Categories
Economics Liberty

[443] Of now, a word from our sponsor

Did you watch Futurama when it was on Fox Network?

If you did, do you remember this one particular episode where Fry was sleeping and an advertisement ran through during one of his dreams and when he woke up, he told Leela that he dreamt an advertisement and Leela said he didn’t dream it but rather, it was some kind of advertisement transmitted via some kind of wave by some marketing firms to the brain for marketing purpose?

(Pardon me but w00t! 68 words in one sentence!) In short, everybody sees commercials during their sleep without wanting to see it.

When I first saw that episode, I laughed so hard that I cried. That idea was so funny because the notion itself is an impossibility. It is so impossible that it is absurd and such extreme absurdity is so impossible, that it is funny.

Currently the US Senate, in the real world of course, is considering an act known as the Intellectual Property Protection Act. As the name of the act suggests, it aims at protecting intellectual properties. Many in the entertainment industry, including the RIAA have hailed this as the way to go.

I haven’t read the whole act yet and I plan not to read the whole boring stuff. But, according to Wired, the idea of fair use might be bulldozed by this act. More:

However, under the proposed language, viewers would not be allowed to use software or devices to skip commericals or promotional announcements “that would otherwise be performed or displayed before, during or after the performance of the motion picture,” like the previews on a DVD.

Yup. If the act is passed, we can no longer skip commercials. That is one step closer to Futurama’s joke. But I will not laugh on this one.

p/s – there is a growing expectation of Malaysia repegging the ringgit from 3.80 to a dollar to 3.30 to a dollar. Now, this is my first chance to speculate in the face of this appreciation. I should convert almost all of my dollar denominated currency into ringgit before the revaluation and then buy back the dollar. Sounds like a plan!

Now, where can I find a billion dollars…

Categories
Liberty Photography

[439] Of celebrating freedom

Today marks 15 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Somehow, it feels like hundreds of years ago when in fact, I was 7 back then. Innocent and ignorant.

East German border guard Conrad Schumann leaps to the West over barbed wire in Berlin on August 15, 1961. Photo by Peter Leibing.
Public Domain.

Without freedom, life is not worth living
– unknown

To freedom, for eternity. Though if I somehow find myself in hell, there might be a little complication with my idealism. But I’m sure God is negotiable. I hope.

Categories
Liberty Politics & government

[433] Of November 2, 2004

Kerry or Bush?

The latest Pew’s polling shows Bush would win by a small margin. However, the standard error is nowhere in sight (actually, I’m too lazy to calculate it) and therefore, I don’t know how well the poll goes in predicting the outcome for tomorrow. Furthermore, the survey seems to represent popular votes rather than predicting the electoral college result. If that is the case, then the poll is probably as useless as the popular votes that Al Gore received.

Regardless of the result, I am not sure if I strictly prefer Kerry to Bush anymore. I don’t like Bush but Kerry doesn’t seem to be sufficiently good.

One reason for this is that I do think Bush is doing a good job in some area.

I don’t like taxes and I do believe taxation is an excuse for the government to steal our money. With this, it is only possible for me to agree with Bush’s tax cut. Moreover, Bush’s tax cut does stimulate the economy. The budget deficit however is another story – it is Bush’s failure, as was Reagan’s failure, to realize the notion of a limited government, of which, another thing that I believe in.

Bush however can’t be blamed too much for the deficit. When it comes to the question of cushioning the recession, an expansionary fiscal policy is a way to do it. Furthermore, nobody, neither Clinton nor Bush, is to be blamed for the recession. It was just unfortunate for Bush to come into office when the business cycle took a dip. But the unnecessary so-called war on terror does worsen the deficit and that is certainly Bush’s fault.

With the exception of Bush’s spending spree, I agree with most of Bush’s economic policy. In fact, this is the only thing I agree with Bush and as a graduating economic major, this counts a lot in shaping my opinion.

At the same time, I am not a citizen of the United States and I recognize myself as an environmentalist (In fact, I love to call myself as a libertarian green or maybe a green libertarian but I’m a green first and libertarian second. What does it mean? Frankly, I have no idea. I just like labels). Bush’s unilateral moves on many issues and his bad environmental record are enough to sway me into the anybody-but-Bush camp.

Kerry on the other hand, seems to be sitting well with the greens and the world community at large. And with him, it is easier to imagine the ratification of the Kyoto Protocol by the US somewhere in the future.

But then, his economic policy will probably not move towards more free-trade – already he promised to make outsourcing more costly. In the name of efficiency, capital and labor should be allowed to roam freely. Any friction towards free flow of trade should be eliminated, unless there is a very strong reason for some restriction.

More importantly, I think most of Kerry’s plans are almost impossible to be implemented without raising taxes. He is promising to do a lot of things and at the same time, promises to not raise taxes on the middle and lower classes. He probably realizes that he has to raise taxes on somebody and so he said he is going to raise the taxes on the higher income level earner. This kind of taxation is called progressive tax rate – the tax rate goes up as the income level goes up. I don’t know about most people but in my view, punishing somebody for being successful is wrong.

So, Kerry or Bush? I don’t know anymore.

Nader? He is hopeless unfortunately, as with other candidates.

So, if I could vote, who would I vote for?

The only real candidate, My Teddy Bear!MTB for President of the World!

Whatever the outcome, the one quote to rule them all:

I voted for it before I voted against it.

It couldn’t get any better than that.

p/s – apart from the Presidential stuff, people in Michigan will be voting on at least two other issues. Proposal 1 is about gambling and Proposal 2, the highly debated issue of gay marriage.

I don’t agree with gay marriage but at the same time, I don’t feel the need for me to go against it. If they amend it, I’ll feel good because I’m a Muslim (no matter how liberal I am). If they don’t, I’ll be fine too because I’m a libertarian – I respect personal freedom.

Categories
Liberty Science & technology

[426] Of the big brother is jamming your band

What is this current fad with radio jammers?

First, it was the French government allowing theaters to install jammers for the sake of eliminating unwanted ringing. Well, since cell phones nowadays are loaded with countless loud incessant noise, ringing might not be the right term. Nevertheless, jamming?

But I guess it’s not too bad. I myself hate people with cell phones that lack ethics. Hate is a strong word. Perhaps annoying is more accurate word to describe these goddamned unethical cell users. Then again, I’ll stick with hate.

Then, I read somewhere that churches in Mexico have installed these jammers. The situation is aptly described in the following excerpt:

MONTERREY, Mexico – It was the reporters who noticed first. Unable to call their editors while covering the weddings of the rich and famous, they asked the priest why their cell phones never worked at Sacred Heart. His reply: Israeli counterintelligence.

Very funny!

Anyway, that is not all. From the article where the excerpt was, err, excerpted, the Indian Parliament has been using such technology to politely discourage congressmen from receiving phone calls during a session.

Regardless the fact that I hate these goddamned unethical cell phone users, I don’t know whether this is good or bad.

For one, it is a blessing to us, the goddamned unethical cell phone users’ haters. If the jamming technology starts to propagate to everywhere, no more ringing or whatever it is called right now in the middle of a lecture, an assembly or any situation that requires cell ethics.

However, isn-t this is somewhat erosion of freedom?

I want my freedom to hate!

If suddenly everybody utilizes this jamming technology, there will be no goddamned unethical cell phone users anymore! Imagine the horror of the goddamned unethical cell phone users’ haters! The pain of no hate is unbearable! There will be no one left for us the goddamned unethical cell phone users’ haters to hate anymore!

Maybe its time all the goddamned unethical cell phone users’ haters start to concentrate on hating the Buckeyes. Then again, the people from a obscure place called Ohio just had one more loss and this time to the Badgers. Due to that, the marginal return to hate is so small; it’s not worth hating the Buckeyes anymore.

Wait!

There exists a subspecies of human that chatter loudly at light speed! Yes! A new found source of hate! Now, if the radio jamming technology is spreading everywhere at our expense, we should all evolve and become haters of goddamned uneducated people that incessantly chatter at a light speed!

Yet, there is a possibility that the government will restrict our freedom to hate the goddamned uneducated people that incessantly chatter at light speed. This is a problem indeed.

A ah! Friends, haters, countrymen!

It is Israel that is providing this jamming technology. It is Israel that is restricting our freedom! It is true then that Jews rule the world by proxy! Hence, we must hate Israel to secure our freedom to hate!

Oh, boy. Mahathir is going to be proud of me. Totally.

p/s – check this out. Via WorldChanging, my current favorite website.

Categories
Books & printed materials Economics Liberty Photography Sports

[412] Of three democracies and World Bank’s report

I read the Wall Street Journal today and I am increasing finding out that I prefer the Journal better to the New York Times. I actually went to the library to read.

Alright, I didn’t actually go the library to read the Journal but rather, went there to borrow Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. I know the book and am familiar with it but had never actually read the book. So, while I am free at the moment, I figured, “Hey, let’s read another classic!” However, that’s not the point of this entry.

Digressing, as I was returning from the library, Kerry’s sister-in-law was speaking at the Diag (a huge green open space on campus from those unfamiliar with Ann Arbor). I decided to hang around but she proved to be boring. I prefer hearing Nader to some democrat ranting about the same old thing over and over again. Regardless of that, again, that’s not the point of this entry.

As I was saying, I read the Journal at the library and a couple articles caught my eyes. To be specific, there were four articles; three concern democracy and another about the World Bank’s Doing Business 2005 report.

Most interestingly, the three articles are about democracy in Russia, Germany and Indonesia. I say it’s interesting because in my opinion, I could form three different classes for each country where the groups could be labeled as progress in democracy, stagnation and simply the wrong direction.

The first class depicts progress in democracy and this is about Indonesia. In the coming week, Indonesia is set to choose her President. I think this is the second time the Indonesians will be able to directly elect their leader. With the runoff around the corner, it seems that the incumbent will lose to the challenger and more importanly, there is no news that Megawati, the current President, is trying to influence the election machine. Furthermore, the democratic process doesn’t seem to lose steam after the bombing incident at the Australian embassy in Jakarta.

Trivia: According to the Journal, Indonesia will be holding the largest one-day-election in the world. India is the largest democracy in the world but India runs the democratic process in the time span of weeks.

Then, there is this stagnation class and Germany is in this grouping. Nothing is wrong in Germany actually. It is just that in next German election, it is projected that there will be a smaller majority in the Bundestag for the two main parties. This means it will be harder to pass a decision on many issues through the Bundestag, in particular, decision on the much needed economic reform that Germany needs. It is mentioned in the column that the German people are mad at the current government led by the Christian democrats and the social democrat for loosening up Germany’s layoff restrictions. The liberalization of the barriers increases unemployment while at the same time, helps firms in Germany to cut losses.

Perhaps stagnation is not the right word to describe the situation in Germany. Maybe “possible problem” is the proper term.

The third class is resided by Putin’s Russia. A few weeks ago, 335 human lives, more than half were children, were killed by terrorists. It was despicable act of inhumane, deserving no respect from any civilized individual. Of course, Russian armed force’s decision to storm the terrorists’ ground is a contributing factor to the horrific drama but I agree with the storming because no government should ever be held hostage by anybody or else, such ugliness in Beslan would encourage more ugliness.

While some of us were mourning, Putin shook one of Russia’s last bastions for democracy by announcing from now on, regional governors will be elected directly by Kremlin instead of via election. Now, it will be from the above instead from the bottom up. It seems that Russia is going back to its Soviet days.

And the last article is about the Doing Business 2005 report. I have nothing much to say on this but merely to repeat one of the report’s result. The report concluded that monetary aid does not help third world countries to improve themselves. Possibly, the aid might even prevent growth. This sounds like a problem with corruption. It might be the fact that the money given is not being fully channeled to developmental projects but instead, it gets into someone’s pocket. As a result, little or no beneficial endeavors being undertaken while debt of the countries increases, making the countries probably poorer.

Oh well. So many things are troubling the world but at least Michigan won, though in a rather unconvincing style in my opinion. The Wolverines won 24 – 21 against the Aztecs. After the game, Michigan probably looks like this.

Some rights reserved

I wonder how we will look like after the Buckeyes game. I caught that at the Graduate Library.Also, the world would have one less problem if Manchester United loses to Liverpool on Monday.

p/s – thought this is great.

Fair use

Sometimes, I guess people are so focused on one thing that they forgot the attributes that they share.