Categories
Politics & government

[1471] Mengenai pemimpin separuh jalan

John Kerry, seorang calon Demokrat untuk kerusi Presiden Amerika Syarikat pada tahun 2004 pernah dituduh sebagai calon yang sering menukar fikiran. Mereka yang menentang pencalonannya dengan mudah melabelkan ahli Demokrat itu sebagai tidak berpendirian. Jawapan Kerry terhadap satu soalan mengenai pembiayaan perang setinggi USD87 billion di Kongress masih lagi berdengung di gegendang telinga: “Saya sokong cadangan USD87 billion itu sebelum saya menentangnya” (I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it). Kata-katanya itu menjadi tema tidak rasmi kempennya yang gagal. Walaupun Lautan Pasifik memisahkan dua negara yang berkongsi jalur merah-putih ini, pentadbiran Perdana Menteri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi tidak jauh berbeza dengan John Kerry dari segi keyakinan pendirian.

Beberapa contoh perlu diberi untuk menguatkan persamaan itu dan peristiwa pembatalan pembinaan jambatan untuk mengantikan Tambak Johor ada untuk diimbas kembali. Pada mulanya, pentadbiran negara ini beria-ia untuk memulakan pembinaan jambatan itu walaupun tanpa persetujuan daripada negara jiran Singapura. Saya adalah seorang daripada mereka yang menyokong pembinaan jambatan itu atas beberapa sebab. Malah, saya juga menyokong Malaysia untuk tarik diri daripada perbincangan mengenai jambatan itu kerana pilihan yang tersedia di dalam pertemuan itu kurang berupaya mengatasi pulangan yang wujud di luar. Setelah menyedari akan kenyataan itu, kerajaan Malaysia memulakan kerja-kerja awal pembinaan jambatan. Beberapa minggu kemudian bagaimanapun, pembinaan dibatalkan dengan mengejutnya. Saya berasa amat kecewa akan keputusan itu yang dicapai seolah-olah oleh seorang remaja wanita yang mengalami haid. Yang lebih menyakitkan hati, duit rakyat sebanyak RM100 juta terpaksa dibayar kepada satu syarikat yang terlibat di dalam pembinaan jambatan itu sebagai pampasan ganti rugi. Ini tidak termasuk malu yang ditanggung oleh Malaysia akibat keputusan kerajaan yang tidak bertanggungjawab. Jikalau pentadbiran Abdullah Ahmad Badawi tidak bersedia untuk membina jambatan itu dari awal, tidak perlulah mereka memberi janji-janji palsu. Saya percaya, saya mampu menerima keputusan “tidak” dengan baik jika ia dilakukan dari awal lagi. Saya jamin, ramai yang bersependapat dengan saya mengenai perkara ini.

Satu lagi contoh menyentuh penjualan sebahagian daripada saham Proton kepada Volkswagen. Saya secara amnya menyokong dasar-dasar liberalisasi. Tarian mengacah yang berlaku di meja rundingan seperti yang disampaikan oleh media massa bagaimanapun tidak membantu menerangkan keadaan. Seperti iklan biskut Chipsmore, sekejap ada, sekejap tiada. Kemudiannya, kerajaan melalui Khazanah Nasional Berhad membuat keputusan untuk menarik diri daripada meja bulat setelah pembincangan penjualan itu berlangsung dengan baik.[1] Ini menguatkan lagi corak yang disaksikan di sekitar isu jambatan pengantian Tambak Johor: pendirian yang goyah. Ini mengugat segala keyakinan yang ada di dalam seseorang kepada kerajaan.

Ini sangat berbeza dengan cara pemerintahan PM Mahathir Mohamed yang tegas. Oleh sebab inilah saya percaya bahawa 50 tahun akan datang, tiada siapa akan mengingati PM Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

Selain jambatan dan Proton, bagai lalang ditiup angin, dasar yang dibuat semata-mata melalui budi bicara yang merosakkan reputasi negara kelihatan di projek landasan keretapi berkembar. Pentadbiran sebelumnya memulakan projek tersebut hanya untuk dibatalkan, atau ditanggungkan oleh pentadbiran kini. Kata kerajaan, membazir; defisit pembelanjaan negara yang besar.[2] Apabila Rancangan Malaysia Ke-9 dilancarkan, tidaklah pula PM memikirkan tentang defisit. Oh ya, setelah beberapa tahun kemudian, projek itu dilancarkan kembali.[3] Janganlah kita lupa pula tentang bagaimana Ircon dari India dipermainkan oleh kerajaan Malaysia pimpinan Barisan Nasional semasa pemberian kontrak landasan berkembar itu.[4]

Pola pemerintahan yang gemar menggunakan budi bicara ini hanya memikirkan apa yang berlaku dijangka masa yang terdekat tanpa menghiraukan kesan jangka masa panjang. Siapa yang akan mempercayai Malaysia apabila kita selalu gagal dan cuba untuk melarikan diri daripada memenuhi kata-kata kita? Jika ini berterusan, janji Malaysia akan kehilangan nilai.

Jadi, apabila PM menyatakan bahawa beliau bukan pemimpin separuh jalan[5], sukar untuk saya mempercayai beliau. Saya menjemput para pembaca untuk menilai rekod pentadbiran ini dengan mata dan telinga sendiri dan tidak mempercayai apa yang diperkatakan oleh PM tanpa usul periksa. Rekod dengan jelas menunjukkan bahawa PM ini memandu kereta ke satu arah dan kemudian patah balik ke belakang tanpa tiba di destinasi yang dijanjikan. Atas sebab inilah, bagi saya, kata-kata PM tiada nilai lagi.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

[1] — FRANKFURT/KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 20 (Reuters) – Malaysia and Volkswagen (VOWG.DE), the world’s fourth-largest carmaker, have ended talks aimed at setting up a cooperation deal with struggling national carmaker Proton Holdings (PROT.KL).

It was the second time in two years that VW-Proton talks over cooperation have ended without a deal, but VW said it still planned to build up a production base in Southeast Asia.

Malaysia announced on Tuesday that it would no longer look for a foreign partner for the ailing Proton for now and added that state investment firm Khazanah Nasional had stopped its talks with both VW and U.S. rival General Motors (GM.N). [Malaysia ends talks with VW, GM over Proton. Reuters. November 20 2007]

[2] — On his move to cancel or postpone certain mega projects after becoming prime minister, Abdullah said it was because the government was facing a deficit budget at that time. [Rules eased to woo foreigners yet help Bumis. New Straits Times. December 5 2007]

[3] — He said some of the projects were being revived, citing the double-tracking project as an example. [Rules eased to woo foreigners yet help Bumis. New Straits Times. December 5 2007]

[4] — New Delhi – Malaysia has re-issued an invitation to the Indian Railway Construction Company (IRCON) to participate in the double tracking railway project from Seremban to Gemas.

The invitation by Prime Minister Dato’ Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi was handed personally to Indian Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh by Foreign Minister, Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar who is attending the Malaysia India joint commission meeting in New Delhi.

Commercial relations between Malaysia and India hit a sour note in 2003 after Malaysia denied IRCON the USD$3.4 billion double-tracking contract despite having issued a letter of intent to the company. [Malaysia re-issued an invitation to IRCON for the double tracking railway project. RTM. February 17 2007]

[5] — PUTRAJAYA: Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi berkata, semua janji yang terkandung dalam manifesto Barisan Nasional (BN) pada Pilihan Raya Umum 2004 sedang dilaksanakan dan ia mengambil masa lebih daripada sepenggal untuk disempurnakan.

Sambil menyatakan beliau bukan pemimpin separuh jalan, Perdana Menteri berkata, segala perancangan kini berjalan lancar dan negara sudah memasuki fasa kedua pelaksanaan program pembangunan bagi mencapai matlamat Wawasan 2020. [Saya bukan pemimpin separuh jalan: Abdullah. Berita Harian. December 11 2007]

Categories
Humor Politics & government

[1470] Of funny, Mr. Rehman. No really!

Just because it is humorous, I think the following deserves a mention for eternity, or until this blog is dead, whichever comes first.

NOON. Somewhere on the upper decks of Buckingham Palace.

[knock knock] “Your Majesty? Are you in there?” [knock knock]

“Who’s there?”

“Your serf.”

“Your serf who?”

“Your serf N’dour.”

“You must be seven seconds away then.”

“Actually, I’m right here, Your Majesty. May I come in?”

“Of course not. I’m on the throne.”

“There’s a group of Indian gentlemen at the gates.”

“So what else is new? They’ve been there since the end of our empire.”

“They have a letter for you, ma’am.”

“Tell them to take it to Sonia Gandhi.”

“They’re not that kind of Indian, ma’am.”

“Neither is she.”

“They’re Malaysians.”

“Malaysians? Lovely people. Quite charming. They have kings and queens too. Highly civilised, I call it. Last time I was there was to open our Commonwealth Games in ’98. There was a spot of rioting going on, as I recall, but they took great pains to spare Philip and I the tear gas.”

“Beg pardon, ma’am, but that should be Philip and me.”

“How dare you. Go find your own husband, you horrid little man.”

“Got one. Would you like me to read you the contents of their letter?”

“Of course not. Just give me the gist of it.”

“They love you and want four trillion pounds.”

“Of what?”

“Sterling.”

“Good heavens. What for?”

“Back wages, I think.”

“Goodness gracious, how long were they working for us? I haven’t got four trillion pounds. Do I?”

“No, ma’am. Unless you’d like to sell Scotland to the Irish.”

“They don’t have four trillion pounds either. Can we sell Europe?”

“No longer, I’m afraid.”

“Hong Kong, then.”

“Ten years too late, ma’am.”

“Blast. Well, you’ll just have to tell these Malaysian Indian gentlemen to go away, we haven’t got the money.”

“They say it’s just a point of principle, they don’t really expect to get four trillion pounds.”

“So what’s all this about then?”

“They want the Crown to acknowledge they’re worth four trillion pounds, and deserve four trillion pounds, even if they’ll not get tuppence.”

“Oh come now, we can give them that much. Maybe even a whole shilling and a cup of tea. They were our loyal servants, after all. See to it, won’t you.”

“Very good, ma’am.”

“I know I am. But tell me, who’s in charge of these people now?”

“At the moment, Scotland Yard, ma’am.”

“I meant back where they came from.”

“Ah. There seems to be some confusion over that. According to their tourist office over on Trafalgar Square…”

“Nelson! My favourite franchise. I’ve always wondered if Hardy actually kissed him.”

“…they are represented by a political party in a democratically elected government under a constitutional monarchy.”

“Like ours?”

“Not in the least. They have nine monarchs.”

“Well, so much the better for them.”

“But these gentlemen claim they have been left out and ignored for 50 years.”

“My husband’s been for 60 and you don’t hear him complaining.”

“But he’s not one of your subjects.”

“Oh yes he is.”

“I stand corrected, ma’am…”

“Just how I like it.”

“…but the gentlemen at the gate aren’t your subjects either.”

“Their country’s part of the Commonwealth, isn’t it?”

“Mm-hmm.”

“And I’m the head of the Commonwealth, aren’t I?”

“Where are you going with this?”

“Therefore, they are my subjects.”

“It doesn’t quite work like that, ma’am. Not any more.”

“Then what’s the point of being queen?”

“Frankly, ma’am, a lot of us are wondering ourselves.”

“I am still queen, aren’t I?”

“Yes, ma’am.”

“And head of the Commonwealth?”

“Yes, ma’am.”

“And these people need my help?”

“That’s what they say, ma’am.”

“And four trillion pounds.”

“Quite.”

“Tell them we thank them for their loyalty, now naff off.”

“Very well, ma’am.”

“I’d send them to Charles, but he’d only tell them to try organic gardening.” [Off to London to see the queen. Rehman Rashid. New Straits Times. November 30 2007]

Categories
Earthly Strip Politics & government

[1469] Of Earthly Strip: The in law

Some rights reserved. By Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams

Categories
Politics & government

[1465] Of angry, tired, disillusioned

Already it is December. My, oh my, how time flies. I woke up last Saturday to discover that it was already 12 hours into December. Around this time several years ago, I’d wake up in a very dark room, curtain blocking the sunlight from penetrating. I’d smile because I was thankful to be alive. I felt blessed. There was nothing more I would ask. These days however, I’m angry, disillusioned and tired. Whereas a smile came naturally then, it’s a chore now.

I wish I could turn back time, forever savoring that blissful moment again and again and again. I wish I could just stare at the ceiling for the whole morning, knowing full well that for that day at least, I was happy and nothing would bother me. I would breathe in cool fresh air filling my pair of lungs with sweetness and then slowly releasing the air. All worries would dissipate by mere breathing. By just breathing, I was satisfied. I would just lie on my bed, breathing, smiling and eyes wide opened, for hours. It was bliss that seems so distance now.

I could hear Haydn in the background. No, it was not on the radio. It was in my head and only I alone could hear it. I had listened to him too many a time the previous night. I had closed my eyes, concentrated to the music and fell asleep over it. If I may, there was an afterimage, an aftertaste that lingered in my consciousness. And I cried before I embarked on a journey to slumber, as I am right now. I cried not because of Haydn but because of that bliss, knowing that it wouldn’t last. And I cry now, for I have tasted the fruit and I long for it. No more could I hear Haydn in the background.

Suddenly a voice, “carpe diem!”

Realizing the sun would not wait for me, I would take a walk, enjoying my time in the sun. I would stroll along the river, enjoying the breeze with an empty mind. I would imagine that I was flying amid a field where the long grasses grew just over the hill away from the clumsy ducks. Before long, I would find myself staring into the blue sky, liberated, lying on the earth, again smiling to myself. And breathing, and satisfied.

That has past and I am growing increasingly bitter now. Each day provokes anger continuously without fail. Already the anger is saturating to a point that it begins to define the opposite of bliss. I dread waking up every day. I really do. I wish I would sleep and never to wake up. I wish for liberty from physical constraints.

Let others argue for I am tired. It is the same argument over and over again. It is the same polemics, the same flaws, the same rationale, the same answers. Enough.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p/s — the early edition of this article was first published at Bolehland.

Categories
Activism Politics & government

[1459] Of letter to Titiwangsa MP

Dear Sir,

I am a resident in the area of Titiwangsa and I would like to thank you for the work you have done for the area so far. I have written to you before and I would greatly appreciate it if you could invest in some time to read this email.

I write to you to express my concern regarding a proposed amendment to Article 114 of the Constitution of Malaysia to extend the retirement age of EC members from 65 to 66 that is currently being discussed in the Parliament. I would like to kindly encourage you to vote no to the amendment.

The amendment is being proposed to accommodate one person at a particular point in time and nothing else. It is no accident that the current EC chairman Tan Sri Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman is nearing his mandatory retirement age.

Amendments of this nature is very damaging to our country’s institutional structure. It gives the impression that our institution and our Constitution are easily made undone at a moment’s whim. I strongly feel that for any law to be respected, it shouldn’t be easily amended to suit a very short-term goal. It is hard to have respect for the law when the law is being formed, modified and unformed in a very discretionary manner. The Constitution is the document that governs us and it worries me that the Constitution is being considered for an amendment with clear disregard for the future in favor of instant gratification.

Greater consideration that firmly keeps a long term view on the integrity of our institution must prevail over any short-term amendment such as that in question.

I kindly hope you are able to agree with me and vote no to the amendment.

Thank you.

Kind regards,
Hafiz Noor Shams