Categories
Economics Liberty

[686] Of levy on CD-R

I had wanted to blog about the Music Council of Malaysia’s call for a levy on blank CD-R earlier. For some reason however, it slipped off my mind. Thanks to an article in The Star today, it came back to me. I think, if you’ve been reading enough of my stuff, you know what I’ve to say. For those that don’t, I’m don’t share the same table with the Music Council.

The Music Council, according to an article in The Star, states that:

…it had asked for the levy because it is concerned over the loss in revenue to the music industry whenever customers make copies of music CDs (see In.Tech, Dec 8). It believes that two out of three CD-Rs sold in the country are used for copying audio-visual material.

The Recording Industry Association of Malaysia claimed that such ‘home recordings’ are a serious problem for the industry.

The nature of the issue is almost similar to protectionism. Yet, this case isn’t quite about competition because the music and CD-R aren’t very comparable. But the bottomline is, an industry is trying to make their product relatively more competitive to some other good not by increasing the quality of their good but instead by forcing the other good’s cost to go up. In the end, it’s nothing more than an interest group with protectionism in mind.

Earlier, Malaysian telcos dealers and distributors have requested the certain Malaysian authority to restrict competition because competition hurts their profit.

By saying that I disagree with the levy, I’m not saying I accept piracy. Duplicating copyrighted media without permission, as much as I hate to admit it, is plain stealing. Still, accussing everybody that uses CD-R is involved in piracy is unfair. Imposing blanket levy is even more unfair.

What the music industry needs is a stronger anti-piracy enforcement, not protectionism. In fact, I’d rather see stakeholders in the music industry to initiate legal actions against those involved in piracy, like what the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) has been doing against illegal file sharers for the past few years in the US. Legal actions won’t introduce market frictions, unlike levying. At least in the long term.

p/s – for the whole morning, I couldn’t access my own site. I couldn’t access a few other sites like Screenshots either.

pp/s – turned out it wasn’t just me. There was a network outage near Putrajaya yesterday. (via)

Categories
ASEAN Humor

[685] Of Malaysian imperialism… err… federalism: ASEAN

Ever wonder why an ASEAN Charter is being cooked up only 38 years after the formation of ASEAN? Ever wonder why it was Mahathir, Malaysian former prime minister, that first gave serious consideration to a formation of loose East Asian trade confederation? Ever wonder why all these are happenning only when Malaysia holds ASEAN’s chair?

There’s only one answer: it’s Malaysian imperialism gone wild!

I don’t know about you but I feel Malaysia is personally responsible in bringing Southeast Asian together. Don’t believe me?

Remember before 1963, when there was Malaya? And then suddenly, there was Malaysia. Indonesia and the Philippines protested. Indonesia went further down the road and declared hostility against Malaysia. At the same thing, there was Malphilindo – a precursor of ASEAN – that main purpose was to cool down the mercury. Malphilindo was a smokescreen to ensure Malaysian survival – nothing else. Malphilindo failed but so did Indonesian hostility against Malaysia. Then, it was ASEAN.

Scholars believe that ASEAN at first was formed to counter communist insurgency which was rampant in Vietnam. Don’t believe those scholars. They were paid by Malaysian agents to further the cause of Malaysian imperialism. ASEAN is formed primarily to guarantee Malaysia’s dominance of Southeast Asian politics.

That’s why when Singapore outdid us in economic development, we were furious and hold grunges against the people down south. We were also disappointed that Brunei turned down an offer to join the Malaysian Federation in 1963. And we funded the rebels in Mindanao when the Philippines tried to encourage separatist movement in Sabah. All these challenged Malaysian ambition.

After our failure to expand Malaysian dominance to Singapore and Brunei, we started to realize that federation is not the answer to ensure Malaysian superiority over Southeast Asia. We found three other more effective ways to expand our frontiers.

First was economic cooperation. Ever wonder the percentage of lands owned by Malaysian corporations in Indonesian Sumatra? Ever wonder why Malaysia, instead had joint-exploration agreement in the disputed areas in the Gulf of Thailand with Thailand? In spite of the gulf is actually named after Thailand? Got you thinking, didn’t I?

Second, claiming more areas and bringing them up to International Court of Justice. ICJ is a Malaysian puppet. The Americans know this and that’s why they refuse to submit to the ICJ. Remember Sipadan and the other island? Does Pulau Batu Putih ring a bell? Ever wonder why Malaysia refuses to give up Tanjung Pagar to Singapore despite the fact that it’s in Singapore? How about Ambalat? Spratly?

Third, funding of rebels. Mindanao, Aceh, southern Thailand. You think Malaysia doesn’t have a hand on it? Isn’t it a bit suspicious that all these provinces are located near Malaysian borders?

Unfortunately, the three methods take years, decade and perhaps centuries to realize Malaysian imperialism.

Hence, come the ultimate strategy, which is political and economic integration of Southeast Asia. Here is where ASEAN and the charter come into play. An ASEAN charter sets to pave a way to a more integrated Southeast Asian communitee. C’mon. Think.

Furthermore, when Myanmar gets into trouble, who is always there first? Malaysia. At the current WTO negoatiation, who represents ASEAN’s interest? Malaysia. Some others too. Despite Malaysia has merely 24 million citizens while Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines have more than 60 million people each – Indonesia has more than 200 million people! -, how on do you explain Malaysian dominance in ASEAN? How could 24 million people control half a billion people in Southeast Asia?

Malaysian hands are the invisible hands within ASEAN. In reality, ASEAN is just another name for Persekutuan Malaysia Raya – Greater Malaysian Federation. The name isn’t Greater Malaysian Federation because we don’t want to alarm those in the other member states. From the look of it, it’s working sublimely.

Previously, I had proposed ascension of Brunei, annexation of Sumatra, invitation to several troubled Malay Thai states and reintegration of Singapore into the Union. This was the situation:

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

In reality, Malaysia really is:

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

LOL! Watch out Australia!

Categories
Liberty Politics & government

[684] Of I’m glad she’s a Malay

When Malaysian lock-up detainee abuse scandal first came to surface, especially when a video of it was made public, I noticed a number of people tried to associate the scandal with discrimination and, ultimately, racism. Moreover, some tried to manipulate some sort of chauvinistic communal nationalism. I wholly disagree with the association; correlation does not imply causation is an apt phrase.

To me, this issue concerns neither ethnicity nor nationality. It’s simply about persons being abused. No more than that. Nevertheless, the apparent fact at that time didn’t help my case since, previously, all the abused detainees seemed disporportionately Chinese Malaysian and Chinese from People’s Republic of China. Hence, I must say, I’m relieved with the revelation that the abused detainee in the video that was forced to strip and squat by a Malaysian police officer was not a Chinese from PRC but in fact, is a Malay Malaysian.

That disclosure vindicates my stance that there was no racism involved. This piece of information should render those that expounded that the scandal was tainted with discrimination and racism to sit in a corner and sulk. It proves that they’re wrong. More importantly, it cleanly undoes those racist opportunists’ crude works that tried to fire up communal feeling.

Of course, because my take is that ethnicity doesn’t matter, the fact that the victim’s a Malay shouldn’t make the issue any less angering as it should be. But it does and it does because of the existence of those that always try to transpose every issue as communal issues. These people cry of discrimination while they, deep within themselves are racists. Without them, the fact that the victim’s a Malay wouldn’t comfort me by one bit.

Malaysian society is young when compared to many others. While we grow up, we need to realize that not everything is about discrimination and racism. At the same time, racists don’t work in the open. They’re among us, trying to cry “Discrimination!” or any other word in similar context even when it’s not. Whenever we overhear somebody cries that, we must to ask ourselves, is it really about discrimination or racism or is someone trying to manipulate Malaysian complicated racial politics?

The ability to discern the two possibilities is paramount if we as Malaysians hope not to see the current Australian race riot to replicate itself in Malaysia as our second May 13 Incident.

Categories
Gaming Photography Politics & government

[683] Of lost in reflection

Yeah, I know. I know. That’s a lame entry title. Unoriginal. But they say, it’s a form of flattery.

This one was taken near Dang Wangi, Kuala Lumpur ; in front of a shoe store.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

Some passersby noticed me while I was taking the photo. And there was this WTF-kind of expression on their face. I’m sure that they were thinking, what so interesting about shoes.For people that know me quite well, and as the picture suggests, I’m interested in the reflection, not the shoes.

This idea of shoot yourself in a mirror started when I first stumbled upon The Mirror Project. As of currently, I have 13 photos there. w00t!

p/s – god. I hate this shaman. I think I’m going to log into World of Warcraft again sometimes soon. I miss all the people in Sanct.

pp/s – What’s going on here? (via)

ppp/s – now, this is what I call shrewd diplomacy.

Iran Offers U.S. Share in Nuclear Plants

By NASSER KARIMI, Associated Press Writer Sun Dec 11, 8:18 PM ET

TEHRAN, Iran –
Iran opened the door Sunday for U.S. help in building a nuclear power plant � a move designed to ease American suspicions that Tehran is using its nuclear program as a cover to build atomic weapons.

…

“America can take part in international bidding for the construction of Iran’s nuclear power plant if they observe the basic standards and quality,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi said in a news conference.

Erm…

p4/s – Wizards of Winter (via).

Categories
Humor Photography

[682] Of when a conservative comes to a university…

They’ll get booed. Well, maybe not all but Ann Coulter sure had earful. She also brilliantly called her audience stupid. No. She actually called her audience stupider.

Ann Coulter to hecklers: You’re stupider than I am

STORRS, Connecticut (AP) — Conservative columnist Ann Coulter cut short a speech at the University of Connecticut amid boos and jeers, and decided to hold a question-and-answer session instead.

“I love to engage in repartee with people who are stupider than I am,” Coulter told the crowd of 2,600 Wednesday.

Boo!

Somebody at Norwich Bulletin wrote something marvelous about the uber-polemicist’s speech:

The UConn College Republicans’ stated reason for inviting Coulter to speak, for $16,000, was to promote conservative thought on campus. In actuality, they paid for a circus, and they got one.

Right on.

Too bad she graduated from Michigan.