Categories
Liberty

[1450] Of mostly uninterested in HINDRAF but interested in liberty

News of demolition of Hindu temples by local authorities that comes to surface from time to time is indeed disturbing but its status on government land blurs the line between right and wrong. Hindu Rights Action Force (HINDRAF) is one of a number of entities that are trying to stop any temple from demolition.

Frankly, I was uninterested in HINDRAF. It is partly to my slight inclination preferring not to have anything do to with religion as well as partly to me being undecided on the issue of temple demolition. I have read of mosques being torn down elsewhere and so I figured, what is so different with a Hindu temple?

Some may have countered that point by stating some of these temples are decades old. Fair enough but I am still staying firm on the fence, with equal force pulling to both sides.

That asides, HINDRAF’s action to drag the British government into local tussle — it is suing the British government for bringing Indians to Malaya, for exploiting them and then leaving them behind — sounds like a comedy. This Sunday, it plans to hold a rally in front of the British embassy, trying to get the British attention, and maybe trying to achieve the same success Bersih had achieved just weeks earlier. It amuses me. At the same time, there is a slight disgust in me of HINDRAF; I am not comfortable of the idea of getting foreigners involved though perhaps, HINDRAF had exhausted all local avenues and had no other choice but this. That notwithstanding, I have a feeling that members of HINDRAF are saying that they wished that they had not been Malaysians. If indeed that is the message HINDRAF is sending, it is hard to sympathize with them. Whatever it might mean, I take that their action is merely as an attention grabber, attracting spotlights from across the sea to highlight the issues that HINDRAF is working on. It is a strategic rather than a be all, end all action. But I essentially did not care. It was a Hindu issue with complex background and too communal to fit my taste.

I however start to care when outright transgression of liberty is happening. I start to care when the police begins to arrest individuals just because these individuals are expressing their opinion, however strong that opinion may be. I start to care when freedom to assemble is being robbed from free people.

This issue has gone from a Hindu-centered issue to a question of liberty. To me, it stopped being an exclusively Hindu issue when the BN-led government decides to ban the rally. It stopped being a Hindu issue when the BN government arrested some leaders of HINDRAF under Sedition Act. It is the same case for the Bersih rally. While I believe Bersih demands are acceptable, I do not agree in bringing the monarch into politics; I have a republican tendency. But when the BN-led government decided to challenge liberty, I resolved to join the rally, despite my misgivings.

Had the government in power shown more respect for liberty, I would have continued not to care.

Categories
Humor Society

[1449] Of Happy Thanksgiving

I ate my turkey at Subway. Sad, huh?

Anyway, for fun reading:

At my friend’s house, a mansion with an army of Iraqi cooks, gardeners and security guards, the Iraqi staff gathered in the kitchen to watch the ajanib cook Ali Sheesh. All men, they lounged against the counter, chain-smoking.

”You will never cook Ali Sheesh in time,” said the tallest, with amused condescension. ”You must cut him up. Otherwise he will not cook before midnight!”

His friends nodded, laughing. They offered other instructions: We should sauté Ali Sheesh first; we should season him with sabaa baharat, seven spices, and layer him in a large pan; we should boil him and add rice. We had no idea what we were doing: we would poison the guests!

Finally my friend had had enough of their mockery. ”How do you know how to cook a turkey?” she demanded.

The ringleader drew himself up, looking down at us, offended. ”I have seen it,” he said, with finality, ”on ”˜Mr. Bean’!” [Baghdad Thanksgiving, 2003. NYT. November 22 2007]

Ali Sheesh is turkey, in Iraqi Arabic.

Categories
Economics Society

[1448] Of before you shut the door, wait

Kuala Lumpur is full of aliens, legal or otherwise. In the recent weeks, there has been a strong call from those in power to reduce dependency on foreign laborers. Xenophobes only happy to jump onto the bandwagon that appeals to protectionism and central planning. This is indeed not the first time xenophobes have spoken out their mind.

The Malaysian economy is highly dependent on foreign labor. The fact that 41% of construction sector workforce is made up of foreigner stresses the importance foreign workers to our economy. Estimate has it that there are 2.6 million foreign workers in the country, or approximately 10% of total population of Malaysia.[1]

There are a few reasons for that and one of them as well as the simplest explanation is cost. Under the same labor and environmental requirements, foreign labors are willing to work for less compared to the locals; of course, foreign labor here refers to mostly low-level talents who privy not to higher education. Given the cost, it makes absolute sense to hire foreigners instead of locals. If the locals are willing to match the wages of foreigners, I am sure the composition of workers in the industries such as construction that demand low-level talents will tip in favor of the locals.

It is true that influx of foreign labors Malaysia depresses wages, assuming demand for labor does not increase, under typical situation. Without these foreigners, wages would be higher and closer to the level that matches locals’ preference. Yet, I would argue, industries which experience such wages depression are those that the locals are uninterested to participate in. On top of that, if it had not been for the increased labor supply, cost of construction will be higher and thus, an obstacle to economic development. Besides, Malaysian workforce on average is more educated than most of these foreigners. Stretching the line of reasoning further, the availability of foreign labors free up local resources — local human capital — for other more productive, higher talent intensive industries.[2] Indeed, it is a high time for Malaysia to move from manufacturing to services, up the value chain. For this reason, Malaysia needs to pay special attention to its education system.

Another possible reason for such a high requirement for foreign labor is shortage of workers. Despite the discussion of high unemployment among college graduates, Malaysia has a low unemployment rate; for the second quarter, the rate stood at 3.4%.[3] Not all of the unemployed, especially college graduate with degree in IT, mass communication, engineering or any other sexy courses would even think of toiling under the merciless sun welding steel, smoothing out the cement surface in effort to build yet another skyscraper to fill the sky of Malaysia, or roofs for most of us to live under.

If the number of unemployed graduate is not enough to explain the 3.4% rate, do not forgot frictional unemployment, those leave their jobs voluntarily for another jobs, which may be better. How many of you have heard a friend said he was in between jobs? That is frictional unemployment. And then, there is cyclical unemployment, which rises and drops according to seasons. In other words, quantity-wise, the number of workers and the availability of jobs may match or more than demanded but talent-wise, there is likely a shortage in the market.

This economic preference for foreign labors over local ones have prompted allegation that these foreigners are stealing jobs from the locals. On the contrary, nobody is stealing anything from anybody. It is simply something called competition and there will be winners as well as losers in a competition. These laborers are sometimes just thankful to escape the kind of poverty that persists in certain countries like Bangladesh or Myanmar. Their determination to escape poverty drives them to work hard. In all fairness, they should at least be rewarded with employment opportunity. I am willing to go farther to say that the locals, me included, which are used to hand outs, have a thing or two to learn from these foreigners. They may reach our shore in rags, looked down upon, but they have the drive that many of us — whom unashamedly demand for subsidy year in year out, as if it is our god-given right — do not.

Objectors to the use, or some may contend as excessive use, of foreign labor, have alleged that the presence of foreign laborers increase the probability of crime. They insist that most crimes are committed by foreigners. This is far from the truth and in fact, it is the locals that contribute to the level of crime rate we Malaysians currently experience.

Others have proposed expanding the use of robotics to reduce dependency on foreign labor. Alas, without doubt, labor cost, at least for low level talents, is much lower than the capital cost associated with robotics. The use of such capital-intensive resources is only justified when the cost of labor is high; high labor cost is associated with high level of education.

One argument against the use of foreign labor however may stand up. It concerns clash of culture. For this reason, it is wise to not allow a sudden influx of immigrants into a community. The locals need time to accommodate their expectation and to build trust while the foreigners need time to learn local culture. Nevertheless, with the expected closer integration among ASEAN member states — relatively freer flow of capital and labor — a good foreign labor policy will be the one that encourages liberal local attitude towards foreigners, expounding the fact that these foreigners are as much as human as you and I, Malaysians.

The sooner we get use to ASEAN’s Schengen area, the easier we Malaysians could integrate with the rest of the people of Southeast Asia.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[1] — Malaysia is home to an estimated 2.6 million legal and illegal foreign workers. They are critical to the nation’s valuable manufacturing and agriculture sectors, and many householders rely on foreign domestic workers. [Malaysian law to curb foreign workers, illegal immigration. AFP via Google News. November 12 2007]

[2] — Kindly compare my rationale to that of the Prime Minister’s:

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 9 (Bernama) — Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi today asked employers to stop the “craze” to hire foreign workers as the move will not contribute to human capital development but will instead have a negative impact on the nation.

He said hiring of foreign workers, be it legally or illegally, would not help to upgrade the technology in the country as the foreigners recruited are not highly skilled and have low productivity. [Stop The Craze To Hire Foreign Workers, Abdullah Tells Employers. Bernama. Retrieved November 9 2007]

[3] Key statistics. Department of Statistics, Malaysia. Retrieved November 21 2007.

Categories
ASEAN Economics Politics & government

[1447] Of aww, crap

SINGAPORE/MANILA (Reuters) – Myanmar should commit to democracy and release its opposition leader if it signs the new ASEAN Charter, or risk the Philippines not ratifying it, Philippine President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo said on Monday. [Myanmar needs democracy for ASEAN charter: Manila. Reuters. November 20 2007]

I hope that does not derail the planned regional-wide economic integration in 2015.

If it does, we, as in ASEAN, need to kick Myanmar off the tightrope and continue a step towards freer trade. I do not support kicking the country out of ASEAN for such move reduces ASEAN’s say over the country but if Myanmar is dragging the rest of ASEAN member states from achieving freer trade (okay, okay; I know it is regionalism, a slightly perverted idea of free trade but given the pace of the Doha Round, regionalism free trade is the next best thing), we might as well cut Myanmar lose. We may have responsibilities to the people of Myanmar but we also have responsibilities to ourselves. Myanmar must not be that wall that prevents ASEAN from moving forward.

We have waited long enough and I do not want to wait much longer than necessary.

Categories
Sports

[1446] Of goodbye Coach Carr

Goodbye.