Categories
Economics

[1316] Of we must liberalize fuel prices

Have you ever found yourself short on gas and there was no gas station in sight?

I have. I had traveled through roads that offer no refueling opportunity for miles and miles but I had never thought I would have to relive that experience here in Malaysia.

KUALA LUMPUR: The 3,200 petrol stations nationwide, including those along highways, will close at 10pm and open at 7am, with or without the approval of the Government.

This was decided at the annual delegates conference of the Petrol Dealers Association of Malaysia (PDAM) here yesterday.

Frequent armed robberies, increased security costs, higher wages for workers, low night sales, soaring rentals and electricity bills were cited as the key reasons for this decision. [10pm closing time for all petrol stations. The Star. August 2 2007]

Do you realize what does this mean?

Congestion at gas stations just before 10PM and after 7AM.

This would also discourage traveling. I would not want to drive in the middle of the night while the tank is low on gas.

Furthermore, through the same rationale, logistics firms that operate during the night to escape traffic congestion during the day would be adversely affected. This problem would flow to the retailing industry as well as many others that rely heavily on uninterrupted logistics services that run 24/7. In short, this might hurt the economy as a new constraint increases cost of doing business.

Maybe it is time for the government to liberalize fuel prices and allow individual station to set its own prices to cope with their own cost as well as the supply and demand curves they face.

Enough of central planning already.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

Do compare that previous report, which the report below, which was published earlier:

KUALA LUMPUR: Fill up your tank before 10pm.

The Petrol Dealers Association of Malaysia wants to close petrol stations at 10pm daily, citing escalating costs and security risk as the reasons.

Association president Alang Zari Ishak said about 200 delegates will attend the association’s annual general delegates conference today to endorse a resolution to close business earlier.

“We want to close for business at 10pm and reopen at 7am every day,” he added.

Alang Zari, however, said that petrol stations along highways would remain open 24 hours. [Fill up at petrol station before 10pm. The Star. August 1 2007]

I think The Star is confused…

Categories
Economics

[1275] Of price floor and donation

I am always under the assumption that more is better in the case of normal goods. By extension, that would mean anybody rational would love money, which is really a normal good. A stranger yesterday tried to shatter my worldview but I believe my worldview just shattered the stranger’s hope.

I was committing the sin of pumping gas in the evening right after work when I was approached by a person soliciting for donation for the special children. I do not usually entertain solicitation but I had volunteer for such work in the past for environmental purposes. I cannot help but felt some empathy for the person and I decided to listen.

As a very skeptical but empathetic man, I tried to hide my frown with a weak smile. I doubt such effort was successful but I listened carefully nonetheless. After all the icings, she finally came to the point: donate at least ten bucks to be free of yourself from guilt.

I decided to throw away my skepticism and for once, maybe, do a little good for the society. I assumed that this was not a scam and I assumed almost the whole sum of the donation collected would go to the children. I might be assuming too much but I wanted to do some good. I want to be naïve. So, “Okay, just give her the ten bucks and shoo her off so that I could continue on to the Bar Council in Kuala Lumpur for a forum.

While I was searching for that ten ringgit note inside my wallet, I spotted a five ringgit note amid the 50s and the 10s and the 1s. At the very last moment, my weird mind started to take a radical centrist stance. My altruist self wanted to donate ten bucks while my skeptical part would love to shove the pamphlet up her your know what. For a moment, a war erupted, egos were hurt and the two parties decided to make peace and agree to take an average between nothing and ten ringgit.

“I’ll give you five.”

To my surprise, the person, she, rejected five and requested for ten. That is the first time in my life somebody actually solicits for donation rejected an offer and said that it is not enough.

“What?” I said, incredulously.

She later explained that the receipts for the donation are pre-printed and the lower domination is ten. Therefore, she would not be able to issue a receipt for me if I donated anything less.

I was about to say, no, I do not need a receipt but at this time, the skeptical part of me ruled supreme and decided to squash the altruism though and through. The libertarian in me joined the skeptic when I realized that is a price floor. And so, I said politely, “If there is the case, then I apologize. I don’t have any to give.”

I could feel the skeptical part of me smirking, valiantly victorious over the altruist. I felt sorry for her later but I hope she realized how impractical that policy is. I do not blame her really because she does not design the policy. Nevertheless, the policy prevents the fund from receiving more contribution. Perhaps, I have taught her a greater lesson in economics than merely 10 bucks. The libertarian and the economist consoled the altruist, trying to convince the latter that we have done greater good to the society by demonstrating how price floor deprives opportunities.

The price floor just is not a good policy, at least, in its current modus operandi of volunteers running around at public spaces soliciting for donation from strangers on the sidewalk. Or gas station. The organization that runs the donation drive has to find a better way to issue receipts.

The same goes with minimum wage. It is counterproductive.

Categories
Economics Humor

[1250] Of price control rendered useless

Hahaha…

PETALING JAYA: Following the painful raids against traders who overprice their food and drinks, most restaurants are sticking to their regular prices.

The difference, however, is that some restaurants may be dishing out smaller-sized roti canai as well as diluted Nescafe or Milo drinks.

Contrary to earlier complaints by restaurant operators that they would lose out following the government move to increase the price of flour, a random survey by The Star found that they would actually make a hefty profit if the price of roti canai goes up by 10sen a piece. [Roti canai getting smaller. Goh, Michelle. Nur Akmal. The Star. June 3 2007]

Instead of liberalizing the market, I suspect the state would engage in more stifling policy by regulating the size of roti canai.

We as responsible citizens on the other hand desperately need to upgrade the mentality of our politicians. I am in the opinion that all ministers need at least at a basic lesson in economics.

Categories
Economics Politics & government

[1223] Of Malaysian budget in May?

Man. It is just May and the Second Finance Minister Nor Mohamed Yakcob has already mentioned the “b” word.

KUALA LUMPUR: Budget 2008 will hand out more benefits to wage earners, Second Finance Minister Tan Sri Nor Mohamed Yakcop said.

He said the Government would ensure that the prices of common consumer items would be affordable and not burden the lower-income segment of society. [Budget 2008 benefits to help lower-income group. The Star. May 16 2007]

This talk of a people’s budget so soon publically is weird. For goodness’ sake, we have not even past the second quarter yet. Talk about forward planning!

Maybe it is a sign that election is coming?

Categories
Economics

[1213] Of fight shortage by creating a larger shortage!

Last time, it was sugar shortage and the scapegoats were so-called smugglers and hoarders whereas the real problem was price ceiling. Now, we are having cooking oil shortage. The scapegoats this time? Guess who?

This is getting old. This problem keeps recurring because the root of the problem has not been deal it with; the root cause is the price ceiling. Have we not learned anything from the failure of central planning?

Free the market and the market would solve this shortage by itself.

But no. This time, to shove the problem under the carpet, the government plans to subsidize the production of cooking oil. Or rather, the government is forcing those on the production side to subsidize manufacturers of cooking oil:

KEPONG: The Government has sorted out the shortage of packet cooking oil after assuring the 300 refineries and 30 packers that they would be compensated for their losses.

Plantation Industries and Commodities Minister Datuk Peter Chin Fah Kui said the refineries and packers had also promised to resume supply of the 1kg packet of oil and ensure retailers sell them at or below the ceiling price.

He said to compensate the refineries and packers, the ministry would impose cess on the 4,100 oil palm estates from June 1 until May 31, 2008.

It expects to collect RM661.2mil in taxes for this period. [Compensation to get 1kg oil packets back in shops. The Star. May 9 2007]

Yup sire. Increase the cost of producing palm oil. Impose large enough a tax, the government might even reduce global supply of palm oil!

Less supply for everybody. Brilliant!