Categories
Environment History & heritage Science & technology

[1076] Of AR4: Eroding uncertainty

According to the NYT, in the First Assessment Report (AR1) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change published in 1990:

The unequivocal detection of the enhanced greenhouse effect from observations is not likely for a decade or more.

In the AR2 of 1995:

The balance of evidence suggests a discernable human influence on global climate.

AR3 of 2001:

There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities.

AR4, 2007:

Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.

Categories
History & heritage

[1037] Of evolution of the Malaysian coat of arms

Have you ever wondered the history behind the Malaysian coat of arms?

I have ever since I visited the Tugu Negara back in 2006. I have two entries for the visit; they are here and here. On the monument itself is a coat of arms that differs from the current one. I have a photo of it but I cannot remember where I placed it.

Though curious of the difference, I never had the time to do a research on it. For the past few weeks however, a Malaysian Wikipedian by the nick of Bukhrin has been doing a remarkably good job on it.

Let us get started on the history of the Malaysian coat of arms.

The current Malaysian coat of arms is this:

Copyrights by the government of Malaysia. Fair use.

As the formal description goes, the five krises represent what was the Unfederated Malay States, the four rectangles in four colors represent what was the Federated Malay States, the lean tree and the bridge represent Penang, the shield between the hibiscus flower and the insignia of Penang is Sabah, the flower is the federation, the hornbill is Sarawak and the green tree is Malacca. Also of interest to me, the fourteen-pointed star represent the 13 member states and the federation.

It had not always been like that. Previously, it looked like this:

Copyright by Vector design. Fair use.

Notice the changes for Penang, Sabah and Sarawak. For Penang, the German term Ich Dien which means “I serve” is visible. For those unfamiliar with history, Penang was formerly called the Prince of Wales island, in honor of, well, the Prince of Wales. According to Wikipedia, the motto of the Prince of Wales is Ich Dien. Therefore, the similarity is not coincidental. I have a feeling that the change to the Penang’s insignia is caused by the Malaysian government’s eagerness to cut ties with the state’s colonial past. For Sarawak, I would venture the same reasoning that I offered for Penang plus another factor: the cross. I however am unsure why Sabah’s symbol was changed. Further, it seems that Sabah transfered its previous symbol to Sarawak.

Farther into history, the original 13-state coat of arms is this:

Copyrights unknown. Fair use.

Notice the tigers and the changes to the symbol of Sabah.

Of course, those three shields are related to the 13-state federation. Malaysia once was a 14-state federation. Singapore together with 13 other states formed Malaysia in 1963 but was expelled by the federation in 1965. So, between 1963 and 1965 inclusively, the coat of arms was like this:

Fair use.

Observe the crescent and the five stars which represent Singapore in place of the hibiscus.

The formation of the Malaysian federation however does not seem to demand a new design. See the Federation of Malaya’s coat of arms:

Fair use.

Observe how the symbol of the Federated Malay States dominates the center of the shield. Also, A Famosa for Malacca, instead of the tree, which really is the Malacca tree. Do not miss the tigers and the 11-pointed star too.

You think it began with the Malayan Federation?

Wait till you see the coat of arms of the Federated Malay States:

Most probably public domain. Fair use if not.

The FMS was established in 1895.

I do not know how the Malayan Union’s coat of arms looks like. The Malayan Union was the entity that existed between the loose British Malaya and the Malayan Federation. Specifically, between 1946 and 1948.

A question, what inspired the FMS’ coat of arms. Does anybody know?

Regardless, this means that the Malaysian coat of arms has undergone more than 110 years of evolution.

Categories
Books, essays and others Economics History & heritage Liberty

[1032] Of dismal science: it mocks liberalism, not economics

I managed to finish up a book on new year’s eve. It might be an odd way to celebrate the eve to you yappies but I am not to blame for that. Eid fell on Sunday and so, though I had the free will not to, I decided to tag along with my family to visit my grandma in Malacca.

Finishing up a book on new year’s eve allowed me to start reading a new one on January 1 itself. I bought three new titles into my collection earlier; of the three, I decided to start with Beinhocker’s The Origin of Wealth. Initially, I thought it would be dry but the first chapter truly attracts me. It starts with a history of economics.

This is what I learn from the first chapter: economics is called a dismal science by Peter Carlyle not because the discipline is all about doom and gloom. Specifically, as it is commonly thought, the term was a reaction to Malthusian theory which suggests that with exponential population growth vis-à-vis geometric food production growth, population would collapse sooner or later.

As mentioned in the notes of The Origin of Wealth, the term “dismal science” was coined by Carlyle in his work, Occasional Discourse on the Negro Question, to mock the “alliance of economists and abolitionists”. Carlyle was a proponent of slavery while liberal economists were standing on the other side of the river, fighting for abolition of slavery. It really has nothing to do about economics having a pessimistic worldview.

On Wikipedia:

Developing a deliberately paradoxical position, Carlyle argued that slavery was actually morally superior to the market forces of supply and demand promoted by economists, since, in his view, the freeing up of the labor market by the liberation of slaves had actually led to a moral and economic decline in the lives of the former slaves themselves.

So, next time, be careful on how you use the term “dismal science”. It might not mean what you meant within the original context it was used.

Categories
History & heritage Politics & government

[1025] Of a tribute to Gerald Ford

Rest in peace, fellow Wolverine.

Categories
History & heritage Poetry

[1005] Mengenai Rumah Bok

Jalan-jalan Jalan Ampang,
ada ternampak rumah besar,
rumah agam di tanah lapang,
di mata kasar, masa kasar.

Jalan-jalan Jalan Ampang,
tiada lagi rumah besar,
tiang tidur di tanah lapang,
di mata kasar, manusia gasar.

Fair use. Copyrights by The Sun, Malaysia.

Menurut The Sun, Rumah Bok sudah tiada:

KUALA LUMPUR (Dec 15, 2006): The legacy of Bok House or Le Coq D’Or on Jalan Ampang came to an end Thursday, with it crushing all hopes and fervour of heritage activists.

Burning questions now await the authorities that be for allowing something so beautiful and beloved to be forever erased.

The building’s roof tiles were the first to be taken down on Thursday morning and hoarding on the Jalan Ampang frontage was put up from 6pm that day. Friday saw the destruction of sturdy pillars which held up the house.

Walau apapun, Rumah Bok adalah harta peribadi. Pemilik berhak menentukan masa hadapan hartanya, walaupun tindakan pemilik itu sungguh menjijikkan.

Saya telah menyumbangkan satu rencana pendek tentang Rumah Bok kepada Wikipedia Inggeris, takut-takutkan saya terlupa sejarah bandar ini di suatu masa.