I saw this on CNN earlier. The video is called Closed Zone.
The video was commissioned by Gisha, a human right group in Israel.
Categories
Tag: Palestine
Watch Astro Awani now!
Yes, Hishammuddin Rais is on TV pawning the BN MP for Pasir Salak!
Relationship between Israel and Palestine has to be one of the most enduring conflicts of our time. Not one year has passed since I first learned of the conflict without the announcement of a death linked to it. The countless deaths and the dead end of this vicious cycle of hostility repeats itself over and over again, and I am numb. As I read of others taking sides in the conflict, I can only sigh and question, ”Where is the wisdom in all of this?”
There is something almost juvenile about this whole business of taking sides. Many are more interested in pointing out who started the quarrel first when in fact, who started what first is a matter lost in time.
Those supportive of the Israeli attack and invasion on Gaza insist that Hamas had been hammering Israel with rockets, hence threatening the lives of Israelis. Sympathizers of Hamas in return point out that Israel had closed the border surrounding the Gaza Strip to create a humanitarian crisis as supplies ranging from food to medicine run short. In a counterpoint of a counterpoint, the Israeli government stated that Hamas was smuggling weapons into Gaza to strengthen itself.
There is yet another counterpoint to the counterpoint of a counterpoint. In the effort to reach the ultimate counterpoint, I would not be surprised if the argument went beyond the time when Nebuchadnezzar II of Babylon first sacked Jerusalem more than two and a half millennia ago, just to prove who first owned that piece of coveted land.
While all the points raised are useful in understanding the conflict better, those who participate in the debate surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are so engrossed in searching other’s faults that they fail to realize that there are faults on both sides. The saddest part of all, neither side is willing to admit their side’s capability of atrocity and the other side’s capability of goodness.
Sympathizers of Hamas or perhaps Palestine as whole are quick to highlight the unfairness of the current conflict by stating Israel has suffered only one-digit casualties altogether while the Palestinian count lies in the three-digit range. Some juxtapose Hamas’s rudimentary equipment like Qassam rockets against Israel’s modern arsenal which includes the Merkava armored vehicles, F-16 jet fighters and Apache helicopters.
If it escapes anybody, Qassams, Merkavas, F-16 and Apaches all kill. Would it comfort you to be killed by a Qassam rocket instead of a shell fired by a Merkava?
Death is still death. What’s in a name?
The truth is, who is more wrong is a hopeless debate which does nothing to solve the conflict. The solution lies not in playing the game of war of attrition. On the contrary, both sides need to refrain from provoking each other. Both sides need to become more trustful of each other.
I do not pretend that this is easy to do especially when history builds reputation and the reputations of both sides in the past have proven to be far from being impeccable. Shakespeare wrote in The Merchant of Venice, ”If you prick us do we not bleed? If you tickle us do we not laugh? If you poison us do we not die? And if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?”
Yet, there is hope in building that elusive bridge.
Hamas, for instance, managed to largely kept its word in maintaining a six-month truce. Israel meanwhile unilaterally withdrew from Gaza and evicted Israelis from settlements deemed illegal. There are other examples.
Then again, this is an easy thing to say for a person sitting behind a desk typing on his laptop with little risk of bullets finding their way to him. If I were standing in a street in Gaza right now, I would sooner be shot dead than be heard there. The desperate shout for peace could easily be drowned by the sounds of flying bullets and missiles and falling bombs.
Whatever happens in Gaza today, I am here and the least I can do is not to compound the problem. The least I can do is to realize both are at fault. The least I can do is to show how there is no angel or demon here. There are only us humans.
This article was first published in The Malaysian Insider on January 6 2009.
Witness the power of the market:
RAFAH, Egypt — Thousands of Palestinians streamed over the Rafah border crossing from the Gaza Strip into Egypt on Wednesday, after a border fence was toppled, and went on a spree of buying fuel and other supplies that have been cut off from their territory by Israel.
They used donkeys, carts and motorcycles to cross the border, and streamed back over the fallen fence laden with goods they had been unable to buy in Gaza. The scene at the border was one of a great bazaar. The streets were packed, and people were bringing into Gaza everything from soap and cigarettes to goats, chickens, medicine, mattresses and car paint.
Israel ordered the closing of its border crossings into Gaza last week, halting all shipments except for emergency supplies, after a sustained and intense barrage of rocket fire into Israel by militant groups in the Gaza Strip, which is run by Hamas. Israel allowed in some fuel, medical supplies and food on Tuesday, as temporary relief, but has said that its closure policy remains in place. [Palestinians Topple Gaza Wall and Cross to Egypt. NYT. January 23 2008]
As supplies dwindled in Gaza, prices shot up. It went so high that the prices difference between Gaza and Egypt makes cost of transportation — which includes the cost of bringing down a wall to cross an international border — irrelevant.
Egypt so far has done nothing to stop Palestinians from crossing the border.
President Mubarak said he had allowed the Palestinians to come in.
He said he had told Egyptian troops to “let them come to eat and buy food and go back, as long as they are not carrying weapons”. [Gazans flood through Egypt border. BBC News. January 23 2008]
If the Egyptian government does nothing, Israel’s policy of border closure, or at least the side effect of the policy, will be as irrelevant as the cost of transportation.
It isn’t a pretty choice, that between Hamas and Fatah. Indeed, it was the reign of plunder and arrogance that Fatah imposed during its years of primacy that gave Hamas its power and room for maneuver. We must not overdo the distinction between the “secularism” of Fatah and the Islamism of Hamas. In the cruel streets and refugee camps of the Palestinians, this is really a distinction without a difference. [Brothers to the Bitter End. Fouad Ajami. NYT. June 20 2007]