Categories
Pop culture

[2178] Of Hurt Locker won an Oscar?

Hurt Locker won the Oscar. We all know that. It winning the Oscar was one of the reasons why I wanted to watch it. And watched it I did. With friends saying how good the movie is, I had high expectation. By the time the credit rolled, I thought, why did it win the Oscar?

It is a good movie, that I admit. Scenes of bomb disarmament are involving. I like it. The acting is fantastic.

I do not see why it deserves an Oscar however. There is really nothing special about it and the storyline is not one that is truly memorable.

A bomb specialist dies. A hero bomb specialist replaces the dead bomb specialist. The hero bomb specialist has emotion. Soldiers are human beings too. The hero gets back. The hero gets reposted to some warzone again.

Big deal.

One might want to analyze the theme of the movie and its moral. Do it. However intellectual one wants to get, Hurt Locker remains an action movie that does not require a lot of thinking. The closest it gets in activating my neurons is the scene when the hero is back home in the United States trying to choose a box of cereal out of many brands available.

I watch movies only infrequently. But if this is the best movie for 2009, then 2009 must have had been a really slow year.

Categories
Photography

[2177] Of here comes the sun

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams.

Moreton Bay, Queensland.

I wish I had captured the sun in its full glory.

Categories
Economics

[2176] Of Lim Guan Eng probably does not know that everybody pays SST

Opponents of the introduction of goods and services tax (GST) in Malaysia have raised a number of points.

Some of the points are valid even if they are disagreeable. Sometimes, the disagreement is ideological and difference is due to premises originating from separate irreconcilable positions. Those points are fine because at least they are logical and honest.

Some, like opposition to GST based on regressiveness, are plainly illogical and wrong however. Some are pure bullshit of gargantuan magnitude, i.e. if the tax rate is 4% and there are four points within a value chain, the total tax rate paid by the end consumer is 16%. One made by Lim Guan Eng at an anti-GST forum some weeks ago is disingenuously irrelevant.

Mr. Lim stated that under GST, everybody will be taxed.[0] It is true that everybody, in a sense that any anybody who consumes a particular taxed good regardless of income levels, will be taxed. But this line of argument presumes that everybody has not already been taxed.

Unfortunately for Mr. Lim, consumers in Malaysia have already been taxed through a consumption tax that is theoretically as flat and as regressive as GST. That tax is the sales and services tax (SST).

Because of the untrue presumption, his argument is irrelevant.

Why is the argument irrelevant?

To evaluate the worth of his argument, a comparison between GST and status quo scenarios has to be made.

Why?

Remember, the proposal is to replace SST with GST. The desirability of one option has to be defined in terms of the desirability of the other and vice versa. In other words, ask the question, “why one option is better than the other?” Absolute statement does not help in decision-making. Relative statement does.

Further, for Mr. Lim’s — and increasingly what is becoming one of Pakatan Rakyat’s as well as others parrot the argument without thinking — argument to be relevant, the status quo must consist of a scenario where not everybody is being taxed. There is no such status quo: the status quo has SST in place.

What is the point of arguing as Mr. Lim has done so when everybody has already been taxed — in fact, taxed at a higher rate? Remember, the current GST  is planned to be introduced at 4% while the current SST rate ranges from 5% to 10% and there are goods taxed at even 20%.[1]

Both SST which is currently in place, and GST, will affect everybody. If one opposes GST on the basis of how GST affects everybody, then the person has to oppose SST too. Therefore, that person should be indifferent between having GST and SST. One simply cannot make sense if one bases one’s opposition on how GST will affect everybody.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[0] — Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng said with the old sales and services tax system, only some 1.5 million of the total of 12 million workers are taxed but its replacement with the GST will mean everyone, including poor workers, will be affected. [Pakatan bets on GST to muscle BN out. The Malaysian Insider. February 29 2010]

[1] — See Sales Tax. Accessed December 3 2009.

Categories
Politics & government

[2175] Of make way for local election

What a wonderful piece of news. That aptly describes my reaction upon learning the request of the Penang state government to the Election Commission to organize two local elections in the Pearl of the Orient this year. Selangor’s decision to follow suit makes it an all the more brilliant development.

There are obstacles to overcome and there is no guarantee that the return will happen for good. There will be challenges no doubt. The EC is already showing sign of reluctance to do as requested.

It is quite clear that not everybody is convinced of the necessity of local elections. Some fear losing their power. Others are caught up in legalese.

Let them lose their powers. It is not theirs to keep in the first place. Be gone with the legalese. We are in a new time where old threats have long past.

The actual push for it in Malaysia is long overdue. This right of ours has been robbed from us. It is only right to have it returned.

What I am most excited about the prospect of having local elections returned is the devolution of power. It is yet another tool to empower citizens at the expense of the state. For too long has power been concentrated in the hand of the state. The return of the third vote will chip away that focused power by distributing it more evenly across the landscape, as it should have been.

Do you remember how such power distribution felt?

The last time such significant redistribution happened was in March 2008.

Yes, it has been two years since that day. Since then, there have been many disappointments: the lies and hypocrisy regarding freedom of association, more slogans, disloyalty and generally broken promises. Yes, many of these disappointments have began to question the wisdom of many whom gave members or former members of what is now Pakatan Rakyat a chance.

That in no way changes the fact that the 2008 Malaysian general election demonstrated that individual citizens do have the power to change the course of the country. It is a reminder that the kind of confidence in individuals that seemed to exist only in Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged does exist in the real world. It blew away the feeling of helplessness that nothing can be done. It proves that in the face of a titan, individuals can be as fearsome as the titan can.

My feeling as a first time voter in the early morning of March 9 was one of pure exhilaration. After all the disillusionment, the feeling that this country belonged only to the selected few forming a cabal, the election showed that I still do have stake in the country. More importantly, I can act on that ownership.

The devolution will further prove that I, along with many other Malaysians, do have ownership over not just the country, but also the street where I — we — live in. We are the ones that should take care of our own streets.

We pay for it after all.

With the third vote, we can stop pretending that those representatives we send to national and state assemblies are taking care of our local interests.

We do not need an MP or state assemblypersons to take care of our streets and everything else in our immediate neighborhood. We can do it ourselves.

Such absurd pretentions have caused Members of Parliament and state assemblies having to deal with local problems while they are supposed to debate on nation and statewide issues respectively. It is not the jobs of these representatives to worry about sewage and trash. Those are the responsibilities of local councilors.

Local elections will enhance the division of tasks and with the division of tasks comes the division of power. Less power in the hand of the few means less opportunity for abuse. If this is what those who oppose the reintroduction fear, then let them fear it.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

This article was first published in The Malaysian Insider on March 9 2010.

Categories
Photography

[2174] Of time for refueling

When was the last time you stopped at a gas station with a pump like this; old, analog and dusty too?

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams.

Me?

Slightly over a month ago.

I saw one in Port Campbell, probably over 100 miles to the southwest of Melbourne.