Categories
Politics & government

[2067] Of focus on Islamic credential is both exclusive and plastic politics

A contest between PAS and UMNO within conservative Malay settings is more likely than not a race to the bottom. It inevitably degenerates into a deplorable inquiry regarding which between the two political parties is more Islamic than the other. While doing so, PAS effectively resorts to exclusive politics that is clearly inconsistent to its assertion that PAS is for all. If the Islamist party is really for all, it needs to adopt a more inclusive approach in engaging UMNO.

In the past, the question of who could enter heaven became a campaign material. Back in January 2009 during the Kuala Terengganu by election, the implementation of hudud gained currency as an election issue.
The most recent example of exclusive politics happened when the top leader of the party, Nik Aziz Nik Mat labelled Islam as practiced by UMNO as plastic.

UMNO did employ the same tactic of inclusive politics with respect to Islam. When PAS finally gathered its weight to say no to the idea of both sides cooperating with each other, UMNO accused PAS of doing a great disservice to the Muslim community.

In the beer controversy in Selangor, UMNO ridiculed PAS for kowtowing to DAP and while doing so, questioned the Islamic credential of PAS.

The ugly debate is an exercise at exclusive politics because it prevents non-Muslims as well as secular Malays from relating to PAS, and UMNO for that matter. While the mudslinging between PAS and UMNO on their Islamic credential can be hilarious at times, it is ultimately damaging to both.

Previously when information could be contained, exclusive politics worked. A party could appeal to local electorates and ignore the rest. Messages could be tailored to be inclusive at one time and exclusives at others. Inconsistency was not much of a great concern, especially so for UMNO since they controlled the media.

These days however, as the common wisdom goes, information flows freely. As a result, any entity with national aspiration does not have the luxury of playing to such exclusive politics. Continuous emphasis on Islamic credential as it is happening has the potential of eroding the possibility of realising national aspiration, which, for PAS, ultimately leads to becoming part of the federal government.

It terribly mocks the slogan ”˜PAS for all’ that it campaigned on earlier and in many cases, as the liberal elements in PAS try to project to wider Malaysian audience.

The truth is that this emphasis on Islamic credential, at the manner at it is done, with apologies to Nik Aziz Nik Mat, is plastic. The punches and counterpunches on Islamic credential are all about form and less about substance.

It is plastic — empty, worthless — because beyond that rhetoric lie no concrete solutions to problems besetting Malaysian society. It does not address the economy, crime, corruption, health and a gamut of other factors that affect the life of Malaysians.

Worse, that debate, as we are witnessing through the press — traditional or online, establishment or otherwise — is more often than not an attempt at negative campaigning. That creates a victim and that victim is Islam itself. Unfair as the association may be, it is hard for the common masses to not to generalise when individuals who claim to represent the religion, on both sides of the fence, failed to be mindful of their words, even as they enter the month of Ramadan.

The route that should be preferred by both sides is one that contains inclusive messages with substance.

PAS should really concentrate on matters that everybody, regardless of religious or irreligious beliefs, can relate to without much consternation. Such matters can be about good governance coupled with concrete policies that can benefit all that it wishes to pursue while being part of the Penang state government.

Surely, good policies that incorporate such universal values and its implementation come far closer to realising whatever ideals Islam promotes than the act of claiming to be a better Muslim and deriding others while at it. Universal concepts and values such as justice and trustworthiness better fit for the idea ”˜PAS for all’. These universal values are present in Islam and PAS can capitalize on it.

PAS already has a working formula. The liberal element in PAS — liberal in a sense more liberal than the rest in PAS and not liberal in classical terms — for instance has focused on the concept of justice rather than harp on the divisive controversial issue of Islamic state. They realised that the idea of Islamic state is only a mean with non-exclusive and non-exhaustive form, while equality and justice is an end and a substance.

That, as some would argue, is the essence of ”˜PAS for all’.

PAS should consult its liberal element on that.

It should not be confused between means and ends. To confuse the two is to confuse between form and substance, and doing so, engaging in exclusive and plastic politics that is all about appearance.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

First published in The Malaysian Insider on August 24 2009.

Categories
Liberty

[2046] Of my position on Islamic headscarf, burqa, etc and France

A person asked me what do I think of Sarkozy’s hostility to burqa and why I have not written against it.

I have not written against it because I generally dislike repeating myself.

It is an old issue and I have made myself clear with respect to Turkey (back in 2008) and the Netherlands (2006).

But for the benefit of that person, banning or forcing the wearing of burqa, Islamic headscarf, etc, is a transgression of liberty.

Now, I have work to do. Bugger off.

And really, try to read my old stuff before any of you insinuate anything.

Categories
Conflict & disaster Liberty Politics & government Society

[2001] Of Obama in Cairo:best parts

I am watching President Obama’s speech in Cairo live right now, with his prepared text on screen. This is the best part so far for me:

For decades, there has been a stalemate: two peoples with legitimate aspirations, each with a painful history that makes compromise elusive. It is easy to point fingers — for Palestinians to point to the displacement brought by Israel’s founding, and for Israelis to point to the constant hostility and attacks throughout its history from within its borders as well as beyond. But if we see this conflict only from one side or the other, then we will be blind to the truth: the only resolution is for the aspirations of both sides to be met through two states, where Israelis and Palestinians each live in peace and security. [Obama’s Speech in Cairo. Barack Obama. Washington Wire. June 4 2009]

Great to be able to watch the speech online, live:

Public domain

Another great part:

There is no straight line to realize this promise. But this much is clear: governments that protect these rights are ultimately more stable, successful and secure. Suppressing ideas never succeeds in making them go away. America respects the right of all peaceful and law-abiding voices to be heard around the world, even if we disagree with them. And we will welcome all elected, peaceful governments — provided they govern with respect for all their people.

This last point is important because there are some who advocate for democracy only when they are out of power; once in power, they are ruthless in suppressing the rights of others. No matter where it takes hold, government of the people and by the people sets a single standard for all who hold power: you must maintain your power through consent, not coercion; you must respect the rights of minorities, and participate with a spirit of tolerance and compromise; you must place the interests of your people and the legitimate workings of the political process above your party. Without these ingredients, elections alone do not make true democracy.

Next:

I know there are many — Muslim and non-Muslim — who question whether we can forge this new beginning. Some are eager to stoke the flames of division, and to stand in the way of progress. Some suggest that it isn’t worth the effort — that we are fated to disagree, and civilizations are doomed to clash. Many more are simply skeptical that real change can occur. There is so much fear, so much mistrust. But if we choose to be bound by the past, we will never move forward. And I want to particularly say this to young people of every faith, in every country — you, more than anyone, have the ability to remake this world.

Near the end:

It is easier to start wars than to end them. It is easier to blame others than to look inward; to see what is different about someone than to find the things we share. But we should choose the right path, not just the easy path. There is also one rule that lies at the heart of every religion — that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us. This truth transcends nations and peoples — a belief that isn’t new; that isn’t black or white or brown; that isn’t Christian, or Muslim or Jew. It’s a belief that pulsed in the cradle of civilization, and that still beats in the heart of billions. It’s a faith in other people, and it’s what brought me here today

Categories
Activism Liberty Society

[1949] Of MP Khalid Samad at Northeast Malaysia Forum 2009

Knowing that this might be my last opportunity to attend an edition of the Northeast Malaysia Forum in Kuala Lumpur, I decided to be there. Although the KL site was not be as big as main site — as true for two previous editions organized in 2005 and 2008 — I saw great improvement this time around for KL compared.

Unlike previous editions, the KL site was hosted in a proper studio this year. On top of that, the site accommodated audience. There were probably more or less 20 people there, including the studio crew, volunteers, panelists and audience. That was not possible in the past.

This edition was larger in its reach too. Apart from Yale and KL, there were a host of following from other cities, namely Chicago, Singapore, London and Sydney. This is a proof that the alumni of Malaysia Forum are spreading their wing wider.

Now, the most interesting statement that came out from the KL site to me is the one from MP Khalid Samad.

He was touching about freedom of religion. In response to a question relating to Lina Joy, he said that if God had willed it, he would have made everybody a Muslim. But God does not do that and that says a lot about the freedom of religion that Islam grants.

I am not quite sure if he is saying simply because the audience was primarily a liberal group but given his track record, I am willing to give him the benefit of doubt. He is after all one of the more reasonable PAS members, probably in the same vein of the PAS MP from Kuala Selangor, Dr. Dzulkifli Ahmad. When I said reasonable, that definitely means better than a majority of BN MPs.

While appealing to freedom of religion, it is unclear what he thinks of Muslims having the same liberty. He did say in the same evening in front of the same audience that Muslims have their own laws and their should abide to it.

For further material on what was discussed by Khalid Samad, as well as MP Yusmadi Yusoff, friend Yeoh Chen Chow did a good job at summarizing it.[1] You may evaluate Khalid Samad’s words yourself there.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[1] — [Live Blogging of NMF – YB Yusmadi Yusoff & YB Khalid Samad. Yeoh Chen Chow. April 11 2009]

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p/s — MP Yusmadi Yusoff, just before leaving the premise, invites members of Northeast Malaysia Forum to visit the Parliament during one of the sittings over the summer. All the more reason why YOU PEOPLE should come back.

He is also looking for individuals to participate in the Asian Renaissance Conference to be held in Manila, the Philippines later in December 2009. What is that? I leave their website to do the explaining.

Interested?

Contact him. Or contact me (I have nothing to do with the Conference. Just doing him a favor).

Categories
History & heritage Society

[1888] Of Islamic art, architecture and literature I

Art, architecture and literature are important in history because only by observing works of past civilizations that we can somehow comprehend its culture further. Not only it provides us with precious records but as Walter Denny stated, it also gives us a feeling on how past societies lived. True to it, art, architecture and literature have become few of the most fundamental aspect of history. This is true for all civilizations including Islamic civilizations especially so when it is common for Muslims to consider the religion not as mere religion but instead a way of life. As a way of life, everything is governed by the Islamic law. Therefore, an inspection of Islamic art, architecture and literature offers a path to understanding Islam.

Islam is a monotheistic religion. The first pillar of Islam is to acknowledge the oneness of god and Mohamed is the prophet of god. Islam is particular about the oneness of god and is very strict in its punishment for the sin of syirik, the act of acknowledging the existence of any other god than Allah. In sura 6 ‘The Cattle’, verse 74, the Koran says, “And when Ibrahim said to his sire, Azar: Do you take idols for gods? Surely I see you and your people in manifest error.” There are a few other places where the Koran asserts similar wrongness of worshiping idols and other gods.

To prevent idol worshiping especially, the Koran even disallows any figurative representation of living things. In sura 16 ‘The Bee’, verse 74, “So coins not similitudes for Allah. Surely Allah knows and ye known not”. Therefore, there is a lack of figurative sculpture or painting in Islamic art. The destruction of a Buddhas of Bamyam in Afghanistan by the Taliban reinforced the fact that Muslims do adhere to the ban in one way or another.[1] Nevertheless, Islam “does not forbid representation of humans, animals and birds in secular context.”[2]

Since Muslim artists had limited options, they had to find another way to express themselves and they did this by concentrating on calligraphy and decoration. As we observe in history, they have truly mastered these arts.

Of all art forms they excelled in, they take pride and cherish their mastery in calligraphy which is called khat in Arabic. That is so because “calligraphy is one art form in Islam explicitly and positively sanctioned by God.”[3] Oftentimes, calligraphic activities decorate Koranic verses.

Arabic calligraphy is identified by two main features. First, “slant-clipped reed pen” is used in order to write or rather draw the words. Secondly, there are rules to be adhered to and each style has its own rule. These rules are the ones that made each calligraphic style differ from one another.[4]

During the reign of Caliph Uthman (644 — 656 CE), he ordered the gathering of Koranic verses into an official text that we know today. When the gathering of verses finally completed, calligraphy was used as “a form of decoration for the greater glory of Allah’s words.”[5]

While breath of calligraphy was greatly expanded under Islam, it began with the development of the Arabic language during pre-Islamic period. Arabic letters were derived from Semitic scripts.[6] It has 28 letters with 18 basic forms.[7] It was later further developed by the Nabataean, an Arabic tribe originating from northern Arabian Peninsula and adopted by other literate Arabic tribe including the Quraisy. It was around this time that a writing system style called Jazm was popular among the Arabs. Jazm was an advanced version of the scripts.[8]

There were two forms of scripts that were used in those times. The first type was “dry writing” and the other was “soft writing”.

The first type was later known as the kufic style. As the name suggests, the style “received its name from the town in which it was first put into official use”, which was Kufa, located in modern day Iraq.[9] The form can be identified easily by its ”angular and sober” style. Kufic characters also seem to have “geometrical intricacies”.[10] The other type was less angular and thus making it distinctly different from kufic. The soft writing style was more practical than its counterpart and later became the foundation for modern styles.[11]

As Islam spread during its golden age, so did the Arabic language and the art of khat. Societies of newly conquered areas especially Persia and to some extend Anatolia absorbed the language and its arts. Although local language was still used, Arabic characters managed to slip into local writing system. As this happened, local experts in calligraphy came into existence and further revolutionized it. In fact, one of the most important styles in calligraphy the naskh was invented by a Persian calligrapher named Mir Ali Sultan al-Tabrizi. In Turkey, Arif Hikmet created the Sunbuli style, “which had a short vogue.”[12]

Apart from the practice of calligraphy as a work of art, Muslim artists also pursued other areas that do not go against Islam. One of the areas is the art of decoration.

Islamic decoration is unique compared to other cultures and this is simply because of the same reason why calligraphy is pursued by Muslims. This resulted in the rareness of sculpture and painting that were prevalent in Greek and Roman civilizations. However, “this deficit is compensated with a richness in ornamentation on the lavish carved plaster paneling, wall tiling and glazed mosaics.”[13] The main themes used in the decorative art are mainly centered on nature and geometry.

Muslim artisans so frequently used geometry in their works that we now called such work as arabesque. Arabesque is simply a collection of a single geometrical pattern repeated on and on until simple shapes became a complex design. Sometimes, the design is “so complicated that they rarely call to mind their sources of origin.”[14]

Both calligraphy and arabesque were prominently used in Islamic architecture. Walls of all prominent buildings Muslims built are covered with them to no end.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[1] — [Taliban Show Off Remains of Ancient Buddha Statues. Kathy Gannon. The Independent via National Geographic. March 27 2001]

[2] — [Islamic Art. Detroit Institute of Art. April 1 2003]

[3] — [The Islamic Impact. Page 141. Yvonne Haddad. Byron Haines. Ellison Findly. New York. Syracuse University Press. 1984]

[4] — [The Calligraphy of Islam: The Reflections of the State of the Art. Page 6. Mohamed U. Zakariya. Washington D.C. Georgetown University. 1983]

[5] — [The Spread of Islam. Page 119. Information missing]

[6] — [Islamic Arts. Islamic Arts and Architecture Organization. April 1 2003]

[7] — [The Calligraphy of Islam: The Reflections of the State of the Art. Page 2. Mohamed U. Zakariya. Washington D.C. Georgetown University. 1983]

[8] — [Islamic Arts. Islamic Arts and Architecture Organization. April 1 2003]

[9] — [Arabic Writing. B. Moritz. Encyclopedia of Islam. 1913]

[10] — [The Spread of Islam. Page 120. Information missing]

[11] — [The Calligraphy of Islam: The Reflections of the State of the Art. Page 2. Mohamed U. Zakariya. Washington D.C. Georgetown University. 1983]

[12] — [Ibid. Page 29]

[13] — [The Umayyad Page 17. Information missing]

[14] — [Ibid]

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

I recently rediscovered a box full of short papers I worked on while in Michigan. This is part 1 of a sophomore paper I wrote in 2003. I place it here out of concern these papers might one day lost to harsh elements. For this particular paper, several pages of citation are already lost due to mishandling and my own irreverence for my own work.

At the moment, I am praying to find papers that I vividly remember: econometric paper on foreign exchange, the politics of climate change (this is probably the thickest paper that I remember; the research to produce this paper took months to complete! That is crazy considering it was just a junior paper) and I think, economic model on climate change.