Categories
Liberty

[917] Of the day part of liberty died in America

At the New York Times:

WASHINGTON (AP) — Some of the most notorious names in the war on terror are headed toward prosecution after President Bush signed a law Tuesday authorizing military trials of terrorism suspects.

The legislation also eliminates some of the rights defendants are usually guaranteed under U.S. law, and it authorizes continued harsh interrogations of terror suspects.

Civil libertarians and leading Democrats decried the law as a violation of American values. The American Civil Liberties Union said it was ”one of the worst civil liberties measures ever enacted in American history.” Democratic Sen. Russ Feingold of Wisconsin said, ”We will look back on this day as a stain on our nation’s history.”

”It allows the government to seize individuals on American soil and detain them indefinitely with no opportunity to challenge their detention in court,” Feingold said. ”And the new law would permit an individual to be convicted on the basis of coerced testimony and even allow someone convicted under these rules to be put to death.”

Remember Lex Gabina?

Categories
Conflict & disaster History & heritage Liberty

[894] Of Lex Gabinia

An extremely interesting article at the New York Times. Pirates of the Mediterranean (via):

IN the autumn of 68 B.C. the world’s only military superpower was dealt a profound psychological blow by a daring terrorist attack on its very heart. Rome’s port at Ostia was set on fire, the consular war fleet destroyed, and two prominent senators, together with their bodyguards and staff, kidnapped.

The incident, dramatic though it was, has not attracted much attention from modern historians. But history is mutable. An event that was merely a footnote five years ago has now, in our post-9/11 world, assumed a fresh and ominous significance. For in the panicky aftermath of the attack, the Roman people made decisions that set them on the path to the destruction of their Constitution, their democracy and their liberty. One cannot help wondering if history is repeating itself.

At the Economist’s View, the blogger says “Can we avoid making the same mistakes, or is it too late already?

Categories
Conflict & disaster Liberty Politics & government

[892] Of a three-state Iraqi federation is just another Yugoslavia

Iraq might be moving towards a weak three-state federation divided by religion and ethnicity :

BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) — Iraq’s fractious ethnic and religious parliamentary groups agreed Sunday to open debate on a contentious Shiite-proposed draft legislation that will allow the creation of federal regions in Iraq, politicians said.

The agreement came after a compromise was reached with Sunni Arabs on setting up a parliamentary committee to amend Iraq’s constitution, a key demand by the minority.

The committee will be set up Monday and the federalism bill will be read to the body a day later, Sunni and Shiite politicians said.

The deal opens the way for Iraq’s Shiites, Sunni Arabs and Kurds to move ahead politically and break a two-week political deadlock that threatened to further sour relations between the communities. If left unresolved, the deadlock could have further shaken Iraq’s fragile democracy and led to more sectarian violence.

The federalism bill calls for setting up a system to allow the creation of autonomous regions in the predominantly Shiite south, much like the self-ruling Kurdish region in northern Iraq. Sunni Arabs have said they fear the legislation will split Iraq apart and fuel sectarian bloodshed.

The Kurdish north and Shiite south hold Iraq’s oil fields, while the predominantly Sunni Arab areas are mostly desert.

Somehow, I don’t think the creation of that kind of federation suits the condition Iraq is currently in. I fear the act of craving Iraq into three regions might mean a permanent strike on unitary state of Iraq. While the three-state solution does have its merit, who could guarantee Iraq won’t be another Yugoslavia?

Categories
Liberty Society

[890] Of failing to line up at the train stations

It’s quite surprising for me to see many commuters of the light rail transit in Kuala Lumpur failed to line up . A considerable number of commuters — at some stations almost overwhelmingly — simply ignore pre-existing lines and cut it with impunity. When the train comes, they get to be the first to get on the train, at the expense of those that actually take the pain to line up. What’s more shocking is the fact that those that are made worse by those that cut the lines do nothing to stop it almost every time.

What’s up fellow commuter?

Don’t you get ticked off to see somebody cut the line you’re in? Don’t you feel the need to do something?

Commuters that don’t know how to line up come in many forms. It might be some senior citizens, adults or simply school kids that think they’re kings of the world with their latest pants style; male or female. Through complex Malaysian culture, perhaps it’s comprehendible why the young don’t criticize their seniors — that would probably amount to disrespect. If this is the case, then I’d like to say, respect is earned; it doesn’t not come automatically with age.

I’m not sure why many commuters refuse to stand up for themselves and tell those that failed to adhere to common courtesy to get in line.

I on the other hand have a strong urge to defend my rights – I line up and I plan to get on the train when my turn comes. I have serious issue when those that don’t line up and then get to get on the train earlier than me. In most cases, the libertarian part of me will whisper to me and say “Hey, are you going to let him/her get away with that?”

Throughout months of me using the light rail system, I’ve only seen four times when somebody actually told off those that cut the line to get in line; that somebody was me.

In three times, it were uncontroversial. I simply reached out for the arm of the person each time and politely said, “I’m sorry but there’s a line here” or its variation right in the public. One time, it was a foreigner while the other two involved locals. The fourth incident however was pretty harsh on my part.

It was morning and commuters were lining up. I as with many others had to let many trains to pass us by simply because the trains were full and it was impossible to get in. Then suddenly came a woman with headscarf. Instead of standing at the back and line up, she had the audacity to come straight to the front and made another line of her own.

When I saw that and the fact that nobody stopped her, my day was practically ruined early in the morning. The thought that she would get on the train first by cutting the line while diminishing my chance of getting on the train according to my turn was the final throe. I asked a person behind me to reserve my turn, broke off from the line, came up to the women and verbally abused her in front of all the other commuters. After a minute or two of abuse, I got back into my line.

And boy, the blowing up experience was a great feeling and even greater because she didn’t fight back. In fact, not only didn’t she fight back, from the look of her face, she was absolutely stunned!

In retrospect, it would’ve been a horrible experience if she had fought back. I myself hate unnecessary confrontation. Perhaps, another reason why most commuters don’t confront the “line cutters” is that common commuters aren’t fond of confrontation. I personally would prefer a peaceful day where I could do my dealings with ease and without trouble if it’s at all possible. Nevertheless, I don’t compromise my rights if the rights are just and fair. Even more if I worked for it. Neither should you.

Really fellow commuters, if you don’t defend your right, nobody will. If you allow others to cut your line at your expense and you fail to stand up for yourself, you only embolden the violators to continue to cut your and somebody else’s lines. Our lines. Soon, they’d would assume that its a norm to cut the lines. Is that what we want?

So, stand up and tell them off. The next time somebody cut your line, ask politely “didn’t your mother tell you to line up when you were small?”

Or you could just say, “Yo f*** face, get at the f***ing back and line your big f***ing *** up like everybody ****ing else” if you’re having a bad day. But please be polite while saying the f word.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p/s – I’ve reading KL Commuter for about a week or so now and I like it.

Categories
ASEAN Liberty Politics & government

[888] Of wishing for a speedy recovery towards Thai democracy

How ironic it is for us in ASEAN to discuss so profusely about getting Myanmar closer to democracy, we failed to stop a democracy from falling back into military rule.

When I was in Bangkok not too long ago, I witnessed the symbol of Thai democracy. It stands so proudly in the middle of the city.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

I as a citizen of ASEAN wish the people of Thailand a speedy return to democracy. It’s only fair for the birthplace of ASEAN to be in a democratic atmosphere.