Categories
Conflict & disaster Politics & government

[645] Of 20 years for drugs, 20 months for killing 200 people

Indonesia, while mocking justice, is fast becoming a nation that runs on farcical judiciary.

Australian Schapelle Corby is sentenced to 20 years behind bars for attempting to smuggle marijuana into the country while another Australian Michelle Leslie faces the possibility of maximum 15 years in jail for ecstasy. Abu Bakar Bashir, the cleric who has been found guilty of conspiring in the 2002 Bali attack which killed more than 200 people on the other hand received merely three years of jail time – that penalty has been reduced to mere 20 months.

Doing drugs is bad and I at least am willing to agree to that. It however is certainly no worse than murder. But no, no – the Indonesian authority has differing view.

Indonesian Justice Minister Hamid Awaluddin is reported of saying that the psychopath fundamentalist and murderer Abu Bakar Bashir is eligible for further lessening in conjunction of the upcoming Eid. This is absolutely absurd and distastefully dishonors victims of the Bali bombing.

If the Indonesian authority decides to shorten the killer cleric’s sentence soon, they might as well release him and supply all the explosives he needs for future ops.

Or maybe, this is Indonesia’s idea of Halloween.

Categories
Books, essays and others History & heritage Politics & government

[643] Of Singapore, Malaysian Malaysia and what if

About fourty years ago, in the Malaysian Parliament, in Malay, by Lee Kuan Yew:

How does the Malay in the kampong find his way out into this modernised civil society? By becoming servants of the 0.3 per cent who would have the money to hire them to clean their shoe, open their motorcar doors? … Of course there are Chinese millionaires in big cars and big houses. Is it the answer to make a few Malay millionaires with big cars and big houses? How does telling a Malay bus driver that he should support the party of his Malay director (UMNO) and the Chinese bus conductor to join another party of his Chinese director (MCA) – how does that improve the standards of the Malay bus driver and the Chinese bus conductor who are both workers in the same company?

If we delude people into believing that they are poor because there are no Malay rights or because opposition members oppose Malay rights, where are we going to end up? You let people in the kampongs believe that they are poor because we don’t speak Malay, because the government does not write in Malay, so he expects a miracle to take place in 1967 (the year Malay would become the national and sole official language). The moment we all start speaking Malay, he is going to have an uplift in the standard of living, and if doesn’t happen, what happens then?

Meanwhile, whenever there is a failure of economic, social and educational policies, you come back and say, oh, these wicked Chinese, Indian and others opposing Malay rights. They don’t oppose Malay rights. They, the Malay, have the right as Malaysian citizens to go up to the level of training and education that the more competitive societies, the non-Malay society, has produced. That is what must be done, isn’t it? Not to feed them with this obscurantist doctrine that all they have got to do is to get Malay rights for the few special Malays and their problem has been resolved. …

I’m finally done with Lee Kuan Yew’s The Singapore Story and I enjoyed it, especially the last few chapters. The book however leaves me behind a few questions. What if we had stayed true to the Federation? What if Singapore were still a Malaysian state? I can’t help but wonder, could Malaysian Malaysia be a reality today if Singapore weren’t expelled from the Federation?

I think yes.

Lee Kuan Yew’s People’s Action Party (PAP), given time and if Singapore weren’t expelled from the Federation, would have outmaneuvered the Alliance. Perhaps, given the competition, United Malays National Organization (UMNO) would have turned into United Malaysians National Organization, as Onn Jaafar had envisioned earlier.

Yet, UMNO, seeing that possibility, acted quickly and put their interest first, Malaysia’s second. They expelled Singapore instead to secure their monopoly of power.

Yes, if Singapore were still part of Malaysia, I truly believe we would have a Malaysian Malaysia by now.

Categories
Economics Politics & government Society

[639] Of overheard in Ann Arbor

I found Overheard in Ann Arbor via Ann Arbor is Overrated and I’m lovin’ it. And wow, OIAA via AAIO. Talk about coincidence.

Somehow, that site makes me miss Ann Arbor and undergrad life even more. I’m reserving a spot for OIAA in my blogroll. It, together with AAIO, is now immortalized. Sort of. And McDonald’s sucks.

Also, this might be old but Berkeley is trying to tell Ann Arbor something

Anyway, for the sake of making the bear happy, I am neutral on the Miers nomination.

p/s – Ben Bernanke is the next Fed chairman. Who’s Bernanke? Don’t ask me.

Categories
Environment Politics & government

[634] Of we need you to be strong Prime Minister

My deepest thought for the Prime Minister. But you cannot and must not succumb to sorrow. Malaysia cannot afford to have a weak leader, especially during a turbulent time when Thailand freely blames Malaysia for its own incompetence and terrorism strikes as close as Bali.

We need you to be strong. If you need us, we’ll be here for you. Just be strong.

p/s – remember the slaughtered tiger? The guy was fined merely RM7,000 along with four months jail time. I’m convinced that Malaysian environmental law is a farce.

Categories
Economics Politics & government

[627] Of where is the anti-corruption agency?

So, Mohamed Isa Abdul Samad has been found guilty of corruption by UMNO disciplinary committee weeks ago. He made an appeal and the committee reduces his penalty.

However, why the case hasn’t been brought up to anti-corruption agency? Am I missing something here? Is federal law inapplicable to a political party’s internal matter?

p/s – two persons won the Prize in Economics for “having enhanced our understanding of conflict and cooperation through game-theory analysis”.