Categories
Politics & government

[2198] Of either empower it or be done with it

In an ideal world, the Dewan Negara would serve to strengthen division of powers in Malaysia. It is supposed to represent the interest of member states of the Malaysian federation. In the world we live in, such idealism is as mythical as a unicorn. If being a glorified rubber-stamp is not insulting enough to the idea of federalism, the upper house functions as Santa Claus’ sack, with the prime minister as Santa. Every time he reaches in to reward his political allies, the farther the myth of federalism floats beyond memory.

Yes, this refers to the recent appointment of four new senators to the Dewan Negara.

Put aside the issue of appointment as political reward for a moment. Put aside even questions regarding the capabilities of these new senators.

Consider what the appointment does to power of the 13 member states vis-à-vis the federal government, which for years appeared to be more of a central government for a unitary state than that of a federal one. Each time the prime minister plays the role of a generous political master, the 13 member states lose their rightful influence to shape the course of this country.

The line where the Dewan Negara begins to stop functioning as protector of state interest has long been crossed. What else is there to say when the number of senators speaking on behalf of the federal government is nearly double that of those who truly represent their states?

For federalists, a discussion on capabilities of these senators is a worthless exercise to have. For them, the Dewan Negara is dead. It is dead as a symbol of federalism and it is dead as the protector of federalism.

Life can only be injected into it by relieving the prime minister of power to advise the Agong with respect to the appointment of senators, as well as convincing the Agong and relevant institutions to give up the power to appoint senators. Without such power, there is one fewer avenue for the federal government to bully the states.

Efforts to convince the rulers to give up the power might not be as hard as it sounds. After all, it is in their best interest to have a functioning Dewan Negara, where the interests of each state can be properly forwarded without being beholden to the federal government. With greater say within the federation, member states will attain prestige. That prestige will come in the form of a more balanced relationship between the states and the federal government.

Without such power, the Dewan Negara, again, is dead. One buries the dead.

Yet, the institution and its senators walk aimlessly and pretend to debate matters of national importance with nauseating pomposity, as if their debates and votes matter. At times, these senators even have the audacity to request for more public money in the name of serving the people. The dead cannot serve the people.

Either empower the Dewan Negara, or be done with it altogether. Rather than let the dead walks to consume precious public funds the living need, it is better to let the dead be dead.

Federalists would mourn the demise of the upper house. Know however, that to mourn once is far less painful for federalists than to suffer mockery all the time.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

First published in The Malaysian Insider on April 30 2010.

Categories
Politics & government

[2197] Of Zaid Ibrahim for Hulu Selangor

There will be a big parliamentary by-election today in Hulu Selangor. By-elections have always been big in Malaysia but the fact that Pakatan Rakyat is fielding a giant makes this edition important by its own right. Zaid Ibrahim is not an obscure name.

Important or not, I do not feel the excitement of by-elections anymore. Part of the reason is that I am away in Australia. Another part is caused by election fatigue. Yet another part is because I have grown skeptical of Pakatan Rakyat due to policy issues.

The biggest of all issue is likely related to the goods and services tax debate. Effort to nationalize highways is another issue I deeply disagree with Pakatan Rakyat. Never mind issue of subsidy of various kinds. Some individuals who I thought would defend liberal economic policies within Pakatan Rakyat turn out to be cafeteria liberals. In short, I am no longer impressed with Pakatan Rakyat’s politics.

That in no way means that I am all set to lend my support to Barisan Nasional. I simply do not trust Barisan Nasional although I am willing to give thumbs up for several initiatives that fit my economic worldview. Their racial policy is a huge turn off for me, even if the current Prime Minister is pushing for liberalization of the economy.

Liberalization, of course, does not necessarily mean economic liberal. It could mean superlatively liberal. What else do I make when the federal government is pushing for liberalization of the economy while appearing to support minimum wage or creation of more government enterprises?

I was ready to largely ignore the election until Barisan Nasional raised the issue of alcohol and how Zaid Ibrahim drinks. I frown at the personal attack because I always expect people to debate on issues. Barisan Nasional failed on that front.

Moreover, the issue of alcohol comes close to the idea of choice, or anti-choice to be more accurate.

While I do appreciate that the norm in Malaysia is for Muslims to refrain from drinking as well as the fact that Muslims do have strong opinion on the matter and thus, Muslims voters who make up the majority in Hulu Selangor may vote based on personal lifestyle, for Barisan Nasional to raise the issue and use it as its election campaign material simply assaults my principle. The fake photographs of Zaid Ibrahim drinking distributed by those close to Barisan Nasional just adds up to the mounting anger I feel with respect to the way Barisan Nasional is campaigning.

That is not the only assault on freedom that is happening as far as the by-election is concerned. A former producer at NTV7 resigned because the Prime Minister’s Department, really, to make it all the more outrageous, the Prime Minister’s wife, demanded that the channel practice censorship to the benefit of Barisan Nasional.

Barisan Nasional has made freedom as an issue for me.

For that, I am stating that, for whatever it is worth and I know that it is not much, I am endorsing Zaid Ibrahim.

Categories
Liberty Society

[2196] Of discrimination and safety helmet

Please do not get me wrong. Being a generally risk-adverse person, I will wear a safety helmet if I ride a motorcycle.

This however is quite different from objecting to government mandating the wearing of safety helmet for motorcyclists, or cyclists. The fact that that mandate coincides with my preferred action of wearing safety helmet does not legitimize the mandate. This is one of those little things that a typical libertarian holds. Libertarianism can be axiomatic at times and the demand for logical consistency demands embrace of such opposition to government mandate.

While I do hold this ideal, I do think those who refuse to wear helmet are stupid, given the risk associated with riding a motorcycle. I in fact rarely argue for it because it is trivial and can be silly at times. It is clear that the convenience of coincidence erodes my temptation to argue against the mandate. Yes, in that sense, I am a cafeteria libertarian.

Why am I talking about safety helmet?

Well, this report reminds me of an old case about safety helmet:

TUMPAT, April 22 — The magistrate’s court here today acquitted five students of a religious school for riding motorcycles without wearing crash helmets, but turbans, two years ago.

Magistrate Raja Norshuzianna Shakila Raja Mamat ordered the students to be released after finding that the defence had cast a doubt on the case.

The students, Adli Abd Halim, 22, Ahmad Hafiz Shaari, 24, Mohd Hafizul Mohamad, 22, Mohd Azam Mohd Arifin, 24, and Che Mohd Noor Che Soh, 28, of the Pondok Al-Madrasah Ad-Diniah Al-Yusufiah, an Islamic religious schools in Gelang Mas here, were caught riding motorcycles without wearing crash helmets about 12.30am at Neting, here, on April 28, 2008 after performing funeral prayers at a mosque nearby. [Turban-clad Religious Students Freed For Riding Motorcycles Without Crash Helmets. Bernama. April 22 2010]

When it first appeared, I secretly sided with them (five motorcyclists) due to my libertarian stance. Still, I thought they were stupid.

What surprised me is that these guys won the case. Won!

The libertarian in me laughs in delight.

The libertarian in me is also shocked by its possible implication to rule of law.

Now, I do not know the case went. I am unsure how the defense “cast doubt on the the case.” Incompetent prosecutors, maybe? I do not know. My only piece of information is that Bernama article. I am going to be lazy and not do any more research on the matter, just to fit the bill of a responsible blogger.

Still, I hope they won they case not because they wore turbans.  If it that is the case, then my question will be what is so special about turban-wearers?

If turban wearers could get away with this, this would discriminate against those who refuse to wear safety helmet and turban.

I, as a non-turban wearer, demand equality before the law!

Okay, that was me tongue-in-cheek.

Or was I?

Categories
Photography

[2195] Of more of Glebe

I have been busy. The only thing I can afford to spend on is to post a picture.

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams.

This is Glebe Point Road in the evening. I had dinner with some friends at a balcony of an Italian restaurant. That was one of those less busy periods.

Categories
Photography

[2194] Of Sydney Law School

I have this weird relationship between law schools and richly-decorated old buildings stuck in my head.

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams.

The Law School at the University of Sydney definitely does not fit that bill. In fact, the building with the most modern design belongs to the Law School.

This building is probably the most prominent building here, next to the Latin Quad. (No, the Latin Quad is not the Harry Potter Building.) It is hard to miss a building which you can see through it.