Categories
Society

[2456] There is a silver lining behind the Seksualiti Merdeka ban

The Annexe Gallery is Bohemian. It is a world of its own, very different from the rest of banal Malaysian life. It attracts anything but the conservative. Its taste in art is different. Its taste in politics is different. It is young, urban, middle-class and it challenges mainstream culture. It is a special spot in Kuala Lumpur.

All kinds of festivals are held there. Farish Noor is always there to share his alternative understanding of history to challenge the official narrative. In many ways, the larger Central Market Annexe is a center of subversive politics. Hishamuddin Rais used to run a small eatery there, patronized by so many Malaysian lefties, and sometimes, yours truly too. I was there not so much of my support for his mostly left politics. I was there just because I was hungry.

And then, Pang Khee Teik is always there to make anything happen. From what I understand and observe, Pang is the pillar for anything at the Annexe. He made the Annexe what it is today. Fringe but fun. Small but popular.

Pang or really the Annexe Gallery has been organizing Seksualiti Merdeka for a number of years now without any controversy. I took that rather nonchalantly but in retrospect, it was an impressive feat. After all, to organize a lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender festival in a jumpily religious Malaysia is not something advisable to do. But those festivals went on anyway, and because it was nationally politically uneventful, I thought nothing much of it. The failure to note what was supposed to be an outlier in a conservative society is perhaps a mental lapse of mine.

But I was not really interested in the fair, despite being aware of it. It is not a Mardi Gras as celebrated in Sydney. The Seksualiti Merdeka festival typically occupies merely a floor of a restored colonial shophouse. It is not big at all, size-wise. It is just some people with booths, forums and maybe performance in a privately-owned premise.

The thought of the festival’s outrageous success to go on without any repercussions within conservative context struck me only after when the Malaysian authority suddenly decided to ban the festival. Some conservatives finally took notice. It is apparent that the festival succeeded previously because the authority or the wider society did not know about the festival.

Now they know of it and decide to ban it.

The ban is a timely reminder for all of us that the LGBT community suffers from extreme prejudice and discrimination by both the state and by the wider society.

That is the silver lining. It raises the profile of the LGBT community in Malaysia and their challenges. Whereas previously the term LGBT would not appear at all in mainstream media, the past several days signaled a change.

That change is both for the better and for the worse. It is for the better because it pushes the boundary of acceptability. It is for the worse for some LGBT community members perhaps, if they want to live a quiet life.

I am not a member of the LGBT community and so, maybe I do not appreciate too much of the preference to stay in the closet. I am not at risk when I see the need for them to come out of the closet. But they need to know that for all the condemnation they receive, there are those whom will put up a thumb-up for the courage they garner.

In any fight against societal discrimination, there will always be a relatively challenging time. That is when the society first becomes aware.  That awareness is an important first stage of any anti-discrimination fight. Without awareness, there can be no fight for equality.

So fight the ban. But take heart if the first fight is lost. It is merely the first step towards a better future.

Categories
Liberty Society

[1838] Of the National Fatwa Council is not a god

Kings of the past used to claim authority over the masses through self-proclaimed association with some kind of gods. The pharaohs of Egypt were famous of this. The Japanese emperors also claimed lineage to some god. Somewhat less absurd claims come in form of the divine rights of kings. Through the concept of divine rights, the rulers obtained their rights to rule by authority supposedly invested in them from above, not from below unlike, modern and liberal democratic system. The bottom line is that their decision is absolute. Any act of questioning these authorities is as good as questioning the authority of god.

Questioning the authority of god in any conservative society familiar with lynching, beheading and burning at the stake is not something one would like to do so openly.

This idea is dangerous for the obvious reason. It implicitly equates an entity formed by humankind to god. To god-fearing society, the power of pharaohs, emperors and kings are absolute, regardless of the idea of right or wrong. Such scenario is a fertile ground for tyranny.

As society matures, individuals become to realize the fallibility of these rulers and began to learn to disassociate these rulers from some all mighty beings. This realization has been crucial in creating freer societies in which individuals are empowered to take their fate into their own hands.

The trend of self-empowerment is observable in Malaysia but there are no doubt challenges. One of the challenges lately came in form of religious edicts read out by the National Fatwa Council. Tomboys and Yoga are recently declared banned for Muslims by the Council.[1]

The edicts have been criticized for trying to dictate lifestyle of an individual. Others accuse the Council of having nothing better to do, judging from the triviality of the issues addressed, compared to the issue of corruption for instance, by the Council.

Utusan Malaysia on its front page today reports that the President of Persatuan Peguam Syarie Malaysia (PGSM; roughly the Sharia Lawyers’ Association of Malaysia), Zainul Rijal Abu Bakar is responding to that criticism by advocating for legal action to be taken against the critics of the decisions of the National Fatwa Council. He rationalizes his position by stating any challenge mounted against the Council is a challenge to Islam.[2]

In that statement is the assumption that the Council represents Islam and inevitably, god. The problem is, they have nothing to prove their appointment by god as the representatives of god or Islam. Neither does the PGSM.

In fact, Islam itself says there is no god by God alone. An act of equating anything to the God is considered a big no no in the religion. Yet, here we have Muslims trying to do that and labeling other Muslims as doing what no Muslims should do.

People like Zainul Rijal Abu Bakar seek to invest the National Fatwa Council with powers by limiting individuals’ right to self-determination. In doing so, he basically accepts the words of the Council as absolute, probably as good as the words of the god the Council is supposedly to represent.

This is clear in the way he is responding to the criticism directed to the National Fatwa Council. Rather than reasoning his support for the Council’s decision, he instead seeks to end the ongoing conversation on the matter while backing his demand with threat. He seeks to make the words of the Council, and his, as absolute, regardless the idea of right and wrong.

The streak of authoritarianism is unmistakable.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[1] — PUTRAJAYA: The National Fatwa Council has declared that yoga is haram (prohibited) in Islam and Muslims are banned from practising it. [Fatwa Council deems ancient form of exercise from India ‘haram’ for Muslims. Mazwin Nik Anis. The Star. November 23 2008]

[2] — KUALA LUMPUR 23 Nov. — Persatuan Peguam Syarie Malaysia (PGSM) mendesak kerajaan menggunakan peruntukan undang-undang di bawah Enakmen Kesalahan Jenayah Syariah dan Kanun Keseksaan bagi bertindak ke atas pihak yang mempertikaikan institusi fatwa.

[…]

”˜”˜Mencabar keputusan Majlis Fatwa Kebangsaan adalah sama seperti menghina agama Islam kerana institusi fatwa mempunyai peranannya yang tersendiri dan diiktiraf syarak serta Perlembagaan Persekutuan. [Fatwa: Ambil tindakan. Hernan Hamid. Utusan Malaysia. November 24 2008]