Categories
Society

[2180] Of sneaky Hadi wants to sneak in Allah

Abdul Hadi Awang saw it and he capitalized on it. Given how the Islamic party he is in positions itself in the Allah controversy, he took the next step and suggested that the first principle of the Rukunegara[0] be changed from belief in god to belief in Allah.[1] If Allah is a generic term for god and god is the generic term for Allah, then they are equivalents, right?

Except, that I take the change as more insidious in nature. Not that the Rukunegara is the law of the land — hence its importance is debatable — but execution of that suggestion is problematic for future discourse on the status of Islam in Malaysia.

Equalizing god and Allah is really a double-edged sword. On one hand, it appeals to unity, at least among the Abrahamic religions especially after the divisive Allah controversy. On the other hand, quite sneakily, it offers greater ammunition for Islamists in future debates regarding secularism and the Malaysian state. I can imagine how later down the line some Islamists would support their arguments by citing the Rukunegara while conveniently forgetting that context which that suggestion was made.

I am not impressed by that suggestion. Even if the word god and Allah refer to the same concept, it is far easier to stick with the status quo rather than wade through the controversy that the change might ignite. Besides, not everybody subscribes to the argument that god and Allah refers to the same idea. I have not heard of Hindus, for instance, referring to their gods as Allah, never mind that the concept of monotheism does not appeal to Hinduism.

Consider also the atheists and the agnostics. Where are they in the grand scheme of things, Mr. Hadi? Burnt at the stake?

I feel there are many Islamists out there who subscribe to the exclusivity of the word Allah to the Muslim community in Malaysia. There would not have been a controversy if these Islamists do not exist. If the word god in the Rukunegara is to be changed to Allah, I am sure they will take this in some way as an Islamization of Malaysia. They will see it as a good move. I also will consider it as an act of Islamizing Malaysia. Unlike the Islamists however, I will be compelled to protest loudly.

As a secularist myself, I am not at all enamored by the first principle of the Rukunegara. I plainly dismiss it but I realize that raising objection to it is really a worthless exercise. Really, it is quite petty. But if Mr. Hadi wants to start a public discourse on the matter, let it be known that my default position is the abolition of the first principle.

And I think, I am not alone.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[0] — See Rukunegara at Wikipedia. Assessed March 22 2010.

[1] — KUALA LUMPUR, March 22 (Bernama) — Pas president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang on Monday suggested that the first Rukun Negara be amended as the word Allah was widely used by non-Muslims.

“I call on the government to amend the first Rukun Negara from belief in God to belief in Allah,” he said during the debate on the motion of thanks on the Yang di-Pertuan Agong’s speech, in the Dewan Rakyat.

Abdul Hadi said the Al-Quran did not bar followers of other religions from using the word Allah. [Hadi Awang Suggests That First Rukun Negara Be Amended. Bernama. March 22 2010]

Categories
Photography

[2179] Of Manly

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams.

A friend told me that British explorers found this place to be manly and hence, the name Manly. At least according to a French publication.

That is just too outrageous but I think Manly is my favorite beach so far.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p/s — well, Wikipedia says:

Manly was named by Capt. Arthur Phillip for the indigenous people living there, “their confidence and manly behaviour made me give the name of Manly Cove to this place”. These men were of the Kay-ye-my clan (of the Guringai people). [Manly, New South Wales. Wikipedia. Accessed March 21 2010]

I owe a friend of mine an apology. How do you say sorry in French?

Categories
Pop culture

[2178] Of Hurt Locker won an Oscar?

Hurt Locker won the Oscar. We all know that. It winning the Oscar was one of the reasons why I wanted to watch it. And watched it I did. With friends saying how good the movie is, I had high expectation. By the time the credit rolled, I thought, why did it win the Oscar?

It is a good movie, that I admit. Scenes of bomb disarmament are involving. I like it. The acting is fantastic.

I do not see why it deserves an Oscar however. There is really nothing special about it and the storyline is not one that is truly memorable.

A bomb specialist dies. A hero bomb specialist replaces the dead bomb specialist. The hero bomb specialist has emotion. Soldiers are human beings too. The hero gets back. The hero gets reposted to some warzone again.

Big deal.

One might want to analyze the theme of the movie and its moral. Do it. However intellectual one wants to get, Hurt Locker remains an action movie that does not require a lot of thinking. The closest it gets in activating my neurons is the scene when the hero is back home in the United States trying to choose a box of cereal out of many brands available.

I watch movies only infrequently. But if this is the best movie for 2009, then 2009 must have had been a really slow year.

Categories
Photography

[2177] Of here comes the sun

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams.

Moreton Bay, Queensland.

I wish I had captured the sun in its full glory.

Categories
Economics

[2176] Of Lim Guan Eng probably does not know that everybody pays SST

Opponents of the introduction of goods and services tax (GST) in Malaysia have raised a number of points.

Some of the points are valid even if they are disagreeable. Sometimes, the disagreement is ideological and difference is due to premises originating from separate irreconcilable positions. Those points are fine because at least they are logical and honest.

Some, like opposition to GST based on regressiveness, are plainly illogical and wrong however. Some are pure bullshit of gargantuan magnitude, i.e. if the tax rate is 4% and there are four points within a value chain, the total tax rate paid by the end consumer is 16%. One made by Lim Guan Eng at an anti-GST forum some weeks ago is disingenuously irrelevant.

Mr. Lim stated that under GST, everybody will be taxed.[0] It is true that everybody, in a sense that any anybody who consumes a particular taxed good regardless of income levels, will be taxed. But this line of argument presumes that everybody has not already been taxed.

Unfortunately for Mr. Lim, consumers in Malaysia have already been taxed through a consumption tax that is theoretically as flat and as regressive as GST. That tax is the sales and services tax (SST).

Because of the untrue presumption, his argument is irrelevant.

Why is the argument irrelevant?

To evaluate the worth of his argument, a comparison between GST and status quo scenarios has to be made.

Why?

Remember, the proposal is to replace SST with GST. The desirability of one option has to be defined in terms of the desirability of the other and vice versa. In other words, ask the question, “why one option is better than the other?” Absolute statement does not help in decision-making. Relative statement does.

Further, for Mr. Lim’s — and increasingly what is becoming one of Pakatan Rakyat’s as well as others parrot the argument without thinking — argument to be relevant, the status quo must consist of a scenario where not everybody is being taxed. There is no such status quo: the status quo has SST in place.

What is the point of arguing as Mr. Lim has done so when everybody has already been taxed — in fact, taxed at a higher rate? Remember, the current GST  is planned to be introduced at 4% while the current SST rate ranges from 5% to 10% and there are goods taxed at even 20%.[1]

Both SST which is currently in place, and GST, will affect everybody. If one opposes GST on the basis of how GST affects everybody, then the person has to oppose SST too. Therefore, that person should be indifferent between having GST and SST. One simply cannot make sense if one bases one’s opposition on how GST will affect everybody.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[0] — Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng said with the old sales and services tax system, only some 1.5 million of the total of 12 million workers are taxed but its replacement with the GST will mean everyone, including poor workers, will be affected. [Pakatan bets on GST to muscle BN out. The Malaysian Insider. February 29 2010]

[1] — See Sales Tax. Accessed December 3 2009.