Categories
ASEAN

[1310] Of a new secretary-general with a charter

Surin Pitsuwan will be the new secretary-general of ASEAN.

The foreign ministers of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations have endorsed former Thai foreign minister, Surin Pitsuwan, as the new ASEAN secretary general.

Mr Surin will succeed Singapore’s Ong Keng Yong who will end his five-year term at the end of this year.

He will be the first ASEAN secretary general to serve under the ASEAN charter, a legal instrument proposed to be ready in November and aiming to transform ASEAN into a rules-based association. [ASEAN endorses new secretary general. Radio Australia. July 31 2007.

While I am pro-ASEAN, perhaps especially so after witnessing the frustrating Doha Round, I am unsure how the new secretary-general would affect me as an ASEAN citizen.

This is even more so when I read that the Singaporean Foreign Minister, George Yeo said the ASEAN Charter is expected to be signed later during the ASEAN Summit planned in November this year in Singapore.

SINGAPORE : Foreign Minister George Yeo has said he is optimistic that the final ASEAN Charter will be signed when the group meets in Singapore later this year. [ASEAN Charter likely to be signed at Singapore meeting: George Yeo. S. Ramesh. Channel NewsAsia. July 31]

When the idea of a charter for ASEAN was mooted, I was expecting what many Europeans had gone through: referenda. Alas, far from it, ASEAN processes are so far detached from the governed.

If ASEAN desperately wants to be relevant to its people, if ASEAN member states want to create a truly organic ASEAN identity, participation of its citizens in ASEAN is essential. When the citizens themselves are disfranchised from something as important as the formulation of a constitution, it is hard to see how the regional grouping would be relevant to its citizens.

I do not think too many of us, the citizens of ASEAN, think of ourselves as citizens of ASEAN. The best way for ASEAN to change that is to include its citizens into its processes. Referenda to the people of ASEAN to approve the Charter is a golden opportunity to set alight the common people interest in ASEAN.

ASEAN must stop pretending that those bureaucrats that are deliberating on matters relating to the Charter are representing the citizens of ASEAN. After all, Southeast Asia is a region with little real democratic tradition.

The ASEAN Charter must source its legitimacy only through the citizens of ASEAN, not from the bureaucrats. Unless that is done, ASEAN risks irrelevancy at home while it develops a reputation of a coffee shop internationally. The ASEAN Charter should be a milestone for a new democratic and modern Southeast Asia, not a projection of an old autocratic or paternalistic region instead.

By Hafiz Noor Shams

For more about me, please read this.

8 replies on “[1310] Of a new secretary-general with a charter”

The problem is that these civil societies have little locus standi in representing individuals. Furthermore, they may consult with those groups but that do not necessarily mean those opinion are considered at all.

The best case in point is the KL 2020 Draft. The consultation sessions were clearly a farce and were more of a propaganda more than anything else.

The best is always to go have a referendum. At the very least, voted upon by the legislative.

This Charter is a constitution after all. We may end up like the EU, bounded as one. I prefer we take our time rather than rushing like what happened in Malaysia. This bind is no small matter but it was treated with unholy weight.

I dont think so. Even the ratification process in Malaysia doesnt require any voting at the Parliament. I think it went thru the cabinet only(not sure though). But i suppose the issue on charter was raised several times at the lower house and deliberated accordingly. Im not the right authority to say for sure. One more thing, i heard ASEAN also convened meeting with civil society groups in the region to discuss pertinent issues during the drafting process.

Dear Hafiz, I dont know for sure how other countries got their citizen involved in the process. But as far as Malaysia is concerned, various bodies/groups, in particular, NGO, IGO and all government agencies were well consulted. As a matter of fact, the MPs were also briefed on the charter. I suppose this exercise, to a certain extent, represented the views of the people. Ideally, of course, would be to consult all citizen but it may not be pragmatic especially when we need to move at certain pace. tq

You are becoming a dangerous man with dangerous idea.

Stop with this liberal shit!

but then you support
free trade…
globalism….
internationalism…
secularism…

what is all this?

Just like international Communist again 100 years ago?

and yes more people have died in the name of No-God(Communist revolution) than in any religion WAR ever.

And Communism is not Nationalism…and those genocide was never about Nationalism.

Speaking of Nationalism, Why don you be a bit more Nationalistic(No, I don’t mean Supporting UMNO) yourself,
cos when push come to shove all politic is local!

And when the supposedly Good Man senator Ron Paul(No.. he can’t save America.. he is already bought off) will say…

America is for America… Fuck NAFTA!!!

So we Malaysia also must think what is best for ourselves(being friendly with our neighbor too and rejecting those stupid Doha Rounds)
but alas it was already determine by people above the President…

I am very worried what Mr. Khairy is up to. Now he is a very dangerous person with his very many international friend….

Maybe since you don’t like a Muslim Opinion or view…
Why don’t you listen and hear(not with what those lying mainstream media(worst than tv3/utusan)) MR. Senor Hugo Chavez has to say about all this!

————————————————-
I am just wondering are you a bona fide stooge or just some useful idiot….

Do you happen to belong to any fraternity?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.