
From the graph above, guesstimate the relationship between hours of sleep with the number of walking spoons seen. Is the latter variable a proxy of an unstated variable? What is that variable? What happened on Thursday?

From the graph above, guesstimate the relationship between hours of sleep with the number of walking spoons seen. Is the latter variable a proxy of an unstated variable? What is that variable? What happened on Thursday?
Between Malaysia and UMNO, I do not believe those influential in the party care for Malaysia more than UMNO. I have recently alluded to that idea but it was done in jest, perhaps unwittingly referring to the upcoming rally demanding for fairer electoral process. After observing development in the past few days, the jest is increasingly becoming a legitimate stance. As Malaysia goes to the International Court of Justice to settle a dispute with Singapore regarding Batu Puteh, UMNO is holding its general assembly in Kuala Lumpur. All mainstream media are reporting on the assembly heavily while there is scant mention — in some media not at all — of the development of the hearing at The Hague.

This is most telling is how Utusan Malaysia treats the two events today and yesterday, which is full of UMNO related news. For these two days, reporting on the dispute should be heaviest as Singapore presents its case in the Court. Yet, the printed media, especially Utusan Malaysia, are dedicating most of its pages to the UMNO assembly, including its front pages. Batu Puteh on the other hand receives a mere back page treatment for today. For yesterday, none at all but the assembly continues to dominate the pages of Utusan Malaysia.
The same case is applicable for Bernama, The Star and the New Straits Times though the stress on UMNO is noticeably less. But the point, the hearing on Batu Puteh receives only passing mention unlike the UMNO assembly which involved deep analysis and spin that pain this assembly remarkably in contrast to those in the recent past, as late as last year, which were jingoistic and filled with deep communal sentiments, to put it politely.
The same trend is observable on television and radio. I dare say, half of the air time is dedicated to the assembly. I am unsure if the same case is observable in media of languages other than Malay and English.
Therefore, the case suffers from limited coverage and due to that, I am forced to rely on Wikipedia, Singaporean media which understandably biased to the Singaporean side and international media.
But perhaps, this lack of reporting from Malaysian sources is due to the fact that this round of hearing is reserved for Singapore. Malaysia will only present its case next week. Still, surely, whatever Singapore, or Malaysia, brings forth as points greatly affects the course of the case. Or, maybe, it is just a little rock in the middle of the sea. Or maybe, Malaysian sovereignty is of little importance.
There is no need to remind everybody that UMNO controls the media in this country, directly or by proxy. Meanwhile, it is clear that those in the media place UMNO higher than the sovereignty of Malaysia in its list. You are welcome to make a conclusion following the two premises.
Such is the sad state of our country.

Religious conservative Muslims have an odd siege mentality. They feel that everybody is trying to get them. They feel that:
The West is trying to get them.
Christians are trying to get them.
Hindus are trying to get them.
Buddhists are trying to get them.
Chinese are trying to get them.
Jews are trying to get them.
Thais are trying to get them.
Pagans, atheists, etc, are trying to get them.
The Liberal Islam movement is trying to get them.
The real liberals are trying to get them.
Feminists are trying to get them.
Communists are trying to get them.
Scholars are trying to get them.
Orientalists are trying to get them.
Secularists are trying to get them.
Project Petaling Street is trying to get them (ha, ha, ha!).
The moderates are trying to get them.
The progressive are trying to get them.
Even somebody in their group is trying to get them.
Paranoia? Maybe but an old story might offer better perspective of what is going on.
Once seemingly long ago, on one spring day while sitting on a bench somewhere in Ann Arbor, reading Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring, I overheard two girls (later, we became friends) sharing joke with each other: There was a guy driving on a highway while listening to the radio. On the radio, an announcement warned motorist of a car driving on the wrong side of the road. He blurted out, “What? Just one? All of them are driving on the wrong side of the road!”
