Categories
Economics

[1762] Of it is big but not that big

I like Tony Pua. And I damn love graphs. Graphs are the real reason why I picked up Economics 101 at Michigan during my freshman year. The second reason why I picked up Economics was that I wanted to help the poor (yeah, right).

When he posted a graph at his blog, I began to really like him.[1]

This is the graph and the figures are in RM billion.

Fair use. Copyrights by Tony Pua.

Unfortunately, I spotted a problem when I checked the figures which he based his comment on: his year 2005 figure of RM89.1 billion as visible above exactly matches with the figure read by the Prime Minister in 2005. The figure for budgeted operating expenditure in 2005 as stated in the 2005 budget document is exactly RM89.1 billion.[2]

If the figures are the same, which it is, that means whatever analysis which Mr. Pua carried out fails to account for inflation.

Mr. Pua said that the budgeted operating budget has increased by approximately 189% between year 2000 and year 2008. True but only in nominal terms.

Comparison made in nominal terms is always unhelpful in times when inflation is high. Without accounting for inflation, it is really hard to know if any increase or decrease in spending is due to actual increase in quantity of goods or services (i.e. real spending) or simply an increase in price, i.e. inflation.

And thanks to Mr. Pua, I cannot continue with my readings until I know how much the Malaysian government opex has increased between year 2000 and year 2008 accounting for inflation.

Assuming inflation rate was steady at 2% for the whole period, there would have been an increase of roughly 142% only. Assuming the rate at 3%, it would have been 121%. Assuming at 4%, it would be 103%.

Below is a table which I have created to illustrate the effect of inflation on the figures as well as the increase of opex under three different inflation rates.

By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Public domain.

If you love graph, like me, here is a gift for you.

By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Public domain.

Figures are in RM billion at 2009 prices.

Lest I be misunderstood, I am not trying to defend the Barisan Nasional government. I only believe that the right perspective has to be put in place before any analysis or criticism is leveled at.

The context which to the deficit took place in has to be considered. The fact that crude oil, food as well as other commodities had become dearer as part of a larger trend has to be factored in for any of us to understand the increase. This is on top of the fact that the opex, if I am not mistaken, also included subsidies. With more expensive food, fuel and commodities, the larger would the subsidies be.

That said, the real increase is still huge and I would prefer to see a more modest opex. I am unsure how much of those increase is attributed to leakage and corruption but I think removal of subsidies would help a lot in slowing down the bludgeoning opex.

Finally, Mr. Pua said:

This rapid expansion of operational expenditure has deprived the country of sizeable funds for development expenditure which has greater economic multiplier effects.

Multiplier effects, sir?

Come back to the light, sir!

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[1] — [Budget 2009: Skyrocketing Operational Expenditure. Philosophy Politics Economics. September 2 2008]

[2] — 13. To implement the above strategies, the Government proposes an amount of RM117.4 billion be appropriated in 2005 Budget. With revenue estimated at RM99.2 billion, the overall Federal Government deficit is expected to be reduced to 3.8 percent of GDP. Of this, RM89.1 billion or 75.9 percent is for Operating Expenditure and RM28.3 billion for Development Expenditure. [The 2005 Budget Speech. Office of the Prime Minister of Malaysia. September 10 2005]

Categories
Economics

[1756] Of what I like, dislike and am thinking about the 2009 Budget

Firstly, I thought this budget was okay but I am concerned with the tax cuts. I am all for tax cuts, especially related to income but I do not see expenditure going down. The projected fiscal deficit of 4.8% shows it. On the surface, it seems as if the government is trying to improve consumption and to some extent investment through tax cuts while fueling government expenditure through various state-sponsored projects. (Not to forget, government spending, especially when the source of funds is local, does crowd out private investment due to increased interest rate)

I am not necessarily against deficit spending because it has its uses. Rather, I am concerned with the involvement of the state in the Malaysian economy. The size of freebies or transfer payment is also worrying. The threat of cross-over as repeatedly said by Anwar Ibrahim probably has a large role in Santa Clausing on part of the federal government.

In any case, I thought I found what I like and what I do not like based on my first read.

The ones I like are:

20. The higher inflation rate has also affected the purchasing power of the lower middle-income group. To assist this group, the Government proposes the current tax rebate of RM350 per person be increased to RM400 for those with taxable income of RM35,000 and below. With this increase, some 100,000 taxpayers will be out of the tax net.

21. In addition, to reduce the tax burden of individuals, especially those dependent on interest income from savings, the Government proposes that all interest income for individuals be tax exempt.

I have a bias for green tax shift as a mean to limit externality. So, in general I prefer taxation on consumption while practically nothing on investment, wages and savings.

22. To mitigate the impact of rising prices on consumers, the Government proposes to reduce import duties on various consumer durables from between 10% and 60% to between 5% and 30%. These include blender, rice cooker, microwave oven and electric kettle. In addition, the Government proposes full import duty exemption on several food items, which currently attract import duties of between 2% and 20%. These include vermicelli, biscuits, fruit juices and canned sweet corn.

Free trade, anybody?

55. At present, buyers of low cost houses are given full stamp duty exemption on all instruments, including loan agreements. For the purchase of medium cost houses of up to RM250,000, a 50% stamp duty exemption is given only on the instrument of transfer. To further reduce the cost of buying medium cost houses, the Government proposes the 50% stamp duty exemption be extended to loan agreements.

Same reason for No. 21. Purchase of houses is basically some kind of investments.

80. To support the Government’s objective to create a knowledge based economy, it is important to increase the number of professionals serving in Malaysia and to minimise the brain drain. In this regard, the individual income tax rates have to be competitive and attractive. The Government, therefore, proposes that the highest marginal tax rate for individuals be reduced from 28% to 27%, effective the year of assessment 2009. In addition, the marginal tax rate of 13% will also be reduced to 12%, which will benefit the middle income group. These reductions, together with the increase in rebate, which I announced earlier, will benefit all taxpayers.

The reasoning is the same for No. 21. To a couple of people, the reduction maybe a little but it is more meaningful to see the reduction as tax competition across countries.

88. Improving operating efficiency in ports is key to facilitating the growth in the nation’s international trade. In this regard, the Government proposes to abolish the import prohibition on cranes used at ports, as well as reduce the import duty from 20% to 5%.

Free trade. But the reduction probably would not affect total trade much since it is so specific. But it is an enabler of trade nonetheless.

96. Many innovative but high risk projects often have difficulty in securing financing. Conventional sources of funding, namely bank borrowings and private debt securities, may not be appropriate for these projects. To facilitate greater investment by venture capital and private equity funds, the Government proposes that venture capital companies that invest at least 30% of their funds in start-up, early stage financing or seed capital be eligible for a 5-year tax exemption.

No. 21. This may well be the fuel for innovation. Innovation is the best, in my humble opinion, engine of growth for the any economy.

102. To address the price volatility of fossil fuels, various measures have been undertaken to diversify sources of energy and conserve energy. Currently, various incentives are provided for the greater use of renewable energy and energy efficiency. Towards this end, the Government proposes the exemption of:

First: import duty and sales tax on solar photovoltaic system equipment;

Second: import duty and sales tax on intermediate goods such as High Efficiency Motors and insulation materials;

Third: sales tax on locally manufactured solar heating system equipment;

Fourth: sales tax on locally manufactured energy efficient consumers goods such as refrigerators, air-conditioners, lightings, fans and televisions; and

Fifth: 100% import duty and 50% excise duty on new hybrid CBU cars, with engine capacity below 2,000 cc, be given to franchise importers. This exemption is given for a period of two years to prepare for the local assembly of such cars.

I am a big fan of alternative energy. The least the government could do is not tax it and that is what happening at the moment.

106. Apart from this, in order to promote efforts to further diversify and attract more foreign investors to the domestic capital markets, the Government proposes that the current tax rate on dividends received by foreign institutional investors from Real Estate Investment Trusts (REIT) be reduced from 20% to 10%. Recognising that REITs is an attractive investment product for individuals as well, the Government also proposes a reduction in tax rate from 15% to 10%.

No. 21.

Now, stuff that I dislike.

19. As part of the Government’s effort to further reduce the financial burden of the lower income group, households which incur monthly electricity bills of RM20 or less, will not have to pay for electricity, for the period from 1 October 2008 to end of 2009. The Government will bear the cost of such bills, amounting to RM170 million for the period. A total of 1.1 million households will benefit from this measure.

Subsidy, subsidy, subsidy. Oh damn it. Just do transfer payment while you are at it.

In any case, the Barisan Nasional government just lost the moral authority to criticize the Pakatan government of Selangor for providing free water.

Anyway, I was thinking, would this actually encourage people to use less electricity? If a person typically consumed RM20.01 worth of electricity, it would be rational to cut consumption by RM0.01.

45. The Government will implement several agriculture programmes to ensure adequate food supply. For this, a sum of RM5.6 billion is provided under the National Food Security Policy, for the period 2008 to 2010. This allocation, among others, is to provide incentives to agriculture entrepreneurs to reduce production costs and encourage higher agriculture output. About 350,000 vegetable and fruit growers, as well as aquaculture and livestock breeders, will benefit from these incentives.

46. In an effort to increase fish landings, an amount of RM300 million is allocated. Of this, RM180 million is in the form of cost of living allowance to fishermen and fishing boat owners, as well as RM120 million as incentive for fish landings. This will benefit about 100,000 fishermen, including boat owners.

47. In addition, to increase poultry output, the Government proposes that the expansion of chicken and duck farms be given Reinvestment Allowance of 60% for a period of 15 years.

48. The Government will provide 220,000 padi farmers throughout the country with incentives to increase padi production, which involves an allocation of RM1 billion. In this regard, more than 1,300 hectares of abandoned land have been identified for padi and other food production, such as fruits, vegetables and livestock.

49. An allocation of RM475 million is provided in the form of agricultural inputs, fertilizers and pesticides to assist padi farmers. To further assist farmers, the Government proposes that import duty on fertilizers and pesticides be abolished.

David Ricardo. Comparative advantage.

Food security. Bad economics.

89. The Government remains committed towards corridor development initiatives to ensure more regionally balanced socio-economic development of the nation. The intention is to provide more investment, employment and entrepreneurial opportunities in the various regions. Thus far, all the five economic corridors have been launched and initiatives, as outlined in the respective Development Masterplans, are beginning to be implemented. The five economic corridors are Iskandar Malaysia, NCER, East Coast Economic Region (ECER), Sarawak Corridor of Renewable Energy (SCORE) and Sabah Development Corridor (SDC). In the Midterm Review of the 9MP, an additional ceiling of RM10 billion has been allocated for the development expenditure of the corridors, of which RM6 billion is provided in the 2009 Budget.

90. To further strengthen private investment in Iskandar Malaysia, an additional allocation of RM300 million is provided under the Strategic Investment Fund. The Fund is to finance the implementation of private-public partnership projects, in the areas of public transportation, healthcare services, education and creative industries. These are priority socio-economic areas, where Government will support the project viability, but with the private sector bearing the project risks. In healthcare, for example, instead of the Government constructing and operating hospitals, the provision of such public services can be partly met through the Government procuring such services from private sector providers.

91. Iskandar Malaysia will develop an integrated public transportation system, initially focusing on enhancing bus services by working together with existing bus operators. In the area of healthcare, a centre of excellence for postgraduate teaching and research will be established in partnership with private sector hospitals. Iskandar Malaysia will also set up and operate not-for-profit schools, initially on a pilot basis. These schools will have a mixed intake of Government and privately funded students. In addition, a creative cluster will be developed in Iskandar Malaysia, with funds channelled towards enhancing the capabilities of local creative talent.

92. Among the major projects being implemented in the ECER are Agropolitan in south Kelantan, Besut-Setiu and Pekan, including developing kenaf products. In the context of optimising the natural resources of the state, the Kertih Plastics Industry Cluster will be developed as a downstream industry, to enable the local residents to benefit from the petroleum resources in Terengganu. Similarly, the SCORE will focus on the development of hydroelectric power and coal, petroleum and gas downstream industries, as well as large-scale agriculture.

93. Towards realising the potential of agriculture in NCER, a number of projects are being implemented, including cattle breeding using the feedlot system in Tobiar, Laka Temin and Cuping, as well as the conversion of about 3,000 hectares of idle land for padi cultivation. In the SDC, a palm oil industry cluster in Lahad Datu and an integrated livestock centre in Keningau are being implemented.

Inorganic. Central planning.

98. Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) play an important role in the economic development of the nation. In order to further enhance the role of SMEs in the economy, the Government recently announced two new funds totalling RM1.2 billion, funded by Bank Negara Malaysia, to assist the modernisation of SME operations, especially for purchase or upgrading of machines and equipment, as well as reducing the impact of price increases. To further support SMEs, the Government proposes all assets in the form of plant and machinery acquired in the years of assessment 2009 and 2010 be given Accelerated Capital Allowance to be claimed within one year. In addition, SMEs are allowed to claim full Capital Allowance on all small value assets within one year.

Can we please make the Bank Negara to fully concentrate on monetary policy instead?

Now, some points which I think deserve comments.

56. In the 2008 Budget, I had announced the Housing Credit Guarantee Scheme (SJKP) to assist those without fixed income to own affordable houses. Under the Scheme, borrowers can obtain housing loans from Bank Simpanan Nasional and Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad to purchase low and medium cost houses. A fund of RM50 million was set up for this purpose. To date, nearly 500 applications valued at RM20 million have been approved. Beginning July 2008, the Government has rolled out the scheme to all local financial institutions. The fund size will be increased to RM100 million, enabling SJKP to guarantee loans amounting to RM2 billion. About 40,000 borrowers will benefit from this facility.

I wonder how these borrowers pay back their loans. I figure we could see a lot of write-off on behalf of the BSN and BIMB since these borrowers do not sound like those whom are able to pay back the loans.

112. The fiscal position of the Federal Government has strengthened over the past seven years, with the overall deficit reduced from 5.5% of GDP in 2000 to 3.2% in 2007. This reduction has provided greater flexibility for Government fiscal policy, especially in an environment of greater uncertainties in the global economy as well as increasing prices of goods.

Sounds fair.

118. The Malaysian economy is projected to grow by 5.4% in 2009, driven by domestic demand, with consumption and private investment increasing by 6.5% and 5.8%, respectively. Growth is expected to be broad-based with positive contributions from all economic sectors and spearheaded by the services sector, which is projected to grow by 6.9%. This is driven by robust growth in tourism, transportation, finance and banking as well as ICT related industries. External trade will remain buoyant with exports growing at 4.6%.

Good to know that consumption and private investment are the drivers of our economy. But it seems like government expenditure is the main driver of our economy.

123. I wish to reiterate that the Barisan Nasional Government, which has been given the mandate by the people in March this year, will continue to safeguard political stability and enhance economic prosperity of the nation. Efforts by certain parties to destabilise the country by attempting to seize power through illegitimate means, and without the mandate of the people, must be rejected. We cannot allow uncertainties to continue, as this will adversely affect foreign investment, economic sentiment and the capital markets. I will not allow these disturbances to continue. I will not permit the mandate given by the people to be seized from Barisan Nasional, which had won the last election with a majority of the seats, based on democratic principles. I am confident the people will continue to support the Barisan Nasional Government to govern the nation. We need to get on with the business of governing and not waste any more time with opportunistic threats to seize the people’s mandate through undemocratic means.

Crossing over is not an illegitimate mean of forming a government. It is freedom of association as guaranteed by the Constitution of Malaysia. Any effort to use coercion to undermine that freedom will be an illegitimate mean of maintaining power.

Categories
Economics Politics & government

[1753] Of what Permatang Pauh could and could not tell us

From the very beginning, the 2008 Permatang Pauh by-election is not about whether Anwar Ibrahim will win it. It is a question of how much will he win. The magnitude of his win could answer several more questions too but not all.

The first question asks whether support for Anwar Ibrahim has changed since March 8. It is tempting to link the magnitude of his win with support which he will receive at the ballot box but a person makes such connection at his own peril. The reason is that there is really no benchmark to measure this in a conclusive manner.

The kosher way of measuring whether support for Anwar Ibrahim has increased or otherwise based on difference in magnitude: this win needs to be compared with Anwar Ibrahim’s last win in the same place. This method will reasonably control noise that would otherwise drown the signal which we seek.

The problem is that Anwar Ibrahim did not contest in the last election in Permatang Pauh. Instead, it was his wife Wan Azizah Wan Ismail. And the last time Anwar Ibrahim contested there was so long ago in 1995 when the situation was very different. The very different scenes make the comparison between the 1995 and the 2008 results useless in answering the question.

Any comparison between tomorrow’s by-election and the result of March 8 comes closer in answering which voters prefer better between Anwar and Wan Azizah. Even this pretends that the effect of their opponents is practically negligible.

The closest possibly way of measuring whether support for Anwar Ibrahim has changed for better or for worse based on tomorrow result is to assume that Wan Azizah is a proxy for Anwar. The assumption of proxy however ignores any individual effect that exists.

This same assumption however cannot be used to measure how damaging all the negative politics — especially the allegation of sodomy and the subsequent oath on the Koran — employed against Anwar.

While it is true that all that attacks launched by Barisan Nasional against the former Deputy Prime Minister will have an adverse effect to his prospect of being elected into office, it is really hard to know what is the exact or even the rough magnitude of that effect based simply on result of Permatang Pauh by-election. This is especially so when accusation of sodomy is really a weapon which cannot be used against Wan Azizah: Wan Azizah and Anwar are very different for the obvious reason even if proxy is a useful statistical tool. This difference renders the proxy method somewhat unreliable than it usually is.

A better way to measure the effect of the allegations made against Anwar Ibrahim is to have consistent polling, which we probably have thanks to the Merdeka Centre. Alas, that sample may not necessarily describe the preference of voters registered in Permatang Pauh. And result from the Permatang Pauh definitely cannot be used to gauge national sentiment in a satisfactory manner.

An easier question to answer with regard the upcoming by-election is which between Anwar Ibrahim and Wan Azizah Wan Ismail do voters of Permatang Pauh prefer. Another concerns the support level of Parti Keadilan Rakyat among the voters of Permatang Pauh. In both cases, the methodology in finding out the answers is straight forward.

So, do keep these things in mind before you read any political analysis by so-called pundits. Obviously, these questions put forth are not exhausting. Neverthless, the question are useful in identifying sweep conclusion. And sweeping conclusion is the last thing we need to understand the very messy political scenario we are currently in.

Categories
Economics Sports

[1751] Of they counted it wrongly

Notwithstanding Tibet, the conflict in Xinjiang, suppression of Falun Dafa, the alleged connection to the alleged genocide in Darfur, broken promises of a free press, the pollution and eviction of citizens from Beijing, or the less than flattering revelation of how the “live” opening of the Olympics was not quite as “live” as it should have been — not to mention the use of a substitute child lip-syncing the song at the opening ceremony because the actual singer was not pretty enough — another phenomenon which this Olympics will forever be associated with is the competition between the United States and the People’s Republic of China. The methods used to measure the competition at the moment are flawed however.

The Olympics, in a way, can be seen as a proxy battle between the world powers. Prior to the Second World War, the United States was up competing against Germany. The battle was conclusively settled outside of the stadium in 1945 in Berlin.

During the Cold War, it was the US against the Soviet Union. As the Soviet Union crumbled under its own weight, so did the competition between the US and the USSR. Today, it is the PRC versus the US.

The competition between the US and the PRC is not just in the courts of sport. It can also be seen in how the points are tallied and, subsequently, how ranks are determined.

Go to the official website of the Beijing Olympics, head over to the medal count table and immediately a visitor can observe how the count is carried out. At the site, a gold medal is the ultimate yardstick. Regardless of quantity of bronze and silver medals, if a country has more gold medals than the other, the country gets to be on the top.

Head over to any Olympic standings published by the US press and there is a good chance that a person will find that countries are ranked by total medal count, regardless of the value of gold, bronze and silver. That is how the New York Times, FoxNews and MSNBC do it, anyway.

I am unsure how far the different ways of assigning ranks relate to competition between the US and the PRC but it is tempting to attribute the difference to the rivalry between the two countries. Another possibility is that this could be an innocent systematic difference.

A quick check of the official standings of previous editions of the Olympics reveals that it is gold medals that count, not total medals. In the 2000 Sydney Olympics, for instance, Ethiopia ranked 20th with four gold and eight total medals while Ukraine held the 21st place with three gold and 23 medals in total. The US ranked first, having the most gold and total medals.

The same arrangement is true for the 1996 Atlanta Olympics. Italy ranked 6th with 13 gold and 35 total medals while Australia ranked 7th with nine gold but 41 total medals. Just as with the 2000 edition, the US reigned supreme by garnering the most gold as well as total medals.

I am unsure how the US media did their rankings for the 1996 and the 2000 Games. Therefore, I cannot comment on the consistency of the US media but it is safe to say that the official convention at the Beijing Olympics is in line with past practice.

One way to see if bias has played a role in the determination of ranks would be to see if changes of circumstances of standings under a particular convention would lead to changes of convention.

Regardless, each convention suffers from a serious flaw respectively. Are 50 bronze medals worth less than a single gold medal? Is a gold medal worth as much as a bronze or a silver medal?

Surely the answer is no to both questions.

Yet, under the gold convention as officially adopted at the 2008 Olympic Games, the answer is yes to the first question and no to the second question. Under the total medal convention as adopted by the US media, the answer is reversed.

Truly, all participants actually care about winning a medal and what kind of medal. Gold is obviously the most favoured medal. Silver is not bad too if gold is out of reach. And better bronze than nothing, do you not think so?

The fact that participants compete for these medals and obviously hold transitive preferences for each type of medal insists that both types of ranking adopted by the Beijing Olympics and the US media are flawed. If the rankings are not flawed, then the principle of microeconomics would have to see a complete overhaul!

It would be the end of economics as we know it.

Seriously!

For those who truly wish to right the wrongs of the world, we can begin by restructuring the way countries are ranked in the Olympics. Weight to medal should be assigned to reflect the transitive nature of preference for different types of medals.

We could assign three points for gold, two for silver and one for bronze. The sum of points would then determine the final standings.

I think this is a worthy cause to fight for. I shall take up my dissatisfaction against the IOC by protesting in front of their headquarters soon. So, who is with me?

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

A version of this article was first published in The Malaysian Insider.

Categories
Economics Education

[1747] Of PTPTN now is an inter-temporal subsidy

Borrowers obviously will celebrate if they see a reduction in their repayment obligation. When the National Higher Education Fund Corporation (PTPTN) reduces its service charge or really, interest rate, from 3% to 1%, already I read borrowers singing high praises to the body. The reduction of rate also turns the financing facility into a subsidy, small as it may be.

Even with the traditional inflation rate between 3% and 4% that Malaysia had enjoyed earlier, 1% interest rate has the PTPTN suffering negative returns. The borrowers meanwhile get to pay less in real terms. Accommodating inter-temporal consideration which is typical in calculation present values, clearly the borrowers are being subsidized.

Now, while I am vehemently anti-subsidy as I have consistently demonstrated in past postings, my opposition towards subsidy is based desire to eliminate certain kind of negative externality as well as a desire for freer market. When it comes to positive externality however, I can be quite supportive. The public benefit derived from well-educated citizens are far higher than any private benefit enjoyed by individual borrowers, assuming all else is constant.

Indeed, subsidization of education creates positive externality. As a result, I am willing to have a subsidy supporting students. This willingness of course has it own qualifications but I shall leave that topic for another day.

One potential issue with the lowering of the interest rate is the disincentive to pay the installments on time. Compared to previously, the penalty of not paying any installment is smaller now. This may encourage borrowers to delay their payments, preferring to incur minor penalty to manage their own cash flow. As a result, PTPTN may have trouble managing its cash flow.

Finally, the across the board cut seems too blunt. I prefer to turn the PTPTN into a convertible loan, rewarding the best students with subsidy, or if you like, scholarship. For those whom are less successful, let them take the full brunt. Under this scenario, I think we would introduce a strong incentive for students to succeed.