Categories
Environment Science & technology

[1040] Of glacial retreat at Puncak Jaya

I am familiar with glacial retreat. To many, the most famous retreat is probably the one occurring at Mount Kilimanjaro of Kenya, Africa. On whether this is a proof of global warming, I will leave you to decide on it.

Kilimanjaro however is perhaps too far away for average Malaysians like me to relate to. Worry not however because there is a closer example of glacial retreat: Puncak Jaya. Puncak Jaya is the highest mountain in Indonesia with the height of 4,884 m. That means it is higher than Mount Kinabalu of Malaysia. It is located in West Papua.

Wikipedia has an animation that illustrates the glacial retreat at Puncak Jaya:

Public domain. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:137.13211E_4.05959S.gif

Nothing less than dramatic, yes?

The entire glacier is expected to melt by 2016, less than 10 years from now.

Where exactly is Puncak Jaya? Thanks to Google, here it is:

Fair use. Copyright by Google.

I hope the familiar features of Borneo and Australia is enough for many to recognize the location of the mountain.

For more similar animations, please visit the provided link to a page at Wikipedia, just before the animation.

If you are wondering what the hell is the hole in the middle of the 2003 picture, it is a copper mine.

Categories
Photography

[1039] Of a morning at a small rubber estate II

As promised.

I had some fun in trying to focus on the object of interest:

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams.

Here is the focused shot:

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams.
Categories
Photography

[1038] Of Eye on Malaysia

Right after work yesterday, I gave Titiwangsa Lake Garden a visit. Though the place was still in a mess with a lot of work still needed to be done as of Friday’s evening, the place was a cool place for photography. Armed with my tiny camera, I set my eyes on the Eye on Malaysia.

From the other side of the lake, the ferris wheel looks impressive:

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams.

After spending RM 30 million, it better be.

On closer inspection:

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams

From the side:

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams

From the front:

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams.

And finally, inclusive of the city’s skyline:

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams.

There were many other like-minded persons patronizing the lake garden. Some of them have big ass cameras. All I could say is that, I am envious!

So, Happy Visit Malaysia Year 2007.

But this year, Malaysia is 44 years old, not 50.

Categories
History & heritage

[1037] Of evolution of the Malaysian coat of arms

Have you ever wondered the history behind the Malaysian coat of arms?

I have ever since I visited the Tugu Negara back in 2006. I have two entries for the visit; they are here and here. On the monument itself is a coat of arms that differs from the current one. I have a photo of it but I cannot remember where I placed it.

Though curious of the difference, I never had the time to do a research on it. For the past few weeks however, a Malaysian Wikipedian by the nick of Bukhrin has been doing a remarkably good job on it.

Let us get started on the history of the Malaysian coat of arms.

The current Malaysian coat of arms is this:

Copyrights by the government of Malaysia. Fair use.

As the formal description goes, the five krises represent what was the Unfederated Malay States, the four rectangles in four colors represent what was the Federated Malay States, the lean tree and the bridge represent Penang, the shield between the hibiscus flower and the insignia of Penang is Sabah, the flower is the federation, the hornbill is Sarawak and the green tree is Malacca. Also of interest to me, the fourteen-pointed star represent the 13 member states and the federation.

It had not always been like that. Previously, it looked like this:

Copyright by Vector design. Fair use.

Notice the changes for Penang, Sabah and Sarawak. For Penang, the German term Ich Dien which means “I serve” is visible. For those unfamiliar with history, Penang was formerly called the Prince of Wales island, in honor of, well, the Prince of Wales. According to Wikipedia, the motto of the Prince of Wales is Ich Dien. Therefore, the similarity is not coincidental. I have a feeling that the change to the Penang’s insignia is caused by the Malaysian government’s eagerness to cut ties with the state’s colonial past. For Sarawak, I would venture the same reasoning that I offered for Penang plus another factor: the cross. I however am unsure why Sabah’s symbol was changed. Further, it seems that Sabah transfered its previous symbol to Sarawak.

Farther into history, the original 13-state coat of arms is this:

Copyrights unknown. Fair use.

Notice the tigers and the changes to the symbol of Sabah.

Of course, those three shields are related to the 13-state federation. Malaysia once was a 14-state federation. Singapore together with 13 other states formed Malaysia in 1963 but was expelled by the federation in 1965. So, between 1963 and 1965 inclusively, the coat of arms was like this:

Fair use.

Observe the crescent and the five stars which represent Singapore in place of the hibiscus.

The formation of the Malaysian federation however does not seem to demand a new design. See the Federation of Malaya’s coat of arms:

Fair use.

Observe how the symbol of the Federated Malay States dominates the center of the shield. Also, A Famosa for Malacca, instead of the tree, which really is the Malacca tree. Do not miss the tigers and the 11-pointed star too.

You think it began with the Malayan Federation?

Wait till you see the coat of arms of the Federated Malay States:

Most probably public domain. Fair use if not.

The FMS was established in 1895.

I do not know how the Malayan Union’s coat of arms looks like. The Malayan Union was the entity that existed between the loose British Malaya and the Malayan Federation. Specifically, between 1946 and 1948.

A question, what inspired the FMS’ coat of arms. Does anybody know?

Regardless, this means that the Malaysian coat of arms has undergone more than 110 years of evolution.

Categories
Society

[1036] Of religion as panacea and naivety

Panacea is a noun that describes an idea of a cure-all. Panacea is also the goddess of cures and healing in the ancient Greek mythology. The etymology of the word is as clear as daylight. Though the myth has been well dismissed by rationality, she still has worshipers of her own; she lives on among the philosophies of many religious conservatives in the far right.

The far right religious conservatives — be it Christian conservatives in the US or the Muslim conservatives in Malaysia — believe that the woes of the world will end once the world returns to religion. They believe that religion is the panacea for the world.

In Malaysia, it is not rare to find a religious conservative expressing the idea fervently. As a nominal Muslim, Friday sermon is one of the places where I could find individuals that believe in the concept of religion as panacea. The local blogosphere is another place where local religious conservatives proudly display their panacea thinking. Wherever I spot the idea, I cannot help but smile in amusement, noting an irony in the thinking of the religious conservatives, hyperbolically speaking.

In the broadest sense, the ancient Greeks that practiced polytheism could be considered as pagans. At the same time, religious conservative Muslims have the most profound disgust for paganism. Now, if conservative Muslims believe in panacea, would not that make them as part of the pagans themselves?

Hyperbolic reasoning asides, it seems that the “religion as the panacea” idea comes together with another concept as a package. I am unsure whether it is a separate idea or part of it. Nevertheless, the idea that tags along with the panacea concept is a longing for the past. There is an implicit belief among conservatives that the past is better than today. On average, of course.

After all the progress humanity has achieved, I find it hard to believe the past is better than today, even with all the problems we are facing currently as a society and as an individual. We today are far richer than our ancestors. Not just in term of wealth but also in term of knowledge. With so much knowledge out there, I could only wonder why a person would want to live in an inferior age.

Yet, I do not mind if these religious conservatives prefer to live in the past. The only one thing that I ask is this: please do not drag me and others that disagree with religious conservatism along to the past. After centuries of progress and discoveries, I prefer to be here and now and strive for a better future rather than seek refuge in the ignorant past. I am a pessimist, yes. Within this context however, I am the optimist.

My optimism has its limit though. It does not include a trust for a cure-all solution. There are limitless problems out there and it is hopelessly naive to believe that all those problems could be solved by a panacea. Snake oil failed as a panacea. Why would religion be any better than snake oil?

Religion might have a role in this world but being a panacea is not it.