Categories
Economics

[2485] Thinks the official inflation rate is wrong? Calculate it yourself

There are Malaysians who find it hard to accept the official inflation rate. They claim that it grossly underestimates the actual inflation on the streets.

Some of them are truly stubborn in the sense that no proof will convince them. Some derive their disagreement out of merely ignorance. Others raise nuanced argument against the official inflation rate as calculated from the consumer price index published by the Department of Statistics.

I typically dismiss the first two groups because I have learned to pick my fight over the years. For the third one, there is some concession to be made.

The truth is, the CPI itself measures the price levels of a basket of goods. The weight of each good depends on what the Department of Statistics thinks a typical Malaysian consumes. While there are ways to estimate the consumption of a typical Malaysian, it is quite easy to imagine and in fact it is the case that the hypothetical typical Malaysian differs from most of us. The difference depends on your preference for one. Your level of income for two.

Your preference is especially important. Do you smoke? Do you prefer bread to rice? Do you drink liquor? Do use your cell phone heavily? Do you drive? What kind of vehicle? Do you drive like a maniac or do you drive, like a friend of mine, like a grandmother? Are you an electronics freak purchasing every single new fancy gadget released out there? There are thousands of questions that if answered, they will reveal your consumption pattern.

The CPI has several components each representing a particular class of goods. These components are food, transportation, housing and apparels among others. There are 12 classes altogether. If you visit the website of the Department of Statistics, you can find out what is the exact weight for a particular component for the CPI.[1]

So, really, you, provided that you accept the reading for a particular component, can construct your own CPI that will be different from the official CPI.

Change the weight according to what you think reflects your consumption. If you do not smoke or do not drink, put zero as the weight for alcohol and tobacco class. If you do eat out often at restaurants, increase the weight for that class. If you do not pay for any education service, put it zero. If you are taking one, then assign them accordingly. If you spend a huge fraction of your disposable income on food like a lot of low-income people, then give it greater weight. Etc. Then multiply the relevant weight to the relevant component index. Voila! Your own personalized CPI.

From then on, you can calculate your own inflation rate. Just do not do it the way Anwar Ibrahim did it or else you will piss off Mr. Hisham. You do not want to do that.

The point is, behind the fancy economics is just elementary mathematics. There is no magic behind it. You really do not need to be an economist to construct your own CPI and calculate your personalized inflation rate. Just understand the basics, and off you go.

If you do not know your weights, then run an experiment. Record your spending and consumption for a couple of months or more and then you can find the weights.

This way you will see how inflation affects you personally and more accurately. In fact, it will likely come closer to your expectation than what the official inflation rate tells you.

What it will not do however is to justify one’s unreasonable opinion that the inflation rate should be, for instance, 10% instead of 3%. Some think the statistics have been fudged to make the government looks good. To them I say you are free to have any opinion on any matter. But not all opinions are valid.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved
[1] — See for instance, the CPI for November 2011 at the Department of Statistics.

Categories
Sports

[2484] Michigan 23, Virginia Tech 20

Need I say more?

Categories
Society

[2483] Hypocritical accusation of cronyism

It is a bit surprising to read about the controversy revolving around both Gardenia and Federal Flour Mills. The accusations have been wild and one reason for the call for the boycott of Gardenia, apart from the racist undertone about Gardenia being Malay-owned and the FFM being Chinese-owned, is cronyism on the part of Gardenia.[1]

Gardenia is ultimately linked to Syed Mokhtar Al-Bukhary. With the tycoon is getting everything — that is not an overstatement — from the government, it is easy to level the accusation of cronyism against Gardenia. But this accusation is really hypocritical.

Why hypocritical?

Since on the other side of the controversy either created artificially or filled with nuanced, is Federal Flour Mills, it is important to see how it rates against Gardenia. The comparison is not pretty.

FFM is ultimately linked to Robert Kuok, yet another Malaysian tycoon. Did you know how Robert Kuok first made his fortune? It was through sugar monopoly granted by the government through the protectionist import substitution industrialization policy of the early Malaysian years. That monopoly lasted for decades, possibly shielding him from competition from abroad. That is also cronyism, just in case that fact has been overlooked. Kuok is a crony from another age, but he is a crony of the state nonetheless.

Choosing one crony over the other is not a fun game for me. None is an angel but for racists, one is the angel and the other is the demon just because of skin color.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved
[1] — Faced with an unrelenting online campaign calling for the boycott of its products, Gardenia Bakeries (KL) Sdn Bhd today took out advertorials in English dailies refuting claims that it is a “crony company”.

The breadmaker also denied charges it had been directed by Padiberas Nasional Bhd (Bernas), which has a 30 per cent stake in Gardenia, to stop buying flour from Federal Flour Mills Bhd (FFM) for allegedly racist reasons. [Gardenia takes out ads to deny crony, racist claims. Yow Hong Chieh. The Malaysian Insider. December 30 2011]

Categories
Politics & government

[2482] A big coup for DAP?

Mohd Ariff Sabri Abdul Aziz and Aspan Alias are joining the DAP. This is big because it is yet another big step in widening the party’s appeal to the larger Malaysian demographics.

Let us face it. The DAP is mainly seen as a Chinese party. The characterization may be unfair to some extent because there is significant number of Indians in the party and there are definitely Malays in it. But the party derives its support mainly from Chinese areas and I do not think that can be dismissed easily. Even if it was untrue, the typical Malays who can be counted on to vote for UMNO and Barisan Nasional see the DAP a Chinese party. As the cliché goes, in politics, perception matters.

This is a problem because if the DAP needs to survive in the long term, it cannot merely depend on Chinese voters and other non-Malays/non-Bumiputras. The Chinese demographics is not inspiring from the perspective of electoral politics. It is shrinking due to both the relative prosperity of the community vis-à-vis the general population (number of child per couple/per person drops as prosperity increases; happens almost everywhere) and emigration. To secure its future, the DAP needs to be more Malaysian and that means more diversified support base. That also means non-urban voters.

There are efforts to do that. In the several months after I returned to Malaysia, I managed to observe the DAP machinery during the Sarawak election, thanks to Tony Pua. As I have written previously, despite the seats in Kuching having a heavy Chinese characteristic, the banners were written in multiple languages for the first time. Those multilingual messages at times can be dizzying and but is the cost of inclusiveness. And of course, this has been the norms in the Peninsula.

And of course, there are Zairil Khir Johari and Tunku Abdul Aziz Tunku Ibrahim. While their presence and effort are valuable to the DAP, there are just not enough Malays to translate those presence and effort into heavy political influence. Furthermore for Tunku Aziz, I do not think the increasingly competitively vicious political atmosphere will do good for the gentleman that is him. I am taking risk in saying this because I know both of them personally and I do appreciate their opinion of me but both of them are urban Malays whom a majority of Malays are unable to relate immediately.

Ariff Sabri Aziz and Aspan Alias are the different kind of Malays. Both are, or were, UMNO members and relatively influential at that. Their participation in the DAP immediately eats into UMNO’s base by virtue of their value as insiders. Secondly, they do communicate in Malay and that is a big plus point. They are widely read and that makes their entry into DAP all the more important. I do not know much about Aspan Alias but Ariff Sabri Aziz’s former connection to no less than UMNO President Najib Razak says a lot about how big a coup this is.

Yet another point to share. Zairil and Tunku Aziz have been accused as DAP or Chinese stooges, being token Malays and all that. With the presence of more influential Malays who are unlikely satisfied to become merely passive members, together with those already in the party, one has to wonder, is that accusation valid in the first place? One has to ask, why exactly are the Malays joining the DAP?

Categories
Photography

[2481] Happy New Year

This was taken exactly one year ago Down Under. The coast guard was partying on the boat.

Some rights reserved. Creative Commons. By Attribution 3.0