Categories
Activism Politics & government Society

[154] Of the invasion of Iraq

The United States Of America and its allies have started bombarding Iraq. At the same time, the Ann Arbor populace are showing their discontent against the unjust war.

A few pro-peace movements organized a successful rally today. The students’ movements started the peace rally at the Diag at 1700 hours. A few students spoke in the name of peace. Later, the students marched along N. University St., E. Liberty, W. Liberty St. and Main St. before joining other war protesters in front of the Ann Arbor Federal Building. I joined the procession at about 1700 hours and left the rally at about 1900 hours.

Although it was raining, the event was a success. The anti-war march received a huge turnout and the peaceful Tree Town was transformed into a noisy city. A few chanted were shouted. Among them were “What do we want? Peace. When do we want it? Now”, “Who let the dog out? Bush, Bush, Bush, Bush, Bush!”, “Who is the bastard? Bush!”

Candle vigil was also carried out with thousand of people standing and singing in front of the Federal Building.



















For peace!

Categories
Politics & government

[153] Of peace, peace, peace… 30x

This post is dedicated to peace.Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace. Peace.

Thirty peace words for the thirty members of the so-called ‘Coalition of the Willing‘.

I know this is stupid but whatever it is, my action does not kill any people. People, if you are against this unjustified war, copy the first paragraph and paste it on your website. Everyone of us needs to show Bush that the majority of the world population is against war.

Categories
Politics & government

[149] Of spring war

Here we’re sitting,
Knowing spring is coming,
But spring is nothing,
When war is looming.

Categories
Kitchen sink Politics & government Solar car

[143] Of Ypsilanti workshop and hypocrisy and honesty

Damn the snow. I was planning to go for a walk at the Arboretum today but God changed His mind. Behold, it must snow today. Sigh…

Anyway, I spent my whole evening at Ypsilanti, trying to help the race crew building the car. One thing worth noting; yesterday session was tense. Never in my life as a Solar Car member have I experienced what I had last night.

At first, the Power Electrical team had wanted to install the wiring on the car but the mechanical team needed to do something first. So, we disappointedly gave up our plan and instead, rescheduled our timetable and went out to Ypsilanti in order to help out the mech team. Once there, Mirai and Ivan needed to test the battery so they left me with our rival, which is the Mech team. While I had nothing to do for the Power Electrical team at that time, I decided to help out Mech. After all, although we’re rivals, our goal is still the car.

The rush of adrenaline started around 2100 hours, I at first stage was given the task of preparing some glue. Later, I had to go into the car to install some carbon stuffs on the car. The interesting thing was that the team had the operation timed. I, well we were racing against time and the Engineering Director even raised his voice, trying to keep people on track. At one time, we screwed up something and he was looking really mad
Nevertheless, we did finish up the work sometimes around midnight.

After the work session, I have decided to hate two thing, fiber glass and ethanol. Fiber glass makes the hand itchy while ethanol burns the hand. Therefore, the moral of the story is not to join the Mech team. Power Electrical rules.

Honesty is not necessarily the best policy and nothing is the best when it comes to ways of behaving. However, hypocrisy is better than honesty. That is for sure. First of all, I define hypocrisy as displaying two kind of behavior in two different situations. I see hypocrisy as a superset of honesty. In fact, the people whom first used the phrase “honesty is the best policy” are hypocrites themselves. Honesty on the other hand is simply the notion of being true to oneself i.e. following rigidly the principles (ideal, rules etc) that one has set on oneself.

The world around us constantly changing and this need us to adapt. Hypocrisy is a way to adapt to the ever changing world. One proof is China before the age of pre-pax Americana and during pax Americana. They were somewhat against the capitalist system and closed their system from world scrutiny. But now, we found that China is even in the WTO, the organization that they once looked in disgust. They only did this after they saw that it will benefit them to join the organization despite the fact that this is against their ideal.

Sometimes, two similar cases need us to deal with them differently. One case is the United States’ stance on North Korea and Iraq. They are applying double standard on those so-called members of Axis of Evil simply because it benefits them to do it. Surely, to fight on two fronts separated by the mountainous Asian terrain is folly. Also, using the same threat on North Korea will be a grave mistake since China is certainly more interested in the Korean Peninsula scenario than the Iraqis’ problem.

The affirmative action movement is classic case of hypocrisy. Yes a long time ago, there was discrimination of certain group of people against others. Discrimination no doubt is bad and the affirmative action was born from the notion that discrimination must be cleaned out from society’s mind. And now, the movement itself is discriminating certain sorts in favor of a few particular groups. Isn’t this hypocrisy?

But of course, when one reads this, one will wonder what the connection between hypocrisy and honesty is. The relationship is, as I said before, honesty is a subset of hypocrisy.

If you don’t agree with me then consider the following situation. You have an ability to do something that nobody else possesses. A friend of yours knows this and asked you to use your expertise to do something for him or her as a favor. His or her request was against your principle and thus, you presented your friend with a monotonous no as an answer. Later, a stranger approached you and asked you to do the same thing that your friend had asked you. As a return, the stranger promise to reward you with something that you need but can’t afford to buy it. So, will you be honest and fair towards your friend by saying no to the stranger or will you obey the stranger’s request and get the thing that you really want?

If you think the last scenario is not strong enough, then imagine that the reward was your life and the request was to murder someone else. Will you be true to yourself and your friend or will you be a hypocrite?

Categories
Politics & government Solar car

[133] Of affirmative action

This week has been a tiring week. Even during weekdays, I found myself during Solar Car business. I am sure this is the start of a busier phase but yet, I am glad. The first stage concerning the solar panels is nearing completion and we are entering the second level.

To mark the start of the second stage, Mirai, Brent, Ivan and I went out of Ann Arbor to eat some seafood. It cost us USD 60 but it was definitely worth.

Also, I have finally seen SpectruM complete design on the computer. The design is complicated but then, I don’t really know how to the read CAD or use it, yet.

In a few hours, I’ll be in Ohio to start on the second stage. This is the first time a Solar Car work has brought me outside of Michigan. Before this, there were a few trips made by the Team members. One was to Canada (“or Canadia” quoting Skip) and the other one was to Detroit for the Auto Show 2003.

Before I depart for Ohio, I want to clarify my stance on affirmative action, particularly concerning Malaysian case.

Basically, I am against affirmative action. Reasons are, number one, it make it unfair for the others. Some (in fact all the AA supporters) argue that AA is a way to correct a wrong. This is a screwed way of seeing it. The way of seeing it is this – it is correcting a wrong with another wrong. The a.a movement is like Hammurabi’s Code of Law that says an eye for an eye. What the code failed to see is that if we took that principle as a way of life, the whole world will go blind.

Secondly, AA movement, at least from my eye is a racist movement. From my observation, most of the AA supporters are the one that were oppressed in the past. So, there will be two groups (maybe three on the people on the fence, lets not count them), the a.a. believer and the opposition. In the end, this will polarize the society. For example, in Ann Arbor, the AA supporters are mainly Blacks. Note that this is exactly the opposite of AA goal.

Thirdly, the notion of feeling guilty. It is true that there are some supporters coming from outside the said ring. For these people, I tend to think of them of still holding to the idea of white man’s burden. For me, I strongly believe the past is the past. We can’t change it until somebody found the secret of traveling backward in time (forget relativity, I am NOT seeing Physics anymore). We can learn from the past but to feel guilty for things that we have already been forgiven is wrong. Life goes on so let us just more on.

Fourth, I can’t think of any.

About the Bumiputra status, it is a little bit difficult to say. Malaysia has gone too far down the affirmative path and in the end, even the Malaysian political parties are divided racially. There are even SRKJ (C), SRKJ (R) and SRK schools. In order to change this, it is going to take some doings. A lot of opposition will arise. Even now, some of the Malaysian Chinese are fighting against the government will to impose “sekolah nasional” or something like that on them.

The Malay of course wants to retain their special rights guaranteed in the Constitution.

After five decades of AA, I could only wonder whether it is worth it to change the policy. It is a dilemma. If we stick to the current policy, the Malaysian society will continually be divided. If we change, there will be another 13th May. Some say to go with the 13th May path all over again. Some rather stay (and these are the conservative).

Which is better? I myself do not know. Do I consider the Malay rights as holy? A part of me say yes, the other half say no.

Yet, suffice to say that I would like to see a day where there will be no Malay, Malaysian Chinese or Malaysia Indian. I want to see only Malaysian. No more, no less.

p/s – The Dutch Eresdivisie has resumed. De Magish van de Meer!!! Go Ajax Go!!!
p/s 2 – I am seeing a lot of grammar mistakes. I am above grammar.
p/s 3 – Just kidding, I’ll do some correction later.
p/s 4 – Console games suck.