Categories
Humor Politics & government

[1475] Of The Liars’ Papers

This is just too good to let go.

Earlier friend Howsy highlighted a discovery by Cakap Tak Serupa Bikin .Howsy aptly calls his post “Fake Merdeka Centre ‘Street Protests’ Survey: Results Produced Even Before Survey Conducted!

Why is that so? Well, see it for yourself and be mindful of the dates (taken from Cakap Tak Serupa Bikin):

Fair use.

Too small? Well, the second paragraph reads:

This was revealed in a survey conducted by the Merdeka Centre between Dec 17 and Dec 21. [‘No’ to street protests. The Star. December 17 2007]

For larger view, click here.

As mentioned by Howsy, today is December 17 and if the statement in the article were true, the result would be out before it could come in! Nothing less than magic!

Go get the dead tree edition quick and parade the copy to the whole wide world. In fact, parade it to the Information Minister’s residence!

Later, perhaps realizing that the mistakes or just maybe, realizing that bloggers are feasting on The Star, they deleted the dates from the online version. The second paragraph then read:

This was revealed in a survey conducted recently by the Merdeka Centre. [‘No’ to street protests. The Star. December 17 2007]

After awhile, the paragraph was yet amended to put in new dates. Currently as of 17:00 local time, it reads:

This was revealed in a survey conducted by the Merdeka Centre from Dec 7 to 12. [No’ to street protests. The Star. December 17 2007]

So, is this a case of misplaced 1’s, too much spinning until the editors dazed himself up or the invention of time machine?

Just in case The Star decides to amend its article again, this is the screenshot of the article at about 17:00.

Fair use.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p/s — Desi followed up on the matter. The Star has yet to, however.

Categories
Environment Politics & government

[1474] Of hero of the COP 13

The US changed its mind after this was uttered (via):

We ask for your leadership. We seek your leadership. But if for some reason you’re not willing to lead, leave it to the rest of us. Please get out of the way.

— Kevin Conrad, Papua New Guinea.

For background:

After two weeks of intense discussions and bitter wrangling, delegates from over 180 nations at the Bali climate summit reached agreement on a two-year “roadmap” for finding a successor to the Kyoto Protocol.

The last-minute deal came on Saturday after the US delegation made a U-turn in a final negotiating session. The US had opposed a proposal by the G77 bloc, which represents developing countries, for rich nations to do more to help the developing world combat increasing greenhouse gas emissions.

Paula Dobriansky, leader of the US delegation, and her colleague James Connaughton found themselves the targets of naked animosity. When Dobriansky announced that the US would not sign up for the Bali roadmap, boos echoed through the room. The Americans were sharply attacked by several delegations. “If you’re not willing to lead, please get out of the way,” said a US environmental activist representing Papua New Guinea.

Other opponents of binding targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, such as Japan or Russia, failed to come to the US delegation’s defense. Left isolated, the American delegation gave in and agreed to the roadmap. “We will go forward and join consensus,” said Dobriansky. This time the delegation was rewarded with a standing ovation from some participants. [Climate Change Deal Reached after US U-Turn. Spiegel. December 15 2007]

There still a long way to go but we are marching on to 2012. But what exactly were achieved?

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS:

It recognizes that “deep cuts” in global emissions will be required to prevent dangerous human interference in the climate. It references scientific reports that suggest a range of cuts between 25 and 40 percent by 2020, but prescribes no such targets itself.

DEADLINE:

Negotiations for the next climate accord should last for two years and conclude in 2009 in order to allow enough time to implement it at the end of 2012. Four major climate meetings will take place next year.

RICH AND POOR:

Negotiators should consider binding reductions of gas emissions by industrialized countries, while developing countries should consider moves to control the growth of their emissions. Richer countries should work to transfer climate-friendly technology to poorer nations.

ADJUSTING TO CLIMATE CHANGE:

Negotiators should look at supporting urgent steps to help poorer countries adapt to inevitable effects of global warming, such as building seawalls to guard against rising oceans.

DEFORESTATION:

Negotiators should consider “positive incentives” for reducing deforestation in developing countries, many of which are seeking international compensation for preserving their forest “sinks” absorbing carbon dioxide. [A Look at the Bali Climate Change Plan. Associated Press via NYT. December 15 2007]

The last point, which essentially the internalization of positive (i.e. living trees) and negative externalities (i.e. loss of carbon sink) though on theory is fantastic, in practice, pricing might be tough or even expensive if done properly. The reason is, the forest should be priced as high as the most productive activities that cause deforestation. This means that those that enjoy positive externality and suffer negative externality from forest and deforestation need not only to match returns from the timber industry but also from industries such as agriculture. This would mean the full compensation could amount to billions.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p/s — I have just realized this:

Lead, follow, or get out of the way.

— Thomas Paine (January 29, 1737 — June 8, 1809)

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

pp/s — Or more explicitly…

[youtube]r0O7RmIsvEQ[/youtube]

Categories
Books, essays and others Economics History & heritage

[1473] Of a farewell to alms, and 2007

This is the last book for the year 2007 for me.

Fair use. Princeton University Press.

This book created quite a buzz in the economic realm. I have actually cheated my way through and read its reviews. Still, that fails to satisfy my curiosity. Thus, the purchase.

The odd thing is, an almost the same point that is central to this book is touched by Beinhocker briefly in The Origin of Wealth: Evolution, Complexity and the Radical Remaking of Economics. And I think, this book should be read together with Douglass North’s Understanding the Process of Economic Change. I have yet to read North myself but I have read enough reviews to suspect that the two authors may be offering competing intriguing explanations to economic development. Or, in fact, complementary since no one theory typically explains everything away at ease in economics. I will invest effort to make North’s work as my first book for 2008.

Anyway, apparently, the book is quite hard to come by in Malaysia; I had to wait for a month or so for this book. Once, I asked for the book at Kinokuniya, and they gave me A Farewell to Arms by Ernest Hemingway instead. That was a “WTF?” moment there then but no matter. All is well now for I am a proud owner of the hardcover edition!

And oh, boy. There are too many books unread and most of them fall under the economics section. Maybe, just maybe, I should stop buying books for awhile.

Categories
Conflict & disaster Liberty

[1472] Of deserve neither and will lose both

Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

— Benjamin Franklin (January 17 1706 — April 17 1790)

Categories
Politics & government

[1471] Mengenai pemimpin separuh jalan

John Kerry, seorang calon Demokrat untuk kerusi Presiden Amerika Syarikat pada tahun 2004 pernah dituduh sebagai calon yang sering menukar fikiran. Mereka yang menentang pencalonannya dengan mudah melabelkan ahli Demokrat itu sebagai tidak berpendirian. Jawapan Kerry terhadap satu soalan mengenai pembiayaan perang setinggi USD87 billion di Kongress masih lagi berdengung di gegendang telinga: “Saya sokong cadangan USD87 billion itu sebelum saya menentangnya” (I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it). Kata-katanya itu menjadi tema tidak rasmi kempennya yang gagal. Walaupun Lautan Pasifik memisahkan dua negara yang berkongsi jalur merah-putih ini, pentadbiran Perdana Menteri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi tidak jauh berbeza dengan John Kerry dari segi keyakinan pendirian.

Beberapa contoh perlu diberi untuk menguatkan persamaan itu dan peristiwa pembatalan pembinaan jambatan untuk mengantikan Tambak Johor ada untuk diimbas kembali. Pada mulanya, pentadbiran negara ini beria-ia untuk memulakan pembinaan jambatan itu walaupun tanpa persetujuan daripada negara jiran Singapura. Saya adalah seorang daripada mereka yang menyokong pembinaan jambatan itu atas beberapa sebab. Malah, saya juga menyokong Malaysia untuk tarik diri daripada perbincangan mengenai jambatan itu kerana pilihan yang tersedia di dalam pertemuan itu kurang berupaya mengatasi pulangan yang wujud di luar. Setelah menyedari akan kenyataan itu, kerajaan Malaysia memulakan kerja-kerja awal pembinaan jambatan. Beberapa minggu kemudian bagaimanapun, pembinaan dibatalkan dengan mengejutnya. Saya berasa amat kecewa akan keputusan itu yang dicapai seolah-olah oleh seorang remaja wanita yang mengalami haid. Yang lebih menyakitkan hati, duit rakyat sebanyak RM100 juta terpaksa dibayar kepada satu syarikat yang terlibat di dalam pembinaan jambatan itu sebagai pampasan ganti rugi. Ini tidak termasuk malu yang ditanggung oleh Malaysia akibat keputusan kerajaan yang tidak bertanggungjawab. Jikalau pentadbiran Abdullah Ahmad Badawi tidak bersedia untuk membina jambatan itu dari awal, tidak perlulah mereka memberi janji-janji palsu. Saya percaya, saya mampu menerima keputusan “tidak” dengan baik jika ia dilakukan dari awal lagi. Saya jamin, ramai yang bersependapat dengan saya mengenai perkara ini.

Satu lagi contoh menyentuh penjualan sebahagian daripada saham Proton kepada Volkswagen. Saya secara amnya menyokong dasar-dasar liberalisasi. Tarian mengacah yang berlaku di meja rundingan seperti yang disampaikan oleh media massa bagaimanapun tidak membantu menerangkan keadaan. Seperti iklan biskut Chipsmore, sekejap ada, sekejap tiada. Kemudiannya, kerajaan melalui Khazanah Nasional Berhad membuat keputusan untuk menarik diri daripada meja bulat setelah pembincangan penjualan itu berlangsung dengan baik.[1] Ini menguatkan lagi corak yang disaksikan di sekitar isu jambatan pengantian Tambak Johor: pendirian yang goyah. Ini mengugat segala keyakinan yang ada di dalam seseorang kepada kerajaan.

Ini sangat berbeza dengan cara pemerintahan PM Mahathir Mohamed yang tegas. Oleh sebab inilah saya percaya bahawa 50 tahun akan datang, tiada siapa akan mengingati PM Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

Selain jambatan dan Proton, bagai lalang ditiup angin, dasar yang dibuat semata-mata melalui budi bicara yang merosakkan reputasi negara kelihatan di projek landasan keretapi berkembar. Pentadbiran sebelumnya memulakan projek tersebut hanya untuk dibatalkan, atau ditanggungkan oleh pentadbiran kini. Kata kerajaan, membazir; defisit pembelanjaan negara yang besar.[2] Apabila Rancangan Malaysia Ke-9 dilancarkan, tidaklah pula PM memikirkan tentang defisit. Oh ya, setelah beberapa tahun kemudian, projek itu dilancarkan kembali.[3] Janganlah kita lupa pula tentang bagaimana Ircon dari India dipermainkan oleh kerajaan Malaysia pimpinan Barisan Nasional semasa pemberian kontrak landasan berkembar itu.[4]

Pola pemerintahan yang gemar menggunakan budi bicara ini hanya memikirkan apa yang berlaku dijangka masa yang terdekat tanpa menghiraukan kesan jangka masa panjang. Siapa yang akan mempercayai Malaysia apabila kita selalu gagal dan cuba untuk melarikan diri daripada memenuhi kata-kata kita? Jika ini berterusan, janji Malaysia akan kehilangan nilai.

Jadi, apabila PM menyatakan bahawa beliau bukan pemimpin separuh jalan[5], sukar untuk saya mempercayai beliau. Saya menjemput para pembaca untuk menilai rekod pentadbiran ini dengan mata dan telinga sendiri dan tidak mempercayai apa yang diperkatakan oleh PM tanpa usul periksa. Rekod dengan jelas menunjukkan bahawa PM ini memandu kereta ke satu arah dan kemudian patah balik ke belakang tanpa tiba di destinasi yang dijanjikan. Atas sebab inilah, bagi saya, kata-kata PM tiada nilai lagi.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[1] — FRANKFURT/KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 20 (Reuters) – Malaysia and Volkswagen (VOWG.DE), the world’s fourth-largest carmaker, have ended talks aimed at setting up a cooperation deal with struggling national carmaker Proton Holdings (PROT.KL).

It was the second time in two years that VW-Proton talks over cooperation have ended without a deal, but VW said it still planned to build up a production base in Southeast Asia.

Malaysia announced on Tuesday that it would no longer look for a foreign partner for the ailing Proton for now and added that state investment firm Khazanah Nasional had stopped its talks with both VW and U.S. rival General Motors (GM.N). [Malaysia ends talks with VW, GM over Proton. Reuters. November 20 2007]

[2] — On his move to cancel or postpone certain mega projects after becoming prime minister, Abdullah said it was because the government was facing a deficit budget at that time. [Rules eased to woo foreigners yet help Bumis. New Straits Times. December 5 2007]

[3] — He said some of the projects were being revived, citing the double-tracking project as an example. [Rules eased to woo foreigners yet help Bumis. New Straits Times. December 5 2007]

[4] — New Delhi – Malaysia has re-issued an invitation to the Indian Railway Construction Company (IRCON) to participate in the double tracking railway project from Seremban to Gemas.

The invitation by Prime Minister Dato’ Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi was handed personally to Indian Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh by Foreign Minister, Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar who is attending the Malaysia India joint commission meeting in New Delhi.

Commercial relations between Malaysia and India hit a sour note in 2003 after Malaysia denied IRCON the USD$3.4 billion double-tracking contract despite having issued a letter of intent to the company. [Malaysia re-issued an invitation to IRCON for the double tracking railway project. RTM. February 17 2007]

[5] — PUTRAJAYA: Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi berkata, semua janji yang terkandung dalam manifesto Barisan Nasional (BN) pada Pilihan Raya Umum 2004 sedang dilaksanakan dan ia mengambil masa lebih daripada sepenggal untuk disempurnakan.

Sambil menyatakan beliau bukan pemimpin separuh jalan, Perdana Menteri berkata, segala perancangan kini berjalan lancar dan negara sudah memasuki fasa kedua pelaksanaan program pembangunan bagi mencapai matlamat Wawasan 2020. [Saya bukan pemimpin separuh jalan: Abdullah. Berita Harian. December 11 2007]