Categories
Politics & government

[2340] What’s important and what’s not

I am tired of politics revolving around personality. With it comes excessive feudal culture and ugly mudslinging all too frequently. One can never truly escape it but there are other issues of actual importance if one wants to take a break from the ugliness of it all. These other issues are the ones that truly affect our livelihood. These issues involve our jobs, our savings and our taxes, among others.

Until very recently, Malaysian politics was grazing at the level that makes politics a worthy field to match its name. From military procurement to the mass rail transit system and to nuclear power, things that matter took the limelight.

For a period, there was nuance in the political debate held in the public sphere. It was a breath of fresh air from the stale old stuff of race and religion.

One example that took public debates to the next level was Pakatan Rakyat’s Buku Jingga. Although I do not necessarily agree with some of its points, I can definitely appreciate how the Buku Jingga forced both sides of the divide to raise the level of debates beyond name-calling. That is the greatest contribution of Buku Jingga.

There were other matters running parallel to this. One was the sodomy trial involving Anwar Ibrahim and Saiful Bukhari Azlan, which is still ongoing of course. Ongoing or not, the issue is dead to me. I have lost interest in it.

What made it even more forgettable were the outrageous details. Listening or reading graphic descriptions associated with the trial created a sensation that I call sodomy fatigue.

Yes, there is a feeling that the system is being manipulated at Anwar’s expense. Yes, there is a feeling of injustice committed against Anwar. Yes, he is important. Yes, he has a significant role to play in instituting a competitive democratic system in the country.

Yet, the country is not about Anwar Ibrahim. Too much energy is being invested in defending and discrediting him.

That energy invested towards Anwar can better be harnessed in other areas that affect our livelihood. For a country that censors the slightest hint of two persons kissing each other on television, there has to be something more than sex — in one way or another — to think about.

The issues of MRT, defense and others that involve billions of ringgit of taxpayers’ money are vying for primetime spots. Rather than reading about someone else’s private parts made public, I would rather focus on public goods treated as private property by the paternalistic few who think they can spend my money better than me.

Imagine my disappointment when morality becomes the centre of attention yet again, as a certain somebody with a lion’s courage alleged that a certain politician is involved in a sex scandal.

In scandal-crazed Malaysia with a sense of morality littered with hypocrisy, many simply drop the things that matter to moralize or hypothesize about others’ lifestyles. The same many are probably rushing to the Internet searching for the video of the scandal, and looking for a cheap thrill along the way.

I am sorry if that is crass. Still, is there anything that is not crass in this country anymore? Parliament is full of it. The courthouse is full of it. The boardrooms of some government-linked companies are so full of it. What is crass anyway? The word by its very self has been diluted by a pool of mud, and something else.

Sarawak is having an important election very soon. In the meantime, what does Malaysia have on its mind?

Sex.

Lim Guan Eng sent out the right message recently. He said ignore the scandal.

Ignore it indeed.

Focus on things that matter instead. Do not take your eyes off your public money, that belonging either to Sarawak, or to Malaysia at large.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

First published in The Malaysian Insider on March 31 2011.

Categories
Economics

[2339] The context of wealth inequality matters

Wealth inequality can be worrying. That does not mean all wealth inequalities are worrying. The concern for inequality in this sense is overblown. Up the Gini coefficient and the trumpet is blown to sound the alarm without accounting for its context.

One out of a few ways wealth inequality can be worrying is when a small fraction of the society owns almost everything while the rest lives under abject poverty. For the majority, they are threatened by starvation almost every day. They have limited access to education and medicine. Their chance to escape poverty is close to zero.

This is a case when there is something in the economy preventing the rest from having their welfare improved. It could be poverty itself twisting the incentive system to encourage individuals to focus on current consumption rather than investing for the future (it is hard for kids to think about ABC when the stomach is growling), dictatorship (it might be the interest of the leadership to suppress the masses through heavy taxation), slavery or really, anything.

In this case where wealth is monopolized by the very few, total and average wealth of a society does not reflect the actual welfare of the society. If one wants to be precise, perhaps the welfare of the median member of the society. Take the rich outliers out and only then total and average wealth begin to reflect societal welfare.

Note that what is worrying here is not the inequality itself. It is the factors that make such inequality possible in the first place. The solutions can be interesting but that is not the reason I am writing this.

What I want to demonstrate is a situation when wealth inequality is not a concern. It is a case where the top fraction of the society disproportionately owns more than the rest of the society, but the rest lives rather comfortably — they can afford to own cars, they can afford to obtain a certain level of education, they eat well, etc. The median lives a comfortable life.

The wealth inequality of the society, however unequal wealth is distributed, does not say anything about the welfare of the society. Take the rich outliers out and total and average wealth will give a message that the society is doing pretty well.  In this sense, inequality is not a concern.

The point I wish to highlight is that inequality by itself is not necessarily a concern. What makes it matters, or not, is the context.

For those who place too much concern on inequality, especially on the Gini coefficient, I have a feeling they are not accounting for the context.

Categories
Photography Travels

[2338] Time sucked down the spiral

Oh boy. It is the end of the first quarter. When I opened up this photo of mine just now, I started to realize how quickly time flies. I took this shot nearly 2 months ago.

The speed at time passing me by scares me.

Some rights reserved. Creative Commons. By Attribution 3.0. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams

This is the stairwell of the Arc de Triomphe in Paris. It took me some effort to negotiate the flight of stairs. Back then, I thought time went by too slowly.

Categories
Photography Travels

[2337] Bent

This is at top of Montmantre and in the background is Sacre Coeur.

I was told that there was a rivalry between the Eiffel Tower and Sacre Coeur. I am unsure if it is true but I am inclined to believe it.

As the story goes, both the Eiffel Tower and Sacre Coeur were completed around the same time. Sacre Coeur Basilica, a Roman Catholic church, sit on the highest point in Paris while the architect of the Eiffel Tower, Gustave Eiffel, aimed to make the Tower as the tallest structure of all Paris. There was a greater honor at stake: which pinnacle would be higher than the other?

Even though the Tower was, and still is, very tall, Sacre Coeur sit on Montmantre, making the Basilica’s pinnacle a contender.

What makes the rivalry interest was the fact that Sacre Coeur symbolizes religion and the old order. Eiffel wanted his work to symbolize science and technology. He said, “My tower will lit up the world, leading it out of the darkness of ignorance”, or something like that.

I am glad Eiffel won. The Eiffel Tower was in fact the tallest man-made structure in the whole world from 1889 to 1930.

Regardless of that, Sacre Coeur is still beautiful.

And I still miss Montmantre.

Categories
Photography Travels

[2336] King’s College Chapel, Cambridge

Awesome.

Some rights reserved. Creative Commons. By Attribution. 3.0

Not quite centered though.