Categories
Environment

[1462] Of Australia ratifies the Kyoto Protocol

Just over three years after Russia ratified the Kyoto Protocol and in effect, bringing it into force, Australia ratifies it.

SYDNEY (Thomson Financial) – Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said Monday he has ratified the Kyoto Protocol on climate change in his first official act after being sworn in as leader.

‘Today I have signed the instrument of ratification of the Kyoto Protocol,’ Rudd said in a statement.

‘This is the first official act of the new Australian government, demonstrating my government’s commitment to tackling climate change.’ [Australian PM ratifies Kyoto Protocol. Forbes. December 3 2007]

And as stated yesterday, the Bali Summit opens today.

Categories
Environment

[1460] Of increasing Malaysian emissions

When I saw this…:

KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia: Carbon emissions in Malaysia have increased by 221 percent since 1990, the highest growth rate among the world’s top polluters, the United Nations said Thursday, as it urged the government to control climate-changing gases more vigorously.

Malaysia, which has rapidly transformed from an agricultural economy to an industrialized one in the last four decades, is now ranked the 26th largest emitter of greenhouse gases in the world, said Richard Leete, the regional representative for the United Nations Development Program. [Malaysian growth of carbon emissions highest in the world, says UN. IHT. November 29 2007]

…I was prepared to defend Malaysia. After all, it is likely for a country’s emissions to increase in spite of improving efficiency (decreasing carbon per some unit of measurement, or in other words, carbon intensity). An economy may expand while emissions per capita dropped due to technological progress. In this case, there is effort to reduce emissions through growth. Indeed, many developing countries such as that in western Europe are experiencing this trend.

But when I read that Malaysian carbon intensity of energy (amount of carbon emitted per some unit of energy; kt CO2 per kt of oil equivalent) and intensity of growth (carbon emitted per some unit of GDP;kt CO2 per million 2000 PPP USD) have increased from 2.44 to 3.13 and 0.56 to 0.76 respectively from 1990 to 2004, I decided to frown instead.

Anyway, the Human Development Index initiative under the United Nations Development Program has tables of data for abuse.

And, the Bali Summit on post-Kyoto climate change action starts tomorrow.

Categories
Environment Politics & government

[1458] Of schism in environmentalism

From the authors of the The Death of Environmentalism:

Shellenberger and Nordhaus have now launched an effort to expand the frame of political environmentalism to encompass core American values. Earlier this year the dynamic duo issued a new book, Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility, in which they attempt to outline a positive vision for the future. Shellenberger and Nordhaus identify an emerging faultline that they argue will divide the environmentalist movement of the 21st century. On one side stand the traditional anti-immigration, anti-globalization, and anti-growth greens. They believe these neo-Malthusians “will seek to establish and enforce the equivalent of an international caste system in which the poor of the developing world are consigned to energy poverty in perpetuity.” Eternal limits to growth for the already impoverished.

One the other hopeful side, according to Nordhaus and Shellenberger, stand “those who believe that there is room enough for all of us to live secure and free lives. It will be pro-growth, progressive, and internationalist.” Nordhaus and Shellenberger see this new positive environmentalism as embracing markets and technological innovation in order to create prosperity and protect the natural world. Central to their positive pro-growth version of environmentalism is the development of cheap low-carbon energy technologies. Not only will such technologies prevent dangerous global warming, but they will also lift billions of people out of poverty by the end of the century. But how to get there? [Techno-Optimistic Environmentalism. Reason Magazine. November 27 2007]

Yup. Red green and blue green.

But emerging? I have always taken it for granted, meaning it is already there, here, now and real.

Categories
Environment

[1453] Of between Gary and Rawang

Among many metropolises in the US, Chicago is the city I have visited the most. It is one of my favorite cities, beautiful during autumn and winter time, much better during spring and summer. I wish my old hard drive had not died on me. Too much of my past is buried in that hard drive, driving me insane, losing my mind for a time. For me to get to Chicago from little Ann Arbor, I always rode along I-94 highway. Crisscrossing the Midwest, it took me some time to notice a town called Gary in Indiana. My recent hiking trip brought me passed Rawang and the surprisingly bustling town north of Kuala Lumpur reminds me of that town in Indiana.

Gary is a typical, mostly uninteresting town around Lake Michigan. By comparison, Ann Arbor is richer in so many ways despite being slightly larger than Gary. Gary’s history however pulls it out of obscurity, if one cares to learn about its dark past.

Apart from being the home of the Jackson family and for fans of Star Wars, Ralph McQuarrie, the city was closely linked to the steel industry. It was the home of the largest integrated steel mill in the northern hemisphere, owned by the United States Steel Corporation. Perhaps, needless to say, in times when environmentalism has yet to firmly take hold in public consciousness, heavy industries like steel manufacturing produce heavy pollution. For Gary, the air, water and earth were not spared. Nothing escaped the unwanted byproducts of steel manufacturing. Hurley writes:

Every evening the mills presented viewers with a display of giant torches, erupting sparks, and massive factories engraved against a glowing red sky. Day and night, black and red smoked wafted through the atmosphere while oils, greases, and chemicals streaked across rivers and lakes. [Environmental Inequalities. Huxley, Andrew]

While on my way to St. Louis to celebrate Thanksgiving, I remember passing through Gary and explaining to a friend why Gary was remarkable as far as the steel industry is concerned. Unlike what had been pictured by my readings however, Gary nowadays does not suffer from the pollution it once had to endure any longer.

Prior that trip that brought me to Rawang, years ago, it was a forgettable town. The only thing that kept Rawang inside my consciousness was the fact that the town sat at the very end of the Malayan Railways’ electric train service. Now, it is an active town with respectable night scene and noticeable traffic congestion, perhaps signaling the economic growth it is undergoing.

My friends and I stopped at Rawang for dinner. It was not long before we found ourselves leaving Rawang, hopping on the North-South Highway back to Kuala Lumpur, back to home. Just after the Rawang toll gate, visibility suddenly dropped to an alarming level. Naturally, the question had to pop up: “Wassup?”

A friend on the wheel explained that Rawang is home to a large cement mill. “Dust is everywhere”, he said. Just a few kilometers behind, APM, a cement producer, churned more cement that many dependent on, undoubtedly contributing to the bad air quality.

“Had anybody complained?”

Sadly, “yes and it is falling on deaf ears.” He continued further by stating that foreign companies enjoy lower cost in Malaysia because of lower environmental standards. In developed countries, the environmental requirements are so tight that it makes economic sense to move out and operate elsewhere where the cost is cheaper.

I am unsure how much a parallel Rawang is to Gary but the dusty, smoggy Rawang air does somewhat perfectly fit the bill I had in my mind for Gary. I will not be happy in Rawang, coughing all the day, clearing my throat of residuals from industrial activities related to cement production.

Categories
Environment Politics & government

[1451] Of welcome Australia to the Kyoto Protocol?

The new Rudd administration vows to ratify the Kyoto Protocol. As far as environmental policy is concerned, I am quietly celebrating the fall of the Howard administration in favor of the incoming one. Nevertheless, I doubt Australian ratification of the Protocol will directly affect global greenhouse gases emissions. That however does not mean having Australia amounts to nothing.

Politically, it puts pressure on the United States to do the same. Furthermore, ratification of the Kyoto Protocol or more importantly, clear directed action to reduce greenhouse gases gives Australia the moral authority to pressure developing countries, specifically China and India to improve their emissions.

There are only 5 more years before the Protocol lapsed and while I do hold high hopes for it, results from the Protocol have been mixed so far. The disastrous handling of emissions permits in Europe is especially disheartening, perhaps suggesting and illustrating how emissions permits-based policy may be practically inferior to Pigovian taxes, despite theoretically being an equivalence. But take hearts for discussion on the son of Kyoto to improve the Kyoto Protocol in already under way. The conference in Bali in December this year is the next important step towards that direction, almost 15 years after the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro.

Just earlier this week, the final part of the 4th Assessment Report was released by the IPCC. The key point of the report is that we as a species now are more certain that human is the cause of the current climate change. That has helped steered debate on climate change away from “what caused it?” to “how to prevent and mitigate its effects?”.

On other front, the award of two Nobel Prizes to climate change related topics increases public awareness on the issue. In fact, being a person that loves to go against the flow, with so many people now a green-convert, I think it is now unfashionable for me to be a green. But at least, I could say, I became a green before you became a green. Hah!

Meanwhile, allow me to congratulate all Australians. I, as a citizen of ASEAN, will look forward to embrace a more understanding, cooperative and respectful Australia.