Categories
Economics Politics & government Society

[2487] Religious conservativism and priorities

Words for Malaysian religious conservatives, maybe especially for Hasan Ali and his sympathizers.

In November, Hazem Salah Abu Ismail, an independent Salafist cleric and presidential candidate, was asked by an interviewer how, as president, he would react to a woman wearing a bikini on the beach? ”She would be arrested,” he said.

The Al Nour Party quickly said he was not speaking for it. Agence France-Presse quoted another spokesman for Al Nour, Muhammad Nour, as also dismissing fears raised in the news media that the Salafists might ban alcohol, a staple of Egypt’s tourist hotels. ”Maybe 20,000 out of 80 million Egyptians drink alcohol,” he said. ”Forty million don’t have sanitary water. Do you think that, in Parliament, I’ll busy myself with people who don’t have water, or people who get drunk?” [Thomas Friedman. Political Islam Without Oil. New York Times. January 10 2012]

Categories
Politics & government

[2486] Glad Anwar is not guilty

I am one of many that expected Anwar Ibrahim to be found guilty. I expected so not because I believe he is guilty, but just because I distrust the Malaysian justice system. And when the judge ruled in favor of Anwar, I found myself pleasantly surprised. I am glad for the ruling for two reasons.

First, like I have mentioned, I do not believe that the former Deputy Prime Minister is guilty as charged. The whole episode appears ridiculous from the outset. The circumstances of the whole charge are suspect.

This of course opens me up to the charge of cherry picking: when the judgment works unfavorably, the system is accused as biased but when it works favorably, the system is fine. In my defense, I am not a fan of Anwar and I maintain certain distrust of him. That said, I think I can see gross injustice for what it is; this is not so much about Anwar Ibrahim per se.

It is really also about, if a person as influential as him can be treated like that, what about the ordinary man on the streets like me? Besides, we all (still) have a stake in this society. To have a gross injustice goes quietly in the night will spell trouble later if not immediately.

Second, which is probably more important and more concrete is that I really do not want to see another 1998 in terms of political strive. Furthermore, I personally have run out of enthusiasm for large protests and I definitely have issues with large and sustained protests like the ones in Bangkok not too long ago. I do not want to see a Bangkok in Kuala Lumpur.

I am a liberal but there is such a thing as too much protests. I am not contesting the rights of the protestors (as long as they are peaceful, and peaceful in the truest sense of the word and not according to the Peaceful Assembly Bill 2011). The point I am bringing up is that continuous protests introduce protest fatigue. That fatigue can easily take away popularity of a cause. It makes many angry in the most unproductive manner. And I think, politically and strategically, this is an important factor that must not be discounted.

If a large protest had erupted today, it would blow up a conflict within me: between the distaste of large, sustained protests and the need to stand up. But with the ruling, I have escaped that seemingly impossible knot.

Despite all that, this is only a High Court ruling. Possibly, there is some way to go still, if the prosecution is to appeal the judgment today.

Categories
Economics

[2485] Thinks the official inflation rate is wrong? Calculate it yourself

There are Malaysians who find it hard to accept the official inflation rate. They claim that it grossly underestimates the actual inflation on the streets.

Some of them are truly stubborn in the sense that no proof will convince them. Some derive their disagreement out of merely ignorance. Others raise nuanced argument against the official inflation rate as calculated from the consumer price index published by the Department of Statistics.

I typically dismiss the first two groups because I have learned to pick my fight over the years. For the third one, there is some concession to be made.

The truth is, the CPI itself measures the price levels of a basket of goods. The weight of each good depends on what the Department of Statistics thinks a typical Malaysian consumes. While there are ways to estimate the consumption of a typical Malaysian, it is quite easy to imagine and in fact it is the case that the hypothetical typical Malaysian differs from most of us. The difference depends on your preference for one. Your level of income for two.

Your preference is especially important. Do you smoke? Do you prefer bread to rice? Do you drink liquor? Do use your cell phone heavily? Do you drive? What kind of vehicle? Do you drive like a maniac or do you drive, like a friend of mine, like a grandmother? Are you an electronics freak purchasing every single new fancy gadget released out there? There are thousands of questions that if answered, they will reveal your consumption pattern.

The CPI has several components each representing a particular class of goods. These components are food, transportation, housing and apparels among others. There are 12 classes altogether. If you visit the website of the Department of Statistics, you can find out what is the exact weight for a particular component for the CPI.[1]

So, really, you, provided that you accept the reading for a particular component, can construct your own CPI that will be different from the official CPI.

Change the weight according to what you think reflects your consumption. If you do not smoke or do not drink, put zero as the weight for alcohol and tobacco class. If you do eat out often at restaurants, increase the weight for that class. If you do not pay for any education service, put it zero. If you are taking one, then assign them accordingly. If you spend a huge fraction of your disposable income on food like a lot of low-income people, then give it greater weight. Etc. Then multiply the relevant weight to the relevant component index. Voila! Your own personalized CPI.

From then on, you can calculate your own inflation rate. Just do not do it the way Anwar Ibrahim did it or else you will piss off Mr. Hisham. You do not want to do that.

The point is, behind the fancy economics is just elementary mathematics. There is no magic behind it. You really do not need to be an economist to construct your own CPI and calculate your personalized inflation rate. Just understand the basics, and off you go.

If you do not know your weights, then run an experiment. Record your spending and consumption for a couple of months or more and then you can find the weights.

This way you will see how inflation affects you personally and more accurately. In fact, it will likely come closer to your expectation than what the official inflation rate tells you.

What it will not do however is to justify one’s unreasonable opinion that the inflation rate should be, for instance, 10% instead of 3%. Some think the statistics have been fudged to make the government looks good. To them I say you are free to have any opinion on any matter. But not all opinions are valid.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved
[1] — See for instance, the CPI for November 2011 at the Department of Statistics.

Categories
Sports

[2484] Michigan 23, Virginia Tech 20

Need I say more?

Categories
Society

[2483] Hypocritical accusation of cronyism

It is a bit surprising to read about the controversy revolving around both Gardenia and Federal Flour Mills. The accusations have been wild and one reason for the call for the boycott of Gardenia, apart from the racist undertone about Gardenia being Malay-owned and the FFM being Chinese-owned, is cronyism on the part of Gardenia.[1]

Gardenia is ultimately linked to Syed Mokhtar Al-Bukhary. With the tycoon is getting everything — that is not an overstatement — from the government, it is easy to level the accusation of cronyism against Gardenia. But this accusation is really hypocritical.

Why hypocritical?

Since on the other side of the controversy either created artificially or filled with nuanced, is Federal Flour Mills, it is important to see how it rates against Gardenia. The comparison is not pretty.

FFM is ultimately linked to Robert Kuok, yet another Malaysian tycoon. Did you know how Robert Kuok first made his fortune? It was through sugar monopoly granted by the government through the protectionist import substitution industrialization policy of the early Malaysian years. That monopoly lasted for decades, possibly shielding him from competition from abroad. That is also cronyism, just in case that fact has been overlooked. Kuok is a crony from another age, but he is a crony of the state nonetheless.

Choosing one crony over the other is not a fun game for me. None is an angel but for racists, one is the angel and the other is the demon just because of skin color.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved
[1] — Faced with an unrelenting online campaign calling for the boycott of its products, Gardenia Bakeries (KL) Sdn Bhd today took out advertorials in English dailies refuting claims that it is a “crony company”.

The breadmaker also denied charges it had been directed by Padiberas Nasional Bhd (Bernas), which has a 30 per cent stake in Gardenia, to stop buying flour from Federal Flour Mills Bhd (FFM) for allegedly racist reasons. [Gardenia takes out ads to deny crony, racist claims. Yow Hong Chieh. The Malaysian Insider. December 30 2011]