Categories
Politics & government

[407] Of Ralph Nader in Ann Arbor

Ralph Nader was Ann Arbor today and I skipped a class to attend it. And apparently, I was not the only one that skipped class. Ralph Nader’s speech was okay though the content is unique when compared to what Kerry or Bush would say.

Some rights reserved
Nader speaking. And goddamnit for the photo quality.

The event was held in the Ballroom in the Michigan Union at 1300 hours. Out of the ballroom, there were some people. Some were some random people handing out some random fliers. Some where Nader supporters. Some were democrats trying to dissuade people from voting for Nader.

The room was full with a number people standing at the back. I sat in the second row. Yup, it was up front but too bad it was too much to the left that I had to twist my neck a little.

Nader talked about a few things.

One concerned how American political scene is becoming a duopoly and how the democrats are trying to prevent Nader from the ballot and how the republicans refused to hold a debate with him. I share his opinion on this. It is just too bad for such thing to happen. Dilemma – face four more years of Bush or face a duopoly well into the future. I do not know which one is the worst.

He also described how the US is different from Western Europe, where welfare level of the people there are higher than the US. Though maybe it is true that social security does not seem to work while the European’s works better, I believe Europe has a much higher unemployment rate. I am not sure if it is better to be in the US or Europe with these two things happening but in my opinion, there is a certainly a trade off between being a welfare state and not being a welfare state.

The crux of his speech is probably about corporate powers. He talked about why it is important to remove corporate powers from Washington D.C. The one phrase that might sums up all of his points on corporate powers is something like this: corporations are not people; they do not vote and they should not be in D.C.; they should not influent the policies drafted in D.C. While at it, he took a swipe at Kerry for being a face for corporations. Bush also received the criticism. Halliburton was mentioned explicitly though it was in a passing style.

Later, he encouraged the students to get involve in civil discussion and stand for democracy. Among Nader, Kerry and Bush, Nader is the one that deserves to tell people to stand for democracy from my point of view. Kerry and even less with Bush, do not seem to stand for grassroot democracy as much as Ralph Nader does.

Somewhere, he criticized the notion of anyone but Bush. His exact words were “Anyone but Bush. Leave Kerry alone. Ask no question” or something like that. He said this is the right formula for defeat and why Kerry is mostly leading marginally instead of firmly. I however cannot remember why that is so but Nader did make the idea of anyone but Bush sounds hypocritical to me.

He touched a few other things but I do not remember.

After he spoke, a Q&A session was held. I, in fact, most of the students left right after Nader wrapped up his speech. I do not know the reason why the others left but I guess the reason is the same as mine – class.

And quote of the day,

Students at Michigan are blessed, except last Saturday.

– Ralph Nader with reference to the ugly game at Notre Dame

p/s – Today, officially, Bush lets the 10-year assault rifle ban to lapse. Now, it is legal to own AK-47 or any assault rifle in America. This will be a perfect natural experiment to see whether freedom to bare arm, especially when it involves assault rifle, affects crime rate. I bet it somebody will conduct a research on this and I bet the effect on crime rate will be positive.

Categories
Environment Politics & government

[406] Of North Korea and mushroom cloud

An explosion along with a mushroom cloud has been reported in the news. Things are unclear for the moment but I pray it has nothing to do with North Korea’s current nuclear aspiration.

I found about it while I was browsing Wikipedia and it happened two days ago according to Associated Press.

p/s – Report by Reuters, US Says N.Korea Blast Unlikely to Have Been Nuclear.

Categories
Environment Politics & government

[405] Of Tioman island and a marina

I have a feeling that the Malaysian government does not give a damn for the environment. The last time, it was the incinerator in Broga. Despite opposition from the locals and various environmental organizations, the project went through. Now, it concerns the Tioman Island, probably one of the famous diving scuba sites in the world with a beautiful coral reef system.

Here is the situation. The government plans to build a new marina somewhere off the island for the sake of tourism. In their mind probably, they would be able to boost tourism by providing the relevant infrastructure; in this case, a marina. They have argued that the marina will help develop Tioman further and at the same time, help the locals to move up the social ladder.

This is my opinion. People from all over the world come to the island mainly to enjoy the reef system and the tropical weather. Part of the attraction will no doubt be devastated during the planned construction of the marina and thus, what good is a marina to tourism when the marina itself will threaten the main reason behind Tioman’s tourism industry?

Tioman does not need a marina. What Tioman needs is to be left alone from a certain type of policymakers.

I, as you would probably guess, disagree with the project. The marina construction comes at the expense of the system. I think it is utterly stupid to destroy the main attraction of the island in order to build a marina. Years ago, similar things happened at Tioman. The government built an airport on a reclaimed land off Tioman and in the process, damaged part of the ecosystem. In my opinion, an alternative to an airport is the usage of floatplane, or seaplane. However, there is no use crying over split milk.

Conversely, the construction of the marina has not even started and any damage to the coral reef system can be avoided by preventing this project.

The Malaysian Department of the Environment (DOE) has recorded its opposition towards the marina project but from what I have read, the DOE has no power comparable to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to prevent this. To prove this, three barges associated with the project contractor have already reached Tioman even though the DOE has yet to approve the contractor’s environmental management plan.

At the same time, I am never going to trust the DOE again. Even the fast eroding EPA earns more respect from any green’s eye. What good is the DOE when the report environmental impact assessment (EIA) is approved even while the environment is at a terrible loss? How could such body, supposedly to take care of the environment, gave a green light even as the coral reef system is being threatened unnecessarily?

The same thing happened to Broga. The EIA allowed the construction of the incinerator despite the knowledge that the incinerator site is in a proven water catchments area.

Perhaps the libertarian’s common belief is entirely true; one cannot trust the government.

I am not sure what I am going to do other than rant. It seems hopeless. It seems, I have more power in the US than in my home country. Nevertheless, I have just joined Environmental Justice, a campus wide environmental group. Through this organization, I hope I could somehow forward the trouble in Tioman.

p/s – This coming Monday, Nader, yes, Ralph Nader is coming to Michigan. I will be skipping class to attend that.

Categories
Sports

[404] Of revenge is sweet

Netherlands 2 – 0 Czech Republic in a World Cup qualifying match. Thanks to van Hooijdonk for both goals.

Regarding Ajax however, I am saddened to see Ibrahimovic leaving Ajax for Juventus. Though this happened about ten days ago, most Ajacieds are still outraged at the amount of transfer Ajax received, a mere 16 million Euros instead of the expected 45 million Euros.

God damns all Italian teams. From now on, all Italian teams are a micron away from being my most hated club(s) ever. Manchester United is still number one for the time being.

And now, if only Ajax could lose Trabelsi.

Categories
Liberty Politics & government

[403] Of Anwar Ibrahim is free, part two

Some people were surprised to see me celebrating Anwar Ibrahim’s release last week. Some of these people have seen me belittled the movement that Anwar helped started more than six years ago. Now, let me explain my position.

During the Asian Financial Crisis, I do believe Mahathir did the right thing by reversing Anwar’s decisions and ultimately, refusing IMF’s aid package. The IMF package in my opinion was too austere to act as a medicine. IMF wanted too many changes in a very short time frame. If Mahathir had gone with Anwar’s decision, Malaysia would probably suffer what Indonesia had.

Of course, that does not mean Anwar should be thrown to jail and treated the way he was treated. With a clash of policy, in my opinion, Anwar dismissal was sufficient.

But then, once dismissed, Anwar called up his supporters and his supporters in turn turned Kuala Lumpur into a war zone in 1999. Perhaps, that riot was not planned by Anwar. Maybe the riot itself was instigated by some of his mindless supporters. But still, whether it was planned or not, it was irresponsible to say the least.

The government acted almost swiftly to suppress the dissent. In some sense, it was good to see peace was restored, no matter how uneasy it was. On the other hand, as a result to that, the government used the Internal Security Act, an act somewhat similar to the Patriot Act in idea that was introduced by the Bush Administration a few years later, continuously in order to suppress almost every opposition toward the government then led by Mahathir.

Later, Anwar was charged with corruption and sodomy. I am not sure whether Anwar is guilty or not but the proofs that were presented against Anwar are not convincing. Here is where the ancient Greek wisdom comes in – innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt. In Anwar’s case, there is certainly reasonable doubt. At the same time, throughout those trials, a few Anwar’s supporters were silenced, their rights stripped.

And then, after all that, somehow, Anwar is associated with freedom and justice.

I love freedom but despite that association, I do not support Anwar. Though the movement did upstart a new call for freedom, it was somewhat shortsighted as it main goal was to fight for Anwar, not freedom per se. It was hypocritical from my point of view.

However, Voltaire once said, “Monsieur l’abb, I detest what you write, but I would give my life to make it possible for you to continue to write.” I truly believe in that. I believe he was wronged for some dubious reason and as a result, his rights were stolen from him and along with the others that protested with him.

That is the main reason why I celebrate Anwar’s freedom. Notice that I am not celebrating Anwar’s release because he is Anwar Ibrahim but because freedom is threatened. I believe it is somehow our responsibility to fight for Anwar’s freedom, may it by force or by merely disagree with the power that be quietly in our heart, regardless whether we agree or disagree with the oppresseds’ opinion. If you disagree with this, remember Martin Niemoeller and his stylized words:

First they came for the Communists, but I was not a Communist so I did not speak out.
Then they came for the Socialists and the Trade Unionists, but I was neither, so I did not speak out.
Then they came for the Jews, but I was not a Jew so I did not speak out.
And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me.

The other reason that I am glad to see Anwar free is the state of the opposition. The opposition is in dire need for a charismatic leader. Without a good opposition leader, Barisan Nasional, the current ruling coalition, will retain a ridiculous supermajority in the Malaysian Parliament. Like in economics, a competitive market is more efficient than a monopoly. With a monopoly, a deadweight loss is inevitable.

That, my friends, are two reasons on why I celebrate Anwar’s release. Again, I say, I do not support Anwar.

p/s – Yeah baby! After three semesters, I have finally gotten into the game theory class. Yeah! My misery is now almost complete.