majority of local consumers. What made it worse was that only not-so-high quality cars were available to a whole lot of us.

That is less of a case now due to ASEAN Free Trade Area Agreement that demands the abolishment of tariff between ASEAN countries.[3] Still, import duty on vehicles originating from outside of ASEAN is as high as 30%, signaling protectionism. The involvement of the government in the automotive business heightens the concern. There is no guarantee protectionism of the past will not repeat itself.

It may make business sense for local car manufacturers to merge but I am in the opinion that such call for merger should come from the industry, and not from the government. That means the government has to exit the industry first. Let the carmakers fight their own fights without dragging the taxpayers into it.

Once the government is no longer wedded to the carmakers, there would be less room and possibility for the government to protect the car industry. The consumers meanwhile would have the opportunity to make choices unadulterated by protectionism.

Whether there should be a merger or not later on, that is less of my business or that of the government. That would be entirely up to local car manufacturers, and probably the regulators if the anti-competitive bill is passed.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[1] — KUALA LUMPUR: Local automotive companies could merge to create a bigger and more capable company, proposed Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

The Prime Minister said one of the ways to overcome the issue of overcapacity in production was for the industry to consolidate.

“The automotive industry in Malaysia needs to undergo a process of re-looking at its structure, to determine whether it can ride all challenges.

“If overcapacity is a limiting factor to the companies, should the process to merge automotive companies in Malaysia be done so that it will create a company that is stronger or bigger and more capable?” he said in his speech at the Proton 25th anniversary celebrations last night. [Merge automotive firms to create bigger and more capable company. The Star. July 9 2010]

[2] — KUALA LUMPUR, July 10 — Proton’s managing director Datuk Syed Zainal Abidin Salleh Mohamed Tahir said that the consolidation of local automotive companies is important to ensure that the industry remains competitive.

He said that mergers were a step forward in the liberalisation of the automotive industry.

“I think it is timely and it is the most natural thing to do. I think we need to sit down and discuss on how to do it properly. I think it is a good way forward to prepare the entire eco-system for liberalisation and it will make us more competitive. The government has already made the call and I think it is time for the people in the industry to sit together and decide what is best,” he told The Malaysian Insider. [Proton chief says mergers future of local car industry. Asrul Hadi Abdullah Sani. The Malaysian Insider. July 10 2010]

[3] — See Duties and taxes of motor vehicles. Malaysia Automotive Association. Accessed July 10 2010. For example, from the MAA, the following schedule for cars:

Import Duty Local taxes
CBU CKD MSP CBU & CKD
Engine

Capacity (cc)

MFN ASEAN

CEPT

MFN ASEAN

CEPT

MFN ASEAN

CEPT

Excise

Duties

Sales Tax
< 1,800
30%
0%
10%
0%
10%
n.a
75%
10%
1,800 – 1,999
30%
0%
10%
0%
10%
n.a
80%
10%
2,000 – 2,499
30%
0%
10%
0%
10%
n.a
90%
10%
Above 2,350
30%
0%
10%
0%
10%
n.a
105%
10%
Categories
Photography

[2223] Of another shot of Blackwattle Bay in raw mode

I have checked my visitor counter just now and boy, my daily average unique hit since June has dropped to below 100. The last time that happened was 2 years ago.

I could not help with the level of inactivity observed at this blog and at my column at The Malaysian Insider. There were so many things happening and I was at best grappling with them.

Now that I have time for myself, I have begun writing again for my column. I look to submit it by this Friday.

In the meantime, just to warm things up here and bump up my blog in your web reader, here is a filler: what else but a picture?

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams.

Again, this is at Blackwattle Bay. Shot in raw mode as well, just like the previous photo.

I like this photo because of the perspective it offers. Okay, that is a load of bullshit. I just needed an object of interest and this was the most obvious around.

Here is something that I recently discovered. When I shoot in raw mode, the size of individual file is large compared to jpeg format. That is expected. Once transferred to a terminal and saved as jpeg, the size becomes about just a third compared to one shot in jpeg.

Question: why? More importantly, does saving the raw photo as jpeg adversely affect the quality of the photo?

So far, I hardly notice the difference.