Categories
Politics & government

[2065] Mengenai perlunya Permatang Pasir menolak simbol kepada budaya UMNO yang korup

Nampaknya, kompas moral parti UMNO berada di dalam keadaan yang sangat, sangat tenat. Dahulu, terlampau mudah untuk menunjukkan betapa UMNO mengamalkan budaya yang korup. Duit rakyat tidak dibezakan daripada harta parti dan kuasa kerajaan dipergunakan untuk kepentingan parti, malah, kepentingan peribadi ahli-ahli UMNO. Bukannya mereka ini berasa malu tetapi dengan megahnya menyatakan yang itu adalah hak mereka.

Semasa Perhimpunan Agung UMNO 2008 yang lalu, Ali Rustam yang didapati bersalah mengamalkan rasuah telah diberikan tempukan gemuruh. Adalah sangat pelik untuk meraikan seorang pesalah, tetapi, disebabkan perverse incentive yang wujud sewaktu itu, itulah yang berlaku.

Tibanya tampuk kepimpanan yang baru datang dengan budaya yang baru yang lebih bersih, kononnya. Apapun kebenarannya, itulah persepsinya di kalangan orang ramai yang mungkin duduk di atas pagar.

Sekarang, pilihanraya kecil bagi kerusi Dewan Undangan Negeri Permatang Pasir mampu memperterbalikkan persepsi itu dan mengembalikan imej UMNO yang buruk itu.

Apa tidaknya?

Rohaizat Othman yang didapati bersalah menggunakan wang orang lain untuk kepentingan sendiri oleh Majlis Peguam langsung dilucutkan kelayakkannya untuk berfungsi sebagai peguam dipanggil hero oleh UMNO. Rohaizat Othman, calon bagi kerusi Permatang Pasir, dipanggil hero kerana, menurut UMNO, yang bersalah adalah rakan kongsinya dan Rohaizat Othman telah menyelesaikan masalah itu bagi pihak rakan kongsinya.[1]

Majlis Peguam menafikan cerita UMNO itu dan menekankan bahawa Rohaizat Othman secara peribadi bersalah dan bukan rakan kongsinya.[2] Berdasarkan kenyataan Majlis Peguam, jelas UMNO menipu.

Rakan kongsinya juga telah bersuara untuk menafikan cerita UMNO itu.[3]

Apabila pesalah dipanggil hero, tidak hairanlah UMNO boleh mencalonkan seorang yang telah memecah amanah sebagai calon ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri.

Timbalan Presiden UMNO pula menyifatkan tindakan Majlis Peguam ke atas calon UMNO untuk kerusi Permatang Pasir sebagai tidak berat, bagaikan saman letak kereta.[4] Sebagai seseorang yang baru sahaja menyalahgunakan helikopter tentera milik rakyat Malaysia untuk kerja-kerja parti tanpa rasa bersalah,[5] kenyataannya — yang akan dikritik hebat di mana-mana negara maju dan demokratik — tidaklah menghairankan.

UMNO masih lagi mengamalkan budaya lamanya: budaya penyalahan guna wang rakyat untuk kerja-kerja sendiri dan meraikan pesalah.

Inikah apa yang pengundi Permatang Pasir mahu?

Jika jawapannya ya, maka dengan kesalnya barah UMNO sudah mula meresap ke jiwa penduduk Permatang Pasir. Yang salah diraikan, yang betul disalahkan.

Jika kompas moral Permatang Pasir menunjukkan ke arah utara, calon UMNO ini patut ditolak. Calon UMNO ini adalah satu simbol budaya UMNO yang korup yang perlu dikeluarkan daripada budaya Malaysia.

Bagi ahli-ahli UMNO yang mahukan UMNO yang bersih, mereka juga sepatutnya menolak calon yang tidak beramanah. UMNO akan kembali gemilang hanya apabila parti tua itu bebas daripada budaya yang disimbolkan oleh Rohaizat Othman.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[1] — Ahmad said in discharging his firm’s responsibilities, Rohaizat had refunded monies due to the cooperative and following this, the cooperative had written a letter to the disciplinary board on March 28 2008 to retract all complaints made against Rohaizat as all their claims had been settled.

This, he said, showed Rohaizat was a leader of quality and did not run away from problems, unlike his partner, and thus could be deemed a “hero”. [Rohaizat Was Not Involved In Transaction, Says Umno Information Chief. Bernama. Ogos 19 2009]

[2] — The Advocates and Solicitors Disciplinary Board struck Rohaizat Othman off the Roll of Advocates and Solicitors on 7 March 2008 after he was found guilty of misconduct. The Disciplinary Board’s decision arose from an investigation into the complaint lodged against Rohaizat Othman by the purchaser of a piece of real property. According to the complaint, Rohaizat Othman failed to refund almost RM 161,000 to the complainant after the transaction was aborted.

Rohaizat Othman appealed against the decision of the Disciplinary Board to the High Court, and the appeal was dismissed on 12 August 2009. He is therefore legally disqualified from practising as an advocate and solicitor.

The finding of misconduct is personal to Rohaizat Othman, as the Disciplinary Board would not hold a lawyer liable for the actions of his/her law partner(s). [Press Release: Clarification regarding Rohaizat Othman. George Varughese. Malaysian Bar Council. Ogos 18 2009]

[3] — PERMATANG PASIR, Aug 20 — The controversy surrounding Barisan Nasional candidate Rohaizat Othman’s disbarment took a new twist today when his partner, the one Umno accused of taking their client’s money, appeared to deny the allegation.

Yusri Ishak alleged that the money was used by Rohaizat to help his friend-cum-client to finance a land transaction worth RM 130,000 which was to be reimbursed but the Umno politician’s friend had failed to do so.

Rohaizat then claimed the land, planning to sell it to remit the funds used to purchase it but to no avail, said Yusri, adding that that was one of the reasons why Rohaizat had failed to repay the co-operative.

He also said some of the co-operative funds had been used to help another of Rohaizat’s friends, a director in a housing development company, and also to manage the firm’s branch in Ipoh. [Rohaizat’s partner denies Umno’s accusation. Syed Jaymal Zahiid. The Malaysian Insider. Ogos 20 2009]

[4] — The deputy Umno president attempted to downplay the issue and said the campaign should not be burdened by the issues surrounding its candidate. [Muhyiddin calls Bar Council fines parking tickets. Syed Jaymal Zahiid. The Malaysian Insider. Ogos 19 2009]

[5] — PUTRAJAYA, Aug 18 — Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin dismissed a corruption complaint filed by PKR over his use of a military helicopter to attend Umno meetings in Sabah.

The deputy Umno president did not, however, offer any explanation as to why he used a military helicopter to fulfill his party duties.

”It (the allegations) does not scare me at all. It is a blatant example of how short on ideas Pakatan (Rakyat) are that they have to start coming up with something like this,” he told reporters here today when asked to comment on PKR’s recent allegations of corruption against him.

Yesterday, PKR Youth leaders lodged a complaint against Muhyiddin with the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) over his alleged abuse of government property for personal use.

This was first highlighted by the news agency Bernama when the DPM flew on a military helicopter to attend the Penampang UMNO division meeting in Sabah after he officiated another division party meeting in Kudat. [Muhyiddin: Corruption allegations don’t scare me. Shazwan Mustafa Kamal. The Malaysian Insider. Ogos 18 2009]

Categories
Economics Politics & government

[2058] Of does prisoner’s dilemma ring a bell?

In denying the allegation that he received RM10 million from Kuala Dimensi Sdn. Bhd., MCA President had this to say:

I am not surprised that the smear tactics and character assassination against me had picked up pace especially with the latest revelations by the PKFZ Task Force.

If indeed I have received pecuniary and financial benefits for myself or the Party, there will be more reasons for me to protect the interests of the givers, as opposed to proceeding to expose their misdeeds. By doing so, I am risking my personal and family safety as well as my own credibility.

The allegation by Dato’ Seri Tiong King Sing that I have taken the RM10 million “loan” from him for use by the Party’s divisions, are obviously made with several motives, including diverting attention away from the alleged irregularities exposed by the Task Force. It could also be meant to create suspicion among my Party comrades that I have pocketed funds meant for the divisions. The fact that he indicated that it was a loan could mean that he wants the option of taking me to court to further embarrass me. [Smear campaign just another obstacle. Ong Tee Keat. August 12 2009]

I presume, Mr. Ong Tee Keat has never heard of prisoner’s dilemma.

If one applies prisoner’s dilemma, it should not be too hard to understand why somebody is defecting. Of course, this is assume that Mr. Ong was involved in the whole fiasco.

Whether true or not, it is still a possibility. It is not as impossible or ludicrous as Mr. Ong insists at all.

Categories
Earthly Strip Politics & government

[2012] Of Earthly Strip: Missing courage

Some right reserved.

Categories
Economics Politics & government Society

[1997] Of a story of abuse of power

Harun al-Rashid, the celebrated ruler who appears in the Tales of a Thousand and One Nights, reigned over an immense empire that stretched right across the Middle East and into Asia. He also won renown as poet and a lover of scholarship. When he was declared Caliph, Harun opened the treasury and distributed prizes to his friends and relatives. He hoped to receive a visit from Sufyan, his former teacher. When Sufyan failed to appear he wrote him a letter and sent a messenger named Abbad to deliver it. Abbad found Sufyan sitting with his companions inside a mosque. When he presented him with the letter Sufyan refused to touch it and instead asked one of his companions to read it for him. The letter said: ‘We await your coming to visit us; we are mindful of the friendship that binds us.’

Sufyan said to his companions: ‘Write my answer on the back of the letter.’ his disciples said, ‘Master you must write to him on a fresh sheet.’ ‘On the back of the sheet,’ he said again. he then dictated the following words: ‘To Harun the misguided, deprived of the sweetness of the Koran. You have opened the treasury of the believers and distributed its funds to gratify your desires. Have you asked permission of the widows and the orphans?’ and so on in this manner, concluding: ‘as for friendship, we have broken it off; no tie or affection binds us now. Do not write to us again; for if you do, we shall neither read your letter nor reply to it.’

After seeing this, Abbad went to the market, where he replaced his clothing with cheaper clothes. When he returned with the letter to al-Rashid, the Caliph understood the meaning of Abbad’s change of appearance and cried out, ‘The messenger has succeeded where his master has failed.’ When the Caliph read it he burst into tears and wept in the most piteous fashion. His courtiers said, ‘Sufyan has demonstrated his impertinence; have someone fetch him here.’ ‘Silence,’ said al-Rashid, ‘ for you are the ones who have misguided me.’ Harun preserved Sufyan’s letter and would take it out from time to time to read it. [Page 43-44. Chapter 4: The Servant State. Good and Bad Power: The Ideals and Betrayals of Government. Geoff Mulgan]

Categories
Economics Politics & government

[1995] Of the absurdity of a condition relating to the PKFZ report

Ladies and gentlemen,

The most anticipated report of the year has come out. Before you can read them, below is one of the conditions which you must adhere to:

You are not authorised to use or rely on the Report to arrive at any conclusion [PKA Report. PricewaterhouseCoopers Advisory Services Sdn Bhd. Accessed on May 28 2009]

PwC (or is it PKA), can you go to hell please?