Categories
History & heritage Society

[1888] Of Islamic art, architecture and literature I

Art, architecture and literature are important in history because only by observing works of past civilizations that we can somehow comprehend its culture further. Not only it provides us with precious records but as Walter Denny stated, it also gives us a feeling on how past societies lived. True to it, art, architecture and literature have become few of the most fundamental aspect of history. This is true for all civilizations including Islamic civilizations especially so when it is common for Muslims to consider the religion not as mere religion but instead a way of life. As a way of life, everything is governed by the Islamic law. Therefore, an inspection of Islamic art, architecture and literature offers a path to understanding Islam.

Islam is a monotheistic religion. The first pillar of Islam is to acknowledge the oneness of god and Mohamed is the prophet of god. Islam is particular about the oneness of god and is very strict in its punishment for the sin of syirik, the act of acknowledging the existence of any other god than Allah. In sura 6 ‘The Cattle’, verse 74, the Koran says, “And when Ibrahim said to his sire, Azar: Do you take idols for gods? Surely I see you and your people in manifest error.” There are a few other places where the Koran asserts similar wrongness of worshiping idols and other gods.

To prevent idol worshiping especially, the Koran even disallows any figurative representation of living things. In sura 16 ‘The Bee’, verse 74, “So coins not similitudes for Allah. Surely Allah knows and ye known not”. Therefore, there is a lack of figurative sculpture or painting in Islamic art. The destruction of a Buddhas of Bamyam in Afghanistan by the Taliban reinforced the fact that Muslims do adhere to the ban in one way or another.[1] Nevertheless, Islam “does not forbid representation of humans, animals and birds in secular context.”[2]

Since Muslim artists had limited options, they had to find another way to express themselves and they did this by concentrating on calligraphy and decoration. As we observe in history, they have truly mastered these arts.

Of all art forms they excelled in, they take pride and cherish their mastery in calligraphy which is called khat in Arabic. That is so because “calligraphy is one art form in Islam explicitly and positively sanctioned by God.”[3] Oftentimes, calligraphic activities decorate Koranic verses.

Arabic calligraphy is identified by two main features. First, “slant-clipped reed pen” is used in order to write or rather draw the words. Secondly, there are rules to be adhered to and each style has its own rule. These rules are the ones that made each calligraphic style differ from one another.[4]

During the reign of Caliph Uthman (644 — 656 CE), he ordered the gathering of Koranic verses into an official text that we know today. When the gathering of verses finally completed, calligraphy was used as “a form of decoration for the greater glory of Allah’s words.”[5]

While breath of calligraphy was greatly expanded under Islam, it began with the development of the Arabic language during pre-Islamic period. Arabic letters were derived from Semitic scripts.[6] It has 28 letters with 18 basic forms.[7] It was later further developed by the Nabataean, an Arabic tribe originating from northern Arabian Peninsula and adopted by other literate Arabic tribe including the Quraisy. It was around this time that a writing system style called Jazm was popular among the Arabs. Jazm was an advanced version of the scripts.[8]

There were two forms of scripts that were used in those times. The first type was “dry writing” and the other was “soft writing”.

The first type was later known as the kufic style. As the name suggests, the style “received its name from the town in which it was first put into official use”, which was Kufa, located in modern day Iraq.[9] The form can be identified easily by its ”angular and sober” style. Kufic characters also seem to have “geometrical intricacies”.[10] The other type was less angular and thus making it distinctly different from kufic. The soft writing style was more practical than its counterpart and later became the foundation for modern styles.[11]

As Islam spread during its golden age, so did the Arabic language and the art of khat. Societies of newly conquered areas especially Persia and to some extend Anatolia absorbed the language and its arts. Although local language was still used, Arabic characters managed to slip into local writing system. As this happened, local experts in calligraphy came into existence and further revolutionized it. In fact, one of the most important styles in calligraphy the naskh was invented by a Persian calligrapher named Mir Ali Sultan al-Tabrizi. In Turkey, Arif Hikmet created the Sunbuli style, “which had a short vogue.”[12]

Apart from the practice of calligraphy as a work of art, Muslim artists also pursued other areas that do not go against Islam. One of the areas is the art of decoration.

Islamic decoration is unique compared to other cultures and this is simply because of the same reason why calligraphy is pursued by Muslims. This resulted in the rareness of sculpture and painting that were prevalent in Greek and Roman civilizations. However, “this deficit is compensated with a richness in ornamentation on the lavish carved plaster paneling, wall tiling and glazed mosaics.”[13] The main themes used in the decorative art are mainly centered on nature and geometry.

Muslim artisans so frequently used geometry in their works that we now called such work as arabesque. Arabesque is simply a collection of a single geometrical pattern repeated on and on until simple shapes became a complex design. Sometimes, the design is “so complicated that they rarely call to mind their sources of origin.”[14]

Both calligraphy and arabesque were prominently used in Islamic architecture. Walls of all prominent buildings Muslims built are covered with them to no end.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[1] — [Taliban Show Off Remains of Ancient Buddha Statues. Kathy Gannon. The Independent via National Geographic. March 27 2001]

[2] — [Islamic Art. Detroit Institute of Art. April 1 2003]

[3] — [The Islamic Impact. Page 141. Yvonne Haddad. Byron Haines. Ellison Findly. New York. Syracuse University Press. 1984]

[4] — [The Calligraphy of Islam: The Reflections of the State of the Art. Page 6. Mohamed U. Zakariya. Washington D.C. Georgetown University. 1983]

[5] — [The Spread of Islam. Page 119. Information missing]

[6] — [Islamic Arts. Islamic Arts and Architecture Organization. April 1 2003]

[7] — [The Calligraphy of Islam: The Reflections of the State of the Art. Page 2. Mohamed U. Zakariya. Washington D.C. Georgetown University. 1983]

[8] — [Islamic Arts. Islamic Arts and Architecture Organization. April 1 2003]

[9] — [Arabic Writing. B. Moritz. Encyclopedia of Islam. 1913]

[10] — [The Spread of Islam. Page 120. Information missing]

[11] — [The Calligraphy of Islam: The Reflections of the State of the Art. Page 2. Mohamed U. Zakariya. Washington D.C. Georgetown University. 1983]

[12] — [Ibid. Page 29]

[13] — [The Umayyad Page 17. Information missing]

[14] — [Ibid]

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

I recently rediscovered a box full of short papers I worked on while in Michigan. This is part 1 of a sophomore paper I wrote in 2003. I place it here out of concern these papers might one day lost to harsh elements. For this particular paper, several pages of citation are already lost due to mishandling and my own irreverence for my own work.

At the moment, I am praying to find papers that I vividly remember: econometric paper on foreign exchange, the politics of climate change (this is probably the thickest paper that I remember; the research to produce this paper took months to complete! That is crazy considering it was just a junior paper) and I think, economic model on climate change.

Categories
Photography Society

[1887] Of move over

In Malaysia, traffic regulations are meant to be broken.

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams

Categories
Earthly Strip Economics

[1886] Of Earthly Strip: Who needs more toilet bowls?

Some right reserved.

For our joint sake, please do not send our money down the hole.

Categories
Economics Liberty

[1885] Of freer market to save Zimbabwe

After millions of percent of inflation[0], Zimbabwe finally gets on the path of freer market as well as dollarization to fight inflation:

Jan. 29 (Bloomberg) — Zimbabweans will be able to trade in any currency they choose and the government will abandon price controls with immediate effect, acting finance minister Patrick Chinamasa said today.

Chinamasa, from President Robert Mugabe’s Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front party, told parliament that price controls would be abandoned because they had ”unintentionally’’ harmed businesses and added to Zimbabwe’s hyperinflation. [Zimbabwe Abandons Price Controls, Promotes Currency Trading. Brian Latham. Bloomberg. January 29 2009]

This is progress, amid horrible set of statist policies practiced by the tyrant Mugabe.

Previously, Zimbabwe passed an idiotic policy making inflation illegal as inflation shot through the roof and upward beyond the sky . That is as stupid as making dying illegal. On top of that, Mugabe administration ordered prices to be reduced, figuring that once inflation was illegal, there would be no more inflation. Right? Wrong.

Even the uneducated traders in Zimbabwe knows this and many violated that ban in the name of practicality. There was risk to that: those who refused to cut prices as sanctioned by the autocratic economic-illiterate government were beaten by pro-Mugabe groups.[1] Meanwhile, Zimbabwe kept printing money, adding fuel to the inflationary fire.

Needless to say, the policies did not stop inflation from increasing exponentially to make the Zimbabwean dollar more worthless than worthless. When inflation was about 10,000% in 2007, it was the world’s highest at that time.[2] With inflation at many sextillion (how many zeroes are there in a sextillion?) percent on annual basis now, it is probably the highest in whole history of human kind.[2a]

In fact, they printed so much money, Zimbabwe ran out of paper to print more money![3] It became so bad that selling the money as paper might worth more than having the paper functioning as money.

But Zimbabweans could give a sigh of relief now. With freer policies, they lives are going to get slightly better.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[0] — The country is in the grip of world-record hyperinflation which has left the Zimbabwean dollar virtually worthless – 231,000,000% in July 2008, the most recent figure released. [Zimbabwe abandons its currency . BBC News. January 29 2009]

[1] — JOHANNESBURG, July 3 — Zimbabwe’s week-old campaign to quell its rampant inflation by physically forcing merchants to lower prices is edging the nation close to chaos, according to some economists and merchants.

As the police and a pro-government youth militia swept into shops and factories, threatening arrest and worse unless prices were rolled back, staple foods vanished from store shelves and some merchants reported huge losses. News reports stated that some shopkeepers who refused to lower prices were beaten by the youth militia, known as the ”Green Bombers” after the color of their fatigues. [Zimbabwe Price Controls Cause Chaos. Michael Wines. New York Times. July 3 2007]

[2] —”People are losing millions and millions and millions of dollars,” said one Bulawayo merchant, referring to the Zimbabwean currency, which has been rendered increasingly worthless given the nation’s inflation, the world’s highest. ”Everyone is now running out of stock and not being able to replace it.” [Zimbabwe Price Controls Cause Chaos. Michael Wines. New York Times. July 3 2007]

[2a] —”People are losing millions and millions and millions of dollars,” said one Bulawayo merchant, referring to the Zimbabwean currency, which has been rendered increasingly worthless given the nation’s inflation, the world’s highest. ”Everyone is now running out of stock and not being able to replace it.” [New Hyperinflation Index (HHIZ) Puts Zimbabwe Inflation at 89.7 Sextillion Percent. Steve H. Hanke. Cato Institute. November 14 2008]

[3] — Zimbabwe is experiencing a shortage of paper needed to print local currency banknotes, the newspaper said. [Zimbabwe Debates Using Dollar, Rand for Budget, Herald Reports. Brian Latham. Bloomberg. January 27 2009]

Categories
Economics

[1884] Of tax cut as backbone for the second fiscal stimulus

The train is on the move and the second fiscal stimulus package seems imminent even as the federal government scrambles with great difficulty to spend RM7 billion as promised in the first stimulus package announced back in November 2008. While that is so, press reports suggest that the general outline of the second stimulus has yet to be written. This is perhaps evident through the solicitation of the Finance Minister for stimulus idea from the public. If indeed that is so, then this is a good time to demonstrate why tax cut is a better solution than government spending within the context of the second stimulus.

If the purpose of an economic stimulus is to reduce the sufferings associated with economic downturn, then the stimulus package has to fulfill at least two criteria.

First, the lag between the administration, the execution and the effect of the stimulus has to be short. This is to ensure that the stimulus comes at the times when it is most needed. That period is when the economy is deep in crisis and not when it is already nearing reasonable level of recovery. Any later, a stimulus will become useless.

Secondly, it has to be widely distributed to among the participants of the local economy. A restricted distribution of stimulus will be meaningless in terms of alleviating the sufferings of individuals adversely affected by the downturn. While theoretically the economy could show sign of recovery even with a restricted distribution, it may do little in improving, for instance, the unemployment rate. The previous RM5 billion injection by the government through its various arms into ValueCap — a fund management company active in the equity market — is a case in point where a stimulus is extraordinarily focused. While the massive injection into ValueCap may save the company, the injection does nothing in improving the real economy.

Government spending is unlikely to achieve both criteria at the same time because there is a trade-off between the two factors as far as government spending is concerned.

For a government spending-based stimulus to act fast, it has to be administered on small items without complex distribution method. Any effort to distribute the spending widely will necessarily bog down the execution of the stimulus. Why?

Designers of the plan will have to know where and on what to spend. This information unfortunately does not come quickly. Any investigation into the subject requires time and an investigation of countrywide magnitude demands reasonable time to complete. It is possible that effort by the Finance Minister to harness the wisdom of the masses is partly to cut short the process of information gathering.

Independent to the quality of information is a question of execution. A widely distributed government spending-based stimulus by definition itself requires considerable number of transactions which transpires various levels in the government as well as the economy. Each transaction itself needless to say consumes time, especially so when transparent processes which include open tenders are applied.

While government spending suffers from the trade-off, tax cut simply does not. Tax cut can be done relatively quicker and more distributed than government spending.

Tax cut especially on transactional taxes on consumer goods like sales tax can be administered quickly because the information required is not a massive as the one required for government spending. The government could announce that tax cuts on sales tax in a matter of weeks if not days. In this age, simple information like that can travel fast and wide.

Secondly, a tax cut, especially on sales tax is more distributed in its effects than any practical government spending. Just imagine how many times a week does any one of us commit a transaction with sales tax appended to it? And then consider how many people do you know pay sales tax? Compare that to how many people do you know that may enjoy the direct effect of government spending on public works?

The reduction of sales tax in particular has the potential of increasing the quantity of goods demanded in the economy by making it prices faced by the buyers cheaper. More so if demand for those goods is elastic.

There are other taxes that could be reduced, like corporate and personal income taxes but that a cut on those will not come as quickly as a cut on sales tax. Regardless, it is possible to do tax rebates on taxes assessed and paid in the previous years in a quick matter. Proof: the government managed to return tax rebates quickly last year in less than a month or two.

Another method is through future tax cut. Future cut on taxes however is likely to be a game of expectation management.

In any case, tax cut on non-transactional taxes on consumer goods must be directed at the lower and middle classes. It has been demonstrated time and again that these groups are the ones most likely to spend instead of save the extra cash that they received. There are ample empirics to eliminate debate on positive economics on this specific issue.

A large tax cut will of course hurt government revenue in times when revenue from petroleum and its by-products may not be as large as projected last year. This therefore will increase the fiscal deficit. Concern for deficit however is immaterial if the alternative is greater government spending. Whether government revenue shrinks or its expenditure grows, the end result is likely the same in terms of direction if not in magnitude.

Besides, while RM7 billion is pale when compared to the size of drop in Malaysian exports seen lately — when exports consists of more than 100% of the Malaysian gross domestic product just months ago — and therefore unlikely to counter the full effect of weakened external demand, the path of government spending essentially has been explored. The first stimulus attacked the demand curve in its first wave. Perhaps it is wise to attack the supply side this time around. When the first and the second stimuli are combined, a more holistic view is taken.

Finally, for Barisan Nasional, tax cut has greater appeal over government spending.

The BN-led federal government has been accused to cronyism with government contracts circulating mostly among BN party members. Even in a system that favors the Malays, the general feeling is that only UMNO members are benefiting from it.

Consider government spending as fiscal stimulus: with its requirement to be executed fast, large spending is likely to bypass many transparent processes, if there is any at all. With an already bad reputation in place, the haste of commissioning various stimulus-conscious projects is likely to encourage the public and even more so for political rivals of BN to question the method of award of the contracts. Suspicion of corruption will be inevitable and that will only solidify the image that BN suffers.

With tax cut, especially on transactional taxes on elastic consumer goods, there is no room for the accusation of cronyism or corruption. A tax cut breaks away from that bad reputation and positions BN as an advocate of a more egalitarian stimulus.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

A version of this article was first published in The Malaysian Insider on January 28 2009.