Categories
Politics & government

[65] Of deteriorating Indian-Pakistani relationship

That’s me; drawn by Azwan. Sigh…

It seems that Human has never quenched his thirst for blood.

In the recent weeks, the relationship between India and Pakistan is deteriorating with both countries starting to test their nuclear weapons as an act of intimidation. This latest development has prompted the world to stand on its toes for a war between those two countries could be the first nuclear war in Human’s history.

The South Asia subcontinent does not need another event to destabilize the region. If war is going to be conceived as an option, it is only fair to say that the whole subcontinent will be having its own World War. This notion is not too absurd as South Asia is mainly consisted of Pakistan and India while Sri Lanka itself is having its own internal conflict from time to time. On the western horizon, Afghanistan is already in chaos.

The flashpoint of this crisis is Kashmir, a Moslem state under the Indian rule. The Kashmiri separatists want an end to Indian superiority and they are receiving aids from Pakistan. Pakistan act is understandable as India did the same when East Pakistan wanted to form Bangladesh.

Never in the world has a nuclear war is seen as a possibility except during the Cuba Crisis where the USSR was caught red-handed by the United States transporting nuclear warhead to Cuba’s shore.

Fortunately for the world community, both sides have agreed to not use their nuclear capabilities on each other. The informal agreement is a “thank God” phrase for the United Nations because a nuclear war will bring a catastrophic result to the world. Worse, the environment will be at stake. Kashmir, which is a paradise will be turned into a wasteland and the Ganges River will be polluted, no more a sacred place for the Hindus. Human should be thankful if a conventional war will be fought between those two foes. The Ganges will only be turned red instead of being polluted.

A nuclear war, once a science fiction, today’s possibility.

Nevertheless, I personally think that a war will not be fought between India and Pakistan. Their words are merely words although they do have the vertebra to back their words. They had tested their Agnis and Ghauris for years but it ended with nothing but war of words and a few exchange of bullets up in the mountainous area of Kashmir. If you don’t trust me, that’s because we are humans and humans tend to disagree with each other. The Tower of Babel was never completed due to the same reason.

Even so, let’s just hope that I am right. I believe none of us would be glad to see another Hiroshima and Nagasaki. To be more accurate, most of us would want to see New Delhi and Islamabad still standing after this crisis ends.

Read this for a related post.

Aaa… it’s raining in Ann Arbor. A refreshing spring rain…

Categories
Politics & government Society

[41] Of secularism is an answer to religious hatred

Looks like this web log won’t be moving out of Blogger after all. Geocities will be charging fee for FTP service and I won’t pay anything for that service. Oh well, it seems that I have to stay here a little bit longer. I have to get out from Blogger because I found out that Blogger’s servers are quite unreliable at times. The University of Michigan’s servers will be more reliable.

Moving on the world news…

India is suffering its worst civil unrest in this new millennium. It is sad to see the Muslims and the Hindus are killing each other just because they are having different religions. History has told us that the Muslims and the Hindus can’t get along very well. The greatest manifestation is the separation of British India into two single entities, India and Pakistan. Mahatma Gandhi regretted this but it was necessary to prevent what is happening in Gujarat at that time.

India, one of the giant of Asia and I want nothing but its success for I believe in the Japan’s Asia for Asia.

I just want to see peace, not war. It hurts me even more when I saw a picture where a Muslim man stood in the middle of a Hindu mob, begging for his live. I hope he received mercy from the Hindus.

While the Hindus are doing what they are doing, certainly the Muslims will retaliate. Nobody will just sit down and see their brothers and sisters being burnt to death. I will certainly not but an eye for an eye makes the whole world goes blind. Truly, the solution to this could only be one thing – secularism, a state where religion plays no important roles in the executive administration. This word is one of the most misunderstood ideas in the Muslim world.

Secularism is not bad for Islam or for any other religion. Of course, I would dream the era when the Islamic Civilization ruled supreme to return. The greatness of another Alhambra or Baghdad would be the best thing to see. Unfortunately, the world is becoming smaller and smaller, allowing everyone to meet everybody; ideas and beliefs clash. Only secularism allows a peaceful interaction between different ideologies.

Secularism doesn’t mean religion is not acceptable to any kind of social life. I believe a belief in God is necessary to maintain some social order but the freedom to believe freely without being discriminated must be allowed. Only through this, peace can somewhat be attained.

This notion doesn’t clash with my idea of restricted freedom. I believe in restricted freedom of expression and secularism does this best. However, my view of secularism doesn’t book a place for Turkey’s style. I don’t believe in Turkish secularism for it is restricting the very freedom for different societies to interact with one and another freely.
For India, secularism might the answer to its woe. Its ruling party is an Hindu-biased party and this must be the fuel that is burning hatred among its people although I can certainly see some restrains in that party in enforcing Hindu-styled state.

It’s sad to see the world is suffering from hatred.

It’s sad to see Ann Arbor is snowing again. Sigh…

Categories
Politics & government

[39] Of Milosevic was only defending his homeland

I’ve never thought a spring break would be this boring. Ann Arbor seems like a cowboy town even when the Sun shines the day brilliantly. My only hope is that I won’t rot in my room.

However, I just received my first copy of National Geographic Magazine yesterday. After about six months of its absence from my life, I welcome the magazine with an overjoyed heart. Its arrival is a goodly-timed arrival. No other time would be most suitable for it. If it had reached me later, certainly my only activity will be hibernation.
Oh how I remember its distinct smell, its distinct yellow border design, its interesting articles and its magnificent photographs. It reminds me of my younger days. It reminds me how innocent I was when I was small. It brings back sweet memories and usually, memory tells, when I was small, I would just stare at the front page, tantalized. Remembering that vivid memory, I tried to savor the front cover which features diamonds on a strawberry but what caught my eyes this time was not the red-monopolized photograph of the strawberry but rather, an article entitled “Danube River: Harmony and Discord”.

I know what the Danube is from listening to Johann Strauss’ classic – Blue Danube. Feeling interested, I skipped all of the other sections and immediately was amazed by a picture featuring the ruins of the Freedom Bridge, a bridge that once ran across the Danube in Novi Sad before it was bombed by NATO a few years ago.

Yugoslavia is the home of the Slovakian culture, the Russia’s closest ally. It’s also the home of Slobodan Milosevic who currently is being tried in the International Court of Justice at The Hague, The Netherlands.

The breaking up of Yugoslavia was the worst event in Europe’s recent history. Through the process of secession, Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Macedonia and Kosovo were born, leaving Yugoslavia’s only member, Serbia’s naked in the open field. Embarrassed and torn apart, Serbia decided that the other states secession from Yugoslavia is unjustified and must be prevented. Thus, the Balkans War was initiated by Serbian leader named Slobodan Milosevic. Under his command, Serbia sent troops to Bosnia and Croatia but the Bosnians and the Croats fought back with the help of the world community. The war closed its curtain with Serbia announced as the loser. Serbia was shaken and left weakened by the result of the war. During this period of grimness, Kosovo sought a chance for independence and won. Kosovan win did not come easy as the Serb tried hard to deny the independence of Kosovo. Fortunately for Kosovo, the West sees the fall of Yugoslavia as the final victory against the Slovak. The West aided the Kosovas. The Russian too realized this and tried hopelessly to help their ally. In the end, the Kosovo and the world won but nationalism received its major blow.

Back in The Hague, Milosevic is not being charged of genocide. Milosevic is not being tried because of crime against humanity but he is simply being tried because he was just trying to defend his homeland from chaos. Of course, the world community says that Slobodan Milosevic is a monster but if we look more closely, we will find that his struggle is justified and sacred. He was fighting in the name of nationalism.

The media of the West has highlighted the fight for independence as holy but it is true only if one is being invaded by an antagonist. The Afghans War was a war for independence but the Balkans War was not. The Balkans War was a fight for perseverance of a nation. The Balkans War has a lot of similarities with the American Civil War. If Slobodan Milosevic is guilty as charged, then Abraham Lincoln should be tried for committing a crime against humanity and Margerat Thatcher should be jailed for refusing the independence of Northern Ireland. The South was only fighting for its independence. The Irish is only fighting for their independence.

Therefore, I plead to the world for Slobodan Milosevic’s innocence. He was merely defending his homeland. He was just trying to preserve the integrity of the once proud Yugoslavia.

Categories
Politics & government Society

[18] Of I am a Malaysian

This shall be my last babble in Minneapolis.

Being too bored staring at the monitor, I’d decided to visit some stuff about Malaysia. My first stop was catcha.com.my. Nothing much to be mentioned there. Second stop, thestar.com.my. I browsed through the news and read some of it. The same stuff over and over again. Politics, car accidents, some events, racial segregation…

Wait! Racial segregation? What in the whole wide universe is this? Racial segregation in Malaysia? I thought this thing has become the thing of the past. Of course, the issue the Chinese conquering the upper level of education level and the meritocracy has become the hot talk when I was in Malaysia but racial segregation in the system?

I say, people will surely blame the British for their divide and conquer method of ruling. Well, the British was surely the one to be blamed but that is the past and nothing can be changed about it, unless of course, if the physicists found the secret of time travel (spelling it out, back through time), that will be another matter. I shout, there’s been a mistake in the Malaysian education architecture and design. I hail, the vernacular system should be stop one and for all, by phrase, slowly and be ended sometimes in the future. No All-Chinese, All-Indian, All-Malay higher education. The Chinese minority should not be allowed to establish a university of their own. Nor the Indian, nor the Malay themselves. The University in Shah Alam should be opened to all. Every University should be made for all. If the Malays argue that it is their right, then, let the quota for the Malay stand tall but not too big to degrade the quality.

I hate it when Malaysians are asked, “Which race are you belong to?” and the question is answered by “I’m a Malay”, or “I’m a Chinese” or “Indian”. Why can’t the answer be just “I’m a Malaysian”? Is it so hard so for us to claim ourselves as a Malaysian?

Categories
Economics Politics & government

[16] Of welcome the Euro

This coming new year will be another year with full of surprises. Once the clock marks midnight, the most enthusiastically awaited event for the European, the E-Day will be launched. It’s the launching of the Euro, the so-called rival to the United States Dollar.

The Euro was actually introduced in 1999 but its usage, up to now, is limited to financial transaction only. After two years of waiting, the Euro will finally emerge in the daily life of 12 European countries’ citizens. The Mirage 2001, Ford and Playstation 2 will be paid in the new Euro, not in Franc, Lire or the Deutsche Mark anymore. The new currency will be the glue that unites the European Union’s members as one and makes them more competitive in the game of globalization. The E.U. leaders smile victoriously as they now have another common ground to talk about Europeanism (if that term ever exist).

While they are embracing for the much-awaited changes, the whole world including the Europeans themselves are cautiously observing the situation and hoping the launch of the Euro won’t hurt the European themselves. The American perhaps hope the new project will be a folly and while the Asian countries hope that they will have an alternative to the Dollar. Such a huge change may help catalyst a lot of events and thus, opening up numerous paths into the future for everybody worldwide. If the usage of the Euro is successful, it may encourage dozens of regional currency. One of such region is Southeast Asia, held together by the ASEAN, an EU counterpart for 10 developing nations.

However, for the European citizens, the pizzeria owner in Italy and the pub owner in Germany will be reluctant to accept this change. The conservatives fear that their country identity will be lost forever. The Franc has been synonym with the Frenchmen since the dawn of the French Empire. Once the Euro takes over, the will be no more Franc that will be related to France. The French will for certain lost a French identity. I see this currency conversion is similar to the lost of the New York World Trade Center in September. As the Twin Towers crumbled down to earth, the American lost part of their soul. Surely, the magnitude of the lost of the Franc to the common Frenchmen is as huge as the lost of the Twin Towers to the Americans. For the Germans, the pharse “eine schnelle Mark machen” (in English, to make a fast D-Mark) are senseless without the Deutsche Mark*. It seems to me that Europeanism is sacking each and every distinct Europeans’ cultures.
While I’ll be celebrating the New Year in Chicago, I will certainly remember that on the eve of first January, the Europeans are betting their head for a better future. It may turn ugly but let us just hope that the Euro will be a good development for us. We don’t need another folly that will affect the whole population of Earth. We don’t need to suffer more than we do.

nb – The words marked by ” * ” is taken from Andreas Purkott’s entry in EUROTRASH.
Visit the official Euro site for the E-Day.