Categories
Economics

[1803] Of the dramatic decline of the Australian dollar against the Malaysian ringgit

Just several weeks ago, it cost approximately MYR3.00 to get AUD1.00. I know this because I needed considerable amount of Australian dollar soon and I have been watching the exchange rate between the two currencies very closely to figure out when will be the best time for me to purchase the Australian dollar in bulk.

Since then, the Australian dollar has lost over 16% of its value compared to the ringgit. As a direct result, I found whatever cost I need to bare in Australia went down by the same percentage.

The decline is spectacular because of its suddenness as well as the fact that the last time the Malaysian ringgit fared so well against the Australian dollar was over 5 years ago. For this week alone, the dollar lost 8% of its value; on the day after the rate cut was announced, at maximum, it lost 6% of its value compared to the ringgit.

This is definitely a chance for me to buy up Australian dollar cheaply.

I am unsure if I should wait since I am unsure if the Bank Negara would keep the Malaysian rate at its current level. With inflation moderating and the economy slowing down, the Bank might be tempted to reduce the rate. If the interest goes down, the ringgit would likely see some depreciation against the Australian dollar.

Also, with the impressive coordinated rate cuts across the world yesterday, the ringgit has appreciated markedly against the British pound sterling and the Euro, among economies saw a rate cut.

But for those interested in the economic implication rather than my networth, does this mean the Malaysian economy is doing good?

That is hard to say because the exchange rate is not a good measure of economic health. Especially in the case between the Australian dollar and the Malaysian ringgit, it is clear that the rate differential plays a huge part in the depreciation of the Australian dollar rather than the health of the Malaysian economy per se. Indeed, the cause of the depreciation is the confidence crisis faced by the Australian economy and less to do with improvement of confidence in the Malaysian economy on general. This causal relationship becomes more convincing when the Australian dollar is depreciating in large magnitude against its trading partners.

This is an important factor to remember the next time you heard anybody trying to pass off the strengh of the ringgit against any currency, including the US dollar, as a reflection of the Malaysian economy. The relationship between the two is not quite so simple. Before believing that person, among other things, check out what is happening in the other economy first. In other words, check the various indicators of the real economy.

Categories
Economics

[1802] Of looking at the wrong barometer

The Malaysia Deposit Insurance Corporation sure does take its job seriously. Amid news of bank runs, financial meltdowns, recession abroad and the spectre of — heaven forbid — depression in the United States, the corporation or PIDM is going all out to inform the public that their savings are insured up to a certain level. It is great that the PIDM is taking the initiative to assure savers but I wonder how justified is it for savers and the public in general to take such a negative perspective of the local economy.

I certainly do not expect a bank run to occur in Malaysia. To expect otherwise just because there are bank run in other countries seems excessively pessimistic. The reason is that the economic circumstances in countries where bank runs have occurred in the past months are different from that in Malaysia despite the fact that the world economy is more integrated than ever before.

But then again, a bank run is usually about a crisis of confidence and rarely about the soundness of a bank. With doomsayers and conspiracy theorists working overtime all over to undermine public confidence, maybe explaining to the public the benefits of savings insurance is not a bad idea after all.

Perhaps, especially so when even the latest data released by the Merdeka Centre showed that “economic issues” is among the top concerns of Malaysians. With the stock market not doing too good either, the headlines in the business section typically play an unhappy tune.

Despite the concerns, yet, looking at various economic indicators, the Malaysian real economy seems to be doing okay. It is not doing great but the sky is not falling either.

One of the few things which may be helpful in judging the state of the economy is to watch for the yield curve of Malaysian government bonds.

An inverted yield curve could signal an economic slowdown because a yield curve in a way measures the expected economic environment in the future. A rising yield curve may indicate better expected returns in the future while an inverted curve may indicate worsening expected returns in the future.

A brief check shows that the yield curve for Malaysian government bonds is healthily normal. The yield for a three-year bond is over 1 per cent lower than that of 20-year bond. Suffice to say, the future does not look too gloomy from this perspective.

Meanwhile, the consumer price index is expected to tatter the further we go into the future. At the same time, core inflation remains relatively low. The reason Bank Negara did not increase the overnight lending rate the last time it deliberated on the matter is exactly because expected inflation is expected to be low in the near future.

Granted, Bank Negara’s loose policy may increase inflation rate in the future and even the yield seems to show that inflation may rise. Still, with falling crude oil prices in part due to an economic slowdown as well as perhaps persistent adaptive responses made earlier with respect to record fuel prices, a tendency for the rate to increase will be met with a downward force.

And how many people are jobless right now?

Surely we would expect a lot of people to be out of jobs if the Malaysian economy is melting away like an ice cream in a middle of a field at noon time. Yet, the unemployment rate was just about 3.5 per cent in the second quarter of 2008. That is pretty much the same for the second quarter of 2007 as well as 2006. How similar?

Well, the unemployment rate for the second quarter of 2006 and 2007 was both 3.4 per cent. That is not exactly a disaster, if you ask me.

Furthermore, it is quite hard to see how the measure of joblessness would increase dramatically, especially when the industrial production index does not show a decrease according to the latest figures we have for this year.

The prospect of growth also does not convince me that the unemployment rate would go up after controlling for seasonal effect. The growth rate of Malaysia’s Gross Domestic Product is expected to be positive in spite of mountains of bad news from overseas. In the most liberal manner, a recession happens if two consecutive quarters see negative growth rate. Malaysia has yet to see that and probably would not see that happening anytime soon.

Malaysia will miss its target but the rate will still be positive; both the Asian Development Bank and RAM expect the country to grow by at least 5 per cent. To make it clear how the fundamentals do not align with the prevalent pessimism in the market, the GDP growth rate for the second quarter of 2008 actually is higher than that for the same period a year ago.

Despite the respectable showing of various indicators including those of the real economy, the public and even the media are accepting the stock market as the barometer of the economy. Hell, some even take whatever direction the Dow Jones would take as indicative of the future path of the Malaysian economy.

The stock markets, however, do not measure the real economy. In fact, the stock market actually lags behind economic cycles. What it means is that whenever the stock markets are down, it is probably already too late to do anything. On top of that, the stock markets take into account various information which has little to do with the real economy. And the fact is that the real economy is doing better than the stock markets.

However, I am not belittling the economic slowdown we are experiencing. For some people, it is getting harder to make a living. After all, the coincident and the lagging indices do suggest that the economy is slowing down. Indeed, the situation in the US, the largest trading partner of Malaysia, is adversely affecting the local economy. Yet, despite dire prediction, the exports sectors are doing better than expected. Truly, believe it or not, the electronics sector is actually growing. The growth is at a snail pace but growing nonetheless.

What I am trying to get at is you should take your eyes off the stock markets and watch the indicators of the real economy instead. That, and keep your chin up.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

A version of this article was published in The Malaysian Insider.

Categories
Economics

[1801] Of minimum wages as a tool to retain local talent in a free flow of labor environment

Today:

Subramaniam said while the Government did not agree on the implementation of a minimum wage for all workers, it recognised that it was necessary to offer decent salaries as the country was losing its skilled employees to its competitors.

”We are losing our skilled workers to Singapore and the Middle East. We may end up losing even more so we must come up with attractive salaries as a way of persuading them to stay on. [Council to look into salaries of electronics, textile sectors. Sim Leoi Leoi. October 7 2008]

Basically, it is an idea to use minimum wages as a tool to retain local talent.

I do not think that it is a good idea. Consider the following scenarios and questions.

If there is free flow of labor as the Minister suggests, then it is far better to let employers and employees to negotiate with each other and decide what levels of wages are the best for both. If the businesses really need the talent, then the employers will offer wages high enough to effectively match wages offered outside of the country. For brevity, let us call this kind of wages as parity wages.

If there is no or little need for the talent, then there will be no parity wages. And when there is no or little need for such talent, would imposition of minimum wages help keep talent local? How does the Minister plan to keep talent local if there is no need or little need for such talent in the first place?

As for businesses based locally but unable to offer parity wages and yet are able to find willing talent, would minimum wages, which increases the cost of factor of production for the business help increase hiring? How would imposition of minimum wages encourage job creation in the country? How would imposition of minimum wages ensure that the businesses do not close down or migrate to somewhere cheaper, and hence, worsen employment opportunites in the country?

Categories
Society

[1800] Of property rights are sacred too

The importance of Hindus’ support to the Pakatan Rakyat is undeniable. It would be hard to imagine how Pakatan could be as successful as it was on March 8 without overwhelming support from the Hindus and the Indians in general. When the Sri Maha Kaliamman shrine in Ampang, Selangor was demolished, many began to wonder if Pakatan were really any different from Barisan. Hindraf was clearly unhappy and a revolt was underway. Popularity of Pakatan among the Hindus was going south until the Pakatan-led Selangor government clarified that the local council had gone against state directive and suspended the person whom allegedly ordered the demolition.

I am less sympathetic to the shrine issue than the Pakatan state government. The fact that the shrine was built in a forest reserve only pushes me away from those who share Hindraf’s position. Why, when and how a shrine found itself in a forest reserve has yet to be clearly explained to the public. Without the questions answered, my default position would be demolition.

I could not care less whether the structure was a mosque, a temple, a church or more secular structures like a luxurious bungalow, a forest reserve — or any forest — is a sacred cathedral to me. Any other structures built that has nothing to do with wildlife protection violates the sanctity of the cathedral.

That particular piece of land is a public property appropriated as a nature reserve. To me, converting any part of that land for a shrine’s use is as angering as turning part of Kota Damansara City Forest Park as a burial ground.

I understand that context is important in considering the issue. Selangor state councilor Elizabeth Wong is content that many temples, including Sri Maha Kaliamman, “were forced over the years into this grey zone, and neglected until recently.”[1] In between the lines, maybe she is suggesting that the previous state government might have not been very forthcoming when it comes to providing land for non-Muslim religious purposes. Indeed, a 2002 report published by the US state department states that the Malaysian government “enforces some restrictions on the establishment of non-Muslim places of worship” may strengthen that opinion.[2]

Within that context, I am willing to see the state helps to relocate the shrine to somewhere else to correct the wrongs of past administration.

Baradan Kuppusamy tried to provide a big picture but I do not quite like what I read. In the article of his, he said there is no such thing as enough temples “because a person who builds temples is deemed especially close to and favoured by the gods.”[3]

Mr. Kuppusamy goes on by saying “there exists a strong urge to build and keep building more temples from roadside shrines to large temples wherever Hindus live.”[4]

I have problem with that. That somehow sounds like a ticket to have religion to trump everything else.

The quantity of temples really does not bother me. Rather, I strongly feel that construction of temples, or any religious structure for that matter, should not exploit public space without going through the necessary processes.

Having a temple in public space effectively turns a public space into a private space as its use is very exclusive. It is therefore, at its worst sounds like a land grab. How reasonable is it for anybody to build something on a piece of public land and then practically claim ownership over the land on behalf of anything, including gods?

Another factor which I am uncomfortable with is the fact that, as Mr. Kuppusamy wrote in the article, poorer Hindus do not go to or prevented from visiting to temples patronized by the richer Hindus. He implicitly makes a conclusion that the existence of the caste system which Hinduism calls for more temples despite the presence of “many larger temples that dot every major town in the country.”[5] My conclusion would definitely take a different path and call for abolition of the caste system. Yet, nobody is being forced to participate in the caste system and coercion cannot be used to abolish the discriminatory system. Yet, while the Hindus are free to practice Hinduism, the practice of their religion should not affect others’ right.

I am in the opinion that religious institutions should be treated no differently from any organization. If anybody wants to utilize public space especially on permanent or long term basis, the necessary approval must be obtained so that others’ right over the use of public space is preserved. The opinion and agreement of most stakeholders of the public space is important to legitimize the privatization of the public space. Any action which effectively turns a public space into private area without consultation from other stakeholders amount to stealing from the public, be the motive is commercial or religious.

The approval processes of course need to be fair and transparent; discrimination based on religion is a no-no. The slowness or reluctance of the authority to grant approval to the construction of places of worships belonging to religions other than Islam definitely needs to be tackled to address the issue.

Before I end, I want to stress this: this is not as much as a religious issue with me as much as a matter concerning property right. The fact that that particular piece of land is a nature preserve makes me care more about it.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[1] — [On the Sri Maha Kaliamman shrine. Elizabeth Wong. September 30 2008]

[2] — [Malaysia. International Religious Freedom Report 2002. October 7 2002]

[3] — [Tempers rage over Hindu temples issue. Baradan Kuppusamy. The Star. September 30 2008]

[4]Ibid

[5]Ibid

Categories
Economics

[1799] Of the website of Department of Statistics gets a facelift

I was doing some research and needed to get some data from the Statistics Department. I was pleasantly surprised to find out that the website of the Department has seen an improvement. It is prettier than the old version and more navigable too.

Good work to whoever that worked on the website.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p/s — I wonder when will Bank Negara do something about their website. It is really a pain navigating around their site.