Categories
Economics

[2400] Good news for the hawks

An argument goes that rate hike will not address inflationary pressure in Malaysia.

It is not as effective against cost-push inflation as it is against demand-pull inflation. And right now, the economy is experiencing cost-push inflation. More importantly, the push is coming from abroad. It is practically exogenous, discounting the liberalization exercise (which itself originates from exogenous pressure applied on government finance).

Hike the rate and price increase will not slow down by much. Local demand is not big enough to slow down the advance of the prices powered mostly by the larger foreign demand.

So, there is little need to increase the rate.

If the mysterious author at Economics Malaysia is correct, then rate hike might be more effective than proponents of the cost-push narrative are willing to accept. The author believes that the economy is already running at its full capacity. He believes the unemployment rate basically is bottoming out and is unlikely to go down any further in a significant manner.[1]

I am will not go into the numbers but the logic is sound.

Because it is sounds, it suggests that demand-push inflation making its round, thus making the exogenous cost-push story line less weight in the determination of monetary policy.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[1] — I’d still take this as a signal that the economy is at full capacity, as we’re looking at near historical lows in the unemployment rate. While GDP growth likely softened in 2Q 2011, there’s been little impact on jobs so far — June’s numbers however may show a different story. [Hishamh. May 2011 Employment Report: Softly, Softly. Economics Malaysia. July 25 2011]

Categories
Economics

[2040] Of a temporary respite to an outdated model

Ah, do we not all wish to return to a time when economics was much simpler, when it was thought that there was a simple trade-off between inflation rate and unemployment rates, when the original Phillips curve worked well, when stagflation had yet to be coined and experienced, when non-accelarating inflation rate of unemployment was unheard of and the days when Keynesian economics reigned before it was blown into pieces by the 1970s crisis?

Well, it is back!

Finally, a return to the good old undergraduate textbook economics problem!

KUALA LUMPUR, July 21 — Malaysia’s consumer price index (CPI) is likely to have fallen in June from a year earlier by 1.35 per cent, the first annual decline in two decades… [Malaysia CPI set for first fall since 1986. Bernama via The Malaysian Insider. July 21 2009]

The original Phillips curve states that there is a inverse relationship between unemployment rate and inflation rate. The unemployment was at 4.0% in the first quarter of the year, much higher than the previous quarter (3.1%).[1] Given that the unemployment rate for 2008 was 3.3%, it is not hard to show that 4.0% is a stark increase even on year-on-year basis. And so, when deflation occurs, along with heightened unemployment rate, the environment fits into the original Phillips curve.

Anyway, enjoy it while it lasts because…

…although a period of deflation is expected to be short lived. [Malaysia CPI set for first fall since 1986. Bernama via The Malaysian Insider. July 21 2009]

Yup. The celebration for the original Phillips curve will not last long. Thank heavens for Edmund Phelps and Milton Friedman’s works!

Phelps, winning the Prize in Economics because of it, introduced and expected-augmented Phillips curve. It basically says that while the inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment rates still hold in the future, when inflation expectation change, the whole curve will shift. Or, in other words, inflation (or rather, monetary policy) does not affect the real economy in the long run.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[1] — Please refer to the following table:

Employment
2008 3rd Quarter
2008 4th Quarter

2008
2009 1st Quarter
Total Labour Force
(‘000)
11,123.4
11,170.8
11,028.1
11,208.5
Employed (‘000)
10,779.7
10,819.8
10,659.6
10,757.8
Unemployed (‘000)
343.7
351.0
368.5
450.7
Unemployed Rate
(% of Labour Force)
3.1
3.1
3.3
4.0

[Employment (Updated 30 June 2009). Department of Statistics of Malaysia. Accessed July 21 2009]