Categories
Society

[1180] Of racism does not solve the Rohingya issue

Gross generalization is easy to do because it does not require rigorous thinking. For a simpleton, this is a preferable style of thinking, or lack of. We as a society unfortunately are so simple-minded that we fall for that trap. Not too long ago, a survey claims that we as a society generalize Malays as lazy, Chinese as greedy and Indians as drunk. After that, foreign labors have been blamed for the increase of crime rate, despite the fact that the locals commit more crime than foreign workers. As if that is not enough, our legislature even considered of passing a xenophobic bill. Now, we see claim that all Rohingyas in Malaysia are beggars or criminals, the people as a whole creates “a sort of a beggar ridden country.”

It all started with a missing kid. In two weeks, the parents with the help of local community joined hand in hand for a search effort. The effort bore fruit in the end and the parents were, I believe, overjoyed.

Initially, the media reported that the kid had been living with a Rohingya family. The kid was lost and upon seeing him all alone, the family decided to take care of him. Later however, the police suspected that the kid was kidnapped by the family and used for begging purpose. There are those that seem to be turning onto the family, passing judgment based on mere suspicion while the court of law has not been given the opportunity to rule over the case. Some courageously indulge a hasty generalization and assumed guilty charge on the family. As if that is not enough, he audaciously takes the next leap and claims that all Rohingyas are beggars or criminals; either way, parasites.

Imagine, a couple’s alleged — not convicted — crime is enough to condemn a whole people. Such hasty generalization borders racism, if it is not racism by itself.

There are people that hold the same thinking. Though the actors differ, the storyline essentially remains the same. Switch Rohingyas for Arabs and Malaysians for French, you would have what racist far right in France are thinking. Switch Rohingyas for Turks and Malaysians for Germans, you would have what the racist far right in Germany are thinking. Switch Rohingyas for Jews and Malaysians for Nazi Germans, you would have what the Nazi on aggregate were thinking.

Issue regarding the Rohingyas, specifically, their status in Malaysia needs to be addressed and there is no doubt of that. But turning to hasty generalization or racism is not a solution. For a solution to be found, we need to sit back and think a little harder.

Categories
Humor Society

[1148] Of literally, whistle-blower

I was a little bit confused, perhaps, hilariously confused for awhile, after reading a report today:

KUALA LUMPUR: If everyone carries a whistle and blows it when a crime occurs, the nation will be a safer place.

This is what the Malaysian Crime Prevention Foundation (MCPF) believes, and so it unveiled the “safety whistle” campaign at its 14th AGM on Saturday as a crime prevention method for the people.  [MCPF kicks off whistle-blowing campaign. The Star. March 24 2007]

A little bit too literal, if you ask me. When I read the term “whistle-blowing“, I was thinking of a different kind of whistleblower. Anyway, further in the report:

“When, for example, burglar breaks into a house, the houseowner or anyone who witnesses the crime can immediately call for help and attention by blowing his whistle and, hopefully, that will scare the burglars away,” said MCPF executive council member Datuk Robert Phang.

Yeah folks. If you happen to stumble into a burglar in your house in the middle of the night, take a whistle and blow it as hard as possible. Hopefully, the burglars would run away, fearing the all powerful shrieking whistle!

Prreeettt! Prreeettt! Prreeettt!

Categories
Liberty Science & technology

[1110] Of liberty-threatening technology applications

Technology has no inherent value by itself. Just like any tool, it sits neutrally in the middle of value spectrum. Such neutrality however does not prevent any technology from being utilized towards specific value, be it for better or worse. Nuclear technology for instance could be harnessed to provide humanity with electricity or as weapon, to strike terror to us all. Such duality is no different when it comes to closed-circuit television (CCTV) and radio frequency identification (RFID) in public space.

Both CCTV and RFID technologies are beneficial in many ways. Within private commercial spaces, both are used to make processes safer or more efficient or both. CCTV could be installed in places where no human could operate safely while RFID makes traceability of goods far easier. On the other end, if applied in public spaces, both infringe privacy.

CCTV perhaps needs no introduction. Between CCTV and RFID, the former has entered public consciousness far earlier in the 1990s. As a teenager, it was common for me then and even now to spot cameras in large stores. And I do remember there was a huge hype when CCTV was introduced along Malaysian expressways to discourage speeding. Despite public familiarity with CCTV, it is only until recently it has proliferated public sphere; the state is central to the proliferation. Cameras are installed in so many places by the state in the name of crime fighting that it chokes innocent but liberty-conscious persons.

I suppose, the first case of massive installation of cameras within public realm occurred in London. Given how frequent London is cited in any debate regarding CCTV and privacy, I would venture to say that London might have been the pioneer in the introduction of CCTV within public space. That might not be true and might be the result of a biased observation because I used to visit Samizdata — a UK-based libertarian group blog — frequently.

Nevertheless, from London or whatever it might originate from, the idea of CCTV within public space has reached Kuala Lumpur. While in the UK, the introduction has met some resistance, in Malaysia, I have yet to meet any protest at all, apart from myself. The image of Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-four has been recalled again and again by those that oppose the installation of cameras in public areas but I do believe Oceania fits Malaysia better due to what I perceive as the willing acceptance of Malaysians of CCTV. I definitely refuse to accept CCTV in public space, more so if the operator of the CCTV is an illiberal state. The moral police would especially cherish the idea of electronic Mat Skodeng.

While CCTV could be a threat to privacy, RFID could be as many times more hostile to civil liberties.

I might have encountered RFID far earlier than I thought I had but my first conscious exposure to it was during a consulting competition at Michigan. During a research, I learned how RFID is used to record inventory and through such information, the realization of just-in-time philosophy that Wal-Mart practices. Despite the positive aspect of it, just like CCTV, the utilization of RFID within public realm is questionable from civil liberty point of view.

Malaysian passport for instance uses RFID. In fact, it is the first RFID-passport in the world. The RFID chip within the passport contains sensitive personal information and that information could scanned and read from afar. Many advocates of RFID insists that information within the chip is secured. Nevertheless, there are reports that point to the contrary. At a blog by Reuters:

With the debate over genetic cloning in full swing, hackers could not have cared less at a conference in New York City, where two presenters demonstrated the electronic equivalent of making a copy of an implanted RFID or radio frequency ID chip.

The point was to show just how easy it is to fool a detection device that purports to uniquely identify any individual.

As time progresses, it is all too possible to track everybody with RFID. At the hand of illiberal bureaucrats that respect no right, RFID could be the tool to suppress civil liberties. This used to belong in the realm of science fiction. Soon, too soon, it will be science.

Despite the rant, I am not an anti-technology or back-to-the-primitive preacher. On the contrary, I believe technology should be used to enhance our living experience. Technologies such as carbon sequestering to reduce carbon emissions and life-saving stem cell technology are essential to build a bright future for us and our children. But when any technology is used at the expense of certain ideals, it is only right to oppose such application.

Categories
Economics Society

[1081] Of foreign labor and crime rate

There are xenophobic Malaysians and that is the truth. Some of these xenophobes take it one step further and allege that the increased population of foreign workers is the cause of increased crime rate.

I am usually uncomfortable with the allegation. In a way, the phobia forms part of anti-free market thinking; protectionist thinking. Further, it seems that foreign workers are being made scapegoats.

Without proper citation however, if I were to challenge the allegation, their words would be as good as mine. That changes today as I have found a reputable source to back me up. At The Economist:

Malaysians think that the increase in foreign workers has worsened crime rates. Official figures show that foreigners in the country commit proportionately fewer crimes than do Malaysians themselves.

Anyway, the xenophobia is not unique to Malaysia though the reason might differ. Nevertheless, it is a typical protectionist rationale:

Locals in the receiving countries already seem to be worried about competition for their jobs. In a recent poll for the ILO, 59% of Thais said their government should admit no more foreign workers, and only 10% thought more should come. Even in prosperous, cosmopolitan Singapore, just over half of locals oppose admitting more foreign workers, according to a poll in the Straits Times.

Also, in Singapore, according to Rajan:

In other words, foreigners are proportionally underrepresented amongst criminals. So not only is “most crimes in Singapore are done by foreign labourer workers” false in the absolute sense, neither is it true on a proportional basis.

So, let us reject out irrational prejudice against foreign labors.

Categories
This blog

[1074] Of beware of impersonator running around; Garyism

I would like to warn everybody that a person is masquerading as me and is posting inflammatory comments at several blogs. In many ways, he is damaging my reputation with clear intent.

It is highly likely that the impostor goes by the nick Abdullah Gul. One proof to back my allegation is his IP address. At Politics 101, a person masquerading as me was caught by John. The admin of Politics 101 later contacted me to confirm whether the impostor was me. Upon my confirmation, the admin deleted the impostor’s inflammatory comment and revealed the impostor’s IP address, which is 218.111.39.55. The following is a screenshot of the comment:

Screenshot of Politics. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Fair use.

The IP is associated with each and every one of Abdullah Gul’s latest comment.

Sometimes, it seems that Abdullah Gul (masquerading as some other person; usually in a hybrid pseudonym like Juferi Ooi Abdullah or Muhammad bin Merah) is masking his IP to post inflammatory comments. I am unable to confirm that but WordPress records all commenters’ IP address as well as the time any comment was made. The IP differs from 218.111.39.55. Nevertheless, I have several other recorders on my blog and those recorders state that 218.111.39.55 did visit my blog and that the time of the visits coincided with posting of the inflammatory comments.

I am currently contacting TMNet to find out more of that IP address 218.111.39.55.

The person Abdullah Gul has been posting many ridiculous comments at my blog. You could read some of his comments at various of my entries ([1050], [1048], [1036], [988], [979], [976], [973], [948], [952], [850], [695], [435] and [456]).

According to John, the same person had tried to impersonate Menj. At this blog itself, he had used Jeff Ooi and Mack Zulkifli with the obvious intent of misleading others.

The latest case of impersonation, which I suspect done by the same person, occurred at Ktemoc. There, the impostor used my nick to hit out at Rajan. At Ktemoc:

Screenshot of Ktemoc. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Fair use.

The person with the nick “__earth” is not me.

I am gathering information on the person and if I have enough evidence, I plan to make a police report. I am not sure how serious the police would take it but at least, it would get the ball rolling. After all, if left unchecked, the impostor’s comments would, sooner or later, get me into undeserved trouble.

Finally, I suspect that the person behind Abdullah Gul is also Garywbush. Several bloggers like Rajan, Bobk and even Menj are probably more than familiar with Garywbush. Garywbush has an account Wikipedia and I as well as admin Robdurbar suspected Garywbush of socketpuppetry. Both of us built a case against Garywbush but it has been left hanging after Garywbush ran away.

Recently I edited Garywbush’s user page; I was placing a bait to lure him in and it worked. After leaving Wikipedia for almost a year, he came back to undo my edit on his talk page. His latest edit at Wikipedia might be the smoking gun that I need to connect Abdullah Gul with Garywbush. I have contacted several Wikipedian admins to cross match Garywbush’s IP with 218.111.39.55, if indeed that IP address is static, or that his terminal is dynamic but always connected to internet.

Another reason why I suspect Abdullah Gul is indeed Garywbush is the fact that both had invited me to establish a Liberal Islamic Party. By the way, that is a ridiculous suggestion.

Currently, I am holding back all comments that I suspect made by Abdullah Gul as proofs.

So, be warned. Please be careful of you find the nick “__earth” posting any comment anywhere. It is possible that that is not me.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p/s — More impersonation:

Screenshots by Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Fair use.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

pp/s — yet another:

Screenshots by Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Fair use.

The impostor seems to be impersonating John too.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

ppp/s — impersonation at My Asylum:

Screenshot. Fair use.

And impersonation at The Scribe A Kadir Jasin:

Screenshot. Fair use.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p4/s — and yet another:

Screenshot. Fair use.

The nick “__earth” here is an impostor. The other two are possibly done by the same sad person. One trend that I learned is that the impostor loves to make an stupid comment and then uses another nick to question that stupid comment.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p4/s — I think I gonna call this Garyism. The ideology of Garywbush. Impostor in action at blog Where is god:

Screenshot. Fair use.

You could see the real John making a statement about the impostor.

More:

Screenshot. Fair use.

Ah. The talk of “Liberal Islam Party” again…

Also, at Ktemoc:

Screenshot. Fair use.

This is how to look for the real “__earth”. An avatar of me and a link linking to my blogger profile at Blogger comment window. A fake “__earth” will not have the avatar at the comment window. At least, so far.

And yes, that Jeff and John’s comments are really the impostor’s.

Remember, Garyism is a crime. My lawyer friend says it is.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p5/s — more:

Screenshot. Fair use.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p6/s — more:

Screenshot. Fair use.

Further, I have contacted TMNet and they say they could trace the IP, even if it was dynamically-assigned. So, all I need to do now is a police report. Once a report is lodged, it will not take long to trace the impostor.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p/s — it is never ending:

Screenshot by Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Public domain.