Categories
ASEAN Politics & government

[747] Of bridge of euphemism: ignoramus

If a person plans to take side on an issue, it’s extremely wise to comprehend the situation first. Failure will bring ridicule and signals ignorance. Here, I wish to highlight a surprisingly ignorant reason why some people are opposing the crooked, scenic Malaysian half-bridge. These people are opposing the bridge because they think the bridge will end in the middle of the Tebrau Strait. In truth, the bridge will be connected to the Causeway and it’s not a multimillion culdesac.

Let me show you.

People think the bridge would be like this:

Google Maps. Fair use. http://maps.google.com/?ll=1.454803,103.768444&spn=0.01922,0.029268&t=k

People who have this picture in their mind will always say with scorn that we would need to swin to Singapore once we reached the end of the bridge.

In reality, the bridge will look like this:

Google Maps. Fair use. http://maps.google.com/?ll=1.454803,103.768444&spn=0.01922,0.029268&t=k

Image taken from Google Maps. I hope it qualifies as fair use.

As you can see, it’s a half bridge because it’s half a bridge and another half a causeway. Not one part bridge and the rest, water. There’s no need to swim and suffer being wet to get across the strait unless you really love swimming.

Don’t believe me? What? Me? A liar? What? Me, a BN lover?

No, I’m being pragmatic. There’s no need to be a rebel without a cause; a rebel that protests to everything for the mere sake of rebelling – that’s an insincere protest. It’s immature and stupid. Much like those in the price hike protest. In the Star last Friday, there was an article about the bridge. The writeup has a picture of the bridge plan and here’s the picture:

The Star. Fair use. http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2006/3/10/nation/13623928&sec=nation

Observe the rightmost diagram. See it?

As to why it’s crooked, well, it’s the only way to gain a required height – in this case, 25 m (25 m is also the air draught for the Second Link to the west) – given the length constraint due to Singaporean refusal to demolish their half of the Causeway. If Singapore had agreed to a bridge and demolish their part of the Causeway, the bridge wouldn’t need to be crooked in order to obtain that 25 m. Once the bridge is completed, Malaysian half of the Causeway will be demolished and the bridge will be linked up to Singaporean half.

I hope this will clear things up for all those ignoramuses out there, particularly those at Lowyat.net’s Real World Issues forum.

Heh, the ignoramuses have already zipped their mouth by the time they found out that the bridge won’t end in the middle of nowhere. If it did end in the middle of nowhere, even I would vehemently disagree to it. But it is not and I fully support the Malaysian initiative.

Next time, really, learn the issue first. This includes the price hike but that’s another story I’ll chance another time.

Categories
Earthly Strip Politics & government

[746] Of Earthly Strip: Insincere Poll

Did you read Saturday’s New Straits Times? The government just launched a “public opinion poll system”. More at NST:

The Government launched its public opinion poll system today, making Malaysia one of the few countries in the world where opinion polls are conducted by the public sector.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi launched the system, which uses the short messaging service (SMS) and the Internet, and said it was a professional and efficient way of obtaining public feedback.

The Public Complaints Bureau (PCB) is managing the polling system with the co-operation of telecommunications companies.

Using SMS, the public can submit their opinions on a given topic by keying in (for Biro Pengaduan Awam) and sending it to 36367.

They will receive a message which contains a question on the poll topic and multiple choice answers marked according to alphabets. They have to select the alphabet according to the answer of their choice and send it back to 36367.

A good effort but whatever it is, it needs to be sincere. Without sincerity, it will turn out like this:

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

To Singaporeans, happy voting and yeah, within this strip’s context of course.

p/s – Tried to follow Ajax-PSV match on www.tvants.com but the lag was unbearable. The match turned out to be 0-0. Many Ajacied expected a win but bah. Even those that watched the match think Ajax could have won. Still, next is Inter Milan.

Categories
Earthly Strip Politics & government

[742] Of Earthly Strip: PKR’s Demand

Youth division of Parti Keadilan Rakyat declares Malaysian Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi as the weakest of all five Malaysian leaders. Malaysiakini has a writeup on it. But, here’s how I see it:

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

Keadilan is going over its head. This one is a bluff – just like the party itself.

Categories
Activism ASEAN Politics & government Travels

[737] Of trouble to the northeast

Filipino President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo has officially declared a state of emergency in the Philippines after a coup plot was uncovered:

MANILA (Reuters) – President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo invoked emergency rule in the Philippines on Friday after security forces said they had foiled a coup attempt, shocking analysts and driving down the country’s currency.

Talk of plots against Arroyo, who survived a crisis last year over allegations of vote-rigging and corruption, has been running high around this week’s anniversary of a “people power” revolt that toppled dictator Ferdinand Marcos in 1986.

“I have declared a state of emergency,” Arroyo said in a taped address on television and radio, adding she had authorized the military and police “to take ample measures”.

“This is my warning to those who are attempting anything against the government.”

I say, Arroyo needs to step down already. It’s becoming more apparent each day that Arroyo has little popular support from the masses. With all the controversies centered around her, I bet the Philippines would solve a lot of problem with her stepping down.

With there’s already trouble to the north of Malaysia (read, Thailand), Malaysia doesn’t need another unstable neighbor.

p/s – remember the great flood of Pasir Kumpal? Well, some people got back there and Pelf has some pictures.

Categories
Liberty Politics & government

[736] Of reductio ad absurdum and selective free speech

A lot of us Malaysians consider our government as the main bulwark towards greater free speech in this country. I thought so too until the Non Sequitur and New Straits Times (NST) controversy occured. As the issue unravels, it’s becoming clear that the principle hurdle towards free speech is not the government. Instead, it is the society itself; us.

The more I look at it, the more convinced am I of the fact that Malaysians, even the urbanites that on the surface are for free speech, are unprogressive and illiberal wherever the ideal is concerned. Instead, they practice selective free speech, which is an act of hypocrisy. In this controversy, same people that chastise the government for blatant disrespect of free speech are calling for censorship of NST. It’s scary to see these people working to undermine free speech. A fifth column in the most unexpected vocal camp – bloggers like Jeff Ooi!

Jeff Ooi is probably a free speech icon in Malaysian blogosphere. Worse, he seems to be jumping up and down seeing NST getting into trouble. It will be crucial to keep the whole episode in mind the next time Jeff Ooi get into trouble.

While bloggers don’t represent the Malaysian society as a whole, it does give a glimpse of what’s happening. And while not all Malaysians are supporting actions against NST, it seems to me, a sizable numbers are.

All I want to say is that, if we ourselves, Malaysians disrespect free speech and criticize other for disregarding free speech, then we shouldn’t blame the government for practicing censorship. We shouldn’t even get mad whenever the government practices it. After all, it’s we that elect the government into office. The government is an image of us, the people, the majority.

The right thing to do in the name of free speech is to come to NST’s defense. No censorship whatsoever.

Finally, in form of reductio ad absurdum: if NST is guilty of publishing and republishing the strip, then Jeff Ooi is also guilty of republishing it. If NST is being punished for publishing the strip, so should Jeff Ooi. Since Jeff Ooi supports action against NST, then Jeff Ooi must support actions against himself.

Absurd? If yes, then there must be a flaw in reasoning somewhere. Right?