Categories
Humor Sci-fi

[106] Of ET R2

Found this over the net.

To the Star Wars fans, enjoy.

Categories
Politics & government

[105] Of war on terror

Who says there’s no adventure in today’s life

I am one of those persons who are in love with history, especially about war. Nevertheless, falling in love with history of wars doesn’t make me to be a nasty person who demands war each and every time chance crosses my path (like Bush). In fact, learning the dates and the factors that started wars makes me falling more and more in love of peace and hence, in the end, resulting me more or less believing in the Green doctrine.

Certainly, the tall tells in ancient battles inspire most of us to a new height. The Peloponessian War, the Napoleon War, the Second World War and lot of others gave birth to many changes. The Peloponessian War were important to the ancient Greek, The Napoleon War redrew the European border drastically and the WWII foreseen the end of Imperialism. War is important but going through it is not very pleasing.

As you guys have predicted, this argument brings us to the present time.

The current war against terrorism seems to have taken a new twist. It started the 11th day of September 2001. It was a day that shocked not just America, but also the very foundation of the world as we now see. Immediately after that fateful day, America declared a war against Afghanistan and quickly overran the Afghan authority without much problem. Later, President George W. Bush declared the members of a so-called Axis of Evil. Now, the war maniac is threatening to topple Saddam Hussein.

The war against terrorism has brought us a new concept of fighting a war. A conventional war will involved at least two entities, two countries with defined borders, much like the Vietnam War or the Korean War. That kind of war has significantly decreased due to United Nations’ Charter that prevents any country from invading another country. Unfortunately, the war of terrorism is a subtler war. It is impossible to declare a war against an enemy that does not have a defined border. Moreover, the enemy is ever hiding in the modern world.

The problem of trying to identify and eliminate terrorism has brought some countries, the US in particular, seeking a revision of the United Nations’ Charter. The main change that they are demanding is the permission to commit pre-emptive strike. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize that pre-emptive strike goes directly against the very values that the United Nations is built upon. The world doesn’t need Winston Churchill to rally itself against this suggestion save the US.

The latest advocate of pre-emptive doctrine is the Australian Prime Minister, John Howard. His words agitated Australia’s neighbors and strong words had already been exchanged between Australia and four of ASEAN main members. As usual, the only one that kept his mouth quiet was Singapore.

Although I believe the four ASEAN leaders have overreacted over their Australian counterpart comment, nevertheless the development is interesting. Leaders of the four countries made strong statements but Dr. Mahathir had gone one step further by saying it will be an act of war if Australia’s force set its foot on Malaysian’s soil.

Imagine a war where Australia is up against combine might of Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines and Thailand. The war will surely hurt the world economy by bringing the most dynamic economies to a standstill. In addition, the Japanese economy will be dragged down even deeper because Japan in one way or another relies on ASEAN’s economy performance. A downward trend on the Japanese shore in turn will bring the already in recession American economy to a worse condition.

If the war came to a reality of which I doubt will, certainly there will some other war here and there and finally bringing a collapse to the United Nations. Iraq on the other hand might exercise its might and Al-Qaida without doubt will be seeking revenge. Russia will step up its authority in Chechnya, war will be omnipresent in Afghanistan, trouble might arise in the Korean Peninsula, Pakistan and India will surely be against each other, and Israel goes without saying. In other word, the Third World War.

Unbelievable but hey, I was arrested by the state police for throwing a snowball.

Categories
Personal

[104] Of arrested by the police for assault

Follow up.At 0011, I went down to the battlefield to take some photos.
At 0020, I threw a few snowballs.
At 0021, I was in the police car, hand-cuffed for throwing snowballs. Reason – assaulting a person and felony.
At 0022, I was in the car, having a conversation about how stupid the charge made against me with some stranger in the police car.
At 0040, I was unarrested and name taken by the policeman.
At 0050, I reached my room, thinking of how stupid was the last 30 minutes were.
At 0053, I wrote this entry.
At 0100, messeged Ayun, Ijat, Fahmi and lots of others about this stupid event.

Categories
Personal

[103] Of 2002 Annual Quad War

Woohoo!!!
The Annual WQ – SQ Snowball Fight is underway!!! I AM GOING DOWN TO KICK SOME SQIANS’ ASSES!!!

Categories
Environment

[102] Of letter from Dow Chemical on Bhopal

They do reply fast:

2030 Dow Center
April 30, 2002

Dear Concerned Citizen:

Thank you for sharing your concerns about the aftermath of the 1984 tragic gas release in Bhopal. We at Dow – along with all of our industry colleagues – were profoundly impacted by the tragedy. I for one can remember exactly where I was and what I was doing when I heard the news. Perhaps the only encouraging news to be gleaned from the tragedy is that it changed our industry forever, for the better.

I would like to share with you Dow’s perspective on Bhopal.

As you are aware, in February of 2001, Dow purchased the stock of Union Carbide.

Since that time, our subsidiary in India, Dow Chemical International, Pvt., Ltd. (DCIL) has been engaged in discussions with the leaders of the National Campaign for Justice in Bhopal (NCJB). The NCJB represents survivors of the 1984 tragedy. DCIL is seeking to better understand their concerns and, potentially, to define an appropriate way to direct a portion of our global philanthropic support towards providing humanitarian assistance to the people of Bhopal. Dow Chemical has also met with Greenpeace representatives regarding these matters. It is too early to know what the results of these discussions will be, but I want to assure you that we will continue to work with NCJB representatives and others interested in assisting the people of Bhopal. We are committed to doing so as a continuation of our long-standing practice of corporate giving and good corporate citizenship around the world, especially in the countries where we operate.

As you may know, immediately following the Bhopal tragedy, Union Carbide stepped forward to publicly accept moral responsibility for the gas release. In 1989, the Government of India and Union Carbide reached a $470 million settlement of all claims associated with the disaster – significantly more compensation than victims had been awarded in the past for this type of claim in Indian courts. The settlement was upheld by the Indian Supreme Court, which found this settlement to be “just, equitable and reasonable” and declared the matter closed. The plant site is owned today by the Indian government.

Assigning responsibility properly belongs to the courts, and as such, we believe Union Carbide has fulfilled its obligations in Bhopal. On a separate level, however, we are acutely aware of the needs of the people of Bhopal, and we remain hopeful we can play a part in meeting some of those needs through an appropriate philanthropic initiative.

All of us in industry, especially the chemical industry, appreciate the gravity and human cost of the Bhopal accident. It is a tragedy that should not have happened. Our obligation is to learn from it and to make every effort to see that such a tragedy never happens again. At Dow, we have redoubled our efforts to make protection of people and the environment a part of everything we do and every decision we make. We have taken, and continue to take, strong steps to realize our “vision of zero” – zero incidents, zero injuries, zero environmental harm. No lesser ideal is acceptable to us.

I hope it is evident that we are taking this issue very seriously and doing our best to take a thoughtful approach. Please continue to express your views and concerns on this and other issues in the future.

Sincerely,

Michael D. Parker
President and Chief Executive Officer