Categories
Education Politics & government

[953] Of Michigan bans affirmative action

Proposition 2 has been passed by the people of Michigan; the proposal calls for the ban of affirmative action:

Michigan voters sent a clear message about affirmative action programs that offer preferences to women and minorities: It’s time for them to end.

An Election Day poll and hard voter numbers showed the controversial proposal winning by a wide margin.

Michigan now becomes the third state to outlaw the practice of giving preferential treatment to groups or individuals based on their race, gender, color, ethnicity or national origin for public employment, education or contracting purposes.

In the poll of 800 voters, the ban led 55% to 45%. In addition, with 49% of Michigan’s precincts reporting, the proposal was ahead 58% to 42%.

I’m a little bit disappointed because the proposition will directly affect my alma mater, adversely in my opinion. Nevertheless, it’s the right decision by Michiganders. I just hope that the University of Michigan will manage to maintain and improve its great holistic academic atmosphere without affirmative action.

Like me, a majority of students at the University oppose Proposition 2:

In the days leading up to the election, U-M students worked to mobilize voters against Proposal 2. According to Tuesday’s poll of voters conducted by Mitchell Research and Communications Inc. of East Lansing, voters under age 40 were the only group to oppose Proposal 2 in significant numbers.

You got that right: it were students that mobilized the voters. You could hardly see that in Malaysia.

For all of you in the North Campus, you wouldn’t find any more female students there in the near future. They will be an extinct species! You should all migrate to Central Campus before it’s too late.

Categories
Politics & government

[952] Of it’s called karma, Mr. GOP

As of 15:44 Malaysian time, the Democrats have gained the mandate to form the new majority power within the new House of Representatives:

Screenshot of NYT.com. Fair use.

Despite tight race, the Democrats are likely to take over the Senate too. Currently, official results for Montana and Virginia (the Virginia race is particularly close) have yet to be announced. Nonetheless, according to the tracker at the New York Times, Democratic Webb and Tester are leading the race and the finish line is just inches away, very much in sight. The Democratic Party need both of Webb and Tester to win in order to take control of the Congress.

How tight the two races are?

In Virginia currently, the difference between the leading Webb and the Republican incumbent is 7,546 votes. The standard deviation is about 619,890 votes. In Montana, the difference between the Democrat challenger and the Republican incumbent is 5691. The SD is around 60,513 votes.

This means, the difference between the two pairs of rivals, from statistical point of view, is very, very insignificant. That’s how close the contest is. Because of this, I wouldn’t be surprised at all if somebody would call for a recount soon after the official results are declared.

Whatever it might be, to the GOP, this is what I call karma. You ripe what you sow.

Categories
Politics & government

[950] Of Lamont lost to Lieberman!

OMG!

Well, folks, the darling of the libby-lib bloggers, Ned Lamont, just conceded, as some of you might have seen. We’re not surprised; he just never managed to successfully broaden his campaign beyond his one-issue battle over the Iraq war with Senator Joe Lieberman, the Democratic incumbent for 18 years who was forced to run as an independent by his primary loss to Mr. Lamont.

I had expected Lamont to win, especially when this midterm election has become the unofficial referendum for war. It’s odd to see a symbol of anti-war to lose out. Furthermore, this is probably a smack in the face for all Democrats in Connecticut.

For those that predicted Lamont to be the next President of the United States, you might want to rethink your prediction.

Regardless, as of 11:39 Malaysian time, the Democrats have captured three seats in the Senate and another five in the House. However, despite Lamont’s loss, everything seems to be going smoothly so far. If everything goes it is right now, the Greens will be coming to power. By proxy!

Despite the fact that I’m happy with the current result, I hope the pressure for protectionism in the US won’t be too great to resist.

Anyway, track the Senate, the House and the Governorship race at the NYT.

p/s – congratulations, Governor Granholm.

Categories
Politics & government Society

[948] Of defining Bangsa Malaysia

What is Bangsa Malaysia exactly?

Is it an assimilation policy to create an united race?

Is it a multicultural policy that celebrates cultural diversity?

Is it simply about the citizenship of Malaysia?

Is it about equality?

Is it about Malay rights?

Is it something else altogether?

Is it about nothing at all?

Somebody. Help me. Please.

A lot of people are giving me contradictory answers and I’m officially confused. For instance, Dr. Rais Yatim said:

IDENTIFYING oneself as Bangsa Malaysia does not mean that one forgets one’s race, culture, heritage and other practices, said Datuk Seri Dr Rais Yatim.

“Each of us is a Malay, Chinese, Indian or other race first, but at the same time, we belong to Bangsa Malaysia. This is because we share a common destiny, common interest socially, politically and economically,” said the minister for Culture, Arts and Heritage.

But Dr. Mahathir said:

In August, Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad made a plea for “Bangsa Malaysia” – a united Malaysian Nation in which being a Malaysian is the thing, not being Malay, Chinese, Indian, Iban or Kadazan. It means “people being able to identify themselves with the country, speak Bahasa Malaysia and accept the Constitution,” said Mahathir.

Then, Najib Razak said:

JOHOR BARU: The Bangsa Malaysia concept is the state of an individual’s mind and does not infringe on Malay special rights and privileges, said Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

The Deputy Prime Minister said Bangsa Malaysia was a concept and had nothing to do with the Constitution or national policies, but was related to an individual’s state of mind.

“Bangsa Malaysia means we do not evaluate someone by his skin colour, race or religion,” Najib said when closing the Johor Umno Convention at Persada Johor here yesterday.

“It does not question the special rights of the Malays, our quota or anything of that sort.”

Before we start banging on each other head, let’s define the term first, shall we?

I hate shooting bullets at somebody while not knowing why am I shooting the bullets in the first place.

Categories
Activism Politics & government

[947] Of free NYT TimesSelect for a week

Did you love the Op-Ed section of the New York Times? Did you say “shit” when NYT tried to make you pay for its addictive Op-Ed? Are you missing Krugman, Kristof, Brooks, Dowd, et alii?

Well, thank you to Philips, the Op-Ed section is now available for free for the whole week. You can even dig up NYT archives! Well, only partly. Still, how cool is that?

NYT calls it Free Access Week. I call it, w00t week! Read them all while you can!

Heh. NYT is probably trying to influence public opinion as far as the midterm election is concerned.