Categories
History & heritage Society

[1888] Of Islamic art, architecture and literature I

Art, architecture and literature are important in history because only by observing works of past civilizations that we can somehow comprehend its culture further. Not only it provides us with precious records but as Walter Denny stated, it also gives us a feeling on how past societies lived. True to it, art, architecture and literature have become few of the most fundamental aspect of history. This is true for all civilizations including Islamic civilizations especially so when it is common for Muslims to consider the religion not as mere religion but instead a way of life. As a way of life, everything is governed by the Islamic law. Therefore, an inspection of Islamic art, architecture and literature offers a path to understanding Islam.

Islam is a monotheistic religion. The first pillar of Islam is to acknowledge the oneness of god and Mohamed is the prophet of god. Islam is particular about the oneness of god and is very strict in its punishment for the sin of syirik, the act of acknowledging the existence of any other god than Allah. In sura 6 ‘The Cattle’, verse 74, the Koran says, “And when Ibrahim said to his sire, Azar: Do you take idols for gods? Surely I see you and your people in manifest error.” There are a few other places where the Koran asserts similar wrongness of worshiping idols and other gods.

To prevent idol worshiping especially, the Koran even disallows any figurative representation of living things. In sura 16 ‘The Bee’, verse 74, “So coins not similitudes for Allah. Surely Allah knows and ye known not”. Therefore, there is a lack of figurative sculpture or painting in Islamic art. The destruction of a Buddhas of Bamyam in Afghanistan by the Taliban reinforced the fact that Muslims do adhere to the ban in one way or another.[1] Nevertheless, Islam “does not forbid representation of humans, animals and birds in secular context.”[2]

Since Muslim artists had limited options, they had to find another way to express themselves and they did this by concentrating on calligraphy and decoration. As we observe in history, they have truly mastered these arts.

Of all art forms they excelled in, they take pride and cherish their mastery in calligraphy which is called khat in Arabic. That is so because “calligraphy is one art form in Islam explicitly and positively sanctioned by God.”[3] Oftentimes, calligraphic activities decorate Koranic verses.

Arabic calligraphy is identified by two main features. First, “slant-clipped reed pen” is used in order to write or rather draw the words. Secondly, there are rules to be adhered to and each style has its own rule. These rules are the ones that made each calligraphic style differ from one another.[4]

During the reign of Caliph Uthman (644 — 656 CE), he ordered the gathering of Koranic verses into an official text that we know today. When the gathering of verses finally completed, calligraphy was used as “a form of decoration for the greater glory of Allah’s words.”[5]

While breath of calligraphy was greatly expanded under Islam, it began with the development of the Arabic language during pre-Islamic period. Arabic letters were derived from Semitic scripts.[6] It has 28 letters with 18 basic forms.[7] It was later further developed by the Nabataean, an Arabic tribe originating from northern Arabian Peninsula and adopted by other literate Arabic tribe including the Quraisy. It was around this time that a writing system style called Jazm was popular among the Arabs. Jazm was an advanced version of the scripts.[8]

There were two forms of scripts that were used in those times. The first type was “dry writing” and the other was “soft writing”.

The first type was later known as the kufic style. As the name suggests, the style “received its name from the town in which it was first put into official use”, which was Kufa, located in modern day Iraq.[9] The form can be identified easily by its ”angular and sober” style. Kufic characters also seem to have “geometrical intricacies”.[10] The other type was less angular and thus making it distinctly different from kufic. The soft writing style was more practical than its counterpart and later became the foundation for modern styles.[11]

As Islam spread during its golden age, so did the Arabic language and the art of khat. Societies of newly conquered areas especially Persia and to some extend Anatolia absorbed the language and its arts. Although local language was still used, Arabic characters managed to slip into local writing system. As this happened, local experts in calligraphy came into existence and further revolutionized it. In fact, one of the most important styles in calligraphy the naskh was invented by a Persian calligrapher named Mir Ali Sultan al-Tabrizi. In Turkey, Arif Hikmet created the Sunbuli style, “which had a short vogue.”[12]

Apart from the practice of calligraphy as a work of art, Muslim artists also pursued other areas that do not go against Islam. One of the areas is the art of decoration.

Islamic decoration is unique compared to other cultures and this is simply because of the same reason why calligraphy is pursued by Muslims. This resulted in the rareness of sculpture and painting that were prevalent in Greek and Roman civilizations. However, “this deficit is compensated with a richness in ornamentation on the lavish carved plaster paneling, wall tiling and glazed mosaics.”[13] The main themes used in the decorative art are mainly centered on nature and geometry.

Muslim artisans so frequently used geometry in their works that we now called such work as arabesque. Arabesque is simply a collection of a single geometrical pattern repeated on and on until simple shapes became a complex design. Sometimes, the design is “so complicated that they rarely call to mind their sources of origin.”[14]

Both calligraphy and arabesque were prominently used in Islamic architecture. Walls of all prominent buildings Muslims built are covered with them to no end.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[1] — [Taliban Show Off Remains of Ancient Buddha Statues. Kathy Gannon. The Independent via National Geographic. March 27 2001]

[2] — [Islamic Art. Detroit Institute of Art. April 1 2003]

[3] — [The Islamic Impact. Page 141. Yvonne Haddad. Byron Haines. Ellison Findly. New York. Syracuse University Press. 1984]

[4] — [The Calligraphy of Islam: The Reflections of the State of the Art. Page 6. Mohamed U. Zakariya. Washington D.C. Georgetown University. 1983]

[5] — [The Spread of Islam. Page 119. Information missing]

[6] — [Islamic Arts. Islamic Arts and Architecture Organization. April 1 2003]

[7] — [The Calligraphy of Islam: The Reflections of the State of the Art. Page 2. Mohamed U. Zakariya. Washington D.C. Georgetown University. 1983]

[8] — [Islamic Arts. Islamic Arts and Architecture Organization. April 1 2003]

[9] — [Arabic Writing. B. Moritz. Encyclopedia of Islam. 1913]

[10] — [The Spread of Islam. Page 120. Information missing]

[11] — [The Calligraphy of Islam: The Reflections of the State of the Art. Page 2. Mohamed U. Zakariya. Washington D.C. Georgetown University. 1983]

[12] — [Ibid. Page 29]

[13] — [The Umayyad Page 17. Information missing]

[14] — [Ibid]

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

I recently rediscovered a box full of short papers I worked on while in Michigan. This is part 1 of a sophomore paper I wrote in 2003. I place it here out of concern these papers might one day lost to harsh elements. For this particular paper, several pages of citation are already lost due to mishandling and my own irreverence for my own work.

At the moment, I am praying to find papers that I vividly remember: econometric paper on foreign exchange, the politics of climate change (this is probably the thickest paper that I remember; the research to produce this paper took months to complete! That is crazy considering it was just a junior paper) and I think, economic model on climate change.

Categories
Conflict & disaster Photography Society

[1853] Of it has no religion

This was the Wall Street Journal Asia in the week of the attack on Mumbai.

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams

Not that I fully agree with it but I thought it sufficiently captures that there are oppositions among Muslims against the use of terror, contrary to accusation that terror happens because the moderates do not voice their opposition out. One form of the accusations, sadly, came from Friedman the other day:

On Feb. 6, 2006, three Pakistanis died in Peshawar and Lahore during violent street protests against Danish cartoons that had satirized the Prophet Muhammad. More such mass protests followed weeks later. When Pakistanis and other Muslims are willing to take to the streets, even suffer death, to protest an insulting cartoon published in Denmark, is it fair to ask: Who in the Muslim world, who in Pakistan, is ready to take to the streets to protest the mass murders of real people, not cartoon characters, right next door in Mumbai? [Calling All Pakistanis. Thomas Friedman. December 2 2008]

I deeply disagree with Friedman.

I disagree here not to defend Pakistanis or Muslims but rather, the logic used. It paints as if there is passive support among moderate Muslims of terrorism. As if, moderate Muslims need to employ the childishness of those whom violently protested the Danish cartoon to express their disagreement to the use of terror.

Categories
Liberty

[1527] Of Islamic headscarf as a symbol of liberty

Three cheers for liberty:

Two major parties in Turkey say they will submit a joint plan to parliament to ease a ban on the Islamic headscarf in universities.

The Islamist-rooted governing AK Party and the nationalist MHP say it is an issue of human rights and freedoms. [Turkish MPs plan headscarf reform. BBC News. January 29 2008]

I dare say that Islamic headscarf (or the burqa) is becoming a symbol of liberty in Turkey, the Netherlands and Europe at large. It has to be noted that it is so because of restriction imposed on it. Circumstances made it so. At other places where headscarf or burqa is a mandatory attire, it is a symbol of oppression instead.

The headscarf itself has no inherent value.

Categories
Society

[1480] Of god, God, allah, Allah, tuhan and Tuhan

By extension of free speech, I am quite indifferent to the usage of the noun “Allah” by Christian groups[1] and I frown at threats issued by the government partial to conservative Muslims to the Christian groups to desist from using the noun “Allah” in local Christian literature. This issue is not new and has been popping now and then. Yet, it has not been resolved and I think it is because the local Christians do not completely comprehend the typical conservative Muslim Malaysians’ objection to the usage of the noun “Allah” by Christian groups. I believe a review of basic grammar would significantly clear the air surrounding this issue and explain why there is a conflict in the first place.

Language may not be my forte but at least I know enough of the differences between proper and common nouns. In my humble opinion, at the center of the controversy is an unstated confusion or assumption over Malay proper and common nouns regarding god.

Before I move on, I would like readers to give special attention to capitalization. I use it to differentiate between proper and common nouns. Now that that is clear, let us move on at a measured pace.

In Arabic, at least as I understand it, “allah” comes in form of proper or common noun, depending on usage. Because of the noun ability to become a common noun in Arabic, everybody could use the noun “allah” to refer to any kind of god.

In Malay however, “Allah” is a proper noun with specific reference to Islamic God and not a common noun. The Malay noun ”Allah” enjoys a sense of exclusiveness; it refers to the Islamic god as it has been, to the best of my knowledge, until recently.

At the same time, the Arabic noun “allah” is not quite similar to the Malay noun “Allah“. This is a crucial point, at least, again, from what I understand through the reaction of conservative Muslims, or those that sympathize with that groups. The noun underwent an evolution during its importation from the Arabic to the Malay language centuries ago; it lost its ability to become a common noun in Malay during the process. That however does not mean the Malay language does not have a word to describe whatever the Arabic noun “allah” tries to describe. The Malay language has the noun “tuhan“; its usage is exactly similar to the Arabic noun “allah” within the context we are interested in. “Tuhan” unambiguously means god in both proper and common forms.

From conservative Muslims’ point of view, the Christian groups in Malaysia might be mistranslating the word “God” into “Allah” instead of “Tuhan“, by accident or on purpose. In fact, I may even sympathize with the Muslim groups since I am in the opinion that there is a confusion between the Arabic noun “allah” and Malay noun “Allah“.

In Indonesian, such translation may be acceptable but it has to be noted that Malay and Indonesian languages have gone through different paths from a common origin. Whatever true in the Indonesian language is not necessarily true in the Malay language spoken in Malaysia, and vice versa.

On the surface, this situation is silly and I really do not know why I care to make clarification on behalf of religious believers to another. Well, maybe, probably because it is annoying to see how both types of individuals — both Christians and Muslims — that care to raise their voices on the matter refuse to least comprehend what the conflict is all about before jumping into the fight, indulging in polemics rather than understanding. This tendency is affecting other people that simply wish to watch the days pass by peacefully without shouting matches and flying vases.

Underneath these layers of nouns, however is not something so superficial.

There seems to be an evangelical competition between Christianity and Islam for Malay-speaking non-Christians or non-Muslims. Like it or not, Arabic terms with Islamic connotations have been absorbed into Malay with ease. For Christian preachers, it may be easier for them to use these Arabic terms to convert Malay-speaking non-Christians into Christianity. It is easier to deliver a message in terms familiar to somebody. Muslims preachers however would like to have exclusive use of these words which have been traditionally utilized locally to refer to Islamic ideas. On top of that, there are Muslims would like to keep Islam clearly separated and differentiated from any other religion.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[1] — KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia: A Catholic weekly newspaper in Malaysia has been told to drop the use of the word “Allah” in its Malay language section if it wants to renew its publishing permit, a senior government official said Friday.

The Herald, the organ of Malaysia’s Catholic Church, has translated the word God as “Allah” but it is erroneous because Allah refers to the Muslim God, said Che Din Yusoff, a senior official at the Internal Security Ministry’s publications control unit. [Malaysian Catholic weekly told to drop use of ‘Allah’ in order to renew publishing permit. AP via IHT. December 21 2007]

Categories
Kitchen sink Science & technology Society

[1404] Of intentional misinterpretation?

Compare this blog entry:

For those who have been screaming off their heads about the so-called “Islamization” imposition (I call it a resurgence) on the country in the last few decades, they certainly would not be able to deny that because of Islam, Malaysia has seen much scientific progress and currently as it stands, are among the top seven most scientifically productive Islamic nations in the world today, according to this blog post.

Fair use. Copyrights by Physics Today.

Granted that we still have a far way to go where science is concerned and I am not going to just sit back and be satisfied with what we have. But compared to the state the nation was in when secularism was thriving in the late 50s and 60s (also having failed this country time and time again but that is besides the point), the Islamic resurgence has given us the much need scientific progress that we have been striving for. To deny otherwise is to shut out evidence of the research that we see before our very eyes. Its too bad that those who advocate for the secularism project to remain alive are most certainly behind current times. [Malaysia among top scientifically productive Islamic nations. He That Shall Not Be Named. October 6 2007]

…with this article that the previous blog entry eventually refers to:

Religious fundamentalism is always bad news for science. But what explains its meteoric rise in Islam over the past half century? In the mid-1950s all Muslim leaders were secular, and secularism in Islam was growing. What changed? Here the West must accept its share of responsibility for reversing the trend. Iran under Mohammed Mossadeq, Indonesia under Ahmed Sukarno, and Egypt under Gamal Abdel Nasser are examples of secular but nationalist governments that wanted to protect their national wealth. Western imperial greed, however, subverted and overthrew them. At the same time, conservative oil-rich Arab states—such as Saudi Arabia—that exported extreme versions of Islam were US clients. The fundamentalist Hamas organization was helped by Israel in its fight against the secular Palestine Liberation Organization as part of a deliberate Israeli strategy in the 1980s. Perhaps most important, following the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, the US Central Intelligence Agency armed the fiercest and most ideologically charged Islamic fighters and brought them from distant Muslim countries into Afghanistan, thus helping to create an extensive globalized jihad network. Today, as secularism continues to retreat, Islamic fundamentalism fills the vacuum. [Science and the Islamic world—The quest for rapprochement. Pervez Amirali Hoodbhoy. Physics Today . August 2007]

Why does He That Shall Not Be Named draw different conclusion from the original article and gives the picture as if the article offers the same conclusion as his?

He That Shall Not Be Named should stop and think, and read before he speaks, lest he would make a fool out of himself, which he has so profoundly. Unless, it was his intention to mislead in the first place.

He probably just read the table (and made awful mistake of correlating and then committing the fallacy of correlation is causation) without reading the article.