The Coincident Index (CI), that measures the current economic activity, rose by 0.9% in April 2009 registered at 113.7 points. The increase of the index were contributed by real gross imports (0.7%), real sales in manufacturing sector (0.4%), Index of Industrial Production (0.2%) and real contributions in EPF (0.2%). The six-month smoothed growth rate of CI in April 2009 showed an improvement to -7.1% from -9.7% in March 2009.
The Leading Index (LI) which monitor the economic performance in advance also increased in April 2009. The index grew by 2.0% to 162.5 points from 159.4 points recorded in the previous month. Main components that have contributed to the increase of index were real total trade of eight major trading partners (0.6%), real money supply, M1 (0.5%) and Bursa Malaysia industrial index (0.3%). The six-month smoothed growth rate of LI improved 4.3% in April 2009 compared to 0.6% in the previous month. [Malaysia Economic Indicators – Leading, Coincident And Lagging Indices April 2009. Department of Statistics. Accessed June 26 2009]
Tag: economic indicator
Visiting the shopping malls of Kuala Lumpur can be a confusing experience. It is always full of happy people with friends and lovers. And probably businesspeople with their clients too.
As I patiently await my opportunity to take a break from this crazy country, I find myself with an employment that is physically located close to Midvalley Megamall, one of the largest shopping malls in Malaysia. This means I visit the mall on every working day.
I do not notice any let up on visitors to the malls. Amid talks of pessimism regarding the economy and ugly reports, the shopping does not seem to relent.
Perhaps, Midvalley Megamall is an aberration, filled with those belonging to a certain class that is by and large not affected by the economic pain even as experts are predicting that the economy could suffer as much as 4% contraction for the first quarter of 2009. After all, the main victims of the ongoing economic slowdown are those from the manufacturing sector. Most frequenting the mall do not seem to belong to the manufacturing sector.
But I can never be sure without data. It could be that I am looking for pattern that I want to see, even if it is not there.
The Department of Statistics today confirms that the trend in Midvalley Megamall is neither aberration nor isolated. I am not dreaming. Based on year-on-year comparison, the retail trade sector actually grew by almost 8%, in defiance of other sectors.
RETAIL TRADE
1. Sales Value
The retail trade sub-sector posted an increase of 7.8 per cent from the comparative quarter of the previous year. The main catalyst was the group of non-specialised retail trade in stores (such as department stores and supermarket including hypermarket) which registered a double-digit growth of 44.4 per cent and retail sale of food, beverages and tobacco in specialized stores of 16.2 per cent. On a quarterly basis, this sub-sector contracted 1.3 per cent.
2. Employment and Salaries & Wages
The number of persons engaged rose 8.4 per cent from a year ago followed by a 9.9 per cent expansion in salaries & wages paid out. A marginal increase of 0.7 per cent in the number of persons engaged and a 3.3 per cent in the salaries & wages was recorded quarter-on-quarter. [Distribution Trades First Quarter 2009. Department of Statistics. May 26 2009]
I think the growth is likely caused by MNC hypermarket retailers’ aggressive expansion nationwide. As a person once employed in the supply chain industry, I can say with certainty that that expansion is true. The expansion of TESCO for instance and especially, was amazing. Their latest expansion plan includes a superlarge distribution center in Bukit Beruntung.
Indeed, the retail sector has been the most impressive and resilient sector so far. In the fourth quarter of 2008, it grew by over 15% based on year-on-year comparison.
It is true that based on quarter-on-quarter comparison, there is a decline but I think that is mostly due to seasonal effect.
It might have been likely that if there was no expansion, there might be a contract in the retail sector. Expansion in a way opens new market. This expansion may have overwhelm any reduction of sales faced by pre-existing outlets. In any case, this raises two questions: if the expansion factor is controlled for, would the retail sector suffer a decline in line with other sectors? Given the expansion, how good is the retail sector — which typically a good barometer of the real economy — in being an indicator of the real economy?
Regardless, that however does not explain Midvalley Megamall still. Perhaps, like I have mentioned above, class of profession plays a large factor as far as Midvalley Megamall is concerned, thus helping the sector to continue to grow in spite of the environment.
Some concrete evidence that the economy may have recovered faster than expected:
The Coincident Index (CI) rose by 0.5% in February 2009. The increase of the index was mainly contributed by real sales in manufacturing sector (0.5%), real salaries & wages in manufacturing sector (0.2%) and real contributions in EPF (0.2%). The six-month smoothed growth rate of CI showed a slight improvement to -9.8% from -11.9% recorded in the previous month.
The Leading Index (LI) which monitor the economic performance in advance also increased in February 2009. The index grew by 1.1% to 158.2 points in the current month. These were attributed by real total trade of eight major trading partners (0.5%), number of new companies registered (0.5%), Bursa Malaysia industrial index (0.1%) and number of housing permits approved (0.1%). The six-month smoothed growth rate of LI improved -0.7% in February 2009.
The six-month smoothed growth rate of Leading Index (LI) and Coincident Index (CI) showed a slight improvement in February 2009. However, it is too early to conclude that the improvement of these index provide signal of the slow economic growth to be over in the near term. [Malaysia Economic Indicators – Leading, Coincident And Lagging Indices February 2009. Department of Statistics. April 29 2009]
If indeed the economy began its recovery in February, it would provide a damning evidence proving the worthlessness of fiscal stimuli announced earlier. Why?
By February, there was no real spending with respect to the first fiscal stimulus and money only beginning to be distributed among various ministries. That is of course with the exception of the RM5 billion given to ValueCap but we can safely discount that RM5 billion because throwing money in the equity market is like hoping to raise the sea level by throwing is a pabble.
Furthermore, the second stimulus was yet to be announced.
In other words, the economy might be recovering even without the stimulus packages so celebrated by Malaysian Keynesians. But as mentioned by the Department of Statistics, it is still too earlier to confirm the worthlessness of economic stimuli. Let us wait for March first.
In the meantime, I am taking bets that March data is going to confirm February’s trend!
[1846] Of forward indices, forward!
Is the Malaysian economy in trouble? Or rather, was it in trouble in September?
Judging by the latest lagging, coincident and leading indicators, the answer to the question is not really in the positive.
The Coincident Index (CI), a measure of current economic activity, decreased by 0.1% in September 2008 registering at 123.6 points. Negative change was recorded by Index of Industrial Production (-0.3%), real salaries & wages (-0.2%) and real sales in manufacturing sector (-0.1). The six-month smoothed growth rate of CI remain positive at 0.2% in the current month.
The Leading Index (LI) moved up 0.8% to reach 158.8 points in September 2008 as compared to 157.5 points in the previous month. Two out of the eight existing components posted an increase, namely, real money supply, M1 (0.8%) and number of housing permits approved (0.8%). The six-month smoothed growth rate of LI recorded an increase of 1.2% in the current month.
The recent trend of the LI six-month smoothed growth rate indicates that the Malaysian economy is expected to sustain its slow growth in the month ahead. [Malaysia Economic Indicators – Leading, Coincident And Lagging Indices September 2008. Department of Statistics Malaysia. Assessed December 7 2008]
It was slowing down but not as bad as feared. The Lagging Index for September especially was higher when seasonally adjusted to the year before.

p/s — The Bank Negara totally needs an RSS feed.