Categories
Economics Environment

[298] Of intentional misclassification of the Big Mac

Politics and economics can be very entertaining if they are mixed with just the right degree.

A few days ago, Michigan Representative John Digell sent a letter to Gregory Mankiw, the Bush’s Council of Economics Advisers chairman concerning the definition of manufacturing.

Before I go on further, I must say that I respect Mankiw. However, quoting Rep. Dingell:

I am sure the 163,000 factory workers who have lost their jobs in Michigan will find it heartening to know that a world of opportunity awaits them in high growth manufacturing careers like spatula operator, napkin restocking, and lunch tray removal.

The food industry is considered as a part of the manufacturing industry? Bush must be really desperate to ‘improve‘ the unemployment rate figure. Read the full letter at the US House of Representative.

Categories
Environment Fiction

[297] Of Chiron

“Have you ever heard of a fiction where a little girl asked her father what an elephant was?”

There was a long pause in the middle of daylight with the wind blowing against the somewhat empty savanna.

“Yes I have. The father somewhat struggled to describe the elephant”. Humlind face was expressionless, as expressionless as the dead mammal in front of them, Chiron observed.

“Well, this might be the last of their kind we have ever seen. I guess we would be the father in that story”. Chiron’s voice almost broke when he uttered the words.

“No, we’ve seen an elephant and so we could describe it well”.

“I’d suppose. But my boy would have a problem with that”.

“No doubt”.

Another long pause but Chiron broke the silence before it got too awkward. “You know, Hammurabi once said, an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth…”

“An eye for an eye…” Humlind cut Chiron short. “I’d wish it were applicable to all lives.”

“Oh it is. Trust me it is.” A scent of anger was noticeable in Chiron’s voice. “I’m going for the poacher with my gun”.

Humlind stared at Chiron. “You aren’t serious, are you?”

www.jackhanna.com/africa99/elephant.htm. fair use

Chiron didn’t reply at all. He turned and headed for the helicopter with a clenched fist. “Chiron, wait for me!”

Categories
Politics & government

[296] Of… guess who?

After persistent rumor, the real deal has finally come. Ralph Nader has announced that he will go for another shot at the presidency. On the other hand, the liberals’ jaw dropped in disbelief and I do not wonder at all. Though Nader is admirable, supporting Nader would possibly mean the liberal would lose some vote, which means another four years of Bush, which directly means another four years of environmental laws deterioration.

Therefore, I assert all greens, despite you would obviously support Nader, vote for the democrats!

A liberal President would be our only hope.

So, go Edwards! If Edwards fails, go Kerry! If Kerry fails, then go Nader! If all fail, well, let’s hope Bush won’t kill us all.

Categories
Economics

[295] Of pegging the MYR

My opinion on the pegged Ringgit; I’ll break it up into the short run and into the long run.

In the short run, I believe the ringgit should be pegged. Reason is, for the past six months, the USD has consistently been growing weaker against the Euro and the Yen. A weaker real exchange rate will make foreign goods expensive while domestic products cheap. This makes domestic products to be competitive because of its lower price. In a way, it helps to improve the trade balance. While the above effect happens to the USD, the Ringgit is pegged against the US and thus, the same thing affects the Ringgit.

In the long run however, expensive foreign goods will hurt import and certain industries that depend on import. Furthermore, Malaysia is trading with other countries. A pegged Ringgit simply implies pegging the Ringgit against the USD, not against every currency. Though the exchange rate to the USD will stay the same, the same case is not true with the Euro, Japanese Yen, Singaporean Dollar, Aussie Dollar etc. And import come not just from the US. It comes from other part of the world. Ringgit should be floated or risk seeing some industries reduces its size.

Plus, as students in the US, I do not feel the heat of the pegged dollar. After all, the same quantity of Ringgit in almost five years ago is needed to buy the same amount of Dollar today. Yet, imagine the Malaysian students in Japan, Australia – anywhere where the USD is not used for local transaction. Their cost of living increases simply because the exchange rate is falling down. And this increase is sharp. If these students rely on scholarship from Malaysia (from some entities or parents), the cost of transaction due to the real exchange rate is high.

Therefore, if my logic is right and if the USD failed to regain part of its former strength, I believe Ringgit should be floated in the near future. A good trade balance is worthless when local industries suffer. A pegged Ringgit was a good solution in the days immediately after the Asian Financial Crisis, not forever.

Of course, the underlying reason why I support the floatation of Ringgit is the fact that my sister is going to the land of Down Under. I don’t want my parent to be spending too much because of the intangible real exchange rate.

Categories
Environment Politics & government

[294] Of emission petition