Categories
Kitchen sink Photography

[611] Of off to Singapore

Well, I’m off to Singapore soon. Ah, more pictures for my collection.

And since I can’t think of anything to write right now (really, just being plain lazy while watching lame p0rn featuring stupid female elf with male troll with oversized tusk), let’s piss off some animal rights extremists.

Live mollusks (cockle?) facing torture.

Dead mollusks facing digestion.

Somehow, I feel bad.

p/s – goddamn. I’m thinking too much.

Come to think of it, most of us can’t help but feeling humane only to humans, mammals, birds, reptiles and large fishes (practically, large animals). Other “lesser” beings like mollusks and small fishes seem to slip that kind of humane treatment. Caught fishes are left to suffocate in open air while salt water mollusks are drown in fresh water.

I wish I hadn’t tried to piss off those weirdos. Now, I’m pissed.

Need to stop thinking or I won’t consume fishes again, ever…

Categories
Photography Politics & government Sports

[610] Of part of Kuala Lumpur

Every city has its own charm, including Kuala Lumpur.

I have no idea whether this shot points to north, south, east or west without looking at a map. The concept of direction in this city is meaningless. But who cares when the sky is gay, true?

Yet, the photo might suck a bit since there is this big ass glass screen in between the camera and the scenery(?).

And, wow, being highlighted by Jeff Ooi bites a lot of bandwidth. Thank goodness it happened in the middle of the month.

Still, thanks! Appreciate the traffic. But most of all, I glad I see him celebrate September 16. Hail to the Federation.

Again, no, I’m not a nationalist. I just love shouting and turn everybody’s excite switch on. To me, nationalist tends to have a closed mind but their passion is something to be admired. Nationalist, especially patriot, always move me – my mind works only after my heart stops. Maybe, that’s why I think I’m a bit brash.

Ah, the curse of being a youth.

p/s – Germans, please vote for Schröder. Schröder is green, by proxy.

pp/s – on second thought, I can determine the direction by observing the shadow on the buildings. I also know that this photo was taken after noon. So, this shot probably points anywhere between north and west.

Heh, astronomy and geography are handy. I know I used the moon for direction when I was “lost” in Sierra Nevada.

ppp/s – in New Zealand, Greens will be back in power since they have assured Labour of assistance. Labour is expected to win without majority.

p4/s – Michigan 55 – 0 East Michigan. Michigan is now 2 – 1. I’m 2 – 1 too!

Categories
Liberty

[609] Of who will guard the guardians?

Several prominent bloggers, some of them I considered as liberty vigilantes, are threading on a thin line between free speech and thought crime. From my point of view, they risk veering to the other side in their quest to extinguish racism. Read Jeff Ooi, Brand New Malaysian and Peter Tan for background.

I neither support racism nor do I believe in supremacist ideas. I do however have strong libertarian beliefs and subsequently, I hold that all individuals should have the liberty to do as they wish with themselves and their property as long as those actions do not infringe on the same liberty of others. This applies to racists and as such, it’s their right to have racist ideas and expresses their point of views.

This is an unfortunate consequence. I would be more than happy to see legal actions against all the racists in this world. However, if a racist’s right to express his or her thoughts is being suppressed, an infringement of civil liberty has occurred. After all, Mahathir escaped unscathed after his Jews rule the world by proxy speech. Why should we apply double standard when it concerns some unknown racist but coward stranger?

What I suggest is this. Blog owners’ should practice discrete censorship with clear rules if they have certain allergies toward certain kind of opinion, regardless whether it’s cut and paste or originally written. Blog owners definitely have the right to practice censorship since their blogs are their private properties.

The law might offer a course to convict racists via several avenues with so-called seditious act. But did it cross anybody’s mind that these set of laws itself infringes civil liberties?

Voltaire was misattributed of saying I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. That misattributed saying truly describes my general feeling against the hoo ha. Abuse of free speech has occurred, yes. Nonetheless, a right remains a right.

As for the bloggers that are lodging a police report against that racist stranger(s), I can say with clear conscience that I’ve eroded confidence for these bloggers – whom claim to carry the torch of freedom – because they are trampling on liberty.

Behind the infringement of right, perhaps there are silver linings. Perhaps, from this episode, Malaysians will learn the ethics of free speech that, quoting an overquoted line, great power comes with great responsibility. Perhaps, the end justifies the mean.

Perhaps.

nb – changed my mind about the police report after seeing similar trolling activities at ReCom.org done by a person. This person has trolled before and has been given countless warnings to stop posting hateful messages.

Thinking it over, blogs and forums are private properties in a sense that they are owned by somebody – owners pay for hosting sercives of those sites. Therefore, that racist person violates private property.

If the owner of the site or the moderator or anyone that serves similar function as an owner has warned a person not to post offensive message earlier but that person still do it again regardless, the owner might be able to take actions againt him/her.

However, I do prefer banning and censorship to real police action. Using such legal measures comes too close to sides of whom I’d rather not be with. Unless if that violator has a real thick skull and wouldn’t take a hint even after banning.

But I still contend that nobody has no right to censor a racist or any opinion in public space.

Categories
History & heritage Personal Sports

[608] Of September 16

Did you know that Lee Kuan Yew was born on September 16 1923?

I found this out after reading Lee Kuan Yew’s The Singapore Story. Also, hah, his name is Harry Lee Kuan Yew. Harry.

Consider also a much unknown fact that Malaysia was formed on the same date, 40 years later (alright, sarcasm doesn’t work on the net. Read with tongue-in-cheek). Coincidence?

Heh, now I know why the formation of Malaysia was postponed from the planned August 31 1963 to September 16 1963. Maybe this is why a lot of people are trying to shun Malaysia Day altogether.

Damn that bugger. Forever will we as Malaysians celebrate his birthday.

p/s – crazy talk.

There’s a buzz in Los Angeles this week about a certain local football team. Its senior quarterback is completing passes like a seasoned pro. Its electrifying tailback is breaking big runs and even bigger punt returns. There’s talk that maybe this could be a special season.

And USC is looking pretty good, too.

My, those Trojans must be fuming by now.

pp/s – this totally reminds me of my meeting with my econometrics professor. Who was the professor? The famed Daniel Hamermesh. Yup yup. Looks like him too.

Categories
ASEAN Humor

[607] Of Malaysian imperialism… err… federalism: Malaysia

For the past few weeks, I have been over my head, talking about how Malaysia could expand its boundary with the ascension of Brunei, Sumatra, several troubled Malay Thai states and Singapore into the Union. Imagine the excitement of a greater Malaysian Federation. Nevertheless, I would prefer Malaysia to be a union of 13 states, as it has been since 1965. Malaysia, as it is, is stable and progressive nation. When there’s trouble brewing up in Southeast Asia, Malaysia will be one of the last few places that I would expect a meltdown. Inclusion of any other state mentioned earlier – perhaps excluding Brunei – will definitely disturb Malaysian equation.

Why is so?

Let’s take Sumatra first. The reason I gave for annexation of Sumatra is to internalize Sumatra environmental problem. It’s a method to solve Malaysian yearly haze issue but the cost far outweighs the benefit. After all, who in his sane mind would bring Malaysia to war with Indonesia. Indonesia has more than 200 million people while Malaysia has merely 26 million. Though Malaysian military is far better-equipped than its Indonesian counterpart, it will be an endless war – the Iran-Iraq war offer a glimpse of things to come if we blunders into war. Moreover, Malaysia is strong because of its economy. War will only wreck havoc to both Malaysian and Indonesian bloodline.

War is not the answer. Indeed, the answer to almost anything is always economics. With regard to environmental externality caused by open burning in Sumatra, Coase theorem in particular provides a roughly guideline on how to tackle it effectively.

Futhermore, Sumatra is prone to natural disaster and Sumatra has always been Malaysia’s natural shield against mother nature’s fury. I’d rather somebody else get hold of Sumatra. Let them face the challenges of managing Sumatra. Moreover, like some have mentioned, NEP for millions more is not really a pretty sight.

Then we have the Malay Thai states.

I’ve always believe that happiness is always easier to achieve if we as a society work towards economic prosperity. It’s true that life is more than hard cold cash but trust me, it’s money that enables us to engage life to the fullest. Economic prosperity demands a stable environment. It follows that it’s Malaysia best interest to not undermine the situation in southern Thailand.

The current conflict will affect trade and that will affect Malaysians that are dependent on trade near the Malaysian-Thai border. For the sake of our own well-being, Malaysia must proactively work towards a harmonious southern Thailand. As such, it is only natural for Malaysia to assist Thailand in any way we can to defuse the tension while observing human rights.

Finally, it’s Singapore. Singapore is always a fun punch bag to be with. Incorporating the island into Malaysia will only deprive us of one. But seriously, Singapore will also be something for Malaysia to look up for. Singapore has managed to overcome serious developmental issue. Subsequently, Singaporean experience is valuable. As time goes by, I’m sure the people on the other side of the strait will provide Malaysia an excellent ongoing case study.

I might however love to see Brunei ascends into the Federation though; not for its natural resources or about having a greater Federation. It’s simply an act of realizing the original dream our founding fathers. A friendly reinvitation is definitely not uncalled for and both Brunei and Malaysia have a lot to gain together. Singapore was part of the Federation but they and us chose to go separate paths and we as Malaysians must respect that.

Of course, the state of our current union is anything but perfect. But then again, there is no such thing as utopia. Discrimination is an open secret while inefficiency still hunts us. And somehow, there are still some distrust between east and west Malaysia. All we can do is perpetually strive for the best for a better union.

If ever we seek a greater Federation, ASEAN should be enough. Either way, globalization will diminish artificial barriers and in the end, there will only be one – humanity itself.

Still, all hail to the Federation.

May our ideal of a perfect union outlives time.

p/s – salute to The Colonel’s Diary – the only other blog that I know of in Malaysian blogosphere that celebrates September 16, the date of the formation of our Federation.