Categories
Events Liberty Politics & government

[2050] Of how many are protesting against ISA, on the ground?

And so, Kuala Lumpur is again the center of a struggle for liberty.

Estimating the number of protesters against ISA is hard but Twitter, specifically from the accounts of The Edge and The Malaysian Insider may be helpful.

The Malaysian Insider reports that there are about 5,000 protesters in Sogo area while another more or less 5,000 gathered near Masjid Negara.[1]

The Edge reports that 1,000 individuals are in Dang Wangi.[2]

Others estimate another 1,000 persons are in Masjid Jamek.

If these numbers are reliable, that makes 12,000 protesters at around 15:00 hours Malaysian time, making it much smaller than Bersih, but large nonetheless by Malaysian standard.

These numbers unfortunately are hard to be aggregated because these sources come from different time points. Crowds in one place may have traveled from one point to another, making double counting a risk. Or, even underestimating because these numbers may swell after time of reporting.

In any case, what about the pro-ISA number? Unknown and likely insignificant.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[1] — ISA – Anti-ISA protesters from Sogo number some 5,000, another 5,000 from National Mosque. [The Malaysian Insider. Twitter. August 1 2009]

[2] — Crowd of more than a thousand at Dang Wangi start moving behind Unit Amal human shield, chants “Reformasi”. No police yet. [The Edge. Twitter. August 1 2009]

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p/s — as the dust settled, better estimation. It is over 20,000:

News services estimated that the rally on Saturday, which was broken up by thousands of police officers using tear gas and water cannons, drew about 20,000 protesters, making it the largest demonstration in two years. [Malaysia Cracks Down on Protests. Thomas Fuller. New York Times. August 2 2009]

Categories
Conflict & disaster Liberty

[2015] Of is the Iranian army the best hope to stop the bloodshed?

It is hard to describe how I feel about the situation in Iran as protesters clash with the basij — a paramilitary group loyal to the incumbent government — and the Revolutionary Guard.[0][1][2] It is not a matter of ambivalence about the brutality of those security force though I am still quiet unsure whether fraud did occur. The issue has gone well beyond the question of fraud to the question of freedom. And when individuals actually die for freedom, my opinion solidified against the government led by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

What I find it hard to describe is the kind of anger I am in, especially after watching a video of a young woman died after being shot.[3] Something simply has to be done.

Amid the chaos, it is important to take note that the ones suppressing the protesters are the basij and the Revolutionary Guard. In contrast, there are limited reports on the roles of police and the army in suppressing protesters. Some reports further suggest that the police and the army are reluctant in moving against the protesters. As Blake Hounsell writes at Foreign Policy Passport, if “we start seeing cracks in those forces, or the regular army, then the regime will really be in trouble. But it will take sustained pressure — more demonstrations, strikes, and smart politics — to get there.”[4] This of course not to suggest that the army is of one mind just as the Revolutionary Guard is not.[5]

Is intervention by the army — presumably based out of conscience as probably evident through the kind of reluctance reported — the only way out of the quagmire Iran is in at the moment?

It is unclear if the protestors could bring down the incumbent government but with the army in, it will surely makes the possibility of a new government brighter. The problem is, of course, if having a military government desirable?

At the moment, it is hard to say no, especially if the army acts on conscience. What guarantees that that military government will not turn on the very same Iranians who are exercising their rights to assembly and freedom of expression now is another question. The burning question is, will a military government be better than the current one, no matter how far short it is from the ideal of a liberal democratic state?

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[0] — Thirty years ago, during the demonstrations that led to the Shah’s downfall, one of the dominant images was scenes of uniformed soldiers firing live ammunition at protesters. This week, Iran’s clerics seem determined, at least, not to repeat that historic mistake. They remember that the daily news coverage of the Shah’s soldiers shooting and killing unarmed protesters precipitated the collapse of the regime.

Instead, bearded plainclothes militiamen have been attacking and harassing the demonstrators in Tehran this past week. These are Basijis, members of a civilian paramilitary organization founded by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1979. It was conceived of as a civilian auxiliary force subordinate to the Revolutionary Guards, and so it has functioned over the past three decades. During the eight-year Iran-Iraq war, fervent Basijis volunteered to serve on the front lines. For a time, very young Basijis were encouraged to offer themselves for martyrdom by clearing minefields with their bodies in what became known as ”human waves”—literally walking to their deaths en masse so that more experienced soldiers could advance against the enemy. An Iranian friend of mine who is a war veteran described the Basiji boy martyrs as having played a tragic but significant role in the war, by providing Iran with a ”flesh wall” against Saddam Hussein’s vastly superior Western-supplied military technology. [Understanding the Basij. John Lee Anderson. The New Yorker. June 19 2009]

[1] — REVOLUTIONARY GUARDS: An elite military corps of more than 200,000 members that is independent of the regular armed forces and controlled directly by the supreme leader. The Guards oversee vital interests such as oil and natural gas installations and the nation’s missile arsenal.

BASIJ: A powerful volunteer militia directed by the Revolutionary Guards. Basiji played a high-profile role as “morality” police after the Islamic Revolution and now are often used in crackdowns of dissidents. Some estimates place the membership at 10 million, or about 15 percent of the population. [Key players in Iran’s disputed election. Associated Press via Google News. June 18 2009]

[2] — CAIRO (AP) — They’re the most feared men on the streets of Iran.
The pro-government Basij militia has held back its full fury during this week’s street demonstrations. But witnesses say the force has unleashed its violence in shadowy nighttime raids, attacking suspected opposition sympathizers with axes, daggers, sticks and other crude weapons.

At least once, the militiamen opened fire on a crowd of strone-throwing protesters. State media said seven were killed. [Feared Basij militia could transform Iran showdown. Associated Press via Google News. June 20 2009]

[3] — See Iranian woman killed in protests [Two Videos] at Youtube. Accessed June 21 2009.

[4] — It’s hard to tell who has the upper hand, but it seems like there are still plenty of people willing to beat, maim, even kill their fellow Iranians. That’s bad news for the good guys. Roger Cohen, the New York Times columnist who’s in Tehran, tells of a police commander who pleaded with demonstrators to go home because, “I have children, I have a wife, I don’t want to beat people.” From what I can glean from Twitter and various reporting, the regular police aren’t quite as eager to beat heads, in contrast with the hard-line Revolutionary Guard and basij militiamen. If we start seeing cracks in those forces, or the regular army, then the regime will really be in trouble. But it will take sustained pressure — more demonstrations, strikes, and smart politics — to get there. [War on the streets of Tehran. Foreign Policy Passport. June 20 2009]

[5] — According to Cyrus News Agency (CNA) in Iran, at least 16 members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard were arrested on Tuesday for allegedly attempting to join the “people’s movement.” Protests, riots and violence broke out in several cities in Iran on Saturday night following an election which many in Iran and the world say was fraudulent. [Report: Members of Iranian Revolutionary Guard arrested for joining ‘people’s movement’. Wikinews. June 20 2009]

Categories
Liberty

[2010] Of a message of friendship to protesting Iranians in Malaysia

I am not quite sure what to make out of the elections in Iran. By that, I mean I do not know if there was a fraud or not. There are so many conflicting information on the internet that I must confess, I am confused and unable to decide which side is true as far as the election result is concerned

But let it be no doubt that I prefer Mousavi to Ahmadinejad. Any agent of liberty will find friendship in me. I applaud you for exercising your liberty which should be guaranteed everywhere in the world, including in Malaysia.[1] With you exercising your right to freedom of expression, you inevitably strengthen the struggle of many Malaysians to make this country truly free. And of course, yours too.

But perhaps, you may want to have more Malaysians joining your protests the next time you hold it. Deplorable as it might be, as with any primitive communal thinking, having purely foreigners protesting might give the impetus for xenophobia among conservative Malaysians. By having a local flavor, that opportunity for xenophobia can be vanquished.

Finally, here, to Spring of Tehran.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[1] —KUALA LUMPUR (AFP) — Malaysian police on Monday fired several rounds of tear gas to break up a noisy protest held by Iranians residing here against President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s controversial election victory.

Earlier more than 200 people gathered at the city’s United Nations building to hand over a protest note demanding the world body nullify elections the Iranian opposition allege was rigged.

“We want all the countries in the world not to recognise Ahmadinejad as Iranian president. The election was fraud. The actual winner is (Mir Hossein) Mousavi,” Ali Bozrgmer, a 28-year-old student told AFP. [Malaysia police fire tear gas on Iran election protest. AFP via Google. June 15 2009]

Categories
Activism Liberty

[1974] Of the Brickfields affairs II

This started to sound like a sequel to a movie but Wong Chin Huat was still there in lock-up and the pressure had to be maintained. Unfortunately, a smaller group of people joined this one compared to the day before although as the night progressed, more members of the society including politically prominent individuals started to show up as the whole affairs dragged well into the wee morning. By the time I left close to 03:00, it had not ended yet.

This time, the police was more polite the first time around, requesting those attending the vigil to disperse. “I would advise you to disperse”. This is very unlike Wednesday when an officer shouted like a mad man.

Polite or not, for the police, it did not work. Freedom of assembly is a natural right of every free citizen, especially so when the assembly is peaceful and pose no hazard to public safety. Given this stance which I think many at the vigil hold, the next chapter was written in stone. The polite officer resigned and a mad man took over. A number of people wearing black and holding lit candles were arrested when the mad man announced to the world of his arrival. Others, they were simply far enough to be out of reach of the officers. They lived to fight for another day, so to speak. Well, another hour actually.

Anyway, I was there early and I can tell you that those who were arrested were prepared to be arrested. “If they want to arrest us, let’s not run away. Let’s be arrested.”

I said to myself, yeah, right. Speak for yourself. I do not want to be detained. I am a chicken, with capital C.

So, they were in and some who were not taken in hang around farther down the road, waiting for something else to happen. Some began contacting people for help. Not long thereafter, legal counsels started to show up.

A friend much earlier joked about the itinerary of the whole affairs. Meet at 20:30 at Brickfields’ KFC restaurant, at 21:00 at the police station and 21:30 inside the lock-up. For those that got arrested, that was more or less the schedule.

Just like yesterday after the first arrest, the size of crowd started to swell again. Not close to the size of the day before not respectable enough to probably make the police nervous.

I sort of relish having a protest organized in front of a police district headquarters. Though the group was small yesterday, it showed a sign that civil society is willing to rise up, even at the doorstep of a lion’s den. Well, I am exaggerating but you know what I mean.

MP Loh Gwo-Burne showed up. And then state assembly person Elizabeth Wong. DAP assembly person Jenice Lee who was arrested earlier in Ipoh for the big party showed up too, I think. The last elected official that was there as far as I know was none other than the man himself, MP Tian Chua.

I do not remember who joked about this but somebody highlighted that on Wednesday, DAP was on duty. On Thursday, PKR. Maybe PAS would come on Friday.

On Wednesday, lawyers were allowed to go in. It was a different story for yesterday; the police was playing hardball. They simply did not want to let the lawyers to see the detainees. These lawyers apparently were young guns on-the-job training to handle emergency arrests. So, they were new and likely inexperienced. That is probably the reason why the police stood their ground rather well.

A senior lawyer was there and she refused to interfere since she wanted to get these young legal aid lawyers to gain some valuable experience.

For those arrested earlier, they were placed in an open space. There was a roof and the space was well-lit but it was open nonetheless.

Probably out of frustration not given access to legal counsel, the detainees started the best thing of all: protesting inside of police compound!

How about that?

If you cannot protest outside, protest inside. Haha!

They sang Negaraku and the crowd outside joined them in chorus.

That got the police angry and there was a commotion after that. Shouting match occurred. People outside who were still free were worried about the whole effect but in the end, nothing happened. It was just one of those harmless confrontations that put pressure on the police to release them.

The police did not buy that and instead, the detainees were relocated to rooms inside some building.

And, the second round of arrest came.

Saya bagi anda 3 minit untuk bersurai.”

Saya bagi anda 2 minit untuk bersurai.”

Satu minit.”

In a typical maniacal manner of a mad man, when time was up, he shouted, “Tangkap! Tangkap!

In retrospect, the episode was funny but when I was there, it was not as hilarious as I currently find it.

We left and decided that we should adjourned to a nearby eatery and come back later if the detainees continued to be detained. But some legal counsels on duty stayed behind and unfortunately, they were pull in by the police.

We only found out about this when we were happy drinking out tea and coke in a restaurant. The senior lawyer was fuming mad upon finding this out. Some of us thought the police were making a big mistake. I suppose, for the legal aid lawyers, they all got more than they bargained for.

Around midnight, we decided to return to the police station. More lawyers from the Bar Council came and they launched 5 police reports against the police.

Around this time, Tian Chua showed up. And god, he looked terribly tired but seemed ready to be arrested yet again in KL after being arrested in Ipoh earlier.

Nothing eventful happened after that. I was up close to 03:00 until I decided I needed my sleep.

The next day, heh, as in right now, hundreds of lawyers are protesting in front of the Jalan Duta Courthouse.

A domino effect is underway and we will see where will this lead us.

Categories
Liberty

[1960] Of Judge Brandeis in 1927

In Malaysia, the slightest possibility of unrest due to free speech is taken by those in power as a ticket to suppress individual rights.

In California in 1927, that rationale was rejected by Judge Brandeis of the United States Supreme Court:

But it is hardly conceivable that this court would hold constitutional a stature which punished as a felony the mere voluntary assembly with a society formed to teach that pedestrians had the moral rights to cross uninclosed, unposted, wastelands and to advocate their doing so, even if there was imminent danger that advocacy would lead to trespass. The fact that speech is likely to result in some violence or in destruction of property is not enough to justify its suppression. There must be the probability of serious injury to the State. Among free men, the deterrents ordinarily to be applied to prevent crime are education and punishment for violations of the law, not abridgement of the rights of speech and assembly. [Whitney v. California. Louis Brandeis. 1927]