Categories
Politics & government

[2007] Of fraud in Iran?

ALERT & UPDATE: Death has been reported in Iran. See Tehran Bureau.

There are reports of fraud committed during the Iranian presidential election.

[youtube]0ruCwNPzDRY[/youtube]

Why are there people believing that fraud has been commited?

In recent days, Mr. Moussavi’s supporters were predicting a wide victory, citing voter surveys. And Mr. Ahmadinejad, the hard-line incumbent, had appeared on the defensive, hurling extraordinary accusations at some of the Islamic republic’s founding figures.

Iran’s Interior Ministry said Saturday that final results gave Mr. Ahmadinejad 62.6 percent of the vote, with Mr. Moussavi receiving 33.7 percent. The ministry says turnout was a record 85 percent of eligible voters.

Though there was no word of Mr. Moussavi’s whereabouts on Saturday, statements on his Web site made clear that he was contesting the official line. [Ahmadinejad Re-Elected; Protests Flare. Robert F. Worth. New York Times. June 13 2009]

An article in Wikipedia however states this:

The opinion polls in Iran have been considered unreliable. A number of polls conducted between relatively small voting groups, like university students and workers, have been reported as election propaganda. More general polls reported in the media do not state the polling organization nor the basic facts about the methodology. The results show a high variance and depend heavily on who is reporting the poll.[Iranian presidential election, 2009: Opinion polls. Wikipedia. Accessed June 13 2009]

It is not quite clear to me if it is a case of fraud or a case of where the loser refuses to accept defeat. But in any case, the way the presidential elections are ran in Iran does not command confidence: only candidates pre-approved by a cabal are allowed to contest.[1]

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[1] — See President of Iran at Wikipedia. Accessed June 12 2009]

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p/s — after reading the issue and the latest developing closely, I believe this could easily be an opportunity for a liberal revolution in Iran.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

pp/s — Professor Juan Cole of the University of Michigan presents the case for fraud.

Categories
Economics

[2006] Of did MAS buy a forward/future contract?

Analysts expect Malaysian Airlines System to make a loss in the order of RM2 billion for the first quarter of 2009. They attribute the loss to a hedging strategy “gone awry”: in times when jet fuel prices were over USD100 per barrel, MAS made a bet for prices to remain above USD100 per barrel. Now that prices are below USD100, MAS is in trouble.[1]

It is unclear what kind of hedging strategy MAS used but judging from the article — words like mark-to-market for instance and the fact that MAS is making large loss due to a hedging strategy when prices are below the agreed prices of delivery — I have a feeling that MAS bought future or forward contracts.

Forward and future contracts are commonly defined as a contract between parties to deliver or accept a certain quantity of goods at an agreed future date at agreed prices. Differences exist between the two but I feel they are unimportant in this case. The important characteristic is that at the agreed date, the contract must be fulfilled regardless of gains or loss on any side.

If it is true that MAS bought future or forward contracts, my question would be why?

Would it not be more prudent to purchase options instead of future or forward?

With options, the buyer will have two choices: buy from the spot market or execute the option. When spot prices are below the strike prices, a buyer can simply purchase from the spot market and hence, avoid the kind of loss a buyer would suffer under a future or forward contract.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[1] — KUALA LUMPUR, June 12 — Malaysia Airlines (MAS) is expected to post a loss, which could exceed RM2 billion, on fuel hedges gone awry for its first quarter to end March.

RHB Research estimated the national carrier’s loss in the region of RM1.7 billion, a projection based on an MAS decision to adopt Financial Reporting Standard 139, requiring the company to recognise mark-to-market losses on its hedges. Industry executives, however, expect the loss to exceed RM2 billion.

When jet fuel was trading at well over US$100 (RM350) per barrel last year, MAS had bet on prices remaining high at around US$100 — but was caught out when the global financial crisis hit last year. The sharp pull-back in business activities quickly dragged down the price of crude oil to less than half at its lowest. [MAS’s Q1 loss expected to top RM2 billion. Business Times Singapore via The Malaysian Insider. June 12 2009]

Categories
ASEAN

[2005] Of a third bridge? Where is the second?

A third bridge?

PUTRAJAYA, June 11 (Bernama) — Singapore is quite keen on the construction of a third bridge linking the republic to Malaysia, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said Thursday.

“The concept of the third bridge on the eastern side of Johor is something which we will pursue, and Singapore is quite keen on having the third bridge.

“When we have a third bridge, we can develop the whole of the eastern side (of Johor) up to Mersing and onwards to Desaru.

“Singapore did say that it (the area) has the potential to be another Nusa Jaya like in Bali (Indonesia),” he said in his opening address at the 2010 Budget consultation meeting at the Finance Ministry, here. [Singapore Keen On Third Bridge – Najib. Bernama. June 11 2009]

Sir, where is the second bridge? How can we have a third bridge when we do not have two bridges linking Johor and Singapore together?

The Causeway is not a bridge, if you are counting that as a bridge.

Categories
Politics & government

[2004] Of Ms Fui does it again…

This is the kind of use of statistics that I absolutely abhor.

In the 1990 general elections, PAS’ support base stood at 375,867 votes. Last year, it reached 1.14 million, an almost threefold increase in 18 years. The huge increase in PAS’ support in last year’s general elections came mainly from its new supporters — the non-Malays.

By comparison, BN’s votes increased from 2.98 million in 1990 to 4.1 million last year, an improvement of only one-third. [BN vs Pakatan: Chinese reaction to PAS is the key. Fui K. Soong. The Straits Times via The Malaysian Insider. June 8 2009]

It is so bad, I think it is self-apparent. The logical gap is too wide to hide.

Spot the problem. Or problems.

Mind you, this is a CEO of an MCA think tank…

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p/s — hints.

What was the percentage of Chinese who voted for PAS in 1990? In 2008?

What is the growth rate of total voters?

What about 1999?

Ong Kian Ming more or less raised this question in my Facebook account: how many seats PAS contested in 1990? in 2008?

Categories
Liberty Photography

[2003] Of reading Utilitarianism under a tree

I have not been posting pictures for a very long time. The reason for that is a certain photography shop — ah, hell, I will just name it; Foto Flash — is taking a very long time to send it to Nikon and service my DSLR.

In the meantime, I have to settle with my old trusty Fujifilm A303. That is a very old point-and-shoot camera; it is the camera before I migrated to D40.

This is the first photo by A303 after more or less 2 years, I think.

Some right reserved.

This is not an entertaining book due to its long proses but it is enlightening anyway. I do not however agree with some that Mill writes, especially with bias towards religion. Somehow, he makes exception for his religion what he outlines for others.

Regardless, I will be in Penang next week and I need my DSLR. If Foto Flash does not return my D40 in time, I may be in need of a new DSLR. At the moment, I am looking at D60. To do that, I might sell my D40 to subsidize my upgrade.

I will be leaving for Australia in the first or the second week of July. So, I need to get it off my hand rather quickly. I am thinking of selling my D40 in between RM1,000 and RM1,500. That is between half and 3/4 of the price I bought it for. Along with it are the charger, the CD, the manual and the kit len. If you are lucky, I might throw in a tripod for you too.

So, anybody want to buy my D40?