Categories
Economics

[2204] Of beware the tragedy of economic populism

The story in Greece is a result of intertwining plots. One major plot concerns economic populism. It is a reminder that populist measures tend to ignore scarcity. It highlights that the policy of spend, spend and spend and then hoping someone else will take care of it, is risky.

With a brick wall up ahead, the Greek government is frantically trying to change its course. It plans to raise taxes, combat tax evasion and cut the salary as well as bonuses of its bloated civil services. Massive cuts are in order. It has to do this urgently because not only Greece is on a collision course, but also because the International Monetary Fund and European governments have told the Greek government that if the country expects others to save Greece, Greece has to be serious about saving itself.

The policy as demanded by the IMF and EU is harsh, but Greece would not have reached this juncture if it had not spent to please Greek voters with impunity. At so many points, there were so many opportunities for the Greek government to stop indulging in immediate gratification. There were so many chances to cease appealing to crass populism.

But no. They wanted to keep the voters happy. Political expediency was more important than responsible fiscal policy. To finance its spending, Greece even misreported its statistics. Oh, what was that about government as the guarantor of transparency in the markets?

It is all too late now. Only hard choices are on the table. The party is no more.

Greece is in so great a wreck that the possibility of bankruptcy is very real. Funny that even in times of great distress, certain fractions within the Greek society are protesting against plans to address structural fiscal deficit suffered by the Greek government. Shockingly, they want the clearly unsustainable status quo to remain.

The Greek Communist Party for instance staged a protest against the austere fiscal policy, which the IMF and the EU demand in exchange for bailing Greece out. Perhaps, it is unfair to single out the Communist Party in such a manner. The outrage in Greece appears to be one shared by many outside of the Communist Party. It is popular outrage after all.

That popular outrage is a little amusing. Where was the outrage when outrageous demands were made and met? It was this populism that brought Greece to where it is today. Due to that, there is some sadistic value to the whole episode.

The Greek government has shown political will to see through reform that the country needs so far. It has no choice. A capitulation to populism at this point will prove to be more costly than the cost austere fiscal measures. The fact that a left-leaning government — typically a leading proponent of government spending — has now become the leading proponent of the austere measures is telling. They finally realize that their freewheeling spending programs invite disasters. It invited disasters.

Greece is so far away from Malaysia but the story of populism is relevant. Perhaps, a comparison between Greece and Malaysia is an overkill, especially as the memory of the Asian Financial Crisis — which is more or less thirteen years old — fades. Yet, the pressure of populism is present in Malaysia. It is not hard to name these populist pressures.

Expansion of the civil service, demand for special treatments, pork-barreling during election times, opposition to subsidy removal, opposition to introduction of goods and services tax to replace existing sales and services tax, call to nationalize highways and effort to provide water free of charge are among many examples that will surely increase government expenditure without raising the necessary revenue to fund it.

In fact, at least three of the pressures that exist in Malaysia contributed to the Greek fiscal mess.

We are not done with 2010 yet but at the rate Malaysia is going, 2011 is likely to be the 14th consecutive year that the government is running a fiscal deficit. Clearly, Malaysia is suffering from a structural deficit. Needless to say, cyclical spending, which is largely unavoidable, exacerbates the situation.

The size of government in Malaysia is wildly big. Its scope is maddeningly wide. Its cost is incredibly huge. Malaysia needs to address this. This is why the story of Greece is a compulsory reading for all public office holders. Beware: populist measures will not address this concern, even up to the very end.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

First published in The Malaysian Insider on May 11 2010.

n/b — there are multiple grammatical problems at the TMI article. That is entirely my bad. I was rushing the article through. I know, I look stupid now.

Categories
Photography

[2203] Of San Churro, Glebe

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams.

A chocolate place in Glebe, Sydney on a Sunday morning.

Categories
Photography

[2202] Of the northern side of Sydney

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams.

This shot was taken from Observatory Hill in Sydney.

Categories
Politics & government

[2201] Of wait, did I endorse them?

Through these hectic times, I have not got much time to say too much.

But let me say just this: I endorse the Tories.

Categories
Economics

[2200] Of proposed tax cut on savings interest in Australia

Holding all else constant, I do not like tax. I do not think, too many people actually like paying tax.

I only rationalize the need for paying tax by holding on to classical rationale for the need of the state: that there is externality. The state is there to protect individual liberty which, generally, cannot be guaranteed in anarchic environment. I say generally because I am still reading Nozick’s Anarchy, State and Utopia and he has some idea how that maybe false. Yes, I am still reading it. But I am digressing.

Like I have mentioned earlier, I do not like tax. And some taxes are worse than others. One of the worst that can exist is tax on savings in one form or another. In Australia, much to my dismay, savings is taxed. More precisely, they tax interest gained on savings.

Tax on savings has its purposes. For one, it encourages spending to promote economic activities. Or allegedly. Islamic economics for one has this goal imbued in it due to its objection to the concept of time value of money, a concept which necessarily brings in the concept of interest. Without interest, there are less reasons to save for tomorrow and more reasons to spend it all today. Tax on interest earned on savings does that albeit to a lesser degree.

Whether that purpose is good or bad is a normative question that cannot be answered with the end set. And I know my end and I frown at the end of taxation savings. In promoting the economy, it penalizes prudent spenders and it penalizes effort to smooth out consumption by savers.

I say allegedly because savings can be turned into loans and that encourage economic activities. There are ways to promote economic activities without penalizing savers. Indeed, that is how the banking sector helps grease the economy. Fractional banking is a magnificent social technology that takes care of that.

In Australia now, there is a big discussion regarding tax reform. Called the Henry tax review, the report was released just days ago. It aims to reform the Australian tax system. One way it seeks to support those reforms is by proposing a large tax on miners. That is dominating the headlines. There appears to be a war between the big miners and the Rudd government right now.

Meanwhile, many other details slip away from public attention. One of the details is the proposed cut on interest earned on savings.[1]

I like that particular proposed tax cut. Hell, I always like tax cut. I hate giving away money that I earned just like that.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[1] — The review proposes a 40 per cent discount on all income from savings, as well as on all residential rental income and losses, and capital gains.

These recommendations were widely flagged prior to yesterday’s announcement, with critics saying the current system doesn’t give enough incentives for workers to put money in savings accounts. [The Henry tax review – what it means for you. Chelsea Mes. News. April 15 2010]