Categories
Humor Politics & government

[1470] Of funny, Mr. Rehman. No really!

Just because it is humorous, I think the following deserves a mention for eternity, or until this blog is dead, whichever comes first.

NOON. Somewhere on the upper decks of Buckingham Palace.

[knock knock] “Your Majesty? Are you in there?” [knock knock]

“Who’s there?”

“Your serf.”

“Your serf who?”

“Your serf N’dour.”

“You must be seven seconds away then.”

“Actually, I’m right here, Your Majesty. May I come in?”

“Of course not. I’m on the throne.”

“There’s a group of Indian gentlemen at the gates.”

“So what else is new? They’ve been there since the end of our empire.”

“They have a letter for you, ma’am.”

“Tell them to take it to Sonia Gandhi.”

“They’re not that kind of Indian, ma’am.”

“Neither is she.”

“They’re Malaysians.”

“Malaysians? Lovely people. Quite charming. They have kings and queens too. Highly civilised, I call it. Last time I was there was to open our Commonwealth Games in ’98. There was a spot of rioting going on, as I recall, but they took great pains to spare Philip and I the tear gas.”

“Beg pardon, ma’am, but that should be Philip and me.”

“How dare you. Go find your own husband, you horrid little man.”

“Got one. Would you like me to read you the contents of their letter?”

“Of course not. Just give me the gist of it.”

“They love you and want four trillion pounds.”

“Of what?”

“Sterling.”

“Good heavens. What for?”

“Back wages, I think.”

“Goodness gracious, how long were they working for us? I haven’t got four trillion pounds. Do I?”

“No, ma’am. Unless you’d like to sell Scotland to the Irish.”

“They don’t have four trillion pounds either. Can we sell Europe?”

“No longer, I’m afraid.”

“Hong Kong, then.”

“Ten years too late, ma’am.”

“Blast. Well, you’ll just have to tell these Malaysian Indian gentlemen to go away, we haven’t got the money.”

“They say it’s just a point of principle, they don’t really expect to get four trillion pounds.”

“So what’s all this about then?”

“They want the Crown to acknowledge they’re worth four trillion pounds, and deserve four trillion pounds, even if they’ll not get tuppence.”

“Oh come now, we can give them that much. Maybe even a whole shilling and a cup of tea. They were our loyal servants, after all. See to it, won’t you.”

“Very good, ma’am.”

“I know I am. But tell me, who’s in charge of these people now?”

“At the moment, Scotland Yard, ma’am.”

“I meant back where they came from.”

“Ah. There seems to be some confusion over that. According to their tourist office over on Trafalgar Square…”

“Nelson! My favourite franchise. I’ve always wondered if Hardy actually kissed him.”

“…they are represented by a political party in a democratically elected government under a constitutional monarchy.”

“Like ours?”

“Not in the least. They have nine monarchs.”

“Well, so much the better for them.”

“But these gentlemen claim they have been left out and ignored for 50 years.”

“My husband’s been for 60 and you don’t hear him complaining.”

“But he’s not one of your subjects.”

“Oh yes he is.”

“I stand corrected, ma’am…”

“Just how I like it.”

“…but the gentlemen at the gate aren’t your subjects either.”

“Their country’s part of the Commonwealth, isn’t it?”

“Mm-hmm.”

“And I’m the head of the Commonwealth, aren’t I?”

“Where are you going with this?”

“Therefore, they are my subjects.”

“It doesn’t quite work like that, ma’am. Not any more.”

“Then what’s the point of being queen?”

“Frankly, ma’am, a lot of us are wondering ourselves.”

“I am still queen, aren’t I?”

“Yes, ma’am.”

“And head of the Commonwealth?”

“Yes, ma’am.”

“And these people need my help?”

“That’s what they say, ma’am.”

“And four trillion pounds.”

“Quite.”

“Tell them we thank them for their loyalty, now naff off.”

“Very well, ma’am.”

“I’d send them to Charles, but he’d only tell them to try organic gardening.” [Off to London to see the queen. Rehman Rashid. New Straits Times. November 30 2007]

Categories
Earthly Strip Politics & government

[1469] Of Earthly Strip: The in law

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams

Categories
Politics & government

[1465] Of angry, tired, disillusioned

Already it is December. My, oh my, how time flies. I woke up last Saturday to discover that it was already 12 hours into December. Around this time several years ago, I’d wake up in a very dark room, curtain blocking the sunlight from penetrating. I’d smile because I was thankful to be alive. I felt blessed. There was nothing more I would ask. These days however, I’m angry, disillusioned and tired. Whereas a smile came naturally then, it’s a chore now.

I wish I could turn back time, forever savoring that blissful moment again and again and again. I wish I could just stare at the ceiling for the whole morning, knowing full well that for that day at least, I was happy and nothing would bother me. I would breathe in cool fresh air filling my pair of lungs with sweetness and then slowly releasing the air. All worries would dissipate by mere breathing. By just breathing, I was satisfied. I would just lie on my bed, breathing, smiling and eyes wide opened, for hours. It was bliss that seems so distance now.

I could hear Haydn in the background. No, it was not on the radio. It was in my head and only I alone could hear it. I had listened to him too many a time the previous night. I had closed my eyes, concentrated to the music and fell asleep over it. If I may, there was an afterimage, an aftertaste that lingered in my consciousness. And I cried before I embarked on a journey to slumber, as I am right now. I cried not because of Haydn but because of that bliss, knowing that it wouldn’t last. And I cry now, for I have tasted the fruit and I long for it. No more could I hear Haydn in the background.

Suddenly a voice, “carpe diem!”

Realizing the sun would not wait for me, I would take a walk, enjoying my time in the sun. I would stroll along the river, enjoying the breeze with an empty mind. I would imagine that I was flying amid a field where the long grasses grew just over the hill away from the clumsy ducks. Before long, I would find myself staring into the blue sky, liberated, lying on the earth, again smiling to myself. And breathing, and satisfied.

That has past and I am growing increasingly bitter now. Each day provokes anger continuously without fail. Already the anger is saturating to a point that it begins to define the opposite of bliss. I dread waking up every day. I really do. I wish I would sleep and never to wake up. I wish for liberty from physical constraints.

Let others argue for I am tired. It is the same argument over and over again. It is the same polemics, the same flaws, the same rationale, the same answers. Enough.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p/s — the early edition of this article was first published at Bolehland.

Categories
Activism Politics & government

[1459] Of letter to Titiwangsa MP

Dear Sir,

I am a resident in the area of Titiwangsa and I would like to thank you for the work you have done for the area so far. I have written to you before and I would greatly appreciate it if you could invest in some time to read this email.

I write to you to express my concern regarding a proposed amendment to Article 114 of the Constitution of Malaysia to extend the retirement age of EC members from 65 to 66 that is currently being discussed in the Parliament. I would like to kindly encourage you to vote no to the amendment.

The amendment is being proposed to accommodate one person at a particular point in time and nothing else. It is no accident that the current EC chairman Tan Sri Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman is nearing his mandatory retirement age.

Amendments of this nature is very damaging to our country’s institutional structure. It gives the impression that our institution and our Constitution are easily made undone at a moment’s whim. I strongly feel that for any law to be respected, it shouldn’t be easily amended to suit a very short-term goal. It is hard to have respect for the law when the law is being formed, modified and unformed in a very discretionary manner. The Constitution is the document that governs us and it worries me that the Constitution is being considered for an amendment with clear disregard for the future in favor of instant gratification.

Greater consideration that firmly keeps a long term view on the integrity of our institution must prevail over any short-term amendment such as that in question.

I kindly hope you are able to agree with me and vote no to the amendment.

Thank you.

Kind regards,
Hafiz Noor Shams

Categories
Environment Politics & government

[1458] Of schism in environmentalism

From the authors of the The Death of Environmentalism:

Shellenberger and Nordhaus have now launched an effort to expand the frame of political environmentalism to encompass core American values. Earlier this year the dynamic duo issued a new book, Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility, in which they attempt to outline a positive vision for the future. Shellenberger and Nordhaus identify an emerging faultline that they argue will divide the environmentalist movement of the 21st century. On one side stand the traditional anti-immigration, anti-globalization, and anti-growth greens. They believe these neo-Malthusians “will seek to establish and enforce the equivalent of an international caste system in which the poor of the developing world are consigned to energy poverty in perpetuity.” Eternal limits to growth for the already impoverished.

One the other hopeful side, according to Nordhaus and Shellenberger, stand “those who believe that there is room enough for all of us to live secure and free lives. It will be pro-growth, progressive, and internationalist.” Nordhaus and Shellenberger see this new positive environmentalism as embracing markets and technological innovation in order to create prosperity and protect the natural world. Central to their positive pro-growth version of environmentalism is the development of cheap low-carbon energy technologies. Not only will such technologies prevent dangerous global warming, but they will also lift billions of people out of poverty by the end of the century. But how to get there? [Techno-Optimistic Environmentalism. Reason Magazine. November 27 2007]

Yup. Red green and blue green.

But emerging? I have always taken it for granted, meaning it is already there, here, now and real.