Categories
Kitchen sink Liberty

[636] Of if here’s my two cents and it costs a penny for your thought, what happened to another penny?

Taxes I suppose.

Regardless, almost everybody has opinion of their own. It’s more prevalent than IPod in our society. Just log on the internet and it will overwhelm us. Sometimes, I swear I’ll puke if another person gives me a piece of his mind. This and that and that and this all over again – it just doesn’t end. It’s a perpetual blabbering that makes people goes nut. Yet, I and many others can’t seem to have enough of it. I still want to announce the world of I feel and I’m still willing to listen to others’ two cents. After years of trying to listen, I think I’ve reached a stage where I could categorize most opinions into a number of classes based on several dimensions.

In my not so humble opinion, opinion may be described by five dimensions:

Informed-uninformed dimension

An informed opinion is the best kind of opinion in this dimension. A person that expresses an informed opinion is usually familiar with the field he or she is commenting on. This doesn’t have to be the case but usually it is. As such, this kind of opinion comes from those of whom are from tertiary institutions and professional circles or at the very least, those that with knowledge or experience on a particular field.

Below informed view is one when if we see or hear it, we won’t be able to agree or disagree without further information. There’s some truth to it and we might want to believe but to accept it without scrutiny is irrational. It’s simply something that best kept at the back of our mind and revisit it later when the time is right.

At the other end of the spectrum is uninformed view. This kind of opinion is definitely disagreeable at first sight and it’s disagreeable not due to point of views or biases but purely because of facts. In short, it’s bullshit – like global wamring causes worsening earthquake or Bush is an alien from outer space. Pretending experts and worst of all, trolls, belong here. People with uninformed opinion are usually field outsiders though outsiders do offer respectable opinions from time to time.

Intelligibility

Opinion could also be seen from intelligibility. I can think of only two classes – articulateness and incoherence. An articulated view is the one that we’ll get the point even with the most artificial skimming while incoherent opinion is akin to reading or listening to a Martian. Incoherent views are usually ignored by most people and occasionally however, flaming may occur due to misunderstanding or frustration. Intelligibility is also dependent on a person ability of being concise.

Friendliness

Friendliness is highly dependent on point of views. Therefore, an opinion may be seen as friendly to a person but offensive to another.

No blood boils when one reads a friendly view. At least I won’t. This view is not too critical of an idea and there are flowery congratulations, praises and agreeable people abounding almost everywhere. Biases also an implicit characteristic – hey, they say birds of the same feather flock together.

Number two has a neutral stance. It’s could be critical or giving credit where credit is due but the bottomline is, it’s done in good faith. Most opinions of this kind are positive in nature; positive as in descriptive or antonym to normative.

Then there’s hostile view and here’s where most polemicists sit. This, coupled with incoherencies, is a recipe for mudslinging. It’s all about right versus left, Ann Coulter and Al Franken or Malaysian blogosphere own illogical Menj and silly Rajan. This particular class is where all hope of intelligent discussion is already forsaken at the earliest possible point. It’s fun though – it what makes a crowd cheers for a bull’s eye and murmurs when a punch is thrown below the belt.

Agreeability

Like friendliness, agreeability is dependent on point of view. Perhaps, agreeability depends on the previous three variables too.

Freedom

This is probably the most important variable there is when it comes to opinion. It is the one thing that determines if there is anything to hear to or read in the first place.

I once heard a joke about free speech – if here’s my two cents and it costs a penny for your thought, what happened to another penny?

Like I said earlier, taxes.

Categories
Economics Kitchen sink

[626] Of PPS economics, free market and market failure

Project Petaling Street is all good and cool but it suffers one complication – how many participants are too many participants? In short, what is its carrying capacity? Will it fail if the limit, if any, is not observed?

Allow me to explain further.

PPS, or to be precise, its ping portal, PPS Pings – hereafter PPS – is a first-in, first-out list (FIFO). The list itself has limited slots.

If there are five slots in a clean list and if person A is the first pinger, he will sit on top of that list. Later, when four other persons ping the list after person A, A will sit at the bottom of the list while the four persons will sit on the top four slots. It follows that if a sixth person pings the list, person A will get the boot. In short, if there are n slots, the person on top of the list will be out of the picture when pinger (n+1) pings.

All this assumes strictly one-to-one relationship; a person leads to a ping and a ping leads to a person. This assumption is not true (enthusiastic posters, as a PPS founder calls them, like Kahsoon and Otis, is a proof) but it definitely simplifies our model. Once we’ve laid out the model, then you and I could relax the restriction considerably.

With FIFO explained, let’s talk about rate. Let’s also assume that each slot receives x visitors per time unit. Here, I don’t think one-to-one assumption is critical but for consistency’s sake, let’s just assume one-to-one relationship.

Assume further that each ping is pinged into the list at a rate of a ping per time unit. Holding time unit constant, the rate is dependent on the number of pings. Subsequently, a ping goes down the list at that rate. Therefore, person on top of the list will be out by the (n+1)th time unit. Also, amount of visitors of that ping will be x(n).

So, imagine that a slot receives 60 visitors per hour and there are five slots. With this setup, a ping will attract 300 visitors throughout its lifetime in the list. Now, what if a ping switches a slot per minute?

That would make each slot a visitor and a total of five visitors throughout the ping’s lifetime. What if, the rate is a ping per second?

Oh, boy. A ping gets a sixtieth of a person; total a twelfth of a person. Ugly.

Ceteris paribus, the rate of which a ping goes down the list depends on the number of pinger. However, the more pingers there are in a timeframe, the greater the rate and as such, less visitors for every ping. The dilemma is, PPS wouldn’t be so successful if it weren’t for all those pingers. I would probably explain how more pingers leads to more visitors later. But I do have a feeling that at first, more pingers leads to more visitors until at one more point, any additional pinger will lead to less visitors.

This brings us back to the question how many participants are too many participants? In short, what is its carrying capacity? And when the carrying capacity is known, should PPS administrator put a cap on number of pinger? Or at least control the rate?

These are normative questions – there is no right or wrong. Nevertheless, by answering this, you might realize where you sit in economic freedom spectrum with controlled economy on the left-hand side and free market on the right-hand side. Of course, basing your political belief on this is absurd but hell, its fun.

So far, PPS Ping rules state that:

PPS will not tolerate ping flooding. Multiple pings within 7 minutes of each other is considered ping flooding, no exceptions, even if you are an “enthusiastic blogger”. It does not matter whether the content is duplicate or different from the previous ping. It is your responsibility to ensure your blog does not multi-ping PPS in consecutive fashion.

This alone is an attempt to control the rate. Does this mean the administrator distrusts free market?

I don’t know but it seems that rule is not strictly enforced.

However, I’m content to say that this is an attempt to prevent abuse and maybe, even market failure. The current DoS attack is similar to market failure there where is too many pings that visitors for each slot goes down to zero, albeit PPS fails due to bandwidth flight (capital flight? LOL!) first before market failure actually takes place.

Categories
Kitchen sink Science & technology Solar car

[615] Of happy 7th birthday, Google?

Seven pieces of cake with chocolate coating and seven strawberries on top are seen today on Google’s front pape. Can’t click on the image but the image is located at http://www.google.com/logos/7th_birthday.gif (sorry but I will not hotlink it. I hate hotlinking and I wish you do too. To see it, copy and paste the URL manually into your address bar).

Also, personalized Google finally gets to the front page?

p/s – Michigan’s currently second in the World Solar Challenge in Australia. w00t!

Categories
Kitchen sink Photography

[611] Of off to Singapore

Well, I’m off to Singapore soon. Ah, more pictures for my collection.

And since I can’t think of anything to write right now (really, just being plain lazy while watching lame p0rn featuring stupid female elf with male troll with oversized tusk), let’s piss off some animal rights extremists.

Live mollusks (cockle?) facing torture.

Dead mollusks facing digestion.

Somehow, I feel bad.

p/s – goddamn. I’m thinking too much.

Come to think of it, most of us can’t help but feeling humane only to humans, mammals, birds, reptiles and large fishes (practically, large animals). Other “lesser” beings like mollusks and small fishes seem to slip that kind of humane treatment. Caught fishes are left to suffocate in open air while salt water mollusks are drown in fresh water.

I wish I hadn’t tried to piss off those weirdos. Now, I’m pissed.

Need to stop thinking or I won’t consume fishes again, ever…

Categories
Kitchen sink Science & technology

[509] Of Google Maps

Lo and behold!

My place is somewhere in the red circle. Almost the whole Ann Arbor, at Google Maps, if you are interested.